You Know What Nintendo Should Do?

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#1 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

Nintendo should stop making games on their own. Just about every game they've made in collaboration with someone has been amazing. F-Zero GX is one of the best racing games, and definately the best F-Zero game ever. Everyone recognizes this as nintendo's doing, but it was SEGA that actually pushed it to its greatness. Also, The Legend of Zelda has been touched by another Dev, Capcom, and we were bestowed two of the best (IMO) top-view LoZ games, being only suceeded by A Link To the Past. Oracle of Ages had some of the hardest puzzles in a zelda game EVER, and i found it really fun, yet frustrating beyond belief. Retro Studios gave us the metroid prime trilogy, and soon the ninja gaiden guys will be giving us another metroid game! just about the only nintendo character who has been with nintendo all the time is mario, and let's face it, he's starting to show his age. nintendo should just lay off developing for a bit and let other devs fufil their fantasies with the characters, we've done nothing but benefit so far, so why not?

Avatar image for blankshore
blankshore

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#2 blankshore
Member since 2008 • 1809 Posts

They shouldn't stop making every game on their own. Sometimes Nintendo does great things that others would refuse to do. But they should do more collaberations. On that, I agree with you.

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
how can u forget the great Square/Nintendo Collabo of Super Mario RPG
Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
They pump out great Zelda games and Mario Platformers. I love them on their own.
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#5 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

they done well on their own for years, i dont expect them to stop now,

sure every once in a while they collaberate its good to , but their great over all , super mario galaxy and zelda is 2 of the most enjoyable wii games ive played,

not to mention mariokart marioparty and ssbb

Avatar image for StephenBassford
StephenBassford

889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 StephenBassford
Member since 2004 • 889 Posts

The reason why Nintendo characters are still around, have a high reputation, and consistently sell and perform well is because they are NINTENDO games. I see where you are coming from, but as they say:

"Don't fix what ain't broken."

Also, I wouldn't trust any Nintendo franchises in the hands of anyone except Rare or Retro Studios (we all know what happened to the first).

I am however excited about team ninja's colaboration with metroid. Their work with Ninja Gaiden is top notch.

Avatar image for 228623477423185005978085524869
228623477423185005978085524869

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 228623477423185005978085524869
Member since 2009 • 604 Posts

How could you not mention the Rare/Nintendo partnership on the DKC trilogy? It's always the first one I remember.

And as long as they don't let anyone touch the danger zone (aka. Mario and Zelda franchises), I'm cool with that. :P

Avatar image for so_hai
so_hai

4385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#8 so_hai
Member since 2007 • 4385 Posts
Having the word "frustrating" in the same sentence when you're trying to prove greatness isn't convincing...
Avatar image for boba707
boba707

1021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 boba707
Member since 2007 • 1021 Posts
super mario galaxy...
Avatar image for StoopidKrazy
StoopidKrazy

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 StoopidKrazy
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
dkc and dk64 were GREAT why hasn't Nintendo tried to create an other 3D DK platformer? Donkey Konga is good too, the New Play Control
Avatar image for Junior_AIN
Junior_AIN

4703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 132

User Lists: 1

#11 Junior_AIN
Member since 2007 • 4703 Posts
Maybe, if you think about F-Zero and Metroid Prime were the best games last gen. And some sweet games happened to be with a partnership.
Avatar image for wii_gamerz
wii_gamerz

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 wii_gamerz
Member since 2007 • 319 Posts

More importantly, they should stop letting third parties make Wii games unsupervised. I mean, there are some great third-party Wii games out there, but most of them are crap. Ninty should at least watch over the process. Collaborations = win

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

More importantly, they should stop letting third parties make Wii games unsupervised. I mean, there are some great third-party Wii games out there, but most of them are crap. Ninty should at least watch over the process. Collaborations = win

wii_gamerz

I have an idea. If you see crap don't eat it.

Avatar image for MadSavage22
MadSavage22

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 MadSavage22
Member since 2009 • 587 Posts

I think colaboration is key here. Not to just say "hey take thereins and lets see how you do" more like "what ideas do you have about this....well I was thinking this". We still want that Nintendo element (you all know what Im talking about) but keep the game fresh and filled with new ideas.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#15 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

How could you not mention the Rare/Nintendo partnership on the DKC trilogy? It's always the first one I remember.

And as long as they don't let anyone touch the danger zone (aka. Mario and Zelda franchises), I'm cool with that. :P

dan_the_menace

capcom did a really good job, i mean a REALLY good job with oracle of ages and seasons

Avatar image for TaMuK711
TaMuK711

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TaMuK711
Member since 2009 • 3367 Posts

I agree, best example I can think of was the great Nintendo + Rare duo. :(

Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#17 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

I don't mind Nintendo collaborating with certain developers on certain projects, but there is one thing I respectfully and wholeheartedly disagree with you on.

just about the only character who has been with Nintendo all this time is mario, and let's face it, he's starting to show his agegarret_duffman

This, this, and this say hi. :P While I'm not against a great developer working on a Nintendo game or two here or there, I'm very much against Nintendo not working on games themselves. Even when other developers have been working on certain games, they've done so with at least a little oversight by Nintendo, which I think plays a significant part with the outcome of a lot of these games. Even with that, it hasn't been perfect. Look at the last two StarFox console games, as both of them was handled by someone not named Nintendo and it can be said that neither title was able to capture the StarFox experience many fans know and love. In fact, many fans say that's a franchise that should be developed only by Nintendo for the sake of getting it back on track. Also, if Nintendo goes on this major collab spree with other developers, what room does that leave these developers for major projects of their own? :P

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36089 Posts

how can u forget the great Square/Nintendo Collabo of Super Mario RPGfunsohng
That's probably one of the most boring SNES games I've played. Love Paper Mario, though. Square.. I do not like.

Avatar image for SwOOp_de
SwOOp_de

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 SwOOp_de
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Nintendo is great they don't need to colaborate! they made the best games ever! but I would like to see some 2D-Games for the Wii! I like the old school flair of Super Mario!...I think I have to try F-Zero..I only played it on SNES and it was one of the best racing games I've ever played! hmm what else? Ah I think they should do a new StarFox with Vector Graphics like on SNES!!! I think they could make awesome games with the Wii Graphics & CPU-Power!
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

I don't mind Nintendo collaborating with certain developers on certain projects, but there is one thing I respectfully and wholeheartedly disagree with you on.

[quote="garret_duffman"]just about the only character who has been with Nintendo all this time is mario, and let's face it, he's starting to show his ageMadmangamer364

This, this, and this say hi. :P While I'm not against a great developer working on a Nintendo game or two here or there, I'm very much against Nintendo not working on games themselves. Even when other developers have been working on certain games, they've done so with at least a little oversight by Nintendo, which I think plays a significant part with the outcome of a lot of these games. Even with that, it hasn't been perfect. Look at the last two StarFox console games, as both of them was handled by someone not named Nintendo and it can be said that neither title was able to capture the StarFox experience many fans know and love. In fact, many fans say that's a franchise that should be developed only by Nintendo for the sake of getting it back on track. Also, if Nintendo goes on this major collab spree with other developers, what room does that leave these developers for major projects of their own? :P

im sorry, i should have specified when i said mario is showing his age. while ctritic-wise, mario is as young and fresh as ever, when it comes down to the games, they are just starting to feel uninspired. the freshest thing mario is doing right now is teaming up with luigi in RPG's, his platformers are starting to feel repetetive. I just think that insight from an outside company could help boost the whole mario thing, like SEGA did with F-zero and Capcom did with zelda, and Square did with mario previously by putting him in an RPG (which APPARENTLY, nintendo really liked, as now mario is in HOW many RPGs? that all play similarly to the original SMRPG) Im not trying to insult or anything, im just saying that collaborations have always turned out pretty positive for us, and we should ask for them more. i could use another super-hard-puzzle-filled Legend of zelda that will make me tear my hair out. isnt that what we all really want? or another F-zero that allows for us to create our own racing machines and play through a fun and pretty unique story?
Avatar image for hansolo14
hansolo14

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 hansolo14
Member since 2003 • 976 Posts

Are you crazy?

ninty games are good cause... their made by nintendo :roll:

Nintendo had prove that is the best developer so far

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#22 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts
[QUOTE="hansolo14"]

Are you crazy?

ninty games are good cause... their made by nintendo :roll:

Nintendo had prove that is the best developer so far

Twilight Princess, both versions say no.
Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="hansolo14"]

Are you crazy?

ninty games are good cause... their made by nintendo :roll:

Nintendo had prove that is the best developer so far

Twilight Princess, both versions say no.

I love Twilight Princess.
Avatar image for 228623477423185005978085524869
228623477423185005978085524869

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 228623477423185005978085524869
Member since 2009 • 604 Posts

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]

How could you not mention the Rare/Nintendo partnership on the DKC trilogy? It's always the first one I remember.

And as long as they don't let anyone touch the danger zone (aka. Mario and Zelda franchises), I'm cool with that. :P

garrett_duffman

capcom did a really good job, i mean a REALLY good job with oracle of ages and seasons



Yeah, I think Capcom also developed The Minish Cap, and that turned out to be an awesome game. What I wanted to say is to leave the Mario and Zelda console games on Nintendo's hands. I mean... they are the best developer in the world for a reason, aren't they?

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#25 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]

How could you not mention the Rare/Nintendo partnership on the DKC trilogy? It's always the first one I remember.

And as long as they don't let anyone touch the danger zone (aka. Mario and Zelda franchises), I'm cool with that. :P

dan_the_menace

capcom did a really good job, i mean a REALLY good job with oracle of ages and seasons



Yeah, I think Capcom also developed The Minish Cap, and that turned out to be an awesome game. What I wanted to say is to leave the Mario and Zelda console games on Nintendo's hands. I mean... they are the best developer in the world for a reason, aren't they?

id love to see what capcom can do with a 3d zelda game...

Avatar image for 1-Up_Gamer
1-Up_Gamer

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 1-Up_Gamer
Member since 2009 • 483 Posts
Nintendo needs no help in making Marios and Zeldas, but partnerships in the other franchises would make for great games. One great partnership was Nintendo and Rare. Rare made the DK games awesome, but since they left after DK64, Donkey Kong hardly ever saw the light.
Avatar image for 228623477423185005978085524869
228623477423185005978085524869

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 228623477423185005978085524869
Member since 2009 • 604 Posts

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] capcom did a really good job, i mean a REALLY good job with oracle of ages and seasons

garrett_duffman



Yeah, I think Capcom also developed The Minish Cap, and that turned out to be an awesome game. What I wanted to say is to leave the Mario and Zelda console games on Nintendo's hands. I mean... they are the best developer in the world for a reason, aren't they?

id love to see what capcom can do with a 3d zelda game...



Yeah... Maybe this is just me being afraid people other than Nintendo mess around with franchises I love so much. Kinda like having a dusty ming vase - because you're afraid to touch it and break it - at your house and a friend says "Hey, I could clean that without breaking it" and you say "HELL DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH THAT OR I'LL BITE YOUR HEAD OFF"

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#28 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]

Yeah, I think Capcom also developed The Minish Cap, and that turned out to be an awesome game. What I wanted to say is to leave the Mario and Zelda console games on Nintendo's hands. I mean... they are the best developer in the world for a reason, aren't they?

dan_the_menace

id love to see what capcom can do with a 3d zelda game...



Yeah... Maybe this is just me being afraid people other than Nintendo mess around with franchises I love so much. Kinda like having a dusty ming vase - because you're afraid to touch it and break it - at your house and a friend says "Hey, I could clean that without breaking it" and you say "HELL DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH THAT OR I'LL BITE YOUR HEAD OFF"

but at the same time, if capcom made a console zelda game and it tanked, it would probably still sell like hotcakes just because of the name, and nintendo could make another

Avatar image for King-gamer
King-gamer

5633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#29 King-gamer
Member since 2006 • 5633 Posts
Yes they should let others make the games for them so they can concentrate on creating new franchises.
Avatar image for skhellitor
skhellitor

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 skhellitor
Member since 2005 • 272 Posts

nintendo is one of the most consistant and high quality publishers in the history of the business if not the best. i think colabs can be great, but nobody understands nintendo or the wii/ds the way that nintendo does. i would like to see some of there lesser franchises colabed to see what could be done with say, starfox or f zero. im interested to see how the new metroid pans out the ninja gaiden series in infamous for terrible camera angles, i know i played both of them and being very difficult and fast paced , while metroids challenge seems to come from a slow methotical pace and using your brain to find the objective.

Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

im sorry, i should have specified when i said mario is showing his age. while ctritic-wise, mario is as young and fresh as ever, when it comes down to the games, they are just starting to feel uninspired. the freshest thing mario is doing right now is teaming up with luigi in RPG's, his platformers are starting to feel repetetive. I just think that insight from an outside company could help boost the whole mario thing, like SEGA did with F-zero and Capcom did with zelda, and Square did with mario previously by putting him in an RPG (which APPARENTLY, nintendo really liked, as now mario is in HOW many RPGs? that all play similarly to the original SMRPG) Im not trying to insult or anything, im just saying that collaborations have always turned out pretty positive for us, and we should ask for them more. i could use another super-hard-puzzle-filled Legend of zelda that will make me tear my hair out. isnt that what we all really want? or another F-zero that allows for us to create our own racing machines and play through a fun and pretty unique story? garrett_duffman

I'm more in tune to your point now. Still, if it's not broken, why fix it? If Mario's still getting high marks, why risk losing momentum with the series by letting someone else handle the game? As far as the games feeling uninspired, that's a matter of opinion, really. Personally, I enjoyed the gravity aspect of Super Mario Galaxy and the Wii-specific challenges that the game created, and I think what Super Paper Mario brings to the table, with its 2D/3D morphing gamplay, is something more developers should look into. At the end of the day, while F-Zero GX was a great racing game with some cool additions, it was still a racer in the end. The same goes for Zelda, as well. It's not like the games are likely to undergo drastic changes in the hands of a different developer, and if they do, it's very possible we could get an incident where fans are upset, much like what happened with StarFox. And poor DK still doesn't know what he wants to do these days... :P

I'm not saying that a different developer couldn't hurt any of these games, including Mario, but I've come to like the offerings Nintendo has given as well. Once again, I'm not in total disagreement with your point, as I think seeing more collabs could create promising results. Still, at the end of the day, I want a polished product, and Nintendo has as good of a rep for that as anyone. :P

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#32 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

nintendo is one of the most consistant and high quality publishers in the history of the business if not the best. i think colabs can be great, but nobody understands nintendo or the wii/ds the way that nintendo does. i would like to see some of there lesser franchises colabed to see what could be done with say, starfox or f zero. im interested to see how the new metroid pans out the ninja gaiden series in infamous for terrible camera angles, i know i played both of them and being very difficult and fast paced , while metroids challenge seems to come from a slow methotical pace and using your brain to find the objective.

skhellitor
consistent being the real keyword here. you know what else is consistent? the wii board complaining about games being too easy, the wii board talking about how nintendo is making games too easy, or too casual friendly, the collab games are some of the hardest, and some of the best. i think the prime series is harder than super metroid. the only hard part of SM is figuring out where to go, which will take half an hour maybe. nintendo should collab on the bigger franchises, just to see. (actually i just want another capcom zelda game, i like them more than nintendo's zelda games...)
Avatar image for 228623477423185005978085524869
228623477423185005978085524869

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 228623477423185005978085524869
Member since 2009 • 604 Posts

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]


Yeah... Maybe this is just me being afraid people other than Nintendo mess around with franchises I love so much. Kinda like having a dusty ming vase - because you're afraid to touch it and break it - at your house and a friend says "Hey, I could clean that without breaking it" and you say "HELL DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH THAT OR I'LL BITE YOUR HEAD OFF"

garrett_duffman

but at the same time, if capcom made a console zelda game and it tanked, it would probably still sell like hotcakes just because of the name, and nintendo could make another



Still, I don't think a major game selling just because of the name fits Nintendo properly. Well, normally a Zelda game sells because of the "Zelda" slapped on the box, but also because people know it's a quality product developed by Nintendo. I imagine that if I, a casual gamer who don't happen to do any research before spending money on games, bought a Zelda game just by its fame, and as soon as I fired up the game the Capcom logo appeared on the screen, eyebrows would raise and curses would be shouted. Nintendo has a reputation to care about. They won't just hand over their big time series for other devs to have fun with.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#34 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]


Yeah... Maybe this is just me being afraid people other than Nintendo mess around with franchises I love so much. Kinda like having a dusty ming vase - because you're afraid to touch it and break it - at your house and a friend says "Hey, I could clean that without breaking it" and you say "HELL DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH THAT OR I'LL BITE YOUR HEAD OFF"

dan_the_menace

but at the same time, if capcom made a console zelda game and it tanked, it would probably still sell like hotcakes just because of the name, and nintendo could make another



Still, I don't think a major game selling just because of the name fits Nintendo properly. Well, normally a Zelda game sells because of the "Zelda" slapped on the box, but also because people know it's a quality product developed by Nintendo. I imagine that if I, a casual gamer who don't happen to do any research before spending money on games, bought a Zelda game just by its fame, and as soon as I fired up the game the Capcom logo appeared on the screen, eyebrows would raise and curses would be shouted. Nintendo has a reputation to care about. They won't just hand over their big time series for other devs to have fun with.

lol Oracle of ages and seasons had capcom and nintendo. and nintendo DID hand out bit time series to other devs to have fun with

Avatar image for 228623477423185005978085524869
228623477423185005978085524869

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 228623477423185005978085524869
Member since 2009 • 604 Posts

[QUOTE="dan_the_menace"]

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"] but at the same time, if capcom made a console zelda game and it tanked, it would probably still sell like hotcakes just because of the name, and nintendo could make another

garrett_duffman



Still, I don't think a major game selling just because of the name fits Nintendo properly. Well, normally a Zelda game sells because of the "Zelda" slapped on the box, but also because people know it's a quality product developed by Nintendo. I imagine that if I, a casual gamer who don't happen to do any research before spending money on games, bought a Zelda game just by its fame, and as soon as I fired up the game the Capcom logo appeared on the screen, eyebrows would raise and curses would be shouted. Nintendo has a reputation to care about. They won't just hand over their big time series for other devs to have fun with.

lol Oracle of ages and seasons had capcom and nintendo. and nintendo DID hand out bit time series to other devs to have fun with



I get you. I meant it for the console versions. It would sure be interesting to see how things would turn out if Flagship Studios made the next Zelda, but also that would be a very dangerous and bold move for Nintendo to make. IDK... If there was a way for 3rd parties to experiment with Nintendo franchises without putting them in front of a possible BOMB in terms of sales, I would even imagine Namco developing the next Super Smash Bros. lol

Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts

Wow, you really got me thinking. Most of Nintendo's best games are actually games made in collaboration of another company:?

Avatar image for Captain-Pants
Captain-Pants

3533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Captain-Pants
Member since 2005 • 3533 Posts

Terrible idea

Avatar image for TaMuK711
TaMuK711

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 TaMuK711
Member since 2009 • 3367 Posts

I think every franchise except Mario needs some third-party flaire.. BioWare would be a nice touch to Zelda ;)

Avatar image for Captain-Pants
Captain-Pants

3533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Captain-Pants
Member since 2005 • 3533 Posts

Wow, you really got me thinking. Most of Nintendo's best games are actually games made in collaboration of another company:?

Thiago26792

No.

All of the main series Zelda games made by Nintendo. All of the main series Mario games made by Nintendo. All of the Fire Emblem games made by Nintendo. The worst Star Fox games were collaborations. I don't wanna keep on going with every series so I will close with this; The most critically/player acclaimed Nintendo games are made in-house with few exceptions.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#40 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="Thiago26792"]

Wow, you really got me thinking. Most of Nintendo's best games are actually games made in collaboration of another company:?

Captain-Pants

No.

All of the main series Zelda games made by Nintendo. All of the main series Mario games made by Nintendo. All of the Fire Emblem games made by Nintendo. The worst Star Fox games were collaborations. I don't wanna keep on going with every series so I will close with this; The most critically/player acclaimed Nintendo games are made in-house with few exceptions.

uhh.... wow i dont even know where to start...I think im gonna hit the hay first then tackle this in the morning maybe...
Avatar image for Captain-Pants
Captain-Pants

3533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Captain-Pants
Member since 2005 • 3533 Posts

[QUOTE="Captain-Pants"]

[QUOTE="Thiago26792"]

Wow, you really got me thinking. Most of Nintendo's best games are actually games made in collaboration of another company:?

garrett_duffman

No.

All of the main series Zelda games made by Nintendo. All of the main series Mario games made by Nintendo. All of the Fire Emblem games made by Nintendo. The worst Star Fox games were collaborations. I don't wanna keep on going with every series so I will close with this; The most critically/player acclaimed Nintendo games are made in-house with few exceptions.

uhh.... wow i dont even know where to start...I think im gonna hit the hay first then tackle this in the morning maybe...

There is no false information in my response. I like the idea of Nintendo collaborating with other talented developers, but all of their biggest title were made in-house. So, I don't see the point in turning everything they do into a collaborative effort. It's silly.

Avatar image for BigBen11111
BigBen11111

1529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 BigBen11111
Member since 2003 • 1529 Posts

And run a risk of Nintendo's skills to get rusty, HECK NO.

Avatar image for deactivated-6224e9178325f
deactivated-6224e9178325f

1556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-6224e9178325f
Member since 2009 • 1556 Posts

although Nintendo has produced some great games with the help of other developers, I don't think they should always collaborate. Every now and again is okay, but all the time wouldn't be so cool.

Avatar image for fatbed
fatbed

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 fatbed
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

they allready r having a bunch of third-party games comming out for wii, the producers are just not trying hard enough to make somthing as truely epic as the past

Avatar image for GamerJM
GamerJM

1218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 GamerJM
Member since 2007 • 1218 Posts
I wouldn't say to stop. Sure, Capcom makes good LoZ, but I think I perfer most of the Nintendo-published ones over it. Mario games are still brilliant and by Nintendo. I hated Metriod Prime, so no for Metriod.
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#47 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

they allready r having a bunch of third-party games comming out for wii, the producers are just not trying hard enough to make somthing as truely epic as the past

fatbed
these third party devs, aside from team ninja, arent making nintendo games
Avatar image for Thiago26792
Thiago26792

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Thiago26792
Member since 2007 • 11059 Posts

[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"][QUOTE="Captain-Pants"]

No.

All of the main series Zelda games made by Nintendo. All of the main series Mario games made by Nintendo. All of the Fire Emblem games made by Nintendo. The worst Star Fox games were collaborations. I don't wanna keep on going with every series so I will close with this; The most critically/player acclaimed Nintendo games are made in-house with few exceptions.

Captain-Pants

uhh.... wow i dont even know where to start...I think im gonna hit the hay first then tackle this in the morning maybe...

There is no false information in my response. I like the idea of Nintendo collaborating with other talented developers, but all of their biggest title were made in-house. So, I don't see the point in turning everything they do into a collaborative effort. It's silly.

The Mario, Zelda, and Star Fox series (Star Fox had basically only 2 great games) are the only ones I can think of. Oh and maybe Paper Mario. What about Donkey Kong, F-Zero, the handheld Zeldas, Animal Crossing, and Metroid?
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#49 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
... retro was a second party at that time, so if you stop and think... anyways, it wont happen, and you know why? because games nintendo make also turn out awesome.
Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#50 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]... retro was a second party at that time, so if you stop and think... anyways, it wont happen, and you know why? because games nintendo make also turn out awesome.

why do people insist on saying it wont happen when it already has in the past? honestly you dont make any sense