This topic is locked from further discussion.
It will be a bad game
The people in charge of it have shown it's users that they're unable to make a good game
Pretty much an invalid statementHow do you know? you already played it? How can you honestly bash a game without playing it or even seeing it in action?[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="Elian2530"] This. It will be trash.Jaysonguy
How?
The people making the game have made garbage and nothing but garbage on the console
You don't need to look too far to see one of their "creations" on the Wii and whatever you happen to run into is a bad game. It's not like these devs have made anything good on the console so yeah, we know how it's going to be.
It's clear that Sega knows that instead of using one of their top tier devs on the Wii they can use High Voltage and let the cards fall where they may.
In the bargain bin
The Conduit got a 72% score on GameRankings, that pretty much destroys your argument stating that its a garbage game. Conduit 2 outline the improvements and it seems to be promising.[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] How do you know? you already played it? How can you honestly bash a game without playing it or even seeing it in action? LastRambo341
How?
The people making the game have made garbage and nothing but garbage on the console
You don't need to look too far to see one of their "creations" on the Wii and whatever you happen to run into is a bad game. It's not like these devs have made anything good on the console so yeah, we know how it's going to be.
It's clear that Sega knows that instead of using one of their top tier devs on the Wii they can use High Voltage and let the cards fall where they may.
In the bargain bin
The Conduit got a 72% score on GameRankings, that pretty much destroys your argument stating that its a garbage game. Conduit 2 outline the improvements and it seems to be promising. In terms of score, some games which got higher than it (on both GS and Gamerankings) include Far Cry Instincts Predator, Shrek 2, and NASCAR 07. Come on like... the Wii isn't that bad, you don't need to defend complete rubbish....It will be a bad game
The people in charge of it have shown it's users that they're unable to make a good game
Jaysonguy
Look at the Killzone franchise.
The first game was s**t, the second game was as close to perfect as a game can get. Both games made buy the same company, Gorilla.
I can mention more game franchises that started as extremely bad games and then turned into great games. Like Resident Evil. First 3 games where very bad, but the 4th game was one of the best in existance.
Conduit 2 will be a good game as long as the issues with the first game are resolved. Like when you fight the same enemies over and over, no real boss battles, its failure to keep up with the times by not being very cinematic. If the entire game resembles the first level, shown at E3, in terms of being an exciting cinematic game, then there is a chance for greatness.
Though, I think Goldeneye will be slightly better. Mainly because it looks as though it will run with double the frame rate as Conduit 2, which is very important if your ganna play with the Wii Remote and nunchuck. That one I got pre-ordered, with Gold Classic controller, just because I can.
How do you know? you already played it? How can you honestly bash a game without playing it or even seeing it in action?[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="Elian2530"] This. It will be trash.Jaysonguy
How?
The people making the game have made garbage and nothing but garbage on the console
You don't need to look too far to see one of their "creations" on the Wii and whatever you happen to run into is a bad game. It's not like these devs have made anything good on the console so yeah, we know how it's going to be.
It's clear that Sega knows that instead of using one of their top tier devs on the Wii they can use High Voltage and let the cards fall where they may.
In the bargain bin
I respectfully disagree.
It will be a bad game
The people in charge of it have shown it's users that they're unable to make a good game
Pretty much an invalid statement What good game did they develop? If you mean the Conduit then you must be very new to the FPS genre.It will be a bad game
The people in charge of it have shown it's users that they're unable to make a good game
Pretty much an invalid statement What good game did they develop? If you mean the Conduit then you must be very new to the FPS genre. They made a baseball game that scored AAA here.[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] Pretty much an invalid statementOreoMilkshakeWhat good game did they develop? If you mean the Conduit then you must be very new to the FPS genre. They made a baseball game that scored AAA here.
Ten years ago, which means that "they" probably aren't even employed there anymore.
They made a baseball game that scored AAA here.[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] What good game did they develop? If you mean the Conduit then you must be very new to the FPS genre. GabuEx
Ten years ago, which means that "they" probably aren't even employed there anymore.
Just answering his question. I agree that the company sucks.Really guys i din't think the first was all that bad, didn't deserve the frosty reception it got.It was too heavily compared to COD, and Halo, which are cleaner, more polished franchises which know what too do.
As far a this on gos, I'll buy it scincei enjoyed the first. And for those who worry about glitches coming back. Don't.. High Volatage would have to be THE STUPPIDEST company ever to not fix those glitches. I do not want to be auto smaw stormed again.
It will be a bad game
The people in charge of it have shown it's users that they're unable to make a good game
Pretty much an invalid statement What good game did they develop? If you mean the Conduit then you must be very new to the FPS genre. The Conduit was a decent game and this is coming from a guy who grew up playing CS: Source, Quake, Doom and Unreal Tournament. Nice conclusion jump ;)[QUOTE="LastRambo341"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]The Conduit got a 72% score on GameRankings, that pretty much destroys your argument stating that its a garbage game. Conduit 2 outline the improvements and it seems to be promising. In terms of score, some games which got higher than it (on both GS and Gamerankings) include Far Cry Instincts Predator, Shrek 2, and NASCAR 07. Come on like... the Wii isn't that bad, you don't need to defend complete rubbish....How?
The people making the game have made garbage and nothing but garbage on the console
You don't need to look too far to see one of their "creations" on the Wii and whatever you happen to run into is a bad game. It's not like these devs have made anything good on the console so yeah, we know how it's going to be.
It's clear that Sega knows that instead of using one of their top tier devs on the Wii they can use High Voltage and let the cards fall where they may.
In the bargain bin
locopatho
What you said was completely irrelevant to my topic and didn't mean any logical sense.
In terms of score, some games which got higher than it (on both GS and Gamerankings) include Far Cry Instincts Predator, Shrek 2, and NASCAR 07. Come on like... the Wii isn't that bad, you don't need to defend complete rubbish....[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="LastRambo341"] The Conduit got a 72% score on GameRankings, that pretty much destroys your argument stating that its a garbage game. Conduit 2 outline the improvements and it seems to be promising.LastRambo341
What you said was completely irrelevant to my topic and didn't mean any logical sense.
So are the three games I named good games?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment