Why Do You Hate GoldenEye?

  • 104 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
So far the singleplayer looks too much like the CoD franchise, which have terrible campaigns, and a history of buggy and unbalanced online. I'm being cautiously optimistic about GoldenEye, but only because the the original was so amazing.
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#52 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts

@J_Ford

Ignorance?!

You're the one going around accusing me of getting mixed up when your initial thought process was me talking about a time frame between 2010 and 2022. I never brought up any time frame up to 2022, YOU did. That's just stupidity how you flipped the time in the wrong direction...oh and yeah I'm supposed to place right here, "not to be rude" Yeah....ok the meaning can sound the same but actually mean something totally different. Just like you did.

Now, the reimagining of Goldeneye 007 is the very reason why Goldeneye Wii will be something awful for any owner, and since it happens to be for the Wii, it's something awful for wii owners.

[QUOTE="wiifan001"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

you've played the game? painguy1

Yes and I still have the cartridge.

How can you play a game that's not scheduled to be released until Q4 2010?

Because it's freekin Goldeneye. Everything I need to see and experience is already on the N64. Any additions are irrelevant, and it has no chance of bringing back the milestone of Goldeneye N64

Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts

Like in the video we saw of the first mission, where Bond and Trevelyan were talking before the mission started and then sneaked to that first guard tower. In the original all you really had to do was just walk up to it in broad daylight, but they added a little cinematic flair to that downtime of just walking. Then where you would walk down that tunnel to the next set of towers, in this game you do more stealth and then the truck scenario. So if what that guy said is accurate about them keeping the mission structure and just altering the level design to convert the methodical, one speed pace of the original into a more action packed take, I think that's exactly what your talking about.Sepewrath
Well they can't actually use the same level designs because they don't own that stuff. The good thing, though, is that the original game used the blueprints of the movie set to design the levels, so the devs of the new game can do the same thing and still call it their own original work. But that means that anything from the original game that WASN'T part of the movie set isn't going to be used.

As far as I understand, this game isn't a remake of the original game in any sense... just a reimagining of the movie in the form of a game. Now of course they're not doing that in a bubble with no context of the original game, but unless I've missed some important copyright info, this game technically doesn't have anything to do with the original. It's not a remake in the sense that Zero Mission is a remake of the original Metroid, for example.

So I don't expect any of the actual levels to be even close to what the original game had.... though I'm sure they'll have similar areas within each level because of the whole movie set blueprint stuff.

Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#54 superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts
No hate, just not easily wowed :p
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Nothing can recreate goldeneyes feel as that just simply cannot happen (completely), but I don't expect it to. Will the game be perfect, of course not. I am sure parts of it will be a dissapointment, but overall it looks pretty freakin sweet, and after watching that single player vid I am considering pre-ordering the game. I am very excited and am most concerned that the MP won't be as good as I hope, because the SP looks awesome. Heres to hoping Eurocom does even better then Nightfire, which was a very fun game.

Avatar image for link027
link027

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 link027
Member since 2008 • 1110 Posts

] Well they can't actually use the same level designs because they don't own that stuff. The good thing, though, is that the original game used the blueprints of the movie set to design the levels, so the devs of the new game can do the same thing and still call it their own original work. But that means that anything from the original game that WASN'T part of the movie set isn't going to be used.

As far as I understand, this game isn't a remake of the original game in any sense... just a reimagining of the movie in the form of a game. Now of course they're not doing that in a bubble with no context of the original game, but unless I've missed some important copyright info, this game technically doesn't have anything to do with the original. It's not a remake in the sense that Zero Mission is a remake of the original Metroid, for example.

So I don't expect any of the actual levels to be even close to what the original game had.... though I'm sure they'll have similar areas within each level because of the whole movie set blueprint stuff.

JordanElek

I think this will be what you want

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Oh and people saying it is too much like COD, you MAY be right, but IMO (as much as it pains me to say this) GE64 is actually similar in someways to CoD4. I HATE MW2, but MW1 was pretty good and certain parts remind me of goldeneye. Especially the bonus airplane level.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts

Well they can't actually use the same level designs because they don't own that stuff. The good thing, though, is that the original game used the blueprints of the movie set to design the levels, so the devs of the new game can do the same thing and still call it their own original work. But that means that anything from the original game that WASN'T part of the movie set isn't going to be used.

As far as I understand, this game isn't a remake of the original game in any sense... just a reimagining of the movie in the form of a game. Now of course they're not doing that in a bubble with no context of the original game, but unless I've missed some important copyright info, this game technically doesn't have anything to do with the original. It's not a remake in the sense that Zero Mission is a remake of the original Metroid, for example.

So I don't expect any of the actual levels to be even close to what the original game had.... though I'm sure they'll have similar areas within each level because of the whole movie set blueprint stuff.

JordanElek
Well even if they owned that stuff it would be pretty lazy to keep everything the same. And they can call it what they will, but its clearly a remake of the game, hell that's the way they basically introduced it in that announcement trailer. They weren't and still aren't talking about the movie, they are talking about the game. I expect there to be a lot of similarities between the two games. Though some of the bigger moments from the original will be bigger in this game. Like the tank level in this one looks like your tearing the city apart, while it wasn't even close to that in the original. But you'll likely still have to find Janus, I think your giving them too much credit by thinking it will be completely different lol
Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
I'm up in the air at this point. Sometimes, I think the game looks great, and others, it looks like one drawn out cut scene that will got boring fast. The game looks like it's meant to play out like a movie. What fun is that?
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts

Well even if they owned that stuff it would be pretty lazy to keep everything the same. And they can call it what they will, but its clearly a remake of the game, hell that's the way they basically introduced it in that announcement trailer. They weren't and still aren't talking about the movie, they are talking about the game. I expect there to be a lot of similarities between the two games. Though some of the bigger moments from the original will be bigger in this game. Like the tank level in this one looks like your tearing the city apart, while it wasn't even close to that in the original. But you'll likely still have to find Janus, I think your giving them too much credit by thinking it will be completely different lolSepewrath
If they're trying to remake the game, they did a terrible job. Multiplayer is what ruled the first game, and the multiplayer in this game is 100% different, aside from a couple modes. Based on what that guy from the GS stage demo said, they are basically remaking the movie. Like I said, they're not completely ignorant of the existence of the original game, and part of the marketing of this game is the nostalgia factor, so there will be nods to it. But it doesn't look like their primary source is the original game.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts
Well I haven't seen enough of the MP to make a call on how close or how different it is. What makes you say its 100% different?
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts
Well I haven't seen enough of the MP to make a call on how close or how different it is. What makes you say its 100% different? Sepewrath
None of the levels are the same (for obvious reasons), but that's the smallest difference. It's basically Modern Warfare. You start with your gun set and two grenades. There's perks and a leveling up system and all that. There's melee attacks that do major damage, like one-hit kills. The biggest similarity is the characters and split-screen.
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#63 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
[QUOTE="Sepewrath"]Well I haven't seen enough of the MP to make a call on how close or how different it is. What makes you say its 100% different? JordanElek
None of the levels are the same (for obvious reasons), but that's the smallest difference. It's basically Modern Warfare. You start with your gun set and two grenades. There's perks and a leveling up system and all that. There's melee attacks that do major damage, like one-hit kills. The biggest similarity is the characters and split-screen.

yeah, Daniel Craig some similarity :lol: But seriously though, I knew what you meant.
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts
I haven't seen any melee attacks yet, what are one kills, some kind of stealth kill, because that would be a good addition. Starting with a gun set doesn't mean anything, you can pick up whatever you want. Not to mention the crates would be right where you started anyway, that's not that different. Yeah not a big fan of the perks, but the masses have spoken so what are you gonna do? But the perks would only apply to online play and I would hope they have a mode where there are no perks allowed. That would be the simple counter to that. And yeah while they couldn't use the levels, a redesign was necessary, some were not as good as others and for the sake for fairness. Someone who never played GoldenEye would be at a stark disadvantage against someone who played the original if stages were the same.
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts
I haven't seen any melee attacks yet, what are one kills, some kind of stealth kill, because that would be a good addition. Sepewrath
No, I mean the melee hits are basically one-hit kills, like in Halo. You just hit them with the butt of your gun.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#67 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="Sepewrath"]Well I haven't seen enough of the MP to make a call on how close or how different it is. What makes you say its 100% different? JordanElek
None of the levels are the same (for obvious reasons), but that's the smallest difference. It's basically Modern Warfare. You start with your gun set and two grenades. There's perks and a leveling up system and all that. There's melee attacks that do major damage, like one-hit kills. The biggest similarity is the characters and split-screen.

Hmm.. I'm not liking the sound of this. How overpowered are the perks? If cheap perks can take over a round like in MW, then I might just pretend this game doesn't exist. If the melee attacks are slower like in Bad Company 2, then I can live with that. But if they're quick, cheap kills like in MW, then screw it.
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts
[QUOTE="JordanElek"][QUOTE="Sepewrath"]Well I haven't seen enough of the MP to make a call on how close or how different it is. What makes you say its 100% different? GamerForca
None of the levels are the same (for obvious reasons), but that's the smallest difference. It's basically Modern Warfare. You start with your gun set and two grenades. There's perks and a leveling up system and all that. There's melee attacks that do major damage, like one-hit kills. The biggest similarity is the characters and split-screen.

Hmm.. I'm not liking the sound of this. How overpowered are the perks? If cheap perks can take over a round like in MW, then I might just pretend this game doesn't exist. If the melee attacks are slower like in Bad Company 2, then I can live with that. But if they're quick, cheap kills like in MW, then screw it.

It's quick. Check any vid on YouTube and you'll see it a bunch. I also forgot to mention regenerating health. It's all standard stuff for contemporary FPS games, but it also completely changes the feel of the game to something that doesn't resemble the N64 game in the least.
Avatar image for Knight-Owl
Knight-Owl

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#69 Knight-Owl
Member since 2008 • 690 Posts
@ wiifan001 Are you even reading anyone elses posts? Or do you just like posting stuff that doesn't make any sense? This thread is about the 007 game that is coming out for the Wii, not 007 for N64. And you yourself said that you've played it...If you meant you've played 007 for N64 then you should've said that :P Anyway on topic...The game looks like it's going to be awesome imo.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#70 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="JordanElek"] It's quick. Check any vid on YouTube and you'll see it a bunch. I also forgot to mention regenerating health. It's all standard stuff for contemporary FPS games, but it also completely changes the feel of the game to something that doesn't resemble the N64 game in the least.

Yep... it looks like a Halo melee attack with the one-hit-kill power of MW. *sigh*
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="JordanElek"] None of the levels are the same (for obvious reasons), but that's the smallest difference. It's basically Modern Warfare. You start with your gun set and two grenades. There's perks and a leveling up system and all that. There's melee attacks that do major damage, like one-hit kills. The biggest similarity is the characters and split-screen.JordanElek
Hmm.. I'm not liking the sound of this. How overpowered are the perks? If cheap perks can take over a round like in MW, then I might just pretend this game doesn't exist. If the melee attacks are slower like in Bad Company 2, then I can live with that. But if they're quick, cheap kills like in MW, then screw it.

It's quick. Check any vid on YouTube and you'll see it a bunch. I also forgot to mention regenerating health. It's all standard stuff for contemporary FPS games, but it also completely changes the feel of the game to something that doesn't resemble the N64 game in the least.

I am not going to lie, some of these thins worry me a bit, but with that said, I think regenerating health CAN be good and as long as you don't regen fast it won't be bad, and might even be a welcome addition, rather then people camping by armor and such. I don't mind melee and it can be relatively strong, but if its really cheap and takes away the point of shotguns and such, then it will annoy me. Perks and such are pretty cool, but the whole crazy MW2 perk system can be a bit much so I am most worried about that more then anything. I don't doubt the ammount of content, the singleplayer, or anything like that. I think the game will rock, I just hope these small things don't add up to make goldeneye Wii bad like MW2.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts

Regenerating health doesn't matter, one its necessary for the increased number of players online, it limits peoples ability to take the scraps of someones kill or get an easy kill for someone just getting out of a fight. Also regenerating health is an option in a lot of online shooters. Since more than any other aspect of the MP, GE was known for its wealth of options, I would assume health would be one of them. As a matter of fact, it would be very wise of them to allow customization to create a replica of the N64 version. To not do that would be just a massive oversight.

The melee isn't an issue either, the likely hood of actually making it to someone and using it is pretty slim, if you sneak up on them, then you deserve that kill. Kind of sounds like nitpicking, those things really do not change the scope that much. The only substantial alteration is the perks and if you can turn those off, then they wont even matter. Though I admit perks are lame, I don't get why the FPS audience likes them so much. Win with skill, not essentially cheats in a competitive arena.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Regenerating health doesn't matter, one its necessary for the increased number of players online, it limits peoples ability to take the scraps of someones kill or get an easy kill for someone just getting out of a fight. Also regenerating health is an option in a lot of online shooters. Since more than any other aspect of the MP, GE was known for its wealth of options, I would assume health would be one of them. As a matter of fact, it would be very wise of them to allow customization to create a replica of the N64 version. To not do that would be just a massive oversight.

The melee isn't an issue either, the likely hood of actually making it to someone and using it is pretty slim, if you sneak up on them, then you deserve that kill. Kind of sounds like nitpicking, those things really do not change the scope that much. The only substantial alteration is the perks and if you can turn those off, then they wont even matter. Though I admit perks are lame, I don't get why the FPS audience likes them so much. Win with skill, not essentially cheats in a competitive arena.

Sepewrath

Yeah I agree. I hope perks are not extreme and feel like cheating, but rather like the perks in Uncharted that seems diverse and fit a playstyle, but are not overpowering. Well except for the situational awareness which is just dumb.

Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#74 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
I just don't like the idea that it's exclusive to the Wii. It needs to be on the PS3 and 360 also so I can play it. :cry: *Sniff*
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

I just don't like the idea that it's exclusive to the Wii. It needs to be on the PS3 and 360 also so I can play it. :cry: *Sniff*The-Apostle

Wii's are not that expensive and the Wii has and is getting many amazing games. I just bought one and also own a PS3 and PC. I love great graphics and all, but the Wii has its strong points, and some of this gens best games. I am very excited for this game :).

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#76 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts
I don't hate it but it doesn't look all that great to me.
Avatar image for Zanoh
Zanoh

6942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Zanoh
Member since 2006 • 6942 Posts

I say no, and I say this with hope that they don't **** it up.

Avatar image for metayoshi9000
metayoshi9000

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 metayoshi9000
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
golden eye for da n64 was epic and it is a game witch due to many factors can not me remaid to be as epic as it was [yes it will suck]
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

golden eye for da n64 was epic and it is a game witch due to many factors can not me remaid to be as epic as it was [yes it will suck]metayoshi9000

Of course no company can make a new game that will bring you back to the SAME feeling of Goldeneye 64 as that is just nostalgia that is gone now. You can feel it a bit, but that feel goes beyond the game, and depends on peoples lives. If people expect this to bring back the SAME exact feeling GE64 did, they are going to be dissapointed. But that doesnt mean they cannot make a very enjoyable game that feels like bond and borrows from goldeneye (a lot) in order to have a familiar and nostalgiac basis for the game. It would be like saying the new Donkey Kong is going to suck. Yes it will borrow a lot from the old donkey kong, but I am sure it will change stuff and improve upon things just as GEWii is doing. It will have nostalgia, but it can never feel the same as playing the past DKC games. And guess what? It has the SAME name as past games, but is made by a different developer then the others. GE Wii and DKCR are no different, but GEWii gets the flack.

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#80 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

I didn't like the original and now days that form of multiplayer isn't the strongest suite in games anymore.

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#81 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
The melee isn't an issue either, the likely hood of actually making it to someone and using it is pretty slim, if you sneak up on them, then you deserve that kill. Sepewrath
Unless they wait around a corner and smack you as soon as you enter a room. Or if you're in a small room and someone jumps in and smacks you right before you kill them. If the maps are big, then it's not much of an issue. But I'm thinking they're going to be like MW maps, which is horrible for instant-kill melee attacks.
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts
Well those rounding corner kills are fair game, because that is still sneaking up on someone and would be no different than people leaving proximity mines on every corner or under every ammo crate like in the original. The simple balance to people just charging you while you shoot them would be to make damage increase as you get closer. So when you try that tactic, it becomes a risk reward scenario, because my shots go from 1 to 3 and all you can hope is I miss or you done. Its simply a matter of proper balance, its not like the original GE didn't have its balancing issues as well.
Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#83 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

[QUOTE="The-Apostle"]I just don't like the idea that it's exclusive to the Wii. It needs to be on the PS3 and 360 also so I can play it. :cry: *Sniff*NaveedLife

Wii's are not that expensive and the Wii has and is getting many amazing games. I just bought one and also own a PS3 and PC. I love great graphics and all, but the Wii has its strong points, and some of this gens best games. I am very excited for this game :).

Yes, well, I can't play Wii because of the way the Wiimote and Nunchuck are set up. :cry:
Avatar image for MathMattS
MathMattS

4012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#84 MathMattS
Member since 2009 • 4012 Posts

I'm eagerly looking forward to GoldenEye. I suppose some people would be opposed to the remake because, perhaps, they feel that Activision is messing with a game that shouldn't be messed with. I don't have a problem with it, though.

Avatar image for Superzone
Superzone

3733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#85 Superzone
Member since 2004 • 3733 Posts
The first trailer at E3 didn't impress me that much, but my opinion is definitely starting to change. It's starting to look really great.
Avatar image for Boni
Boni

921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#86 Boni
Member since 2005 • 921 Posts

I'm eagerly looking forward to GoldenEye. I suppose some people would be opposed to the remake because, perhaps, they feel that Activision is messing with a game that shouldn't be messed with. I don't have a problem with it, though.

MathMattS
That's probably it, many people don't want the game to be remade so that they don't ruin it, and also because it's not on PS3/360 :P.
Avatar image for Superzone
Superzone

3733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#87 Superzone
Member since 2004 • 3733 Posts
[QUOTE="Boni"][QUOTE="MathMattS"]

I'm eagerly looking forward to GoldenEye. I suppose some people would be opposed to the remake because, perhaps, they feel that Activision is messing with a game that shouldn't be messed with. I don't have a problem with it, though.

That's probably it, many people don't want the game to be remade so that they don't ruin it, and also because it's not on PS3/360 :P.

I don't see why people should get upset about it not being on PS3/360. Goldeneye was born on Nintendo, and should stay there. After all, PS3 and Xbox 360 don't believe in splitscreen multiplayer, which is required for Goldeneye!
Avatar image for gangstaa9
gangstaa9

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#88 gangstaa9
Member since 2007 • 258 Posts

Does this game have health packs like the original. Im getting tired of my screen being like 85% blood.

Avatar image for sydneyfcrules1
sydneyfcrules1

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#89 sydneyfcrules1
Member since 2010 • 153 Posts

golden eye for da n64 was epic and it is a game witch due to many factors can not me remaid to be as epic as it was [yes it will suck]metayoshi9000

spelling mate u might want to check it next time.

Avatar image for sydneyfcrules1
sydneyfcrules1

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#91 sydneyfcrules1
Member since 2010 • 153 Posts

If the maps are big, then it's not much of an issue. But I'm thinking they're going to be like MW maps, which is horrible for instant-kill melee attacks.

The bigger the map is the more opportunities people have to recover health which can be very annoying.

Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts

Kind of sounds like nitpicking, those things really do not change the scope that much. The only substantial alteration is the perks and if you can turn those off, then they wont even matter. Sepewrath
No, those things change the game substantially. Pretty much every aspect of strategy is changed just based on regenerating health vs set health alone. Also, melee hits happen all the time in any FPS that has them.

I'm not necessarily saying these are bad things, but my point was that the whole feel of multiplayer will be nothing like the original game at all. It'll be more like a split-screen CoD game, which some people have probably been wanting for awhile, and it's honestly going to be the best split-screen experience on the Wii so far, regardless of how different it is from the original GE.

But yeah, options would be awesome.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
Because its a remake, I don't want one of my favorite games to get reborn then buried into a bigger hole.
Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts

Yep, they're just butthurt fanboys that hate that it isn't coming to their system just like us Wii and PC fans could go there and say the same about Street Fighter X Tekken, Tekken x Street Fighter &Marvel Vs Capcom 3(Even thoughMvC3 button setup is EXACTLY like TVC now 3 attacks and an exchange button) being only PS3/360 but you don't hardly see that because System wars is a biased 360/PS3 forum and everything's ok when good games come to their respected consoles.

Now, I absolutely loved Goldeneye and will be getting this too. The only thing I can even remotely think about hating this game for is that it isn't a Perfect Dark Remake. I liked Perfect Dark and I thought Perfect Dark was a Total Step up in every department from Goldeneye except framerate. The Weapons were better, Stages were better and Longer, Enemies were better and tougher, Story was better, immersion was better, it was a total upgrade to Goldeneye and you Had to have the Expansion Pack to even get everything out of Perfect Dark. I'd rather have that but I'm perfectly fine with Goldeneye as it was an awesome game too.

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
[QUOTE="Boni"][QUOTE="MathMattS"]

I'm eagerly looking forward to GoldenEye. I suppose some people would be opposed to the remake because, perhaps, they feel that Activision is messing with a game that shouldn't be messed with. I don't have a problem with it, though.

Superzone
That's probably it, many people don't want the game to be remade so that they don't ruin it, and also because it's not on PS3/360 :P.

I don't see why people should get upset about it not being on PS3/360. Goldeneye was born on Nintendo, and should stay there. After all, PS3 and Xbox 360 don't believe in splitscreen multiplayer, which is required for Goldeneye!

They Don't? Most of their FPS have Split Screen Multiplayer. I actually can't think of one that doesn't. And to add to your argument, Perfect Dark was also born on Nintendo but the Wii didn't get that and you didn't see masses fussing over it going to 360, I argued about it but you didn't see the amounts that you see about Goldeneye being Wii Exclusive.
Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
[QUOTE="The-Apostle"][QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

I just don't like the idea that it's exclusive to the Wii. It needs to be on the PS3 and 360 also so I can play it. :cry: *Sniff*The-Apostle

Wii's are not that expensive and the Wii has and is getting many amazing games. I just bought one and also own a PS3 and PC. I love great graphics and all, but the Wii has its strong points, and some of this gens best games. I am very excited for this game :).

Yes, well, I can't play Wii because of the way the Wiimote and Nunchuck are set up. :cry:

It has support for the standard Cla$$ic Controller too so you have no argument.
Avatar image for Charpig
Charpig

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 Charpig
Member since 2010 • 36 Posts

If GoldenEye is like Goldeneye 007 or Perfect Dark, it will not suck. Every developer of this game should play Goldeneye 007 so they can see how good it is and not mess this golden opportunity up.

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#98 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
I'm on the fence right now still deciding. Maybe once I see more gameplay videos of different areas, I may decide....
Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts

If GoldenEye is like Goldeneye 007 or Perfect Dark, it will not suck. Every developer of this game should play Goldeneye 007 so they can see how good it is and not mess this golden opportunity up.

Charpig
True. I think they should've went the route that xbox took with Perfect Dark but I still think this game will be great (Minus Daniel Craig - the worst Bond ever to don the Bond name).
Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#100 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

It has support for the standard Cla$$ic Controller too so you have no argument.nini200

Yeah, well, most the games I want to play (Zelda, Mario, etc...) require the nunchuck so my argument stands.