Why are a lot of people more excited about Goldeneye than conduit 2?

First of all, Goldeneye isin't even being made by the same people, so it's not like this is rare's long awaited sequel. The conduit can have more people in an online match, voice chat, wii motion plus support, co op, split screen, tons of customization, and a better story.

As someone else put, goldeneye looks like CoD in Bond skin. Also, not as much customization, voice chat support, ect.

I probaly won't get either, but Conduit 2 looks much better.

Why should someone buy Goldeneye over Conduit 2?

I like Bond, and I like Call of Duty. Meanwhile, I hated the Conduit. Why would I not be more excited about Goldeneye?

The Conduit is being made by a dev that is going on 18 years without a good game

The Goldeneye devs are not High Voltage

I don't see why anyone would look forward for the Conduit since the first one was so bad and it comes from a bad developer

You might as well ask why people are looking forward to Black Ops and not the new Data Design game

No surprise... Goldeneye has had a cult following for over a decade.

why not look foward toboth like me..

GoldenEye has the well known name going for itself, but that's about it. Also, Activision has been doing more promotions and creating awareness than what Sega has done thus far with Conduit 2. It seems GoldenEye is getting the most hype that Activision has ever put towards a Wii game. I'm actually interested in both. I want GoldenEye so that I can own those who play with dual analog controls. GoldenEye is the first Wii FPS that actually allows use of not only pointer controls but also dual analog. I still think Conduit 2 is the better deal, but I may still get both--I really enjoy Wii FPS games.

Conduit 2 is like a paper bag filled with dog poo and Goldeneye is probably a good game.

I pick the game.

Conduit 2 is like a paper bag filled with dog poo and Goldeneye is probably a good game.

I pick the game.

Haziqonfire

Stop trolling.

First of all, Goldeneye isin't even being made by the same people, so it's not like this is rare's long awaited sequel. The conduit can have more people in an online match, voice chat, wii motion plus support, co op, split screen, tons of customization, and a better story.

As someone else put, goldeneye looks like CoD in Bond skin. Also, not as much customization, voice chat support, ect.

I probaly won't get either, but Conduit 2 looks much better.

Why should someone buy Goldeneye over Conduit 2?

StarFire571

Then why this thread?

Goldeneye doesn't have HVS so it wins and it has a name

Stop trolling.

Tri-Enforcer

Hey I saw your Halo Reach thread on the xbox360 forum

:D

[QUOTE="Tri-Enforcer"]

Stop trolling.

wiifan001

Hey I saw your Halo Reach thread on the xbox360 forum

:D

I did that just to see the 360 fanboys crowd around their beloved franchise...lol. Shame it got locked and I got a warning.

[QUOTE="wiifan001"]

[QUOTE="Tri-Enforcer"]

Stop trolling.

Tri-Enforcer

Hey I saw your Halo Reach thread on the xbox360 forum

:D

I did that just to see the 360 fanboys crowd around their beloved franchise...lol. Shame it got locked and I got a warning.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]

[QUOTE="Tri-Enforcer"]

I did that just to see the 360 fanboys crowd around their beloved franchise...lol. Shame it got locked and I got a warning.

Tri-Enforcer

Since I've been a member I have never trolled. I guess everyone has to try it once and see how it feels. Well at least I did it towards an overrated franchise, who have the most hypocritical fanboys.

the most hypocritical fanboys would have to be the zelda ones :PBrunoBRS

The Conduit is being made by a dev that is going on 18 years without a good game

The Goldeneye devs are not High Voltage

I don't see why anyone would look forward for the Conduit since the first one was so bad and it comes from a bad developer

You might as well ask why people are looking forward to Black Ops and not the new Data Design game

Jaysonguy

The only bad thing about the Conduit I think was that it was stuck in the past. Will Conduit 2 be a AAA game? Don't really think so, but will it be better than the original? Most likely. The Conduit's controls and visuals I believe are perfect, and since they are including features that are standard for most shooters now (Iron Sights, Sprint function, Co-op, etc) that it should be at worst a good game that deserves a rent. You may be wrong and it would rock, or I may be wrong and it would suck. But this time, I'm not hyping it to avoid dissapointment, I'm just ganna wait until it comes.

As for Goldeneye, I can see this game failing big time, but I could be wrong.

I will most likely buy and enjoy both.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] the most hypocritical fanboys would have to be the zelda ones :Pwiifan001

Goldeneye hasn't dissapointed us yet. Coduit has.

[QUOTE="wiifan001"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] the most hypocritical fanboys would have to be the zelda ones :PBrunoBRS

sheesh stop bashing cod so much people, it isnt a horrible game, but i dont think it is the best either, it is a solid shooter game.

i dont remember coduit 1 being that great of a game, so of course some peope might not be excited for the sequel.

goldeneye was a legendary game (back in its time) and seeing it come back is great, even though it wont be an exact remake. making goldeneye similar to cod is good, cod was a solid shooter, and if goldeneye was similar to it then im gessing it will be a great shooter too.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="wiifan001"] Will you stop attacking the Zelda fanbase already?wiifan001

exactly, well put wiifan.

A better question would be, why are people excited about either game?King-gamer

Because some people enjoy Wii FPS games.

The Conduit is being made by a dev that is going on 18 years without a good game

The Goldeneye devs are not High Voltage

I don't see why anyone would look forward for the Conduit since the first one was so bad and it comes from a bad developer

You might as well ask why people are looking forward to Black Ops and not the new Data Design game

Jaysonguy

Nostalgia.

/thread

The original Goldeneye was amazing

The original Conduit was NOT amazing

007 is unique and interesting. Conduit 2 (as was The Conduit) is the very definition of generic.

because james bond can fly

Because Goldeneye is a lot more likely to not suck. Tell me one good game High Voltage Software (the makers of The Turdoit) have made. Please, do tell.

Nostalgia and the expectation of quality.

The conduit wasnt bad as what ppl say, its a good game ppl just hate on it

simply put, the first the conduit didn't deliver for most people. on the other hand, the original goldeneye 007 was praised as one of the best FPSs of its time, and one of the first successful console FPSs (yes, they existed before halo)BrunoBRS

Greg Hastings Paintball 2 Will be better than Conduit 2

http://www.majescoentertainment.com/games/nintendo-wii/greg-hastings-paintball-2/

[QUOTE="King-gamer"]A better question would be, why are people excited about either game?Tri-Enforcer

Because some people enjoy Wii FPS games.

I'm curious to see Conduit 2. I don't expect it to be the pinnacle of FPS (but what can you expect on the Wii?), but The Conduit wasn't that bad as people made it out to be, and I could already see the potential in that game. Taking a look at Conduit 2's features, it seems to become a considerable improvement.

Goldeneye Wii could be interesting, but I fear it will just be another lackluster CoD clone, and I don't even like CoD to begin with.

The original Goldeneye was amazing

The original Conduit was NOT amazing

Sword-Demon

Goldeneye Wii is a new game made by people who had absolutely nothing to do with the first game. Its developers, Eurocom, have released 3 Bond games already, the last of which (Quantum of Solace) scored 54/100 on average on the Wii. If anything, that is the game we should be going by, not the original Goldeneye game which was made by infinitely more talented developers 13 years ago.

I'm curious to see Conduit 2. I don't expect it to be the pinnacle of FPS (but what can you expect on the Wii?), but The Conduit wasn't that bad as people made it out to be, and I could already see the potential in that game. Taking a look at Conduit 2's features, it seems to become a considerable improvement.

Goldeneye Wii could be interesting, but I fear it will just be another lackluster CoD clone, and I don't even like CoD to begin with.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

Goldeneye Wii is a new game made by people who had absolutely nothing to do with the first game. Its developers, Eurocom, have released 3 Bond games already, the last of which (Quantum of Solace) scored 54/100 on average on the Wii. If anything, that is the game we should be going by, not the original Goldeneye game which was made by infinitely more talented developers 13 years ago.

DraugenCP

I'm curious to see Conduit 2. I don't expect it to be the pinnacle of FPS (but what can you expect on the Wii?), but The Conduit wasn't that bad as people made it out to be, and I could already see the potential in that game. Taking a look at Conduit 2's features, it seems to become a considerable improvement.

Goldeneye Wii could be interesting, but I fear it will just be another lackluster CoD clone, and I don't even like CoD to begin with.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

The original Goldeneye was amazing

The original Conduit was NOT amazing

DraugenCP

Goldeneye Wii is a new game made by people who had absolutely nothing to do with the first game. Its developers, Eurocom, have released 3 Bond games already, the last of which (Quantum of Solace) scored 54/100 on average on the Wii. If anything, that is the game we should be going by, not the original Goldeneye game which was made by infinitely more talented developers 13 years ago.

This post makes the most sense, considering people want to go by developer reputation. I could see if the more experienced Rare were behind this Goldeneye remake, but they're not (technically they couldn't either since most of the people behind Goldeneye 64 left Rare). It's made by Eurocom who have a track record just as bad as HVS and have been around longer. Also, Goldeneye Wii is mostly a cash in title to get people, who played the original, to believe they will have the same feeling from the original. Trust me you wont. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="wiifan001"] Will you stop attacking the Zelda fanbase already?wiifan001

By todays standards TP does everything that OoT did but better it is the better game. All 4 of the 3d console zelda games have been masterpieces

"Quantum of Solace" was a multi-platform marketing tie-in. Those always suck. A Wii-exclusive "Goldeneye" is likely to have a bit more effort put into it.

Because people hate High Voltage. Even though they're actually putting out more effort than ever before with Conduit 2.

I'm curious to see Conduit 2. I don't expect it to be the pinnacle of FPS (but what can you expect on the Wii?), but The Conduit wasn't that bad as people made it out to be, and I could already see the potential in that game. Taking a look at Conduit 2's features, it seems to become a considerable improvement.

Goldeneye Wii could be interesting, but I fear it will just be another lackluster CoD clone, and I don't even like CoD to begin with.

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

The original Goldeneye was amazing

The original Conduit was NOT amazing

DraugenCP

Goldeneye Wii is a new game made by people who had absolutely nothing to do with the first game. Its developers, Eurocom, have released 3 Bond games already, the last of which (Quantum of Solace) scored 54/100 on average on the Wii. If anything, that is the game we should be going by, not the original Goldeneye game which was made by infinitely more talented developers 13 years ago.