[QUOTE="nosferatu"] Long story short, I'm now beginning to understand why this game has the acclaim it does. I never did before.
KingKoop
Kinda shot yourself in the foot there, your basing this on the Wii remote and controls but RE4 had this acclaim before the Wii version was ever planned.
Huh? I see a game as its own entity with story, gameplay, etc... the content. The controls, while an extremely important element as this topic would show, play the bridge between the player and the game to me. I really don't see how that comment detracted from anything I said. Of courseI know there wasn't always a Wii(or PS2 version) planned and that it got its acclaim with the old controls. Those controls proved to be a barrier to me experiencing the content and thus didn't provide that bridge between me and the game. Thus, I didn't enjoy the content of the game.... that's what I was referring to.
EXAMPLE:
I realized that my explanation was confusing and weird so I thought about it and came back with this example to explain it. The Bible, despite my irreligiousness, makes for a great example.
Millions of people love the stories of the Bible, but they can be delivered in numerous ways and this delivery can severely affect their enjoyment of them although it is not technically a part of its content. You can read them in a book or on a computer, you can have them preached to you or simply recounted, or you can dig for 2000 year old copper scrolls and read them off those. Some deliveries will be far more conducive to your sense of enjoyment and which one works best will differ between people and to their impact will be todifferent degrees.
This is similar to how I feel about controls and their impact on a game: the delivery method is important, but is a separate element from the actual content of the game. I hope that made a bit more sense.
Log in to comment