So how about HD for Rev, any news ?

  • 94 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for way2funny
way2funny

4570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#51 way2funny
Member since 2003 • 4570 Posts

The first one is oblivian for 360, the second is twilight princess for gamecube, and the thrid is resident evil 4 for gamecube. I dont see much difference. Noting that the last two are running on regular SD. The Revl promised us better graphics than this, so im happy regardless. I also do find the last 2 pictures better looking, even while the resident evil 4 picture is really low quality cause its a jpeg.

Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts
it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm]
Avatar image for shrum91
shrum91

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 shrum91
Member since 2005 • 3927 Posts
it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm] spd39th
you = fanboy
Avatar image for four_zero40
four_zero40

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 four_zero40
Member since 2003 • 2304 Posts
ninty is stupid...always being behind...just like online play
Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts
[QUOTE="spd39th"] it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm] shrum91
you = fanboy


fanboy of women? always.
Avatar image for shrum91
shrum91

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 shrum91
Member since 2005 • 3927 Posts
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trash
Avatar image for monty_4256
monty_4256

8577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 monty_4256
Member since 2004 • 8577 Posts
[QUOTE="spd39th"] it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm]



actually the highest polygon count on nearly if not all the consoles this gen was star wars rogue squadron which was one of the release titles for the GC
if u want to compare them to it then go for it!
Avatar image for raphtmarqui
raphtmarqui

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 raphtmarqui
Member since 2006 • 467 Posts

[QUOTE="spd39th"] it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm] monty_4256


actually the highest polygon count on nearly if not all the consoles this gen was star wars rogue squadron which was one of the release titles for the GC
if u want to compare them to it then go for it!

exactly, there alot of First high graphics hames for the cube like Star Fox Adventures

u can compare that one also

Avatar image for way2funny
way2funny

4570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#59 way2funny
Member since 2003 • 4570 Posts
well, what other xbox360 game would u like me to compare?? Anyway, if there ISNT a HUGE difference, as in you admitted because you disgraded my comparing, why is everyone acting so big with HD. The REV will be 2-4 times as better as the gamecube screens i provided, so if thats not good enough for you... go suck on a lemon and enjoy your pitiful 360 HD raphics while i hae fun with me REV;  and i will enjoy my pc which has better graphics and will have higher resolutions...
Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.
Avatar image for Petri87
Petri87

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#61 Petri87
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts

[QUOTE="fiercedeity901"]lets see who would buy it,hmmm...lets see who would be in their right minds to pass up a deal of a $150 console, tons of great games including old schools, and new ways to play them, and a system to own all FPS genre type games,hmmm...yep i guess your right i'd pass all this up just for a better looking game anyday i mean afterall it is about looks and how high the price is right, i mean you just can't get a good game without it's sytem being $600, hmmm....now that you metion it i guess no one will buy it SARCASM^^^^^^^nasos_333_basic

Under 300$ means 150$. SINCE WHEN ? By the way, do you have a pc. You would know then that setting any game on 640x480 res look like crap compaing to 1024x768 one. So do we want more crap looking BLURRY games ? NO WAY.

EDIT: By the way, a good HDTV 32'' costs a bit more than 1000$, xbox 360 can show HD on PC screens too, and HDTV will be in every house in some years. Anyway, i am a gamer, i want the best, who cares if some gamers do not have HDTV, i have and would like to see amazing graphics not blurry stuff as with GC and xbox, is that clear ? I can't support a console that will give blurry graphics in this generation, i want choice to enable high res ones too. By the way you do realise xbox 360 plays on normal tv's too, right ?

The REV is aimed at the mass market, not those who can afford a HDTV for 1000 bucks and a console for 400+ bucks and then games that are 10bucks more expensive just for having HD support.

There are only about 1-5% of the house holds in the world that have HD(not counting afrika, asia(exept japan) and south america) if you count the whole world its much less then 1%.

And when Xbox 360 is played on a statndard TV it wont look better then REV, it even may look worse since REV is built for 480p and has the power to look awesome on the res and the xbox 360 is both 720p and 1080i and thats why it needs more power. If 360 was 480p only then it wont have/need more power then the REV.

And BTW you do realise that REV playes on HDTVs, PC monitors and standard TVs too, right?

Avatar image for way2funny
way2funny

4570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#62 way2funny
Member since 2003 • 4570 Posts

Look at the original metroid prime game, meh, no use...

I hooked up my n64 to my hd plasma, looks awsome. Same with my gamedcube. 360 probably looks better but still. I still enjoy 8bit games. The rev will be 2-4 times as more powerful, so does it really matter? the 360 will be more powerful but it cant show it cause it uses all of its power to support HD. Just as in last gen, and same as in current/next gen the rev will probably do the most with the least.

Avatar image for Petri87
Petri87

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#63 Petri87
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts

[QUOTE="monty_4256"] [QUOTE="spd39th"] it's funny to compare the FIRST Xbox 360 games with the LAST GC games... oh yes, the graphics from the FIRST GC games are exactly the same to the LAST GC games, the same happens to PS2 and Xbox... [sarcasm] raphtmarqui



actually the highest polygon count on nearly if not all the consoles this gen was star wars rogue squadron which was one of the release titles for the GC
if u want to compare them to it then go for it!

exactly, there alot of First high graphics hames for the cube like Star Fox Adventures

u can compare that one also

And Metroid Prime witch is the second best looking game this gen. The first beeing RE4 and not counting LoZ:TP since its not out yet

Avatar image for monty_4256
monty_4256

8577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 monty_4256
Member since 2004 • 8577 Posts
[QUOTE="spd39th"]
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.



fine we'll take ur point

I admit it does look better... but is it worth paying $50-60 more on the console and $5  more on every game?



Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts

I admit it does look better... but is it worth paying $50-60 more on the console and $5 more on every game?
monty_4256

no but what can we do? to wait till they drop is probably a solution but not final.
everything is increasing, the bigger the tecnology is, the bigger is the price. isn't this obvious?

look, i'm not saying that what you're talking about is all wrong or is just rubish. is just it doesn't make sense to compare games from different generation when one of them is just starting, it's way too soon to have a decent opinion, even if there's almost no difference between them.
Avatar image for megamegaman
megamegaman

3302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#66 megamegaman
Member since 2003 • 3302 Posts
Ooo HD whoop dee freaking doo. Since the 10% of the North American population owns at least 1 HD tv in their home, while the other 90% dont, is that even intelligent to use technology that is not even mainstream yet? No it isnt, having HD support costs like 50 bucks extra on a console and is as stupid as Sony and MS with the whole Blu Ray and HD DVD competition. Both are not mainstream and cost a ton of money. Not everyone can afford a 300 dollar Blu Ray or HD DVD player, or a 1000 dollars and upwards for a HD TV. It is obscene to use non mainstream technology on consoles because it costs more for both the developer and the consumer. We arent all made of money for christ sakes.
Avatar image for nintencat
nintencat

1005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 nintencat
Member since 2006 • 1005 Posts
The Revolution is'nt going down the HD road because it's got somthing better than HD. It's like Iwata said " when you see the graphics you will say wow".
Avatar image for Reptile711
Reptile711

3191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#68 Reptile711
Member since 2003 • 3191 Posts
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Avatar image for Reptile711
Reptile711

3191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#69 Reptile711
Member since 2003 • 3191 Posts
[QUOTE="spd39th"]
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.

The visual clarity was EXACTLY THE SAME. Whether you saw more polygons or more leaves in a tree or in the environment/models for that matter, the resolution is exactly the same. Tekken1 and Tekken5 are different in the polygonal aspect. Simply because they were able to take better advantage of what they had. They improvised. But what was limited to them, stayed in every game. The visual clarity may differ, but the resolution? EXACTLY THE SAME.
Avatar image for Contelis
Contelis

4903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#70 Contelis
Member since 2004 • 4903 Posts
The difference between HD and normal is not huge. Actually, it will vary from tv show, movie, or game. I've played 360 on HD and normal, and I can see some definition clarity, but I wouldn't say it's huge. In fact, after you play a few minutes you don't even notice. HD basically just gets rid of a few more jaggies. I think HD-TV, like football games for example, shows a much more drastic difference than playing games.
Avatar image for raphtmarqui
raphtmarqui

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 raphtmarqui
Member since 2006 • 467 Posts

The Revolution is'nt going down the HD road because it's got somthing better than HD. It's like Iwata said " when you see the graphics you will say wow".nintencat

i agree with that

Avatar image for Maximus_xcv
Maximus_xcv

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Maximus_xcv
Member since 2004 • 2755 Posts

Here is the real deal. First on is 1024x700 and the other in 640x380 upscaled. See the blurryness now ? Textures loose all detail too, grass seems less individual.

nasos_333_basic
Well done. That doesn't show what the rev graphics will look like, that shows what 360 graphics will look like on a SDTV, in a way self ownage. Here is an example of an SD comparison between the Gamecube and the 360. This is just to show how the consoles compare at Standard Definition.
Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts
[QUOTE="Reptile711"][QUOTE="spd39th"]
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.

The visual clarity was EXACTLY THE SAME. Whether you saw more polygons or more leaves in a tree or in the environment/models for that matter, the resolution is exactly the same. Tekken1 and Tekken5 are different in the polygonal aspect. Simply because they were able to take better advantage of what they had. They improvised. But what was limited to them, stayed in every game. The visual clarity may differ, but the resolution? EXACTLY THE SAME.


what clarity? when did i said to that? i mean EVERY ASPECT OF GRAPHICS, not clarity.

and you still don't know what i'm talking about.
Avatar image for Reptile711
Reptile711

3191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#75 Reptile711
Member since 2003 • 3191 Posts
[QUOTE="spd39th"] [QUOTE="Reptile711"][QUOTE="spd39th"]
where are all the trolls coming from all of the sudden?!! if you dont have something decent to say go to system wars with that trashshrum91

what exactly did i said wrong before?

compare this... for example, Eternal Darkness and RE4, are the graphics the same? the first Tekken of PS2 is the same as Tekken 5? the first Halo is the same as Half Life 2? for seeing this, i am a fanboy? all of you are talking about the graphics of Xbox 360 from his FIRST and comparing with the LAST games of GC. am i that wrong? is this trolling? am i a fanboy to say that? 360 is only 3 months old, not 5 years. Xbox 360 is going happen to PS3 AND Rev like it happen to PS2, GC, Xbox and it will happen in the next-next-gen... you can't compare FIRST games with LAST. give it time, then, we can compare exactly.

The visual clarity was EXACTLY THE SAME. Whether you saw more polygons or more leaves in a tree or in the environment/models for that matter, the resolution is exactly the same. Tekken1 and Tekken5 are different in the polygonal aspect. Simply because they were able to take better advantage of what they had. They improvised. But what was limited to them, stayed in every game. The visual clarity may differ, but the resolution? EXACTLY THE SAME.


what clarity? when did i said to that? i mean EVERY ASPECT OF GRAPHICS, not clarity.

Yes, but you compare the graphical difference of 1 game to another. But the topic is explaining HD. And HD only allows you to achieve a better visual clarity. It's a given that games from one time period to another will have progression. But the only benefit that HD is gonna give you is a clearer vision.
Avatar image for spd39th
spd39th

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 spd39th
Member since 2003 • 1569 Posts
Yes, but you compare the graphical difference of 1 game to another. But the topic is explaining HD. And HD only allows you to achieve a better visual clarity. It's a given that games from one time period to another will have progression. But the only benefit that HD is gonna give you is a clearer vision.Reptile711

all i'm saying is that the first games of each console are diferent from the last and all i gave are examples from diferent periods of this gen. is not about clarity.
and i am the one that are comparing the current games, the last games from this generation from the very first games of the next? it doesn't make sense.
Avatar image for Maximus_xcv
Maximus_xcv

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Maximus_xcv
Member since 2004 • 2755 Posts
Here is an example of a HD comparison between the Gamecube and the 360. How did I get hold of a HD screenshot of a gamecube game? Look at gamespot. This is just to show how the consoles compare at High Definition.
Avatar image for KingWickee
KingWickee

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 KingWickee
Member since 2005 • 2174 Posts

Under 300$ means 150$. SINCE WHEN ? By the way, do you have a pc. You would know then that setting any game on 640x480 res look like crap compaing to 1024x768 one. So do we want more crap looking BLURRY games ? NO WAY.

EDIT: By the way, a good HDTV 32'' costs a bit more than 1000$, xbox 360 can show HD on PC screens too, and HDTV will be in every house in some years. Anyway, i am a gamer, i want the best, who cares if some gamers do not have HDTV, i have and would like to see amazing graphics not blurry stuff as with GC and xbox, is that clear ? I can't support a console that will give blurry graphics in this generation, i want choice to enable high res ones too. By the way you do realise xbox 360 plays on normal tv's too, right ?

nasos_333_basic


Alright. I play San Andreas on lowest graphics settings, lowest draw distance settings, etc, on computer, and I still think it looks damn fine! Why do I do that? Because I only have an onboard graphics card, built into the motherboard. Am I happy with the graphics? Hell yeah!
My Gamecube, which my friend informs me looks ****-house next to his PS2, amazes me in graphics. Games like Metroid prime 2, etc look DAMN fine to me, and they're ALL non-HD.
I dont know how much more realistic you can get to Ghost Recon 2 (plays crappily, but damn good graphics), and its on Standard Definition TV.
Now, you say "A high definition TV only costs a bit more than $1000", well I know that I DONT have the money to spend on something pretty wasteful like that - my normal 60 cm flatscreen gives me great graphics, etc, and it was about $200.
My non-HD Gamecube cost me $179. So my whole setup cost me $379.00 Aussie Dollars. Thats just over 1/3 of the cost of the TV alone (Not taking into account exchange rates, which make mine comparatively even less)  which is required to play the games on the 360 and make them look pretty. Case in point there. However, then you have to buy the console itself, which will set you back $600-800US.
Well. That adds up to $1800.00 US. I could buy a damn good computer for that, and get a lot more fun and more use out of it for that price. That kind of pricing defeats the purpose of the console: to be a cheap, enjoyable platform for entertainment.
Avatar image for nasos_333_basic
nasos_333_basic

2801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 nasos_333_basic
Member since 2002 • 2801 Posts
[QUOTE="nasos_333_basic"]

Under 300$ means 150$. SINCE WHEN ? By the way, do you have a pc. You would know then that setting any game on 640x480 res look like crap compaing to 1024x768 one. So do we want more crap looking BLURRY games ? NO WAY.

EDIT: By the way, a good HDTV 32'' costs a bit more than 1000$, xbox 360 can show HD on PC screens too, and HDTV will be in every house in some years. Anyway, i am a gamer, i want the best, who cares if some gamers do not have HDTV, i have and would like to see amazing graphics not blurry stuff as with GC and xbox, is that clear ? I can't support a console that will give blurry graphics in this generation, i want choice to enable high res ones too. By the way you do realise xbox 360 plays on normal tv's too, right ?

KingWickee



Alright. I play San Andreas on lowest graphics settings, lowest draw distance settings, etc, on computer, and I still think it looks damn fine! Why do I do that? Because I only have an onboard graphics card, built into the motherboard. Am I happy with the graphics? Hell yeah!
My Gamecube, which my friend informs me looks ****-house next to his PS2, amazes me in graphics. Games like Metroid prime 2, etc look DAMN fine to me, and they're ALL non-HD.
I dont know how much more realistic you can get to Ghost Recon 2 (plays crappily, but damn good graphics), and its on Standard Definition TV.
Now, you say "A high definition TV only costs a bit more than $1000", well I know that I DONT have the money to spend on something pretty wasteful like that - my normal 60 cm flatscreen gives me great graphics, etc, and it was about $200.
My non-HD Gamecube cost me $179. So my whole setup cost me $379.00 Aussie Dollars. Thats just over 1/3 of the cost of the TV alone (Not taking into account exchange rates, which make mine comparatively even less)  which is required to play the games on the 360 and make them look pretty. Case in point there. However, then you have to buy the console itself, which will set you back $600-800US.
Well. That adds up to $1800.00 US. I could buy a damn good computer for that, and get a lot more fun and more use out of it for that price. That kind of pricing defeats the purpose of the console: to be a cheap, enjoyable platform for entertainment.

400$ for what xbox360 offers is CHEAP as hell. Even if games are 25$ more expensive than pc ones, still you would have to get 100 games to reach the 2500$ for a pc able to run those games today properly. 100 games are really many.

As for the few HDTV's, anyone with a pc could as well hook xbox up on the screen, and enjoy amazing clarity, so that makes the possible HDTV/pc screen owners a huge percent. By the way, whatever the case, even if you have SD only or HD or PC screen, xbox supports it all. While Rev for users with HDTV's and pc screens will be like connecting xbox 1 to them, which would make anyone with a HDTV SAD

Avatar image for KingWickee
KingWickee

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 KingWickee
Member since 2005 • 2174 Posts
But the rev connects to the PC monitor through the digital-AV connection, I thought...
Doesnt that then make your argument void? You get the "amazing clarity" which is supposedly inherant in HD, yet on something that isnt HD, because a good computer monitor is better than any TV any day. No IFs no Buts, it just is. (not sizewise, unless you use a projector, but picture clarity and preciseness wise).
Avatar image for DriftRS
DriftRS

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 DriftRS
Member since 2004 • 3491 Posts

I don't see what the argument is about.

The XBox360's HD games are definetly going to look better then any SD games, and those who claim they can't tell the difference are either in denial or need to get thier eyes checked. Go play a game like Timesplitters 2, run it in 4 player split-screen, and have a look at how blurry each of those screens are, if you were running it in HD, each screen would be much clearer. As for fullscreen games, it's harder to see it for yourself because unless you've seen a game running in HD, you probably wouldn't realise your missing anything. However, I play both console and PC games, and even older PC games can look better then console games due to being a higher res.

I just thought of something, if you have an N64 or PS1, take it out and play it, notice how blury it looks? It didn't seem that blurry when you first got it, but after playing on the GC and getting used to those graphics, the last generation now look very blurry. You'll find the same thing will happen this comming gen, at least for people or buy a PS3 or 360, they'll get used to the higher res and find games on older systems will look blurry.

Avatar image for KingWickee
KingWickee

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 KingWickee
Member since 2005 • 2174 Posts
[QUOTE="DriftRS"]

The XBox360's HD games are definetly going to look better then any SD games, and those who claim they can't tell the difference are either in denial or need to get thier eyes checked.



Okay, I'll admit it, Im in denial about Microsoft. And Sony, for that matter, lol.
Avatar image for DriftRS
DriftRS

3491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 DriftRS
Member since 2004 • 3491 Posts

[QUOTE="DriftRS"]

The XBox360's HD games are definetly going to look better then any SD games, and those who claim they can't tell the difference are either in denial or need to get thier eyes checked. KingWickee


Okay, I'll admit it, Im in denial about Microsoft. And Sony, for that matter, lol.

lol, it would be nice to get HD, but most of us don't have HD tv's anyway, only thing I'll be in denial about is if we don't get a cool online mode like XBoxLive. However, if we get a cool online mode and it's free, it won't be us in denial :D

Avatar image for nasos_333_basic
nasos_333_basic

2801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 nasos_333_basic
Member since 2002 • 2801 Posts

[QUOTE="KingWickee"] [QUOTE="DriftRS"]

The XBox360's HD games are definetly going to look better then any SD games, and those who claim they can't tell the difference are either in denial or need to get thier eyes checked. DriftRS



Okay, I'll admit it, Im in denial about Microsoft. And Sony, for that matter, lol.

lol, it would be nice to get HD, but most of us don't have HD tv's anyway, only thing I'll be in denial about is if we don't get a cool online mode like XBoxLive. However, if we get a cool online mode and it's free, it won't be us in denial :D

Even if some do not have HDTV

1. They get cheaper all the time, so one could be affordable in near future

2. I would like to have the option if i buy a HDTV later, to be able to play all my games in HD

By the way, the bigger the tv, the worst SD shows, so all those that spends much money on huge HDTV's will see terrible blurry images from Rev, i think that will hurt when comparing to standard 720p of xbox 360 and ps3

Avatar image for jarman_91
jarman_91

620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 jarman_91
Member since 2005 • 620 Posts

who cares about graphics? i sure as hell dont. i mean, would you want a game with the most realistic, best graphics ever, OR a game that is ACTUALLY good, a game that you will enjoy.

That's what i say.

Avatar image for mac1133
mac1133

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 mac1133
Member since 2004 • 216 Posts

who cares about graphics? i sure as hell dont. i mean, would you want a game with the most realistic, best graphics ever, OR a game that is ACTUALLY good, a game that you will enjoy.

That's what i say.

jarman_91
hmmm... well with this day and age, we should be shooting for both. So i say both
Avatar image for chris3116
chris3116

12174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 chris3116
Member since 2003 • 12174 Posts

Nintendo already said you can hook up Revolution to a computer monitor.

http://cube.ign.com/articles/522/522559p2.html

Q: Will Revolution hook up to a television?

A: Yes. It will also be able to interface with a computer monitor. In June 2004 Nintendo engineer Genyo Takeda said: "You'll be able to play [Revolution] not just by linking up to a television but to a computer monitor as well."

For me, computer monitor >>>>>>>> HDTV anytime for the resolutions. Anyway, I'm not a graphic whore. I really don't care about HD. In Canada, HD won't be standard on the Revolution era.

Graphics will be great no doubt about them. As long the world, characters, etc have good drawings, I'll be in heaven. It's the resolution that may be weak not the graphics.

Avatar image for igielty
igielty

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 igielty
Member since 2004 • 168 Posts
While I will still buy The Revolution I must say that the lack of HD is dissapointing.
Avatar image for igielty
igielty

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 igielty
Member since 2004 • 168 Posts

Nintendo already said you can hook up Revolution to a computer monitor.

http://cube.ign.com/articles/522/522559p2.html

Q: Will Revolution hook up to a television?

A: Yes. It will also be able to interface with a computer monitor. In June 2004 Nintendo engineer Genyo Takeda said: "You'll be able to play [Revolution] not just by linking up to a television but to a computer monitor as well."

For me, computer monitor >>>>>>>> HDTV anytime for the resolutions. Anyway, I'm not a graphic whore. I really don't care about HD. In Canada, HD won't be standard on the Revolution era.

Graphics will be great no doubt about them. As long the world, characters, etc have good drawings, I'll be in heaven. It's the resolution that may be weak not the graphics.

chris3116


Correct me if I'm wrong but rven if you can view it in HD on a computer monitor that doesn't matter because the Revolution wont be outputting it in HD.
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts
I really dont care about graphics, the only reason I want the Rev to apply an HD upgrade in the future is to get those casuals who are using this as a reason not to buy it, when they dont even have HDTV :lol:. They most likely will because the presentation of the Rev on Nintendo.com has the person sit down and wave the Revmote at a HDTV, I am pretty sure you there is going to be one.
Avatar image for clarkeyboy21
clarkeyboy21

702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#91 clarkeyboy21
Member since 2006 • 702 Posts
ye!
Avatar image for StigmatTickles
StigmatTickles

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 StigmatTickles
Member since 2005 • 76 Posts
A good hd tv costs 1000 dollars. Yeah, try paying for college, an apartment, AND a thousand dollar HD tv all at once. It's not that easy. Unless your mommy buys you everything. Which wouldn't surprise me. The fact is most families don't have 1000 dollars to throw away on an HD tv. Sorry. Nintendo got it right guys. I'll stick with SD until HDs are cheaper.
Avatar image for stickontheradar
stickontheradar

986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 stickontheradar
Member since 2006 • 986 Posts
ye!clarkeyboy21


you suck......
Avatar image for b11051973
b11051973

7621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 b11051973
Member since 2002 • 7621 Posts
It would take more than a revision to make the Wii HD. It would need a more powerful CPU and GPU. Plus, they would have to up the memory. Don't expect a HD console from Nintendo until the console after the Wii.