TIRED of the ATTITUDE Gamespot seems to have towards the Wii ? ........ BE HEARD

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Mostly I am upset with the fact that there are many great Wii games on this site that are not even being reviewed. Games like PES,Rune Factory Frontier, Dawn of Discovery, Tiger Woods 10, Rock Band 2 are all highly critically acclaimed games on the Wii, yet Gamespot does not feel it is a priority to reveiw these titles. Many Wii reviews have not only been lacking in quality, but are very late or missed altogether. I feel this is a great indignity to the developers who have worked so hard on these games.

I'm a Wii owner and I'm tired of Wii not being treated with the same level of importance as the other consoles. When we're getting reviews for a game like COD WaW a month after the other consoles get reviews for the same game, there's a problem.

I have started a thread in the site enhancements and feedback area of this board and several moderators are already participating in this disscusion. I welcome all posts on this subject matter. Here is the thread:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26929316&tag=topics;title

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
rune factory's still not reviewed? that's a problem
Avatar image for Captain-Pants
Captain-Pants

3533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Captain-Pants
Member since 2005 • 3533 Posts

The attitude would exist without the Wii, it is the anti-Nintendo treatment. It thrives mostly on internet forums, it doesn't represent popular opinion, it doesn't represent the critic community. It generally represents the opinion of opposing fanboys, the gaming ignorant, and insecure children.

BTW

Gamespot is one of the worst sites to use as a Wii gaming reference.

Avatar image for Km0n
Km0n

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Km0n
Member since 2008 • 337 Posts

The attitude would exist without the Wii, it is the anti-Nintendo treatment. It thrives mostly on internet forums, it doesn't represent popular opinion, it doesn't represent the critic community. It generally represents the opinion of opposing fanboys, the gaming ignorant, and insecure children.

BTW

Gamespot is one of the worst sites to use as a Wii gaming reference.

Captain-Pants

true i like ign better

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

You are right Gamespot is mistreating the wii and it must be stopped. I don't trust gamespot's editer reviews anyways.

Avatar image for fireforge_basic
fireforge_basic

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fireforge_basic
Member since 2002 • 106 Posts
The 1800's and 1900's great people fought racism, classim and sexism. Today we fight the great peril of our generation, consolism.
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts

You are right Gamespot is mistreating the wii and it must be stopped. I don't trust gamespot's editer reviews anyways.

Burning-Sludge
wow your sig is.... a little creepy i love it tho
Avatar image for snowman6251
snowman6251

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 snowman6251
Member since 2006 • 5321 Posts

The attitude would exist without the Wii, it is the anti-Nintendo treatment. It thrives mostly on internet forums, it doesn't represent popular opinion, it doesn't represent the critic community. It generally represents the opinion of opposing fanboys, the gaming ignorant, and insecure children.

BTW

Gamespot is one of the worst sites to use as a Wii gaming reference.

Captain-Pants
which is why its such a shame they have the best forums. I'd like to use IGN because GS is crap at reviewing for the wii but 1. their forums suck and 2. I can't navigate the site. Its like they built a labyrinth to lock up some minotaurs over there. (mythology joke har har har)
Avatar image for kardine
kardine

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 kardine
Member since 2008 • 2863 Posts

[QUOTE="Captain-Pants"]

The attitude would exist without the Wii, it is the anti-Nintendo treatment. It thrives mostly on internet forums, it doesn't represent popular opinion, it doesn't represent the critic community. It generally represents the opinion of opposing fanboys, the gaming ignorant, and insecure children.

BTW

Gamespot is one of the worst sites to use as a Wii gaming reference.

Km0n

true i like ign better

IGN and GoNintendo ARE the sites for Wii coverage. I do not think GS is teh biased against the Wii, but they do ignore many good games and do not review them. They need to get their priorities right.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
dont forget to mention they're mostly biased. that's why i buy gaming magazines... and dont check GS reviews (well, i see the emblems and the "good & bad" and the subtitles for the pics :P)
Avatar image for Boomarley
Boomarley

897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 Boomarley
Member since 2006 • 897 Posts

I wish that you would tone down the emotional rhetoric, though. Making a thread titled "Kind of tired of the derogatory attitude against Nintendo." gives a bad first impression to the GS staff that isn't necessary when you could merely cite the fact that certain game reviews are severely delayed and scores tend to be lower than the Gamerankings average. Personally, I feel that the latter is something GS has always been doing, but that justification doesn't change the fact.

Avatar image for AlmightyDerek
AlmightyDerek

4144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AlmightyDerek
Member since 2002 • 4144 Posts

Yeah I normally don't care about this kinda stuff, but Gamespot's coverage Wii coverage is horibble. I'm a paying member and I get ripped off every year. The only reason I payed this year was because the credit card I had registered was expired so I figured they would just cancel my subscription, but nope they charged an expired card anyway. They average like 5 Wii reviews a month. They reviewed the 360 version of Tiger Woods before the Wii version. That's just wrong. Like everyone else I only come here for the forums. IGN and GoNintendo are infinitly better for Nintendo coverage. Either Gamespot hates the Wii, their Wii is broke and can't afford to fix it, or they are severly understaffed. If the latter is the case hire me, I need some money bad to cover my useless subscription fee.

Avatar image for blankshore
blankshore

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#13 blankshore
Member since 2008 • 1809 Posts

The real problem is that GS seems to be ignoring the quality titles and only reviewing the poor titles. Would anyone have cared if they didn't review Up? Or Night at the Museam? Or Indiana Jones? No. But they ignore all the critically acclaimed titles, as if they want the Wii to look bad. GS's reviews are also highly minimalistic, and boring. They put almost no personality into their Wii reviews, as if they're affraid that showing any interest in a Wii game makes them less "hardcore". GS needs to get over themselves, and start acting like proper journalists. I have never seen a site that attracts so many immature system-hating fanboys. And it's not surprising--the site is run by them.

Avatar image for Luigi12901
Luigi12901

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#14 Luigi12901
Member since 2009 • 1243 Posts

I just read Nintendo Power...there reviews are much better (and timely).

Avatar image for yeahyeahbigN
yeahyeahbigN

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 yeahyeahbigN
Member since 2007 • 1345 Posts

Yeah...I have stopped waiting on their reviews for a Wii game a long time ago. I mean, where have you been, you know this place takes forever or never for a Wii game. :( And if anything, it seems like they DON'T like the Wii anyway.

Avatar image for Makedonijo
Makedonijo

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Makedonijo
Member since 2007 • 351 Posts

its obviously that they dont care about wii.. ive posted this in topics before.. like you are saying they take so long to review games.. basically the only reason most wii owners come here is for the forums

Avatar image for gronk-bonk
gronk-bonk

1951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 gronk-bonk
Member since 2008 • 1951 Posts

i only use gamespot for forums and unions, everyone here mostly respects one another. Other sites slay u if ur a wii fan boy ( ahm gt)

Avatar image for boba707
boba707

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 boba707
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts
COD WAW for wii was not reviewed for months after its released but PS3 and 360 versions were reviewed shortly after release. i think GSs problem is that they dont have editors for Wii, PS3 and 360 or not like IGN, ign has fanboys for every system that do good reviews
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

I wish that you would tone down the emotional rhetoric, though. Making a thread titled "Kind of tired of the derogatory attitude against Nintendo." gives a bad first impression to the GS staff that isn't necessary when you could merely cite the fact that certain game reviews are severely delayed and scores tend to be lower than the Gamerankings average. Personally, I feel that the latter is something GS has always been doing, but that justification doesn't change the fact.

Boomarley

I have edited the emotionally driven aspects of my post out at your advice.

I will continue to take suggestions from the posters here if they feel I should include anything else in the OP at the Site Enhancements and Feedback board.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

COD WAW for wii was not reviewed for months after its released but PS3 and 360 versions were reviewed shortly after release. i think GSs problem is that they dont have editors for Wii, PS3 and 360 or not like IGN, ign has fanboys for every system that do good reviewsboba707
Cod WaW sold over a million copies and was a huge game on the Wii. For the life of me I dont understand how a game of this magnitude along with PES 09 for the Wii arent a first priority.

Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
Not to mention that Wii reviews on Gamespot are significantly lower than the collective aveage on Gamerankings or Metacritic.redfordo
Actually, this is the reason why I read GS reviews. They're more critical than other sites, so you usually get a better picture of the game's flaws. The mere fact that their reviews are lower than the average doesn't demonstrate that anything is wrong. It's kind of odd to bring this up. Also, I really don't see how their reviews have been lacking in quality. If you're going to make allegations, you need to provide examples or else your feedback will be overlooked.
Avatar image for kardine
kardine

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 kardine
Member since 2008 • 2863 Posts
COD WAW for wii was not reviewed for months after its released but PS3 and 360 versions were reviewed shortly after release. i think GSs problem is that they dont have editors for Wii, PS3 and 360 or not like IGN, ign has fanboys for every system that do good reviewsboba707
If they were fanboys they would be doing bad reviews.
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]Not to mention that Wii reviews on Gamespot are significantly lower than the collective aveage on Gamerankings or Metacritic.clicketyclick
Actually, this is the reason why I read GS reviews. They're more critical than other sites, so you usually get a better picture of the game's flaws. The mere fact that their reviews are lower than the average doesn't demonstrate that anything is wrong. It's kind of odd to bring this up. Also, I really don't see how their reviews have been lacking in quality. If you're going to make allegations, you need to provide examples or else your feedback will be overlooked.

The quality of Gamespot Wii reviews is my own personal opinion therefore I left it out of my linked thread. I have to say though I disagree with you, I've heard so many stupid reasons as to why Gamespot has docked Wii game scores for completely mundane reasons from lack of Mii support, to lack of online in games that it has no place in.

As far as Gamerankings are concerned, Wii Gamespot game scores are usually among the lowest from all sources and over the past two years that has not been the case for either the 360 and PS3. There has been a growing disparity between Wii reviews and the reviews of games on other consoles since Kasavin left.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
Wii games averaging 70% or higher at Gamerankings that Gamespot hasn't reviewed: Rune Factory Frontier (82%) Pro Evolution Soccer 2009 (86%) Guilty Gear XX Accent Core Plus (76%) Tiger Woods PGA Tour 10 (89%) The Conduit (81%) I know this one just came out. New Play Control Pikmin (79%) New Play Control Pikmin 2 (80%) New Play Control Donkey Kong Jungle Beat (81%) Virtua Tennis 2009 (81%) Dawn of Discovery (82%) Overlord: Dark Legend (72%) A few points: a some of those games just came out, and some are only out in Europe. And I know someone is going to say that the NPC games don't count because they're just GC games, but so was RE4. And DK Jungle Beat even has new levels. The point is that Gamespot is not doing all it can to inform Wii gamers about purchases. I know the review staff is small at the moment, but there's no reason the Wii should be the only one getting neglected. I can't think of any PS3 or 360 games that were well-received elsewhere that went unreviewed here for more than a week or two.
Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts

As far as Gamerankings are concerned, Wii Gamespot game scores are usually among the lowest from all sources and over the past two years that has not been the case for either the 360 and PS3. There has been a growing disparity between Wii reviews and the reviews of games on other consoles since Kasavin left.

redfordo
That may be true, but what does it indicate? Maybe it indicates that only the Wii reviews have stayed properly critical, whereas the pressure exerted on reviewers of PS3 and 360 games is much higher because they're typically reviewing big-budget games with big-name publishers. There's a tendency in the industry to consider 7.0 the new 5.0, and I think any game review section that resists that tendency is doing something right.
Avatar image for kardine
kardine

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 kardine
Member since 2008 • 2863 Posts
[QUOTE="redfordo"]

As far as Gamerankings are concerned, Wii Gamespot game scores are usually among the lowest from all sources and over the past two years that has not been the case for either the 360 and PS3. There has been a growing disparity between Wii reviews and the reviews of games on other consoles since Kasavin left.

clicketyclick
That may be true, but what does it indicate? Maybe it indicates that only the Wii reviews have stayed properly critical, whereas the pressure exerted on reviewers of PS3 and 360 games is much higher because they're typically reviewing big-budget games with big-name publishers. There's a tendency in the industry to consider 7.0 the new 5.0, and I think any game review section that resists that tendency is doing something right.

While I agree this is not as dire as the TC is making it, what your saying is really a stretch. That ONLY the Wii reviews are the honest ones so the PC, PS3, PSP, and 360 reviews are truly the skewed reviews. I don't think so, if so it would have been easily noticed with what the reviewers said in those reviews. Being overly strict for the sake of being strict is not good. Giving the game what it deserves not strict or lenient is how a review should be seen.
Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts

While I agree this is not as dire as the TC is making it, what your saying is really a stretch. That ONLY the Wii reviews are the honest ones so the PC, PS3, PSP, and 360 reviews are truly the skewed reviews. I don't think so, if so it would have been easily noticed with what the reviewers said in those reviews. Being overly strict for the sake of being strict is not good. Giving the game what it deserves not strict or lenient is how a review should be seen.kardine

I don't know about the PC. I think we're just talking about 360 and PS3. IF GS's DS, PSP, GC, PS2, and Xbox or a majority of those listed also have average GS scores that are lower than the metacritic averages, then I think we are talking about inflated PS3 and 360 marks, not overly strict Wii reviews.

As I recall though, GS is under the MC average for all three current platforms. They're just generally more demanding across the board. It could be the case that Wii reviews are more under the average than for the other two platforms. All I'm saying is that you can't use metacritic to determine what their opinion and scores should be.

Also, go back to the OT Lounge. I want to talk about The office!

Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

Dude who are you to police how ppl feel about there own games....in the end the only critic you can really trust is you...rent the game play it and if you enjoy it then buy if not then u saved yourself $50 easy as that. Dont start getting onto other cause u cant make up your own mind come now!

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

As far as Gamerankings are concerned, Wii Gamespot game scores are usually among the lowest from all sources and over the past two years that has not been the case for either the 360 and PS3. There has been a growing disparity between Wii reviews and the reviews of games on other consoles since Kasavin left.

clicketyclick

That may be true, but what does it indicate? Maybe it indicates that only the Wii reviews have stayed properly critical, whereas the pressure exerted on reviewers of PS3 and 360 games is much higher because they're typically reviewing big-budget games with big-name publishers. There's a tendency in the industry to consider 7.0 the new 5.0, and I think any game review section that resists that tendency is doing something right.

I made sure not to throw down any accusations in my OP. I simply stated that GS reviews for the Wii were proportionally lower than those seen on Gamerankings and the other platforms. I personally feel that Wii titles have not been getting a fair shake since the departure of Greg, but I am keeping my opinions out of this and sticking with the facts.

Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
I made sure not to throw down any accusations in my OP. I simply stated that GS reviews for the Wii were proportionally lower than those seen on Gamerankings and the other platforms. I personally feel that Wii titles have not been getting a fair shake since the departure of Greg, but I am keeping my opinions out of this and sticking with the facts.redfordo
Ya, but facts alone don't make an argument. Presumably, you think the facts you bring up show a pattern of dismissiveness to Wii games and you want this changed. What does bringing up GR scores contribute to this argument?
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

Dude who are you to police how ppl feel about there own games....in the end the only critic you can really trust is you...rent the game play it and if you enjoy it then buy if not then u saved yourself $50 easy as that. Dont start getting onto other cause u cant make up your own mind come now!

MadSavage22

As a member of this site and a Wii owner, I am more than entiteld to expect timely reviews for the games on my console, and we absolutley have the right to complain when games on our platform aren't even being reviewed.

Avatar image for kardine
kardine

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 kardine
Member since 2008 • 2863 Posts

[QUOTE="kardine"] While I agree this is not as dire as the TC is making it, what your saying is really a stretch. That ONLY the Wii reviews are the honest ones so the PC, PS3, PSP, and 360 reviews are truly the skewed reviews. I don't think so, if so it would have been easily noticed with what the reviewers said in those reviews. Being overly strict for the sake of being strict is not good. Giving the game what it deserves not strict or lenient is how a review should be seen.clicketyclick

I don't know about the PC. I think we're just talking about 360 and PS3. IF GS's DS, PSP, GC, PS2, and Xbox or a majority of those listed also have average GS scores that are lower than the metacritic averages, then I think we are talking about inflated PS3 and 360 marks, not overly strict Wii reviews.

As I recall though, GS is under the MC average for all three current platforms. They're just generally more demanding across the board. It could be the case that Wii reviews are more under the average than for the other two platforms. All I'm saying is that you can't use metacritic to determine what their opinion and scores should be.

Also, go back to the OT Lounge. I want to talk about The office!

But how much more are Wii games lower than the other platforms? Thats the question. Even if it was significantly lower it may not "prove" GS is biased against the , but it is an indication.
Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts
[QUOTE="kardine"] But how much more are Wii games lower than the other platforms? Thats the question. Even if it was significantly lower it may not "prove" GS is biased against the , but it is an indication.

Ya, facts are lacking. I'm willing to do this calculation some time later in the week. There is something very soothing about making Excel spreadsheets. ^_^
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]I made sure not to throw down any accusations in my OP. I simply stated that GS reviews for the Wii were proportionally lower than those seen on Gamerankings and the other platforms. I personally feel that Wii titles have not been getting a fair shake since the departure of Greg, but I am keeping my opinions out of this and sticking with the facts.clicketyclick
Ya, but facts alone don't make an argument. Presumably, you think the facts you bring up show a pattern of dismissiveness to Wii games and you want this changed. What does bringing up GR scores contribute to this argument?

I feel it needs to be said. You can look through this thread and see that both of those are issues to people on this board. Whether or not you agree doesnt change the fact that many here do.

Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

Dude who are you to police how ppl feel about there own games....in the end the only critic you can really trust is you...rent the game play it and if you enjoy it then buy if not then u saved yourself $50 easy as that. Dont start getting onto other cause u cant make up your own mind come now!

redfordo

As a member of this site and a Wii owner, I am more than entiteld to expect timely reviews for the games on my console, and we absolutley have the right to complain when games on our platform aren't even being reviewed.

AHAHA You know what your right I totally forgot that this is the only website that reviews games lol..What was I thinking I mean owning a Wii totally give you the right to complain LMAO. Man where did you come from this is great! I needed that laugh lol.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="kardine"] But how much more are Wii games lower than the other platforms? Thats the question. Even if it was significantly lower it may not "prove" GS is biased against the , but it is an indication.clicketyclick
Ya, facts are lacking. I'm willing to do this calculation some time later in the week. There is something very soothing about making Excel spreadsheets. ^_^

Actually that would be great. Make sure to post it when you have it complete. Thanks.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

Dude who are you to police how ppl feel about there own games....in the end the only critic you can really trust is you...rent the game play it and if you enjoy it then buy if not then u saved yourself $50 easy as that. Dont start getting onto other cause u cant make up your own mind come now!

MadSavage22

As a member of this site and a Wii owner, I am more than entiteld to expect timely reviews for the games on my console, and we absolutley have the right to complain when games on our platform aren't even being reviewed.

AHAHA You know what your right I totally forgot that this is the only website that reviews games lol..What was I thinking I mean owning a Wii totally give you the right to complain LMAO. Man where did you come from this is great! I needed that laugh lol.

The fact that I can go to other sites is completely irrelavant. If Gamespot stopped reviewing games altogether, people wouldnt have the right to complain, many of which are paying members, just because they could go to another site?

Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

[QUOTE="redfordo"]As a member of this site and a Wii owner, I am more than entiteld to expect timely reviews for the games on my console, and we absolutley have the right to complain when games on our platform aren't even being reviewed.

redfordo

AHAHA You know what your right I totally forgot that this is the only website that reviews games lol..What was I thinking I mean owning a Wii totally give you the right to complain LMAO. Man where did you come from this is great! I needed that laugh lol.

The fact that I can go to other sites is completely irrelavant. If Gamespot stopped reviewing games altogether, people wouldnt have the right to complain, many of which are paying members, just because they could go to another site?

what Im trying to get across is that you dont have much of an argument. If your paying for a service that isnt fullfilling its perpous you get rid of it. Same here if Gamespot isnt up to snuff then you are free to stop paying and go somewhere else. Your not FORCED to come here online. You coming here is just wasting time. Look its not that I dont see what your trying to do and believe me I know your intent is good but its making us look bad. Making us look like were trying fight some power or something cause we are slaves to its reviews LOL. You just need to calm down and take advice from ppl who enjoy the wii and know what wii fans are looking for. This isnt the place for this convo and this isnt the place for you. It would be much less of a hassel to move on to somewheres else to get ur opinion.

Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

what Im trying to get across is that you dont have much of an argument. If your paying for a service that isnt fullfilling its perpous you get rid of it. Same here if Gamespot isnt up to snuff then you are free to stop paying and go somewhere else. Your not FORCED to come here online. You coming here is just wasting time. Look its not that I dont see what your trying to do and believe me I know your intent is good but its making us look bad. Making us look like were trying fight some power or something cause we are slaves to its reviews LOL. You just need to calm down and take advice from ppl who enjoy the wii and know what wii fans are looking for. This isnt the place for this convo and this isnt the place for you. It would be much less of a hassel to move on to somewheres else to get ur opinion.

clicketyclick

TL;DR version: We dunt like ur kind round these parts, redfordo. Better be movin it alawng if u dunt want no trouble... :roll:

0.0....say what!?

Avatar image for clicketyclick
clicketyclick

7136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 clicketyclick
Member since 2008 • 7136 Posts

[QUOTE="clicketyclick"][QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

what Im trying to get across is that you dont have much of an argument. If your paying for a service that isnt fullfilling its perpous you get rid of it. Same here if Gamespot isnt up to snuff then you are free to stop paying and go somewhere else. Your not FORCED to come here online. You coming here is just wasting time. Look its not that I dont see what your trying to do and believe me I know your intent is good but its making us look bad. Making us look like were trying fight some power or something cause we are slaves to its reviews LOL. You just need to calm down and take advice from ppl who enjoy the wii and know what wii fans are looking for. This isnt the place for this convo and this isnt the place for you. It would be much less of a hassel to move on to somewheres else to get ur opinion.

MadSavage22

TL;DR version: We dunt like ur kind round these parts, redfordo. Better be movin it alawng if u dunt want no trouble... :roll:

0.0....say what!?

You told him that "this isnt the place for you" and that he should "move on to somewheres else". I think I summarised your general sentiment pretty well.
Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

AHAHA You know what your right I totally forgot that this is the only website that reviews games lol..What was I thinking I mean owning a Wii totally give you the right to complain LMAO. Man where did you come from this is great! I needed that laugh lol.

MadSavage22

The fact that I can go to other sites is completely irrelavant. If Gamespot stopped reviewing games altogether, people wouldnt have the right to complain, many of which are paying members, just because they could go to another site?

what Im trying to get across is that you dont have much of an argument. If your paying for a service that isnt fullfilling its perpous you get rid of it. Same here if Gamespot isnt up to snuff then you are free to stop paying and go somewhere else. Your not FORCED to come here online. You coming here is just wasting time. Look its not that I dont see what your trying to do and believe me I know your intent is good but its making us look bad. Making us look like were trying fight some power or something cause we are slaves to its reviews LOL. You just need to calm down and take advice from ppl who enjoy the wii and know what wii fans are looking for. This isnt the place for this convo and this isnt the place for you. It would be much less of a hassel to move on to somewheres else to get ur opinion.

Not to be hasty, but I'm going to stay here and continue to argue this whether you like or not. As a paying customer on this board I expect prompt reviews and I dont want to have to cancel my account and going elsewhere. It's my right to post my opinion just as its within your right not to support it.

Avatar image for redfordo
redfordo

262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 redfordo
Member since 2009 • 262 Posts

[QUOTE="clicketyclick"][QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

what Im trying to get across is that you dont have much of an argument. If your paying for a service that isnt fullfilling its perpous you get rid of it. Same here if Gamespot isnt up to snuff then you are free to stop paying and go somewhere else. Your not FORCED to come here online. You coming here is just wasting time. Look its not that I dont see what your trying to do and believe me I know your intent is good but its making us look bad. Making us look like were trying fight some power or something cause we are slaves to its reviews LOL. You just need to calm down and take advice from ppl who enjoy the wii and know what wii fans are looking for. This isnt the place for this convo and this isnt the place for you. It would be much less of a hassel to move on to somewheres else to get ur opinion.

MadSavage22

TL;DR version: We dunt like ur kind round these parts, redfordo. Better be movin it alawng if u dunt want no trouble... :roll:

0.0....say what!?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFG2P-toC6k

this

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#45 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

Well, I don't feel Gamespot is exactly treating the Wii unfairly in reviews, giving Ghostbusters for Wii the highest rating of the platforms, for example. What I do, however, dislike is the overall disrespect the Wii gets by users and staff of Gamespot. It is completely uncalled for.

Avatar image for yeahyeahbigN
yeahyeahbigN

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 yeahyeahbigN
Member since 2007 • 1345 Posts

Well, I don't feel Gamespot is exactly treating the Wii unfairly in reviews, giving Ghostbusters for Wii the highest rating of the platforms, for example. What I do, however, dislike is the overall disrespect the Wii gets by users and staff of Gamespot. It is completely uncalled for.

calvinsora
I agree with this fella.
Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

Well, I don't feel Gamespot is exactly treating the Wii unfairly in reviews, giving Ghostbusters for Wii the highest rating of the platforms, for example. What I do, however, dislike is the overall disrespect the Wii gets by users and staff of Gamespot. It is completely uncalled for.

calvinsora

I am not mad because of the rating. I rarely have been mad because of the rating. I am disappointed in the lack of reviews of wii games.

Avatar image for rgame1
rgame1

2526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 rgame1
Member since 2008 • 2526 Posts
i posted.
Avatar image for mfp16
mfp16

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 mfp16
Member since 2006 • 4551 Posts
The 1800's and 1900's great people fought racism, classim and sexism. Today we fight the great peril of our generation, consolism.fireforge_basic
one of the more disgusting metaphors I've ever seen... are you seriously equating slavery and civil rights with biased wii reviews?
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#50 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

I don't read reviews here, but what does annoy me so much is hearing that "Nintendo abandoned the hardcore gamers and it's fans!" There are so many users here who have to bash the Wii because they think it isn't "hardcore." There is alot of shovelware on the Wiii, yes, but so what? Nintendo isn't forcing you to buy any of it; just ignore, and look for games that would interest you, if any. There are plenty of quality Wii titles if you bother to look past the shovelware. And the way I see, the shovelware isn't even all that bad; if the shovelware helps to get more people into the Wii and therefore giving Nintendo more money, that extra cash can go into the "hardcore" titles such as Mario or Zelda that we all like. And also, some of the casual games are actually good games as well, such as Wii sports, and Wii Sports esort looks promising.