SpiderMan 3 why?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jukieuk
jukieuk

940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 jukieuk
Member since 2006 • 940 Posts

Why is the wii game smaller then the 360 and the ps3?

why only 5 missions?

why no free roam in the sewers in the wii?

why have we got the same version at the ps2?

Avatar image for creativeminded
creativeminded

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 creativeminded
Member since 2005 • 1729 Posts
no idea...it had potential and failed. it's a shame i was planning on getting this game
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts

Why is the wii game smaller then the 360 and the ps3?

why only 5 missions?

why no free roam in the sewers in the wii?

why have we got the same version at the ps2?

jukieuk

 only 5 missions?

Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts

no idea...it had potential and failed. it's a shame i was planning on getting this gamecreativeminded

I'm officially boycotting Activision. If they think they can pump this crap on the Wii, they've just lost one customer. 

Avatar image for OGTiago
OGTiago

6546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 OGTiago
Member since 2005 • 6546 Posts
because it was rushed to be released when the film came out.
Avatar image for Kikouken
Kikouken

15913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 Kikouken
Member since 2006 • 15913 Posts
Sucks. Thank God I rented it. and I beat it in 4 hours :?
Avatar image for ZeroDemo
ZeroDemo

1026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#8 ZeroDemo
Member since 2006 • 1026 Posts

Why is the wii game smaller then the 360 and the ps3?

why only 5 missions?

why no free roam in the sewers in the wii?

why have we got the same version at the ps2?

jukieuk

I still think its not a bad game.

And I still think games based on movies suck.

Hm, dilemma:)

Avatar image for Dust24311
Dust24311

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Dust24311
Member since 2004 • 1215 Posts

[QUOTE="creativeminded"]no idea...it had potential and failed. it's a shame i was planning on getting this gameBoba_Fett_3710

I'm officially boycotting Activision. If they think they can pump this crap on the Wii, they've just lost one customer. 


I second that boycott.  The world will have 15 million Wii's by december, eclipsing both the PS3 and the x360, and we still get crappy versions of games!!!???  Activision will hopefully learn by then!
Avatar image for jukieuk
jukieuk

940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 jukieuk
Member since 2006 • 940 Posts

because it was rushed to be released when the film came out.OGTiago

 

But the 360 and the ps3 were rushed and has 10 missions, so why did we get 5

Avatar image for OGTiago
OGTiago

6546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#11 OGTiago
Member since 2005 • 6546 Posts

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]because it was rushed to be released when the film came out.jukieuk

 

But the 360 and the ps3 were rushed and has 10 missions, so why did we get 5

I dunno, maybe they started later...
Avatar image for Conjuration
Conjuration

3562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 Conjuration
Member since 2006 • 3562 Posts
Activision has always been the definition of meh.  They spent all their money on the Marvel license and got nothing left to make any decent games.  Activision is one of my most loathed game companies.  Their name is synonymous with crap. 

It really is too bad about Spider Man 3.  The IGN review said the game had alot of really cool ideas, but graphically and technically it failed to do its job.  The only part of the review that angered me a little was when they said "...or blame the technical limitations of the Wii hardware if you'd prefer."  That is an idiotic statement.  IMO that just shows pure bias on the part of the reviewer (Matt Casamassina).  We've got hardware here that's capable of what, something like 12 - 15 times the graphical power of the GC, and we're supposed to blame Nintedo's machine for Activisions hack job?
Nice try Matt, now go to bed.
Avatar image for fluffers623
fluffers623

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#13 fluffers623
Member since 2007 • 1769 Posts
got lucky there. i was at sams ready to buy it but said na not worth it
Avatar image for Morgario
Morgario

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Morgario
Member since 2005 • 2534 Posts

Vicarious Visions developed Spiderman 3 from the ground up for the Wii, it's not a PS2 port at all. And the story mode is less than half the overall game anyway and it's still a good length at 5 missions. I've put 18 hours into my game so far and I'm 70% complete.

I'm leaving these boards soon they've gone sooooo down hill, before the Wii became super popular this board was used for discussing/debating theories and ideas about the console and games. Now they just seem to be full of complainers who think it makes them sound clever if they're hypercritical towards games they haven't even played. And what's the average of the posters here now? I only ask this because of the huge amount of bandwagon jumping that goes on, which is a trait I associate with young children. Seriously, one person makes a negative comment and then it spreads with loads of posters parroting the same comments and criticisms; it's a vicious cycle. This post isn't aimed at anyone specifically.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

Good for you, leave please.

 As for the game, I'm disappointed at the differences between the systems also.  It really is about making games for the big 2 and then dumbing it down fo rthe Wii, but tha tmay change once developers start actually making games for the Wii and converting them to the other systems.  if that ever happens, we will see good stuff.

Avatar image for Morgario
Morgario

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Morgario
Member since 2005 • 2534 Posts

Good for you, leave please.

 As for the game, I'm disappointed at the differences between the systems also.  It really is about making games for the big 2 and then dumbing it down fo rthe Wii, but tha tmay change once developers start actually making games for the Wii and converting them to the other systems.  if that ever happens, we will see good stuff.

Phazevariance

Lol you make my point perfectly, you probably haven't even played the game and your trashing it. You obviously haven't looked into the game either otherwise you'd know they built the Wii version from the ground up for the Wii, it's not a dumbed-down port in any way shape or form. The two versions of the game were developed separately so there's nothing saying the missions/chapters are the same length, they could be twice as long in the Wii version for all we know (I haven't played the PS3/360 version).

Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
I honestly believe the reasno the game turned out so bad was because they were pressed to release it with the other games.  Wii games take more work because you have to focus on gameplay AS WELL AS the controls (since the Wiimote is unique, it takes more time to get the controls together).  If they had more time to develop, it would have came out better.
Avatar image for RyanWare
RyanWare

12113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 RyanWare
Member since 2002 • 12113 Posts

Why is the wii game smaller then the 360 and the ps3?

why only 5 missions?

why no free roam in the sewers in the wii?

why have we got the same version at the ps2?

jukieuk

Don't get mad, but... in case you haven't noticed, the Wii is closer to the PS2 than the PS3/360 in terms of hardware power. If you're expecting the Wii to be able to handle PS3/360 games, then you're going to be disappointed. Sure, the Wii will get PS3/360 ports, but the games will be downgraded a lot to work on the Wii.

Avatar image for coltonnaslund
coltonnaslund

3793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 coltonnaslund
Member since 2005 • 3793 Posts
according to gamerankings.....right now the reviews are better on Wii then PS3 and 360.......
Avatar image for andyrulesliver
andyrulesliver

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 andyrulesliver
Member since 2005 • 436 Posts

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]because it was rushed to be released when the film came out.jukieuk

because they know that brats at the cinema will be craving the game, beg their parents until they get it so they release a half hearted game, same price but with less level. Still meaning that they get the audience but also meaning that te game sucks...

 

But the 360 and the ps3 were rushed and has 10 missions, so why did we get 5

Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts

Sucks. Thank God I rented it. and I beat it in 4 hours :?Kikouken

 wow, so much for this being a game I wanted to buy

Avatar image for santanablu3
santanablu3

1467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 santanablu3
Member since 2007 • 1467 Posts

Vicarious Visions developed Spiderman 3 from the ground up for the Wii, it's not a PS2 port at all. And the story mode is less than half the overall game anyway and it's still a good length at 5 missions. I've put 18 hours into my game so far and I'm 70% complete.

I'm leaving these boards soon they've gone sooooo down hill, before the Wii became super popular this board was used for discussing/debating theories and ideas about the console and games. Now they just seem to be full of complainers who think it makes them sound clever if they're hypercritical towards games they haven't even played. And what's the average of the posters here now? I only ask this because of the huge amount of bandwagon jumping that goes on, which is a trait I associate with young children. Seriously, one person makes a negative comment and then it spreads with loads of posters parroting the same comments and criticisms; it's a vicious cycle. This post isn't aimed at anyone specifically.

Morgario
i Agree with you 2.... the game isnt bad at all but not the best.
Avatar image for LavisFiend
LavisFiend

150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 LavisFiend
Member since 2007 • 150 Posts

Just wait for my review that I will be writing up preety soon to get my true hands on idea of the game. The pros and cons if you will.

So far, there is just way too much hate against it. I think it is preety decent.

Avatar image for Morgario
Morgario

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Morgario
Member since 2005 • 2534 Posts

[QUOTE="Kikouken"]Sucks. Thank God I rented it. and I beat it in 4 hours :?kidrock17xp

 wow, so much for this being a game I wanted to buy

I've put 20 hours into the game so far and I'm 80% complete. He's obviously just talking about completing the story section which only counts for about 50% of the game and takes a lot less time than fully upgrading spidey, defeating the gangs, unlocking venom and black suit etc. I don't know what the TC is talking about any way, the "story progress" section of my game say it's devided up into 24 chapters/missions.

Avatar image for ImajinMyFX
ImajinMyFX

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ImajinMyFX
Member since 2006 • 564 Posts
man .. the previous two spidermans were crap. can't believe some of you bought it. just got the wii this sunday and i was tempted to get the wii/spiderman deal at toys r us but i said to myself "let me wait till gamespot has a score" ... thank god i didn't buy it after seeing the 4.6 or what ever it was
Avatar image for jonathan_rector
jonathan_rector

2734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 jonathan_rector
Member since 2003 • 2734 Posts
The game and movie sucked equally.