Variety's review of super mario galaxy (it says it's a BAD game)

[QUOTE="nomadph"]

how would you know that guy wasn't paid off? are you from Variety magazine?

and that reviewer didn't just _mentioned_ ratchet and clank...he actually compared the two games (saying galaxy looks old fashioned and lifeless compared to that SONY PS3 game -- wtf?)...from two different consoles...on a ps3...on a sony sponsored review...

duh man...duh...

GlassDominion

with that logic how do we know anyone is actually telling the truth and isnt payed off?how do you know he was? do you work there?

and ratchet and clank and mario have a bit in common. similar genre, cartoony artstyles, and even released near each other. so i feel its natural they get compared.

it was "sponsored" by sony...whose money do you think the reviewer's salary for that article came from?

you DON'T compare games in a review because they are in the similar genre or art style. i don't see how it feels "natural" they get compared. in as much as if you're a reviewer, you shouldn't compare doom with half life. that's just wrong...

There is no doubt, the ignorance is way to much dangerous than some weapons.

They should at least play the game, because they just talk about the visuals and the Wii vs Ps3 capabilities.

SMG for GOTY.