Should sonic be taken over by Nintendo?

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#1 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

I don't mean that he has gone down the tube. But besides being in Brawl. NOTHING good has happened to sonic since the dream-cast. I think Nintendo should fight for Sonic.

His last like 20 games were horrible.

Avatar image for shadimoscouplos
shadimoscouplos

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shadimoscouplos
Member since 2004 • 1572 Posts
yea and send gta to ea...
Avatar image for BrooklynHotBoy
BrooklynHotBoy

818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 BrooklynHotBoy
Member since 2003 • 818 Posts

hell to the no

nintendo would put a smile on his face and have him jumping on mushrooms heads.

he would lose his bad-arse attitude.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#4 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts
If you think it should stay with sega please make a point on WHY you think so. Not to be mean in any way in the slightest.
Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.
Avatar image for shadimoscouplos
shadimoscouplos

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 shadimoscouplos
Member since 2004 • 1572 Posts

Sonic IS sega. Mario IS nintendo. So what if mario went to sega? exactly.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#7 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.Duckman5

Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#8 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts

If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#9 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42195 Posts

No! People are disappointed with Sonic enough, it'll get worse if Sonic switches companies.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#10 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)

wiifan001

wait.....are you for or against nintendo taking sonic? you don't make it very clear in your message.

Avatar image for onesimos
onesimos

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 onesimos
Member since 2005 • 320 Posts

I say no, because there is no legitimate reason why Nintendo would purchase the rights to Sonic the Hedgehog from Sega. After all, Nintendo does have many profitable franchises.

If people are unhappy with most of the recent Sonic games, then they should boycott them than daydream that Nintendo would be the "white knight" that will save the franchise. Nintendo has no moral obligation to save the Sonic franchise.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
I'm going to vote yes just because anything new would raise him from the abomination he dwells in
he would lose his bad-arse attitude.BrooklynHotBoy
I'd be content with this... he is NOT bad ass in anyway. Every "cool" phrase he spits out in his games make my insides churn. The last scene in Secret Rings - though beautiful looking in the visuals dept - made me want to...idk but I hated it Put Sonic back in simple games where he doesn't talk, the bg music isn't crap (yes I said it, the music is crap), and the secondary characters aren't main characters. and please bring back the invincibility star music. I should write a blog on what should happen to this poor rodent... I may just do it :P

Sonic IS sega. Mario IS nintendo. So what if mario went to sega? exactly.

shadimoscouplos
though... Mario isn't in a slump so there would be no reason for Mario to go anywhere
Avatar image for gamecubeown
gamecubeown

327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 gamecubeown
Member since 2007 • 327 Posts
they should own sonic he isn't getting the respect from sega like he used to he used to be my favorite video game character but that gone down the toilet since sonic heros (havent played secret rings and not to offend anyone)
Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts
No, they can ruin the character by doing that.
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#15 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
[QUOTE="wiifan001"]

If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)

TheAcejoel99

wait.....are you for or against nintendo taking sonic? you don't make it very clear in your message.

Neither. I'm neutral.

Avatar image for BrooklynHotBoy
BrooklynHotBoy

818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 BrooklynHotBoy
Member since 2003 • 818 Posts

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.TheAcejoel99

Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.

so you just made this thread to find people whom will agree with you? wow

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#17 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts

If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)

wiifan001
I agree with this. Nintendo would be able to help Sega with games and maybe we'll see better Sonic games
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Since Sonic has been doing well lately there's no real point of Sega letting him go

Now if this thread was made years ago you might have some sort of argument in your favor, not today.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#19 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts
[QUOTE="TheAcejoel99"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]I say yes he should. He's floundering with sega.BrooklynHotBoy

Thank you...finaly someone who agrees with me.

so you just made this thread to find people whom will agree with you? wow

no it's just that the first 3 or so people were against what I THOUGHT would be a landslide victory for nintendo taking sonic.

Avatar image for zephead4
zephead4

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 zephead4
Member since 2005 • 115 Posts
I think he should, unless Sega does something like SA2.
Avatar image for lightdarksamus
lightdarksamus

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 lightdarksamus
Member since 2006 • 264 Posts
it would be a terrible waste of money for nintendo...
Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#22 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

it would be a terrible waste of money for nintendo...lightdarksamus

Please explain why.

Avatar image for nentindow29
nentindow29

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 nentindow29
Member since 2006 • 594 Posts

Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.

Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#24 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.

nentindow29

Sonic Adventure 2: Battle got a 6.8 .....................I'm not saying it's a horrible game.....but...... come on it got a 6.8.

Avatar image for nentindow29
nentindow29

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 nentindow29
Member since 2006 • 594 Posts
it's just my opinion. and 6.8 is just their opinion. it got a better score from the critics and it got an even better score than that from the users also.
Avatar image for Voltaire_Tmpntr
Voltaire_Tmpntr

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Voltaire_Tmpntr
Member since 2007 • 45 Posts
Of course!!! Sonic would lose any "badassness", sonic team would still develop, just with some help.
Avatar image for despa1r_fact0r
despa1r_fact0r

24611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#27 despa1r_fact0r
Member since 2008 • 24611 Posts

I think that both Nintendo and Sega need to collaborate on the next Sonic game (after Unleashed), and make it exclusive version on the Wii (3D) and the DS (2D).

and if Sega was to ever sell the Sonic franchise Nintendo would buy it.

Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
I think we all know Nintendo could succeed where Sega has failed. They could make a whole 3d Sonic game.
Avatar image for 00chaos8
00chaos8

1682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 87

User Lists: 0

#29 00chaos8
Member since 2005 • 1682 Posts

personally, I say yes...nintendo always put there time in to the there games. I mean really? Sonic Unleashed with Werewolf sonic??? Seriously sega:roll:

Avatar image for DJSAV_101
DJSAV_101

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DJSAV_101
Member since 2008 • 3701 Posts
[QUOTE="nentindow29"]

Dude, Sonic Adventure 2: Battle for Gamecube is one of the best games i've ever played. If sega made that, then i'd say no. yes thats right, just because of that ONE game.

TheAcejoel99

Sonic Adventure 2: Battle got a 6.8 .....................I'm not saying it's a horrible game.....but...... come on it got a 6.8.

Thats because it was a port of the original Sonic Adventure 2 from the DC. That game got an 8.6.

Either way the game was great.

Avatar image for supertails123
supertails123

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 supertails123
Member since 2004 • 31 Posts
sega should make sonic like the old days..just him goin hyper all over the stage
Avatar image for PlasmaBeam44
PlasmaBeam44

9052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 PlasmaBeam44
Member since 2007 • 9052 Posts
They should just kill him off at this point. No one cares about Sonic anymore except for the fanboys.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#33 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

They should just kill him off at this point. No one cares about Sonic anymore except for the fanboys.PlasmaBeam44

You can say that about every single mascot including the one in your avatar.

Avatar image for red192837465
red192837465

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#34 red192837465
Member since 2008 • 164 Posts

If Sonic is going over to Nintendo, then Nintendo may as well own Sega (kind of like how Microsoft owns RARE)

wiifan001

Thta is not a bad idea. Sega does nothing good, and Nintendo could save Sonic.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#35 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
No he was created by SEGA it just won't feel right.
Avatar image for pppjjj
pppjjj

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 pppjjj
Member since 2004 • 1094 Posts
NO and i mean no sonic should stay with sega end of conversation.
Avatar image for thebisonx
thebisonx

2203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 thebisonx
Member since 2003 • 2203 Posts
I don't think Nintendo should waste their resources on trying to save the Sonic series from whatever it is that currently plagues it. Let Sega do that.
Avatar image for pppjjj
pppjjj

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 pppjjj
Member since 2004 • 1094 Posts

I say let Sega save Sonic on there own they don't need Nintendo, all they need to do is put some effort in their Sonic games like they use to.

Avatar image for imnotwhite
imnotwhite

6437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 imnotwhite
Member since 2005 • 6437 Posts

I'm dissapointed with all of you. This is like wanting Link to go to Square Enix. We all know what he'd look like!

Avatar image for pppjjj
pppjjj

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 pppjjj
Member since 2004 • 1094 Posts

I'm dissapointed with all of you. This is like wanting Link to go to Square Enix. We all know what he'd look like!

imnotwhite
lmao good one.
Avatar image for DaLegendKilla92
DaLegendKilla92

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DaLegendKilla92
Member since 2007 • 919 Posts
Nintendo shouldn't take Sonic, but Sega should align themselves with their former rival company. Nintendo rubbed off a little on them and came up with Sonic Rush, a good solid game that could slowly help bring the Bad Blue Bomber back. Sega is most appreciated on Nintendo consoles now more than any other console. Sonic in Smash Brawl was just the commercial to the show. Sonic Unleashed is the Series Premiere.
Avatar image for Weslii
Weslii

2309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Weslii
Member since 2007 • 2309 Posts
SEGA should go 2nd party.
Avatar image for trigun_h
trigun_h

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 trigun_h
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts
its not that complecated!!!

all nintendo needs is to add Sonic team to its army of Developer's, and secure sonic rights and try to bribe yuji naka to come back and work for sonic team!!!!

then sonic is reborn.
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

Sonic IS sega. Mario IS nintendo. So what if mario went to sega? exactly.

shadimoscouplos

Yeah but the fact that Sonic is SEGA now makes SEGA look like a bad company. I think he should move, SEGA are doing nothing for him, if the next Sonic flops he's doomed.

Avatar image for mrjam0
mrjam0

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 mrjam0
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

Since Sonic has been doing well lately there's no real point of Sega letting him go

Now if this thread was made years ago you might have some sort of argument in your favor, not today.

Jaysonguy

as far as handheld games go, u have a point.

console wise? no

Avatar image for newkid69
newkid69

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 newkid69
Member since 2007 • 293 Posts
Sonic is sega. i do think that sonic would be better finding a permanent home with nintendo than any other company. if sega and nintendo were to work more exclusively together it would benefit them both. It would be nice if all of sega's games were exclusive to nintendo. It makes sense for sonic to appear on just Nintendo.
Avatar image for TheAcejoel99
TheAcejoel99

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#47 TheAcejoel99
Member since 2008 • 1059 Posts

Please keep the messages coming!

Avatar image for Fatkiwi
Fatkiwi

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Fatkiwi
Member since 2008 • 132 Posts
Yes, because face it, he can't get any worse can he?
Avatar image for nightwngs
nightwngs

53

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 nightwngs
Member since 2006 • 53 Posts

Sega shouldn't sell sonic to nintendo. sonic games have been bad recently but they were once very good Sonic Adventure 1&2 were both great games. If the went back a few steps sonic would be a great game again they got close with sonic the hedghog but it was ruined with load times and flaws, but when playing the levels(not loading them) the game was fun. maybe the next sonic game would be good sonic unleashed, but i feel most people here would agree they should make a sonic adventure 3 or a game close to that.

Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts

I'm dissapointed with all of you. This is like wanting Link to go to Square Enix. We all know what he'd look like!

imnotwhite


Actually no its nothing like that. People are saying Nintendo should make a Sonic game because Sega does not seem to have the resources or the talent to make a SOnic game themselves.

Link is doing fine inf act he is doing great in his series. Zelda games still a ten steps ahead of whats out there. If anything Square Enix would kill that franchise.