House approves ‘Keep Your Plan’ ObamaCare bill; 39 Dems defect
Can you smell that? That's the smell of fear.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
House approves ‘Keep Your Plan’ ObamaCare bill; 39 Dems defect
Can you smell that? That's the smell of fear.
That is due to them wanting to be reelected next year. If people remember that they voted for the bill to begin with, they will lose their elections soundly, but that is to be seen. The voting public can be really stupid at times.
Obama’s prosecutorial discretion raises questions about executive authority also shows how his declaration yesterday, to extend the old policies for a year might even be illegal according to the law.
State insurers head: Obama fix could sink healthcare law
Even liberal Howard Dean questions whether Obama's "fix" is legal
People get fed up and discouraged from visiting us when they see separate threads for the same topic within the time frame of what I call page time.
It's what killed OT
The time frame of a unit of page time. Which is now even worse given the fact that there may be 50 threads a page. Although Maybe it's still 20 or something less then 50
People get fed up and discouraged from visiting us when they see separate threads for the same topic within the time frame of what I call page time.
It's what killed OT
That's ok, you don't have to worry about OT anymore since you are leaving. Good riddance, either that, stay on topic or feel free to not click on my threads anymore.
The issue is the redundancy of OT. Not the thread content. As I said already Obama needs to reap the consequences of his action.
As I said already Obama needs to reap the consequences of his action.
Yeah, you said that. You also said you where leaving OT. So we can't really take you at your word, can we Dave?
@WhiteKnight77: but even if people do vote them back into office does that mean that they were stupid?
Perhaps they understand the issues at hand and made a decision that was in good faith. I think one of the main issues is that people feel that paying the piper automatically means that everyone should feel the way you feel. That is a simple minded version of the world that takes away people's sense of agency. If people vote back the democrats that does not necessarily mean they didn't hold them accountable. It may just means that they had a different way of assessing the pros and cons of the situation
house approves alot of crap, they have voted to overturn obamacare probably something like 50 times now. Its just a political game that allows people to vote against it so they can win primaries.
Why do we need a new thread every god damned time something new happens with obamacare? Keep it in 1 thread please.
Eh, we don't really have enough new threads being made to keep this place interesting tbh. Might as well make new threads.
Anyways, doesn't a veto threat make them fairly safe to do whatever they want?
If Obamacare was a Republican idea (stuff like the mandate was) they'd be defending it to the end. The battle over Obamacare is all bs.
Its amazing how the far right operates the same way everywhere. They use the exact same dumb methods. LOOK EVEN THE OTHER SIDE DOESN'T SUPPORT THE OTHER SIDE. The ironic part is how they think they're being real clever and cunning while in reality they're being the same dipshits they've always been.
No ObamaCare is a look at Obamacare.
That sandwich analogy was stupid.
How so? Would you rather a person eat for a day or eat for a lifetime? The sandwich analogy fits right in with "give a person a fish, feed him for a day; teach a person to fish, feed him for a lifetime." Would you rather eat for just a day or eat for a lifetime?
No ObamaCare is a look at Obamacare.
That sandwich analogy was stupid.
How so? Would you rather a person eat for a day or eat for a lifetime? The sandwich analogy fits right in with "give a person a fish, feed him for a day; teach a person to fish, feed him for a lifetime." Would you rather eat for just a day or eat for a lifetime?
Because it grossly oversimplifies the issue.
No ObamaCare is a look at Obamacare.
That sandwich analogy was stupid.
How so? Would you rather a person eat for a day or eat for a lifetime? The sandwich analogy fits right in with "give a person a fish, feed him for a day; teach a person to fish, feed him for a lifetime." Would you rather eat for just a day or eat for a lifetime?
Because it grossly oversimplifies the issue.
Some things need to be simplified so others can understand it.
No ObamaCare is a look at Obamacare.
That sandwich analogy was stupid.
How so? Would you rather a person eat for a day or eat for a lifetime? The sandwich analogy fits right in with "give a person a fish, feed him for a day; teach a person to fish, feed him for a lifetime." Would you rather eat for just a day or eat for a lifetime?
Because it grossly oversimplifies the issue.
Some things need to be simplified so others can understand it.
Not if it's simplified to the point that it's not applicable to reality anymore.
The problem is that people who have low-premium high-deductible policies will be out of compliance under obamacare, which is why their policies are getting canceled. This "fix" only stretches it out for a year, at which point they still will get dropped.
@WhiteKnight77:
As d said, oversimplifying things is an issue when because it doesn't allow the crucial facts to get through.
@WhiteKnight77:
As d said, oversimplifying things is an issue when because it doesn't allow the crucial facts to get through.
So the both of you are fine with feeding a person for a day instead of that person eating for a lifetime?
Point being that boiling things down too much will make it inapplicable to the situation. Or it SHOULD
@WhiteKnight77:
As d said, oversimplifying things is an issue when because it doesn't allow the crucial facts to get through.
That's something Republicans love to do to trick and scare voters into siding with them.
@WhiteKnight77:
As d said, oversimplifying things is an issue when because it doesn't allow the crucial facts to get through.
So the both of you are fine with feeding a person for a day instead of that person eating for a lifetime?
Also why is this your response to the posts talking about oversimplification issues. Even if you disagree with the assessment that things are being too simplified to convey the situation in a meaningful manner shouldn't you be making that point instead of just seemingly plugging your ears and asking the question again?
This reminds me about asking how can a question be misleading. You should honesty be able to see how a question can be misleading .
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment