[QUOTE="Shirley_Temple"]Reasons it deserves lower
#1 Its linear, for the first 20 hours of the game, your forced down a narrow path.  Run around here, Beat this dungeon, turn into a wolf, collect tears, repeat 4 times until you get the master sword.....NO you may NOT go to Hyrule castle yet, get back to kakariko.
#2 Music is an abomination, I think my ears bled while running around hyrule field.
#3 Little character development, aside from midna, the most major other character was Zant, and behind Zant it was that Half horned moblin, and behind him was Telma, and so forth.
#4 Dungeons are short, shorter than the GB Zelda dungeons.
#5 Between dungeons, there's about twenty minutes of content from when you exit one and enter another.
#6 Bosses sucked.Â
#7 Wind Waker kicks its ass.
*goes back to playing Oracle of Ages*
bofe1234
- hate to break it to you man thats how every zelda game works if you havent noticed. ex: ww go find the chart go gather money to decipher it go give it to tingle, go find the treasure. rinse and repeat like 10 TIMES. ex: LTTP find all 3 shards wait now go into dark world find 6 more of them. its just how zelda works. its always gonna be fetch quests and thats just how it works.
- Agreed koji kondo really fd this games music up and is no where near the quality of Oot or WW
- Agreed. but when you really think about it most characters in zelda games really have little personality aside from character in MM and WW they usually are pretty bland. but even if they are it really doesnt take away from an over all experience. if you want in depth characters play an RPG.
- The Dungeons are just as long as any of the other games. i remember the Fire temple in Oot being very short. the sky temple is actually really long. also there are more dungeons in this game anyway so it makes up for it even if you complete one quickly
- wtf is that a serious critism. of course there is you have to run to the other dungeon. how is that a bad thing LMAO.
- Thats entirely your opinion. i rather liked nearly all TPs bosses and all of them have attitude. i may have like Oots a little better but they still are very good. there is nothing wrong with them.
- Thats also your opininon. i also partly agree i did enjoy taht game more. but it doesnt make this game any worse.Â
1. No Zelda game but TP has been this linear. Ocarina let you beat dungeons out of order, hell as soon as you met Zelda, roughly an hour into the game, you could choose to anywhere you wanted. MM was similar, WW had a lenthier linear period, but still it doesn't come close to TP's 20 hours of hands-inside-the-car gameplay.
5. I wanted more to do, it seemed that as soon as you left one dungeon, they shuffled you into another.
6. Hm, The dekubaba, Stallord, Yeta, and Ghoma were good? Stallord had potential, but they effed up his attacks, he should have been more imposing, like a colossus, hell put a spinner track on his arm and make the player have to jump on it and ride up to him, would have been better than just running into his spine at 2 miles an hour after wasting momentum dodging his skeletons. Argorok was another that had potential, but they messed it up by making it too simple, what's impressive about destroying his armor because Link put on some boots? What's impressive about hookshotting onto a stationary target who's also Z-targeted? Nothing.
7. My point is, TP doesn't deserve 9.0 if it wasn't as good as it could have been, everywhere I went in that game, I looked at and thought "this doesn't work, they should have done this." While in Wind Waker, the only thing I'd change, would be to reduce Tingle's greediness, and have the game point you to the Ghost Ship Chart location, the only thing that seems to hang up gamers, is figuring out where to find that.
Log in to comment