You guys seen the new Disaster Day of Crisis Screens...?

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for monty_4256
monty_4256

8577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 monty_4256
Member since 2004 • 8577 Posts

looks like an on-rails shooter a some parts... why?

Avatar image for 100000
100000

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 100000
Member since 2003 • 549 Posts
Maybe I have been completely spoiled with a very high-end PC rig (8800 GTX), but in my eyes this game's graphics lean more towards bad than good. They are not god-awfully bad, but there is nothing really shining in the screens. It also has a lot of that fuzzy TV-consolish look that plagued the PS2. There are low-res textures everywhere. Maybe Wii-console users are not used to seeing "omg graphics" the way I am heh.
Avatar image for Wintry_Flutist
Wintry_Flutist

14834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Wintry_Flutist
Member since 2005 • 14834 Posts

looks like an on-rails shooter a some parts... why?

monty_4256

First, the game is made of a bunch of little segments and a godamn variety of gameplay, so I don't see the need of deep shooter controls. It balances first aid, shooting, quick time actions, platforming, etc. I can't help but to compare it to MGS: one thing I hated in MGS1 and specially MGS2 is that you had a hell of an arsenal, but you rarely had freedom to use them as you wished, every situation required very specific actions. So I'm happy Disaster has more linear shooting so you won't feel like you want to do something else, but just can't because it would 100% fail.

Second, there could be some in game animations going on. Let's say a disaster is going on and animations kick off, you can't let the player go everywhere, you have to restrict his moves so it won't interfere with animations. It kinda reminds me of Gears of War, there's plenty of sections where you're limited to a small area and everywhere else lots of stuff is happening.

After all, according to Nintendo, it's "similar" to on rails shooting, but not specifically on rails.

Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#54 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts

The protagonist looks like a douchebag, though.

LordQuorthon
Yeah. It looks like they were trying to create a character that would appeal to both a Western (muscular body, skin color, clothes) and Japanese audience (hair, facial hair, eyes).

Turned out poorly imo

Avatar image for monty_4256
monty_4256

8577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 monty_4256
Member since 2004 • 8577 Posts
[QUOTE="monty_4256"]

looks like an on-rails shooter a some parts... why?

Wintry_Flutist

First, the game is made of a bunch of little segments and a godamn variety of gameplay, so I don't see the need of deep shooter controls. It balances first aid, shooting, quick time actions, platforming, etc. I can't help but to compare it to MGS: one thing I hated in MGS1 and specially MGS2 is that you had a hell of an arsenal, but you rarely had freedom to use them as you wished, every situation required very specific actions. So I'm happy Disaster has more linear shooting so you won't feel like you want to do something else, but just can't because it would 100% fail.

Second, there could be some in game animations going on. Let's say a disaster is going on and animations kick off, you can't let the player go everywhere, you have to restrict his moves so it won't interfere with animations. It kinda reminds me of Gears of War, there's plenty of sections where you're limited to a small area and everywhere else lots of stuff is happening.

After all, according to Nintendo, it's "similar" to on rails shooting, but not specifically on rails.

there's no excusing this, I'm sorry to tell ya, but taking away the freedom of a player as soon as action starts is just stupid, they have freedom everywhere else, why not when it's really useful

on-rails shooters, as great as they were, are not great ideas for home consoles, and this "you have to restrict movement thing" that's really a load of rubbish, if they can have freedom for exploring city streets they can have freedom shooting people in the face. They've just gone a lost someone who was actually interested in the game

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#56 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

We get another mediocre third-person action game? Sweetness!THA-TODD-BEAST

Gamespot review: 5.5/10
http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/disasterdayofcrisis/review.html

Was I correct in my original assessment?  :)

I saw this one coming 50 miles away.