http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCzhvNK66nM
it's called anarchy reigns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy_Reigns
it started on the wii...cmon platinum games!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What the heck? I had no idea about this. It's good to see Jack again, although it is weird seeing him in colour.
3. Its likely going to tank at retail on two HD systems with a combined user base of 140+ million, so how on earth does a version for 2 million Wii U owners make any sense?bonesawisready5
ubisoft made assasins creed liberations for vita...and vita games sell like garbage..
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"] 3. Its likely going to tank at retail on two HD systems with a combined user base of 140+ million, so how on earth does a version for 2 million Wii U owners make any sense?KBFloYd
ubisoft made assasins creed liberations for vita...and vita games sell like garbage..
Ubisoft isn't Platinum Games/SEGA so it's irrelevant what they did.
[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"] 3. Its likely going to tank at retail on two HD systems with a combined user base of 140+ million, so how on earth does a version for 2 million Wii U owners make any sense?KBFloYd
ubisoft made assasins creed liberations for vita...and vita games sell like garbage..
Ubisoft has a lot more money than Sega does.wow, this game looks like ballz :( Madworld had so much charm and awesomeness. this game has ONLY Jack, that s not enough. Blue blood?? WTF!!>!?
well technically it would be a late port. and madworld wasn't very good anyway >.>BrunoBRS
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!!!!!!
RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!
now go and ACTUALLY play the game
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]well technically it would be a late port. and madworld wasn't very good anyway >.>kungfool69
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!!!!!!
RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!
now go and ACTUALLY play the game
i played. it's one of the few games i've rented that managed to get me bored after an hour or two. but i pushed on. maybe it gets better, you know? by the time i returned it, i was pretty sick of it. so no, it wasn't very good.[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"] 3. Its likely going to tank at retail on two HD systems with a combined user base of 140+ million, so how on earth does a version for 2 million Wii U owners make any sense?KBFloYd
ubisoft made assasins creed liberations for vita...and vita games sell like garbage..
There's a huge difference between starting development on a exclusive game (that can be ported later) when the Vita wasn't doing badly last year (since it hadn't released yet) and porting a game that is already finished and will sell terribly on a 140 million customer base to a new console with a 2 million customer base. Ubisoft simply got in over their head and didn't know the Vita was going to have poor software sales. They had no choice but to release a finished product that would die at retail, they had invested too much. This is why this scenario is different from Anarchy Reigns. Anarchy Reigns will sell bad and SEGA knows it. They wouldn't have knocked the price down to $30 at launch if they didn't think so. Why spend even $1 million to port it to the Wii U? So it can sell 1/5th what the 360/PS3 version will sell? You know many multi-plats on Wii U like Mass Effect, Assassin's Creed are selling just as bad as most Vita games right? If Anarchy Reigns started development recently then yes, a Wii U version would make sense. At this point it would be like flushing money down the toilet.[QUOTE="kungfool69"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]well technically it would be a late port. and madworld wasn't very good anyway >.>BrunoBRS
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!!!!!!
RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!
now go and ACTUALLY play the game
i played. it's one of the few games i've rented that managed to get me bored after an hour or two. but i pushed on. maybe it gets better, you know? by the time i returned it, i was pretty sick of it. so no, it wasn't very good. There was like.. 5 ways to kill dudes? Yeah, that game was very repetitive. Fun for about an hour or two.[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="kungfool69"]i played. it's one of the few games i've rented that managed to get me bored after an hour or two. but i pushed on. maybe it gets better, you know? by the time i returned it, i was pretty sick of it. so no, it wasn't very good. There was like.. 5 ways to kill dudes? Yeah, that game was very repetitive. Fun for about an hour or two.YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!!!!!!
RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!
now go and ACTUALLY play the game
Litchie
nah, heaps of fun. so much charm and style. the commentators were SOOOOOOOOOOOOO hilarious.
There was like.. 5 ways to kill dudes? Yeah, that game was very repetitive. Fun for about an hour or two.[QUOTE="Litchie"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] i played. it's one of the few games i've rented that managed to get me bored after an hour or two. but i pushed on. maybe it gets better, you know? by the time i returned it, i was pretty sick of it. so no, it wasn't very good.kungfool69
nah, heaps of fun. so much charm and style. the commentators were SOOOOOOOOOOOOO hilarious.
Funny lines didn't overshadow the simplistic and repetitive gameplay. Neither did the charm and lack of colors. But hey, glad you liked it.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment