This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played.
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played. None of what you said makes any sense or least any gaming sense. Oh Yeah, VIOLENCE RULZ!
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played. None of what you said makes any sense or least any gaming sense. Oh Yeah, VIOLENCE RULZ! Yeah wooh Violence!
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played. None of what you said makes any sense or least any gaming sense. Oh Yeah, VIOLENCE RULZ!
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played. None of what you said makes any sense or least any gaming sense. Oh Yeah, VIOLENCE RULZ! What do mean doesn't make sense? Capcom failed the mark of 16 billion an easy task for any game to complete.
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.LitchieShut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. This post of yours would only make sense if you were being sarcastic. You guys are so stupid. Resident Evil 4 is the biggest flop in gaming history. It had the worst graphics ever, it looked like it was made for the GBA *another unsucessful piece of hardware from Nintendo*, All the critics hated, it only got a 9.8 at IGN, everyone knows for a game to be truly good it must get at LEAST a 9.9. And that's just being to kind. The game didn't help sell the console at all and everyone just hates it. It was also very uninventive, as you can see no games have borrowed the formula, take the recent big hitter Gears of War, it's nothing like Resident Evil 4. Also the game sold terribly, it just sold a little over a million and a half, Capcom completely failed at their target sales for 16 billion. No offense, but Resident Evil 4 just felt like every other beat-em-up I've ever played. We're stupid for having opinions? Get lost, kid.
[QUOTE="LINKloco"]So I take it that you passed on seeing movies like Kill Bill? Or playing games like RE4 or God of War. Man, you're missing out.Haziqonfire300 too :) 300 was awesome!!!!! Dude, I love Suda's games, I'm soooo down for this one.
When i first heard of this game i looked pretty awsome...untill i seen the trailer, i mean like c'mon, i seen a man get there head sliced clean off and then some other guys get spilt from their head to their toes clean. Thats very disturbing and this game is diffenatley crossed off my wish list. I've never liked any of those man hunt or super violent games i mean like c'mon is it neccesiary?laidback_16are you mormon? maybe to some people its necessary. like cutting someone up with a chainsaw in gears of war.
Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.ShakeNBake1491I can't believe they think I'm being serious.
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="LINKloco"]So I take it that you passed on seeing movies like Kill Bill? Or playing games like RE4 or God of War. Man, you're missing out.monopolyloser300 too :) 300 was awesome!!!!! Dude, I love Suda's games, I'm soooo down for this one. 300's amazing!
And all I see you doing is whining about the greatest video game ever created, so we're even.Is Dencore ever sincere anymore? All I see are outrageous sarcastic comments.
Shirley_Temple
Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.ShakeNBake1491
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
[QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
People on these forums happen to be this stupid sometimes. I'm sorry, Dencore, if I didn't see your sarcasm (I did pray to God that you were sarcastic), but some people are like this.. I just can't see who is and who isn't sarcastic on these forums anymore.. LitchieNo if they do say stuff like that they are just trying to make you mad usually. Although it did take me a while before realizing the Shirley_Temple actually hated Twilight Princess with all his ridiculous comments. "Twilight Princess story sucked, Ocarina's was much more emotional" :| I think he has to play some more games then, especially JRPG's. "Twilight Princess is by far the Zelda with the least amount of variety" :| NVM I can see your guy's point.
[QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
I can't tell (unless I realize its Dencore) because its not far from what actual people will say here.
[QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.Shirley_Temple
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
I can't tell (unless I realize its Dencore) because its not far from what actual people will say here.
[QUOTE="Shirley_Temple"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
I can't tell (unless I realize its Dencore) because its not far from what actual people will say here.
[QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="Shirley_Temple"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.Dencore
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
I can't tell (unless I realize its Dencore) because its not far from what actual people will say here.
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]If you pass on games, just because they're violent, you're definitely missing out on a lot of awesome games. I like games. Period. Doesn't matter to me how violent it is, as long as it's a good game. I find it ridiculous to not play a game just because it isn't violent, but if you pass on games just because they contain violence... that's pretty ridiculous too. If the game is great, but you don't like violence - get used to it. :P You're really missing out.ShakeNBake1491Shut up that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Seriously how stupid can you be..really? I mean let's take Resident Evil 4 for example, that game is complete garbage, the reviews and critical and commercial failure of it shows so too, it was just complete garbage. Oh and let us not forget the really pile of poop called Half-Life 2, it had no innovation what so ever and what just terrible from the gameplay to the graphics to the controls. Another joke would be the Metal Gear Solid series, I mean it didn't add more depth to games or alter genres it just gave a main character with a cool name a gun and lived off of that. Truth be told, violent games are never innovative the Grand Theft Auto series is a perfect example of this. So why don't you go check up some of your facts before posting that dribbling nonsense in here. I feel bad for those who respond to this that don't know about the Zelda "rant" lmao my thoughts exactly
[QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="Shirley_Temple"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
I can't tell (unless I realize its Dencore) because its not far from what actual people will say here.
[QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.burfeindt21
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
[QUOTE="burfeindt21"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"][QUOTE="ShakeNBake1491"]Don't worry Dencore.. I still appreciate your wisdom in these forums.WR_Platinum
I can't believe they think I'm being serious.Dencore
When i first heard of this game i looked pretty awsome...untill i seen the trailer, i mean like c'mon, i seen a man get there head sliced clean off and then some other guys get spilt from their head to their toes clean. Thats very disturbing and this game is diffenatley crossed off my wish list. I've never liked any of those man hunt or super violent games i mean like c'mon is it neccesiary?laidback_16
Don't be such a p*ssy.
[QUOTE="Litchie"]People on these forums happen to be this stupid sometimes. I'm sorry, Dencore, if I didn't see your sarcasm (I did pray to God that you were sarcastic), but some people are like this.. I just can't see who is and who isn't sarcastic on these forums anymore.. DencoreNo if they do say stuff like that they are just trying to make you mad usually. Although it did take me a while before realizing the Shirley_Temple actually hated Twilight Princess with all his ridiculous comments. "Twilight Princess story sucked, Ocarina's was much more emotional" :| I think he has to play some more games then, especially JRPG's. "Twilight Princess is by far the Zelda with the least amount of variety" :| NVM I can see your guy's point.
Um, I'm currently playing Chrono Cross for like the umpteenth time, I think I have the experience to recognize a poor story when I see one. TP suffers from the Legend of Mana curse, a GREAT series marred by a mediocre follow up.
Too Violent? i wonder what your going to say when you see Manhunt 2.Haziqonfireyea manhunt will probly be 2X as worse. the first was
No if they do say stuff like that they are just trying to make you mad usually. Although it did take me a while before realizing the Shirley_Temple actually hated Twilight Princess with all his ridiculous comments. "Twilight Princess story sucked, Ocarina's was much more emotional" :| I think he has to play some more games then, especially JRPG's. "Twilight Princess is by far the Zelda with the least amount of variety" :| NVM I can see your guy's point.[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]People on these forums happen to be this stupid sometimes. I'm sorry, Dencore, if I didn't see your sarcasm (I did pray to God that you were sarcastic), but some people are like this.. I just can't see who is and who isn't sarcastic on these forums anymore.. Shirley_Temple
Um, I'm currently playing Chrono Cross for like the umpteenth time, I think I have the experience to recognize a poor story when I see one. TP suffers from the Legend of Mana curse, a GREAT series marred by a mediocre follow up.
My point exactly.
[QUOTE="Shirley_Temple"]No if they do say stuff like that they are just trying to make you mad usually. Although it did take me a while before realizing the Shirley_Temple actually hated Twilight Princess with all his ridiculous comments. "Twilight Princess story sucked, Ocarina's was much more emotional" :| I think he has to play some more games then, especially JRPG's. "Twilight Princess is by far the Zelda with the least amount of variety" :| NVM I can see your guy's point.[QUOTE="Dencore"][QUOTE="Litchie"]People on these forums happen to be this stupid sometimes. I'm sorry, Dencore, if I didn't see your sarcasm (I did pray to God that you were sarcastic), but some people are like this.. I just can't see who is and who isn't sarcastic on these forums anymore.. Dencore
Um, I'm currently playing Chrono Cross for like the umpteenth time, I think I have the experience to recognize a poor story when I see one. TP suffers from the Legend of Mana curse, a GREAT series marred by a mediocre follow up.
My point exactly.
Trigger>Cross
Opinion, I'd say their equal, different but equal.
Trigger is slow to start, and I've seen about 6 endings for it, I don't feel the urge to work my way through to see the rest. +New game doesn't make the game more fun, just a cakewalk.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment