http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=15068987&postcount=1
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
bc1391
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
So it's an On-rails shooter?SER69the word "chronicles" indicated its the sequel to umbrella chronicles.
[QUOTE="bob_newman"]
[QUOTE="bc1391"]
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
ActicEdge
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
It is confirmed, they have the magazine and the post the contents, what more do you need?
Sorry, all I see is that one post. Can you link me to the scans?[QUOTE="bc1391"]
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
bob_newman
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
Apparently its in this weeks Famistu, I don't have but neogaf posters are saying that there is a scan of it. Even in the new IGN podcast (at about 17:50) its heavily hinted. You are right though I shouldn't have used the word confirmed though.[QUOTE="bc1391"]
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
bob_newman
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
Listen to ign nintendo podcast. They don't say what it is but after hearing this it pretty much confirms what it is. What is left that re:uc did not cover. Don't tell me they are trying to get us to buy re4 again. Hey Capcom Port U, Port U.[QUOTE="bob_newman"][QUOTE="bc1391"]
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
bc1391
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
Apparently its in this weeks Famistu, I don't have but neogaf posters are saying that there is a scan of it. Even in the new IGN podcast its heavily hinted. You are right though I shouldn't have used the word confirmed though. Meh, no biggie. Besides, if what ArcticEdge said is true, there should be scans somewhere. I ain't seeing them, though.Here's a thought: buy the game used.
You won't be supporting capcom's effort(less)s, and you'll still get to enjoy the game. That's what i'll do.
[QUOTE="bob_newman"]
[QUOTE="bc1391"]
It seems other gaffers have confirmed this. Scans should pop up later.
WllDan7
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
Listen to ign nintendo podcast. They don't say what it is but after hearing this it pretty much confirms what it is. What is left that re:uc did not cover. Don't tell me they are trying to get us to buy re4 again. Hey Capcom Port U, Port U. I like how Capcom has gotten so bad that people want certain remakes instead of other remakes. It's like people expect Capcom to release ports, so they're like "well, let's hope it's a port of a good game at least". How about an original title? That would be nice.but then there would be one less used copy for sale... the guy who would have bought that used game that you bought might now not have the option to buy used and he will then buy new. So you buying the game used could very well still support capcom.Here's a thought: buy the game used.
You won't be supporting capcom's effort(less)s, and you'll still get to enjoy the game. That's what i'll do.
Dingerious
EDIT: I dont see your logic... you are basically telling capcom "Don't make any games like this even though I enjoy it". If it's a game you will enjoy then support it, if not then dont.
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="bob_newman"]
Uh, do you know the definition of "confirmed"?
bob_newman
It is confirmed, they have the magazine and the post the contents, what more do you need?
Sorry, all I see is that one post. Can you link me to the scans?They aren't allowed to post scans but that really doesn't matter. If you visit neogaf you would know that every week there is a famitsu thread and every week they list the new games and scores from said issue. Consequently, every week some one denies the truth of said thread and like in the next day or 2 they are proven wrong. It is confirmed but you don't need to believe it if you don't want to.
Sorry, all I see is that one post. Can you link me to the scans?[QUOTE="bob_newman"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
It is confirmed, they have the magazine and the post the contents, what more do you need?
ActicEdge
They aren't allowed to post scans but that really doesn't matter. If you visit neogaf you would know that every week there is a famitsu thread and every week they list the new games and scores from said issue. Consequently, every week some one denies the truth of said thread and like in the next day or 2 they are proven wrong. It is confirmed but you don't need to believe it if you don't want to.
So you're saying there is no actual proof of this? So you're saying that my first post still stands (that it is not confirmed)? So you're saying that when you said "it is confirmed", you really meant "it's not confirmed yet"? Doesn't anybody know the definition of "confirmed" anymore? I never said I didn't believe the post, my point was that it wasn't "confirmed", as the TC said it was. And it isn't yet. Right now it's just a guy on a forum who typed words. That's not a confirmation. Check your dictionary.[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="bob_newman"] Sorry, all I see is that one post. Can you link me to the scans?bob_newman
They aren't allowed to post scans but that really doesn't matter. If you visit neogaf you would know that every week there is a famitsu thread and every week they list the new games and scores from said issue. Consequently, every week some one denies the truth of said thread and like in the next day or 2 they are proven wrong. It is confirmed but you don't need to believe it if you don't want to.
So you're saying there is no actual proof of this? So you're saying that my first post still stands (that it is not confirmed)? So you're saying that when you said "it is confirmed", you really meant "it's not confirmed yet"? Doesn't anybody know the definition of "confirmed" anymore? I never said I didn't believe the post, my point was that it wasn't "confirmed", as the TC said it was. And it isn't yet. Right now it's just a guy on a forum who typed words. That's not a confirmation. Check your dictionary.If its printed in the magazine, its confirmed. Just because you cannot read the magazine, doesn't make it less confirmed, sorry.
As long as its an improvement over UC - not just graphics, I don't mind it.maxgil2Same, though I don't know how they can improve on UC. It's almost perfect.... I think the only improvements could be in additional modes or extended gameplay elements... basically just additions to the formula.
If this rumor is true, I'll be pretty happy.
I was hoping Capcom would make remakes of 2 and code veronica. It would really be a HUGE boost to the wii library and I would be forced to buy the system.
Sadly, this is extremely disappointing. Hopefully they wont reuse PS2 levels and make it outright terrible like UC became (nemesis comes to mind ... shudder).
Shame on you capcom.
I got the first chronicles game because I only watched a fourth of RE0, played RE1 on the ds, and didn't play RE:3. But this is does not sound like a buy for me seeing as how the games that they would use are games I have now. I played and beat RE:CV, I borrowed RE4 on the gamecube and got it on the wii. RE2 I have seen played almost to the end but have not played it, but I can get on past systems. So unless this has something that is completely new in it, I am not getting this. I like light gun shooters but I want a new game, not a port compilationthat they say is new.
So you're saying there is no actual proof of this? So you're saying that my first post still stands (that it is not confirmed)? So you're saying that when you said "it is confirmed", you really meant "it's not confirmed yet"? Doesn't anybody know the definition of "confirmed" anymore? I never said I didn't believe the post, my point was that it wasn't "confirmed", as the TC said it was. And it isn't yet. Right now it's just a guy on a forum who typed words. That's not a confirmation. Check your dictionary.[QUOTE="bob_newman"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]
They aren't allowed to post scans but that really doesn't matter. If you visit neogaf you would know that every week there is a famitsu thread and every week they list the new games and scores from said issue. Consequently, every week some one denies the truth of said thread and like in the next day or 2 they are proven wrong. It is confirmed but you don't need to believe it if you don't want to.
ActicEdge
If its printed in the magazine, its confirmed. Just because you cannot read the magazine, doesn't make it less confirmed, sorry.
Ok, I'll prove my point right this second:
Hey, ArcticEdge, did you hear? In next month's Nintendo Power they said that there's a new Metroid game coming out next month.
Don't believe me? Prove me wrong. You can't. By your logic, that must mean that it's "confirmed", right?
I don't read Japanese but the site I usually find Famistu scans at says that reads Biohazard: Dark Side Chronicles.Believe me, it does say that, my Japanese may be extremely rusty, but I can still read the good old katakana.bc1391
[QUOTE="SER69"]So it's an On-rails shooter?garrett_duffmanthe word "chronicles" indicated its the sequel to umbrella chronicles. big mistake on their part... who even plays rail shooters outside of arcades now? maybe house of the dead overkill... but still, that game was supposedly fun.
Believe me, it does say that, my Japanese may be extremely rusty, but I can still read the good old katakana. So... what does it says?[QUOTE="bc1391"]I don't read Japanese but the site I usually find Famistu scans at says that reads Biohazard: Dark Side Chronicles.
Cesar_Barba
[QUOTE="Cesar_Barba"]Believe me, it does say that, my Japanese may be extremely rusty, but I can still read the good old katakana. So... what does it says?No, I said that it was wha tyou had wrote on your post with the picture. For the sake of romanizing it, here you go[QUOTE="bc1391"]I don't read Japanese but the site I usually find Famistu scans at says that reads Biohazard: Dark Side Chronicles.
SER69
ba i o ha zaa do : daa ku sa i do ku ro ni ku ru zu
which comes out to Biohazard: Dark Side Chronicles, it's English really, just as they, Japanized.
EDIT: Hard to see when they make a Su and a Zu in that picture.
I don't mind a resident evil rail shooter.
I DO mind a resident evil rail shooter that comes in place of a fully-fledged resident evil game.
Didn't like Umbrella Chronicles. Just couldn't get into it. Given the "Chronicles" at the end of the title, sounds like another on rails shooter. This was supposed to make Wii fans happy? Really? If this is case Capcom, I'm disappointed, I expected better.
Oh I C. Well... atleast we have the name. :PNo, I said that it was wha tyou had wrote on your post with the picture. For the sake of romanizing it, here you go
ba i o ha zaa do : daa ku sa i do ku ro ni ku ru zu
which comes out to Biohazard: Dark Side Chronicles, it's English really, just as they, Japanized
EDIT: Hard to see when they make a Su and a Zu in that picture.
Cesar_Barba
I don't mind a resident evil rail shooter.
I DO mind a resident evil rail shooter that comes in place of a fully-fledged resident evil game.
Dingerious
There was never a full fledge Biohazard gamecoming tothe wii to begin with. People just need to give up on hoping big companies are going to give us wii version of there big franchises without ruining the reason we like the franchise in the first place. Basically, play niche games cause big ones aren't coming for the most part.
[QUOTE="Dingerious"]
I don't mind a resident evil rail shooter.
I DO mind a resident evil rail shooter that comes in place of a fully-fledged resident evil game.
ActicEdge
There was never a full fledge Biohazard gamecoming tothe wii to begin with. People just need to give up on hoping big companies are going to give us wii version of there big franchises without ruining the reason we like the franchise in the first place. Basically, play niche games cause big ones aren't coming for the most part.
I suppose you're one of those who believes RE5 is a dramatic departure from RE4 that's impossible to pull off on Wii?
Same, though I don't know how they can improve on UC. It's almost perfect.... I think the only improvements could be in additional modes or extended gameplay elements... basically just additions to the formula.[QUOTE="maxgil2"]As long as its an improvement over UC - not just graphics, I don't mind it.JordanElek
If this rumor is true, I'll be pretty happy.
I know how to improve it, on line co-op!There was never a full fledge Biohazard gamecoming tothe wii to begin with. People just need to give up on hoping big companies are going to give us wii version of there big franchises without ruining the reason we like the franchise in the first place. Basically, play niche games cause big ones aren't coming for the most part.
ActicEdge
Only because Capcom just has the love for XBOX360 atm, that's their primary console to develop for..everything else is secondary. As long as their not lazy with this I don't think it will be bad.
Same, though I don't know how they can improve on UC. It's almost perfect.... JordanElekEasy: Get rid of missions that HAVE to be played alone just by yourself and make everything playable and unlockable in co-op.
well here it is, from neogaf:
"1 page of scan is up
gun shooting, 1~2 players
2, Raccoon City, Leon, Claire"
you were rightCapcom, I'm happy,here'smy happy face
I don't mind a resident evil rail shooter.
I DO mind a resident evil rail shooter that comes in place of a fully-fledged resident evil game.
agreed, its like 360/ps3 gets re5, wii gets on rail re, WHAT A SLAP IN THE FACE Pretty much how I feel.................[QUOTE="JordanElek"]Same, though I don't know how they can improve on UC. It's almost perfect.... I think the only improvements could be in additional modes or extended gameplay elements... basically just additions to the formula.[QUOTE="maxgil2"]As long as its an improvement over UC - not just graphics, I don't mind it.ekalbtwin
If this rumor is true, I'll be pretty happy.
I know how to improve it, on line co-op! If they did that, and did it well, that would warrant me a buy.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment