[QUOTE="TheGrayEye"]
[QUOTE="Tigre_Rivera"]
That's funny. Someone who believes in an actuall entity, is making fun of another man who believes in multiple invisible men in the sky that have already been proven to be non-existint.
Fixed.
Tigre_Rivera
If you can prove to me that there is an actual entity, I will literally change my stance on faith and religion this very second. I will no longer be agnostic, and will not only believe in God, but acknowlege his/it's existance for the rest of my life.
Look, we already know that these "gods" you speak of were proven to be nothing more than characters made to explain natural happenings in the world. It has yet to be proven/disproven about my God being a non-existint one. So, altogether, my religion is more plausible.
Of course it's more plausible- now. To be honest, religion is only relevant until science proves it wrong. The only correct attitude towards it is being agnostic. You admit your god has yet to be disproven, but that also means he hasn't been proven. Something can't be a fact, or an "actual entity" until it is PROVEN to be so. You basically just gave me the answer I was looking for in spades.
If religion can't SHOW me that what it says is true, then I have no reason to actually spend my time believing it. Instead, I will contine to live in an agnostic light, and neither deny the existance of god, nor accept that there is a god.
Log in to comment