Your committee leaves the process vulnerable to corruption. Voters will vote for themselves which will result in there being no strongly supported candidates. Then there is nothing stopping the committee from nominating their favourites for each caption and putting them up against unpopular users with no chance of winning. This committee is a bad idea.[QUOTE="Laihendi"][QUOTE="dave123321"] Jim has said that mods won't let either of us just hijack hosting duties. We must be chooses by our peers. Have a feeling pirate will get it. I hope he implements my committee if he does.jimkabrhel
Corruption? This is an internet forum, and we're discussion yearly awards that mean nothing and should just be for fun. You are taking this way too seriously.
If you don't think this committee is a tool for corruption, then please answer this: why have a committee? Why allow self nominations if you are only going to accept a small number of them? The whole point of not allowing self nominations is to weed out people with no chance of winning. Why change that? What is the point?
Log in to comment