Punch Out!! Receives an 8.5 from Nintendo Power

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gohansephiroth
Gohansephiroth

9871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Gohansephiroth
Member since 2005 • 9871 Posts

So the first review for punch out has arrived from Nintendo Power which gave it an 8.5 according to this Article. Its a good score and pretty much what I expected from Nintendo Power, they usually rate most nintendo games pretty high though so I'm interested in what other reviewers and sites give it, but so far its looking good.

Avatar image for Master_Bland
Master_Bland

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Master_Bland
Member since 2006 • 136 Posts

so long as it has that cover of gloss that all nintendo games get then I will be happy.

Maybe I will buy this game, although I live in NZ so like buying games; for Wii especially is like so hard, omg like whatever, pillow fight.

I can type without out looking heeeee.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#3 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Given that I'm definitely gonna be getting this game, the only score I care about at this point is the one I give it. :P

Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts
sounds pretty good.
Avatar image for jmangafan
jmangafan

1933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 jmangafan
Member since 2004 • 1933 Posts
they usually rate most nintendo games pretty high though Gohansephiroth
This is definitely true of older Nintendo Power, but honestly I can't see why people are still saying this. From what I've seen from the past few years, NP has really grown up. Using the "rates system's owner's games higher than others" rings no truer than what OXM or PSM do. They've been calling incredibly fair shots, and I haven't seen any real examples of first party games getting inflated scores from NP that don't correlate to other places like here or IGN. I mean, I guess it looks inflated compared to what Edge and Game Informer score things, but those are both terrible magazines. That being said, from what I've seen of the game, an 8.5 sounds like a solid score to me, and its pretty encouraging that there is plenty of game to keep one satisfied, but I'll also keep an eye out for more reviews because its always a good idea to read as many opinions as possible.
Avatar image for jin3438
jin3438

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jin3438
Member since 2006 • 340 Posts

Well that's a pretty good score and good news to me since Punch out!!! might just become the first Wii title I buy since SSB came out. Lets wait and see what the sites rate it.

Avatar image for hansolo14
hansolo14

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 hansolo14
Member since 2003 • 976 Posts

I really don't care about ANY review from this game cause is a remake and I actually used to love the NES one when I was a child :)

but is really good too see such a score to this instant classic

Avatar image for marrawi
marrawi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 marrawi
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
is it gonna get released next month in the US?
Avatar image for Shy_Guy_Red
Shy_Guy_Red

17138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#9 Shy_Guy_Red
Member since 2006 • 17138 Posts

[QUOTE="Gohansephiroth"] they usually rate most nintendo games pretty high though jmangafan
This is definitely true of older Nintendo Power, but honestly I can't see why people are still saying this. From what I've seen from the past few years, NP has really grown up. Using the "rates system's owner's games higher than others" rings no truer than what OXM or PSM do. They've been calling incredibly fair shots, and I haven't seen any real examples of first party games getting inflated scores from NP that don't correlate to other places like here or IGN. I mean, I guess it looks inflated compared to what Edge and Game Informer score things, but those are both terrible magazines. That being said, from what I've seen of the game, an 8.5 sounds like a solid score to me, and its pretty encouraging that there is plenty of game to keep one satisfied, but I'll also keep an eye out for more reviews because its always a good idea to read as many opinions as possible.

I agree with this, NP used to rate Nintendo games higher than usual but nowadays they are unbiased which is real great.

Avatar image for Cone_Zone
Cone_Zone

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Cone_Zone
Member since 2009 • 235 Posts

so long as it has that cover of gloss that all nintendo games get then I will be happy.

Maybe I will buy this game, although I live in NZ so like buying games; for Wii especially is like so hard, omg like whatever, pillow fight.

I can type without out looking heeeee.

Master_Bland
W...T...H?
Avatar image for eveileb-ekam
eveileb-ekam

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 eveileb-ekam
Member since 2009 • 1578 Posts

[QUOTE="Gohansephiroth"] they usually rate most nintendo games pretty high though jmangafan
This is definitely true of older Nintendo Power, but honestly I can't see why people are still saying this. From what I've seen from the past few years, NP has really grown up. Using the "rates system's owner's games higher than others" rings no truer than what OXM or PSM do. They've been calling incredibly fair shots, and I haven't seen any real examples of first party games getting inflated scores from NP that don't correlate to other places like here or IGN. I mean, I guess it looks inflated compared to what Edge and Game Informer score things, but those are both terrible magazines. That being said, from what I've seen of the game, an 8.5 sounds like a solid score to me, and its pretty encouraging that there is plenty of game to keep one satisfied, but I'll also keep an eye out for more reviews because its always a good idea to read as many opinions as possible.

Just out of curiosity, why do people dislike Edge so much? I see nothing but hate directed at the magazine, but Ive been buying it for a while now. In mag, they dont give games numbered ratings and I find I pretty much always agree with the written review. I like the format and the writing style too, and they always have pretty good content. What gives?

On topic, thats an awesome score. I hope it gets scores like that across the board but, to be honest, its not gonna stop me buying and playing it for a long long long time :P

Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#12 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

About what I was expecting the game to get. I will buy it anyway so I am not really interested in review scores but it is always nice to see the average media opinion on the game.

Avatar image for Boomarley
Boomarley

897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Boomarley
Member since 2006 • 897 Posts

Interesting, but I'd like to hear about the actual written review, primarily to see hints at the features in the game. Eh, it'll come eventually.

Avatar image for ms-fable
ms-fable

741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 ms-fable
Member since 2008 • 741 Posts

It could get mostly 6's from most reviewers and I'd still get it.

Avatar image for WllDan7
WllDan7

2581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 WllDan7
Member since 2004 • 2581 Posts

Given that I'm definitely gonna be getting this game, the only score I care about at this point is the one I give it. :P

GabuEx
In the end that is the only one that matters.
Avatar image for Cone_Zone
Cone_Zone

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Cone_Zone
Member since 2009 • 235 Posts

It could get mostly 6's from most reviewers and I'd still get it.

ms-fable
Same here. I don't go by other people's reviews. Other people's reviews are essentially other people's opinions, and I am capable of forming my own opinions.
Avatar image for eveileb-ekam
eveileb-ekam

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 eveileb-ekam
Member since 2009 • 1578 Posts
[QUOTE="ms-fable"]

It could get mostly 6's from most reviewers and I'd still get it.

Cone_Zone
Same here. I don't go by other people's reviews. Other people's reviews are essentially other people's opinions, and I am capable of forming my own opinions.

Thats cool if you have the money to buy every single game that goes on your radar, but the fact is that reviews are a big deal for those people who dont like or cant rent, and dont want to drop max price on a game that they might not enjoy. What the problem is, is that people focus too much on the number. If GS gave this game a 6, but I read the review properly and used that information to determine whether or not I would personally like the game, then it wouldnt matter about the number. Other peoples opinions are valid when it comes to making game purchases. Its silly to drop money on a game if it messes up majorly (not that Im saying Punch-Out!! will).
Avatar image for SoAmazingBaby
SoAmazingBaby

3023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SoAmazingBaby
Member since 2009 • 3023 Posts
I would like to see some fighting video footage! :O
Avatar image for blankshore
blankshore

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#19 blankshore
Member since 2008 • 1809 Posts

Quite honestly I thought they'd give it a higher score--I was expecting a 9. But an 8.5 is still good, and even if they gave the game a 2.0 I'd still buy it. I can't wait for this game.

Avatar image for Grim_Heaper94
Grim_Heaper94

4574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 Grim_Heaper94
Member since 2009 • 4574 Posts
8.5 sounds good to me.
Avatar image for Gohansephiroth
Gohansephiroth

9871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 Gohansephiroth
Member since 2005 • 9871 Posts

Quite honestly I thought they'd give it a higher score--I was expecting a 9. But an 8.5 is still good, and even if they gave the game a 2.0 I'd still buy it. I can't wait for this game.

blankshore

yea same here, I would have bought it no matter what cause like other people have said its your opinion that matters in the end. But I put this score up to perhaps get those who were on the fence about the game a bit more interested since reviews and scores may give them an incentive to check the game out if they are gonna by it. Ill get the written review if I can.

Avatar image for SMR-Venom
SMR-Venom

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 SMR-Venom
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts
They scored it higher than Excitebots. I can see it getting AA on GS too.
Avatar image for awssk8er716
awssk8er716

8485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 awssk8er716
Member since 2005 • 8485 Posts

Good news.

I never played the original, so I really don't understand why people want this game so badly.

It looks like a normal boxing game...

Avatar image for SMR-Venom
SMR-Venom

6500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 SMR-Venom
Member since 2007 • 6500 Posts

Good news.

I never played the original, so I really don't understand why people want this game so badly.

It looks like a normal boxing game ...

awssk8er716

That is where you are completely wrong. Punchout is more of a rythm based boxer.

Avatar image for FFCYAN
FFCYAN

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 FFCYAN
Member since 2005 • 4969 Posts

Good news.

I never played the original, so I really don't understand why people want this game so badly.

It looks like a normal boxing game...

awssk8er716

I think that's your problem right there. Punch-Out is nothing like other boxing games. It's more about pattern memorization and timing than real boxing. Try downloading the NES or SNES versions to see for yourself. I'd recommend those and can safely assume the new Punch-Out will be more of the same greatness I come to expect from Nintendo.

Avatar image for blankshore
blankshore

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#26 blankshore
Member since 2008 • 1809 Posts

[QUOTE="awssk8er716"]

Good news.

I never played the original, so I really don't understand why people want this game so badly.

It looks like a normal boxing game...

FFCYAN

I think that's your problem right there. Punch-Out is nothing like other boxing games. It's more about pattern memorization and timing than real boxing. Try downloading the NES or SNES versions to see for yourself. I'd recommend those and can safely assume the new Punch-Out will be more of the same greatness I come to expect from Nintendo.

Yes. Punch-Out is more of a strategy game, actually. Oh, and if you're going to be downloading Punch-Out off the VC (which you absolutly should), if you get Punch-Out featuring Mr. Dream make sure you're not playing it on an HD or Widescreen TV because there's a horrible controller lag problem with those.

Also, in case anyone's interested, you can read part of an interview with the developers of Punch-Out at nintendopower.com. It's pretty good.

Avatar image for g1rldraco7
g1rldraco7

2988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 3

#27 g1rldraco7
Member since 2008 • 2988 Posts
As long as it sells alot, it's alright with me.
Avatar image for riou7
riou7

10842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#28 riou7  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 10842 Posts

good score, hope other reviewers give more than this

Avatar image for -snorlax-
-snorlax-

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -snorlax-
Member since 2009 • 721 Posts
i'm a bit dissapointed. expected at least AAA. *goes back to playing puchout on nes*
Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
Not good :( Basically means the game will be an 8.5 AT BEST.. :( (and if you say reviews don't matter then why are you in this thread? -_-)
Avatar image for blankshore
blankshore

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#31 blankshore
Member since 2008 • 1809 Posts

Just got my Nintendo Power in the mail! Here's what they had to say:

First of all, they had nothing but praise for the wonderful character animations, responsive controls, and the fact that it remains a hardcore gamer's game, despite its casual appeal. They also had screenshots of two new characters (well, old characters) Piston Honda and Great Tiger! They also applauded "Title Defense Mode" which is unlocked after you beat the game. It's basically the whole game all over again, except all the characters have new moves, and are therefore much more difficult. All the unlockables and challenges to complete in exhibition mode add a lot of replayability.

So why did it get marked down? For all the reasons you probably expected. They said they weren't quite sold on the Multiplayer, which is fun but not nearly as satisfying as the Single-Player modes. They also said that the balance-board controls aren't nearly responsive enough for the faster paced, more difficult fights. And, of course, there's only one new character, so although the fighters have different moves from the last time around it's all a bit familiar.

Seems fair enough for me. I personally didn't give a flying crap about the multiplayer (although I was hoping balance board controls would be better) and I'm perfectly fine with an old-school character roster. Can't wait!

Avatar image for Gohansephiroth
Gohansephiroth

9871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 Gohansephiroth
Member since 2005 • 9871 Posts

Just got my Nintendo Power in the mail! Here's what they had to say:

First of all, they had nothing but praise for the wonderful character animations, responsive controls, and the fact that it remains a hardcore gamer's game, despite its casual appeal. They also had screenshots of two new characters (well, old characters) Piston Honda and Great Tiger! They also applauded "Title Defense Mode" which is unlocked after you beat the game. It's basically the whole game all over again, except all the characters have new moves, and are therefore much more difficult. All the unlockables and challenges to complete in exhibition mode add a lot of replayability.

So why did it get marked down? For all the reasons you probably expected. They said they weren't quite sold on the Multiplayer, which is fun but not nearly as satisfying as the Single-Player modes. They also said that the balance-board controls aren't nearly responsive enough for the faster paced, more difficult fights. And, of course, there's only one new character, so although the fighters have different moves from the last time around it's all a bit familiar.

Seems fair enough for me. I personally didn't give a flying crap about the multiplayer (although I was hoping balance board controls would be better) and I'm perfectly fine with an old-school character roster. Can't wait!

blankshore

that's great news man thank for the update, I had figured great tiger would be one of the characters they would decide not to put in but I'm glad hes back. I usually get my nintendo power pretty late for some reason maybe because I'm in california but either way I'm glad you let us in on this info.

Avatar image for wetwilli64
wetwilli64

464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 wetwilli64
Member since 2008 • 464 Posts
[QUOTE="Gohansephiroth"] they usually rate most nintendo games pretty high though jmangafan
This is definitely true of older Nintendo Power, but honestly I can't see why people are still saying this. From what I've seen from the past few years, NP has really grown up. Using the "rates system's owner's games higher than others" rings no truer than what OXM or PSM do. They've been calling incredibly fair shots, and I haven't seen any real examples of first party games getting inflated scores from NP that don't correlate to other places like here or IGN. I mean, I guess it looks inflated compared to what Edge and Game Informer score things, but those are both terrible magazines. That being said, from what I've seen of the game, an 8.5 sounds like a solid score to me, and its pretty encouraging that there is plenty of game to keep one satisfied, but I'll also keep an eye out for more reviews because its always a good idea to read as many opinions as possible.

agreed. and Punch-Out looks terrible. I will not be getting it.
Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts
[QUOTE="WllDan7"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Given that I'm definitely gonna be getting this game, the only score I care about at this point is the one I give it. :P

In the end that is the only one that matters.

I agree.
Avatar image for srdjan311
srdjan311

1247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 srdjan311
Member since 2007 • 1247 Posts

i see it scoring 8.0 and above 4rm most websites and mags

Avatar image for DS_Lightning21
DS_Lightning21

741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 DS_Lightning21
Member since 2007 • 741 Posts

I still think the Punch Out series is the best series of boxing games. With Punch Out Wii's NES controls, there's really no way to go wrong.

Avatar image for Number_1_Gamer
Number_1_Gamer

1786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Number_1_Gamer
Member since 2007 • 1786 Posts

[QUOTE="FFCYAN"]

[QUOTE="awssk8er716"]

Good news.

I never played the original, so I really don't understand why people want this game so badly.

It looks like a normal boxing game...

blankshore

I think that's your problem right there. Punch-Out is nothing like other boxing games. It's more about pattern memorization and timing than real boxing. Try downloading the NES or SNES versions to see for yourself. I'd recommend those and can safely assume the new Punch-Out will be more of the same greatness I come to expect from Nintendo.

Yes. Punch-Out is more of a strategy game, actually. Oh, and if you're going to be downloading Punch-Out off the VC (which you absolutly should), if you get Punch-Out featuring Mr. Dream make sure you're not playing it on an HD or Widescreen TV because there's a horrible controller lag problem with those.

Also, in case anyone's interested, you can read part of an interview with the developers of Punch-Out at nintendopower.com. It's pretty good.

The "lag" all depends on what kind of t.v. you have. It has nothing to do with the controller.
Avatar image for RyanKenward
RyanKenward

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 RyanKenward
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Wow, 8.5 seems a little low for Punchout. I am really excited for Punchout! I am not even that upset that they only could come up with 3 new fighters in the past 20 years haha.