I don't mean that he has gone down the tube. But besides being in Brawl. NOTHING good has happened to sonic since the dream-cast. I think Nintendo should fight for Sonic.
His last like 20 games were horrible.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I don't mean that he has gone down the tube. But besides being in Brawl. NOTHING good has happened to sonic since the dream-cast. I think Nintendo should fight for Sonic.
His last like 20 games were horrible.
hell to the no
nintendo would put a smile on his face and have him jumping on mushrooms heads.
he would lose his bad-arse attitude.
I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.Duckman5
Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.
If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)
wiifan001
wait.....are you for or against nintendo taking sonic? you don't make it very clear in your message.
I say no, because there is no legitimate reason why Nintendo would purchase the rights to Sonic the Hedgehog from Sega. After all, Nintendo does have many profitable franchises.
If people are unhappy with most of the recent Sonic games, then they should boycott them than daydream that Nintendo would be the "white knight" that will save the franchise. Nintendo has no moral obligation to save the Sonic franchise.
he would lose his bad-arse attitude.BrooklynHotBoyI'd be content with this... he is NOT bad ass in anyway. Every "cool" phrase he spits out in his games make my insides churn. The last scene in Secret Rings - though beautiful looking in the visuals dept - made me want to...idk but I hated it Put Sonic back in simple games where he doesn't talk, the bg music isn't crap (yes I said it, the music is crap), and the secondary characters aren't main characters. and please bring back the invincibility star music. I should write a blog on what should happen to this poor rodent... I may just do it :P
though... Mario isn't in a slump so there would be no reason for Mario to go anywhereSonic IS sega. Mario IS nintendo. So what if mario went to sega? exactly.
shadimoscouplos
[QUOTE="wiifan001"]If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)
TheAcejoel99
wait.....are you for or against nintendo taking sonic? you don't make it very clear in your message.
Neither. I'm neutral.
[QUOTE="Duckman5"]I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.TheAcejoel99
Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.
so you just made this thread to find people whom will agree with you? wow
[QUOTE="TheAcejoel99"][QUOTE="Duckman5"]I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.BrooklynHotBoy
Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.
so you just made this thread to find people whom will agree with you? wow
no it's just that the first 3 or so people were against what I THOUGHT would be a landslide victory for nintendo taking sonic.
Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.
Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.
nentindow29
Sonic Adventure 2: Battle got a 6.8 .....................I'm not saying it's a horrible game.....but...... come on it got a 6.8.
I think that both Nintendo and Sega need to collaborate on the next Sonic game (after Unleashed), and make it exclusive version on the Wii (3D) and the DS (2D).
and if Sega was to ever sell the Sonic franchise Nintendo would buy it.
[QUOTE="nentindow29"]Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.
TheAcejoel99
Sonic Adventure 2: Battle got a 6.8 .....................I'm not saying it's a horrible game.....but...... come on it got a 6.8.
Thats because it was a port of the original Sonic Adventure 2 from the DC. That game got an 8.6.
Either way the game was great.
If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)
wiifan001
Thta is not a bad idea. Sega does nothing good, and Nintendo could save Sonic.
I'm dissapointed with all of you. This is like wanting Link to go to Square Enix. We all know what he'd look like!
Sonic IS sega. Mario IS nintendo. So what if mario went to sega? exactly.
shadimoscouplos
Yeah but the fact that Sonic is SEGA now makes SEGA look like a bad company. I think he should move, SEGA are doing nothing for him, if the next Sonic flops he's doomed.
Sega shouldn't sell sonic to nintendo. sonic games have been bad recently but they were once very good Sonic Adventure 1&2 were both great games. If the went back a few steps sonic would be a great game again they got close with sonic the hedghog but it was ruined with load times and flaws, but when playing the levels(not loading them) the game was fun. maybe the next sonic game would be good sonic unleashed, but i feel most people here would agree they should make a sonic adventure 3 or a game close to that.
I'm dissapointed with all of you. This is like wanting Link to go to Square Enix. We all know what he'd look like!
imnotwhite
Link is doing fine inf act he is doing great in his series. Zelda games still a ten steps ahead of whats out there. If anything Square Enix would kill that franchise.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment