Who doesn't have Moh:H2 and why not?!?

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
well if this game tanks we will see very few wii FPS in its life time. These are still good games and for some reason as you play this one you forget the idea that its a wartime shooter.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.
Avatar image for chefstubbies
chefstubbies

2583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#53 chefstubbies
Member since 2007 • 2583 Posts

I don't have it and don't plan on trying it for a while because I still have Halo 3 to play through, Bioshock to play through, Mario Galaxy to beat, I just got Oblivion game of the year edition for my birthday...I still plan on getting Nights: Journey into Dreams and Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicals...

So honestly considering I actually have very little time to play any games as it is, I don't see the opportunity to be playing MOH any time soon.

Avatar image for ebaybenjidogg
ebaybenjidogg

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 ebaybenjidogg
Member since 2007 • 196 Posts
I'm thinking of asking for this for Christmas. 32 player online sounds SWEET! Is it really hard though? I wasn't the best with these type of games on PS2 & XBOX.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#55 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
I dont have it. Why:
- No headset makes it boring.
- I rented it, the graphics for some reason become really bad online
- Melee attack doesnt feel like your doing anything online
- People online arent that good anyway
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Darthmatt

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts

according to VGchartz:

http://vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=12534

It has pretty lackluster sales but it is doing better than the PSP version. This game is still good esp when you can play it and not feel like another WWII game evn though it is.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#58 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

True, but being used to having a jump in FPS for so long not having it is like buying a new car without power windows and locks. Also, this is an action oriented game. I could understand if it were ghost recon, but its not. It just bugs me about this game. Its 2007, you would think jump would be a standard element in a game like this. Its not like it would mess up the single player or multiplayer experience. It makes it less fun IMO.
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Darthmatt

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

True, but being used to havinf a jump in FPS for so long not having it is like buying a new car without power windows and locks. Also, this is an action oriented game. I could understand if it were ghost recon, but its not. It just bugs me about this game. Its 2007, you would think jump would be a standard element in a game like this. Its not like it would mess up the single player or multiplayer experience. It makes it less fun IMO.

there are some devs who dont want to use jump. If no one has it its no big deal. If this was a sci fi shooter which is more fast paced then I would understand but this game you can start killing people pretty fast.

Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#60 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

True, but being used to havinf a jump in FPS for so long not having it is like buying a new car without power windows and locks. Also, this is an action oriented game. I could understand if it were ghost recon, but its not. It just bugs me about this game. Its 2007, you would think jump would be a standard element in a game like this. Its not like it would mess up the single player or multiplayer experience. It makes it less fun IMO.

there are some devs who dont want to use jump. If no one has it its no big deal. If this was a sci fi shooter which is more fast paced then I would understand but this game you can start killing people pretty fast.

Yeah I understand that. But from a player point of view, I just wanted them to push it a little further. I think it would have just made the game more fun and dynamic with jumping. I feel like i'm just driving a meat tank instead of a combat ready GI. I guess my problem with this game is I will always compare the online to Return to Castle Wolfenstein. That was the best WW2 FPS online experience I've ever had, and MOHH2 doesnt even come close in so many ways.
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Darthmatt

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

True, but being used to havinf a jump in FPS for so long not having it is like buying a new car without power windows and locks. Also, this is an action oriented game. I could understand if it were ghost recon, but its not. It just bugs me about this game. Its 2007, you would think jump would be a standard element in a game like this. Its not like it would mess up the single player or multiplayer experience. It makes it less fun IMO.

there are some devs who dont want to use jump. If no one has it its no big deal. If this was a sci fi shooter which is more fast paced then I would understand but this game you can start killing people pretty fast.

Yeah I understand that. But from a player point of view, I just wanted them to push it a little further. I think it would have just made the game more fun and dynamic with jumping. I feel like i'm just driving a meat tank instead of a combat ready GI. I guess my problem with this game is I will always compare the online to Return to Castle Wolfenstein. That was the best WW2 FPS online experience I've ever had, and MOHH2 doesnt even come close in so many ways.

that is true, but for being a multiplat with a PSP game this is pretty impressive. And if it does well we will see more FPS on Wii that will push the envelop in every front like graphics, full multiplayer, controls as good as MOH2, and an epic story. i really hope the dev team that made the wii version is going to make another FPS for Wii. They lacked the right material but they had the right attitude.

Avatar image for bobdood99
bobdood99

1862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 bobdood99
Member since 2007 • 1862 Posts
i didnt get it because it doesnt have the non wifi multi
Avatar image for nintendoman562
nintendoman562

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 nintendoman562
Member since 2007 • 5593 Posts
i dont because im getting it before the christmas break.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#64 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

I ment to say they took a huge step backwards in online gameplay. Just because its the only FPS online for wii shouldnt excuse the obvious lack of effort to add modern gaming implements like a freaking jump button. Last time I checked this game wasnt a tactical shooter. Its all about the action. Assult mode would have made online way better but thats asking a lot from EA.

obviously it has flaws, jumping not being on of them. Games dont encessarily need a jump to be good.

True, but being used to havinf a jump in FPS for so long not having it is like buying a new car without power windows and locks. Also, this is an action oriented game. I could understand if it were ghost recon, but its not. It just bugs me about this game. Its 2007, you would think jump would be a standard element in a game like this. Its not like it would mess up the single player or multiplayer experience. It makes it less fun IMO.

there are some devs who dont want to use jump. If no one has it its no big deal. If this was a sci fi shooter which is more fast paced then I would understand but this game you can start killing people pretty fast.

Yeah I understand that. But from a player point of view, I just wanted them to push it a little further. I think it would have just made the game more fun and dynamic with jumping. I feel like i'm just driving a meat tank instead of a combat ready GI. I guess my problem with this game is I will always compare the online to Return to Castle Wolfenstein. That was the best WW2 FPS online experience I've ever had, and MOHH2 doesnt even come close in so many ways.

that is true, but for being a multiplat with a PSP game this is pretty impressive. And if it does well we will see more FPS on Wii that will push the envelop in every front like graphics, full multiplayer, controls as good as MOH2, and an epic story. i really hope the dev team that made the wii version is going to make another FPS for Wii. They lacked the right material but they had the right attitude.

Yeah I hope youre right. I just seems like developers use to put more effort into the the online part of games. RTCW is a great example of how ID was able to develope a solid single player and a solid multiplayer (on PC).
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
I think anyone who enjoys FPS should buy this game because we have not witnessed a control scheme on consoles that is this precise and able to do it competively with other people.
Avatar image for XPunkXManX
XPunkXManX

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 XPunkXManX
Member since 2007 • 530 Posts
My Wii is not hooked up to the internet. I've heard from people and friends that it is boring unless you got it online, because there's only like 6-8 stages on campaign.
Avatar image for AndYOU
AndYOU

6712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#67 AndYOU
Member since 2005 • 6712 Posts
As Mario would probably say, "I have a no money" and I'm trying to get money for Christmas presents for my family
Avatar image for teej97
teej97

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 teej97
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Hey tsup peoples if u do have moh:h2 + online, request me im PWNDR0N3 (note that the O, and the N, are numbers

and also ig u gh3 + online just message me and well exchange Friend Codes.

Avatar image for bob_newman
bob_newman

8133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 bob_newman
Member since 2006 • 8133 Posts
[QUOTE="bob_newman"][QUOTE="fraz1776"]

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]I really love killing humans, but it's not released yet.
I'm also waiting for RE:UC/Zapper, Zack and Wiki, No more heroes and BWii.
So whichever comes first i guess, which looks to be the zapper (7th of december).
KungfuKitten

lol twisted much???

I think he was trying to offend me. Whatever, he can do what he wants. But it's because of statements like his that non-gamers think we're all mindless, twisted nerds who have some sort of social problem. Oh well.


Don't really see the point in offending You, but thanks for offending me.
It's true that i am twisted, by choice, and i do have some sort of social problem, of which i don't see myself as the constant cause, and i do enjoy picturing people from reallife when shooting people down ingame, because i don't relate the action itself to reality at all. But i'm not mindless.

I never said that I think you're a "mindless, twisted nerd", I was saying that it's because of statements like your that make non-gamers think we're mindless, twisted nerds. I'm including myself in this statement, as well as all gamers. I don't know about you, but I don't exactly like it when I'm considered to be mindless and twisted for playing videogames. I'm sure a lot of people would agree.

Again, my statement was nothing against you.

Avatar image for jriddle89
jriddle89

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 jriddle89
Member since 2004 • 1209 Posts

I don't have it because I dont have the money as of yet, but I am wanting to try it. I am currently playing Mass Effect on my 360 and CoD 4 on my PC but I have a Wii at my girlfriend's house and I need a game to play, got bored with SMG at about 60-something stars and now I sit and watch her play Trauma Center, but reading up on the first Wii online shooter with better controls than MP3, which is one of my fav games hands down partly because of its controls, is definitely an eye opener.

How many people play online? is this the kind of game that in a month, nobody will be online anymore? And how is the online?

Thanks

Avatar image for goalring27
goalring27

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 goalring27
Member since 2006 • 1693 Posts
me, cuz i just dont feel like it, simple as that ^^
Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

Actually, it is very similar to the PSP version except for the controls(Haven't played MOH:H 2 on psp, but I've played the first one and this version is just like it butwith better graphics and an arcade mode).

Avatar image for Linkthedueler
Linkthedueler

4389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#73 Linkthedueler
Member since 2003 • 4389 Posts
I'm broke...thats about it...
Avatar image for deactivated-5c35826ea3913
deactivated-5c35826ea3913

5298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#74 deactivated-5c35826ea3913
Member since 2004 • 5298 Posts

I don't really like shooting other humans in the face, especially if these are based on actual events. And don't say "it's just a video game" because it's not. And as much as I am against war, I have respect for the people who were forced to fight in WWII, and I find it insulting when people reenact these events so mindlessly.

That's a downer, I know, but you asked why I don't have the game yet, so there you go.

bob_newman

someone who agrees with me!

I'd play quake or unreal though because they're completely sci-fi...

Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.catfishmoon23

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

Actually, it is very similar to the PSP version except for the controls(Haven't played MOH:H 2 on psp, but I've played the first one and this version is just like it butwith better graphics and an arcade mode).

And the controls are a HUGE difference. So much so its not even worth pplaying the PSP version.

Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts
[QUOTE="catfishmoon23"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.Cyber-

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

Actually, it is very similar to the PSP version except for the controls(Haven't played MOH:H 2 on psp, but I've played the first one and this version is just like it butwith better graphics and an arcade mode).

And the controls are a HUGE difference. So much so its not even worth pplaying the PSP version.

That's not to say the psp version is bad. It's actually just as addicting as the wii version, but the wii version has it beat on the controls.

Avatar image for Quiksilver0519
Quiksilver0519

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Quiksilver0519
Member since 2007 • 402 Posts
I would get the game if I had the money. I'm hoping to get it for Christmas. (I'd pay for it myself but I can't get a job yet cause I don't have my license yet.)
Avatar image for Cyber-
Cyber-

4026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 Cyber-
Member since 2007 • 4026 Posts
[QUOTE="Cyber-"][QUOTE="catfishmoon23"][QUOTE="Cyber-"]

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"]Because I played FPS online that were 100x more evolved than MOHH2, on PC 7 years ago. The controls are good, and its a nice start for wii, but the online is like they took a huge step in FPS gameplay. The single player is generic too.catfishmoon23

ya but being that devs are generally so lazy this game is really well done. There is literally no comparison with the PSP version.

Actually, it is very similar to the PSP version except for the controls(Haven't played MOH:H 2 on psp, but I've played the first one and this version is just like it butwith better graphics and an arcade mode).

And the controls are a HUGE difference. So much so its not even worth pplaying the PSP version.

That's not to say the psp version is bad. It's actually just as addicting as the wii version, but the wii version has it beat on the controls.

most of my friends and myself could not play it after using the Wii version. Its slow and clunky.

Avatar image for catfishmoon23
catfishmoon23

5197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 catfishmoon23
Member since 2005 • 5197 Posts

most of my friends and myself could not play it after using the Wii version. Its slow and clunky.

Cyber-

Yeah, pretty much lol. I forgot to include that it's agreat gameif you don't have the wii.

Avatar image for XCrunner161
XCrunner161

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#80 XCrunner161
Member since 2007 • 153 Posts
super mario sunshine comes before this game on games to get but MOH is up there on my list. Just need some more money.
Avatar image for jirca87
jirca87

539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 jirca87
Member since 2005 • 539 Posts

Because there are a lot of other games I'd much rather have. And I haven't seen a console shooter yet that can rival PC shooters, so there's another downer.

Avatar image for VegetaMaelstrom
VegetaMaelstrom

1083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 VegetaMaelstrom
Member since 2006 • 1083 Posts
For the woefully brief single player campaign: rental. For the online aspect: not the least bit interested. Maybe if the inevitable sequel doubles the playtime of the campaign and ships with a headset for online games I'll pick up the next one. By all accounts this is a good game but just not for me.
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts

I don't because

A. I'm waiting for a better online FPS that's not WWII related

and

B. I felt that for not GH3 would give me more replay value personally.

Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts
I'm not MADE of money, but I sure as hell wish I was. xD