This topic is locked from further discussion.
most screen shots that I've ever seen were released before the game came out. 99% of them were extremely misleading imo. I never saw one screen in the game that was even compareable to those shots, and I played the game with component cables.
The game was alright looking attempting to go for that "realistic" look, but I think there's been a few others since, that have surpassed it.
Here's hoping RS2 pushes Wii to the limits
I have those two games, SMG has good graphics but SSBB idk, SSBB has more jaggiez than SSBM, and I checked it out. So i wouldn't say SSBB, I don't count SMG because humans and real environments thats destructable and guns should be harder to do, and shows more of what the wii is capable of since it's more action packed... so please don't hate.TC,
See SMG and SSBB for proof that you haven't played a Wii
Nova_Mongoose
Red Steel's graphics aren't horrible, but I still think Brawl and Galaxy blow it out of the ballpark graphically.
[QUOTE="Nova_Mongoose"]I have those two games, SMG has good graphics but SSBB idk, SSBB has more jaggiez than SSBM, and I checked it out. So i wouldn't say SSBB, I don't count SMG because humans and real environments thats destructable and guns should be harder to do, and shows more of what the wii is capable of since it's more action packed... so please don't hate. Jaggies don't mean anything if the models are more complex (which they are) or textures are more detailed (which they are) or if the environments have more detail and more going on in the background (which they do). Brawl is far and away much better looking than Melee ever was. A simple look at the Melee levels that made it into Brawl should be proof enough. On the matter of SMG's credibility. There is quite a bit going on at once all while also rendering fully spherical worlds. It also has very strong texture work and modeling. Just because something is cute doesn't mean its less impressive than a realistic rendered game. Galaxy has quite a bit more under the hood than a corridor shooter like Red Steel. The fact that you'd consider it otherwise honestly means you don't understand how video games are made and how important a strong artistic style is.TC,
See SMG and SSBB for proof that you haven't played a Wii
Raijinko
[QUOTE="Raijinko"][QUOTE="Nova_Mongoose"]I have those two games, SMG has good graphics but SSBB idk, SSBB has more jaggiez than SSBM, and I checked it out. So i wouldn't say SSBB, I don't count SMG because humans and real environments thats destructable and guns should be harder to do, and shows more of what the wii is capable of since it's more action packed... so please don't hate. Jaggies don't mean anything if the models are more complex (which they are) or textures are more detailed (which they are) or if the environments have more detail and more going on in the background (which they do). Brawl is far and away much better looking than Melee ever was. A simple look at the Melee levels that made it into Brawl should be proof enough. On the matter of SMG's credibility. There is quite a bit going on at once all while also rendering fully spherical worlds. It also has very strong texture work and modeling. Just because something is cute doesn't mean its less impressive than a realistic rendered game. Galaxy has quite a bit more under the hood than a corridor shooter like Red Steel. The fact that you'd consider it otherwise honestly means you don't understand how video games are made and how important a strong artistic style is. I think rendering real humans and and real environments is more difficult to make look good than rendering goombas, flower plants, and bomb enemies sorry.TC,
See SMG and SSBB for proof that you haven't played a Wii
jmangafan
Really? So Metroid prime 3 doesn't count then? It's got humans so that obviously makes it look better then any game without humans. While we're at it, CoD3 must have the greatest graphics of all time since it's only people.
Your logic fails, buddy. And saying sorry after every setence doesn't hide your ignorance.
I said "sorry" once? Idk what u been reading. To end this discussion I guess nothing on the Wii looks good then, I have MP3 and all those games you people brag about, and its sad.. I want to believe that there are other better looking games out there for wii since ps2 games look better than all those games u people mentioned. since some people are being a$$es i'll be one to.. Jak3, R@C, kingdom hearts on ps2 look better than SMG and any other wii game. And to end it even more ,FFX, and MGS2-3 look better than any wii game released. which is sad.Really? So Metroid prime 3 doesn't count then? It's got humans so that obviously makes it look better then any game without humans. While we're at it, CoD3 must have the greatest graphics of all time since it's only people.
Your logic fails, buddy. And saying sorry after every setence doesn't hide your ignorance.
Ignition93
no freaking way look at okami or zelda TPk3nne3eYou can't be serious?? You do know that they were ports with no graphical updates? You are telling us that you think that a Gamecube game and a PS2 game have the best graphics on the Wii? Get with it!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment