http://gonintendo.com/?p=33692
NES
Adventures of Lolo 2
SNES
Super Street Fighter 2: The New challengers
It'S really now confirmed 2 games per weeks. 3 consecutive weeks with only 2 games.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
oh c'mon! why didnt they just release the new challengers in the first place!? now i gotta spend more $$ on street fighter (for the record, that is the version of street fighter i grew up and i accidentally confused it for the new challengers...crap)
on a side note: wth! why only 2 games? at this rate we'll never get earthbound OR super mario RPG! (forget about chrono trigger!)
LoLo...?
oh, i see this is your second time in a row to post whats new on the VC before Phantom_Leo.
Keep it up!uzevx
I didn't realise I was competing with anyone...:question:
I don't mind if people post it before me, just do it with pics and styIe like I do... :P
I like creativity... Just reporting news to report news is boring...
oh c'mon! why didnt they just release the new challengers in the first place!? now i gotta spend more $$ on street fighter
icarus212001
That's exactly why they released the other two street fighters first. And hey everybody, two games is fine considering everybody just whined and complained about how weak the 3 game selections were. Let's face it, nobody's gonna be happy unless a major title is released. It doesn't matter if there's one or two terrible games accompanying it that week.
[QUOTE="icarus212001"]oh c'mon! why didnt they just release the new challengers in the first place!? now i gotta spend more $$ on street fighter
supreuph
That's exactly why they released the other two street fighters first. And hey everybody, two games is fine considering everybody just whined and complained about how weak the 3 game selections were. Let's face it, nobody's gonna be happy unless a major title is released. It doesn't matter if there's one or two terrible games accompanying it that week.
yes but with 3 games released per week they could get the bad stuff out of the way quicker before the big ones.
[QUOTE="uzevx"]LoLo...?
oh, i see this is your second time in a row to post whats new on the VC before Phantom_Leo.
Keep it up!Phantom_Leo
I didn't realise I was competing with anyone...:question:
I don't mind if people post it before me, just do it with pics and styIe like I do... :P
I like creativity... Just reporting news to report news is boring...
[QUOTE="supreuph"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]oh c'mon! why didnt they just release the new challengers in the first place!? now i gotta spend more $$ on street fighter
gamer6464
That's exactly why they released the other two street fighters first. And hey everybody, two games is fine considering everybody just whined and complained about how weak the 3 game selections were. Let's face it, nobody's gonna be happy unless a major title is released. It doesn't matter if there's one or two terrible games accompanying it that week.
yes but with 3 games released per week they could get the bad stuff out of the way quicker before the big ones.
I guess...although I suspect that if they decide to release all of the major SNES games that everybody is asking for, there won't be as much interest in the VC anymore...which is exactly why they keep stringing us along with these mediocre and sometimes obscure titles. Earthbound, Chrono Trigger, Super Mario RPG, heck even goldeneye... and bam! VC sales slow down dramatically. Nobody would be checking for these games anymore and Nintendo's pockets would hurt because of it. For that reason, I don't expect any of these releases anytime soon. And in the case of the Square games that could still be released on DS...a Nintendo system that has tens of millions of installed users...for a sale price of $20-$30...I'm not holding my breath for those games to find their way to the VC.
[QUOTE="gamer6464"][QUOTE="supreuph"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]oh c'mon! why didnt they just release the new challengers in the first place!? now i gotta spend more $$ on street fighter
supreuph
That's exactly why they released the other two street fighters first. And hey everybody, two games is fine considering everybody just whined and complained about how weak the 3 game selections were. Let's face it, nobody's gonna be happy unless a major title is released. It doesn't matter if there's one or two terrible games accompanying it that week.
yes but with 3 games released per week they could get the bad stuff out of the way quicker before the big ones.
I guess...although I suspect that if they decide to release all of the major SNES games that everybody is asking for, there won't be as much interest in the VC anymore...which is exactly why they keep stringing us along with these mediocre and sometimes obscure titles. Earthbound, Chrono Trigger, Super Mario RPG, heck even goldeneye... and bam! VC sales slow down dramatically. Nobody would be checking for these games anymore and Nintendo's pockets would hurt because of it. For that reason, I don't expect any of these releases anytime soon. And in the case of the Square games that could still be released on DS...a Nintendo system that has tens of millions of installed users...for a sale price of $20-$30...I'm not holding my breath for those games to find their way to the VC.
That's bull, do you know how many good games there are on the SuperNES, add all the other consoles, that's a lot of content. Even 3 per week wasn't enough. If only Sqare Enix would release their uncomon RPGs: Lufia, 7th Saga, Brain Lord, Soul Blazer. I guess we have to be patient.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment