6 year old getting sued...

LINK

6 year old girl is allowed to be sued for causing the death of an elderly woman... The little girl was 4 at the time of the accident and hit an 87 year old woman while racing her bike, fracturing the elderly woman's hip and causing her death 3 months later...

What say you?

3 months later? Maybe she died because she was 87? Also its not the 4 year olds fault some old **** couldn't get out of the way.

You can't sue minors.Quick-Time

Not according to this judge:

"He also wrote that the Juliet's lawyer had presented no evidence as to the child's lack of intelligence or maturity, nor that "a child of similar age and capacity" would not have understood the danger of riding a bicycle into an old woman."

Stupid, stupid, stupid, thats all that I can think.

This world lacks common sense....

Im sure it wasnt the girls fault...

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

Justs proves how heartless the goverment is.

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

TheHighWind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

[QUOTE="Quick-Time"]You can't sue minors.Buttons1990

Not according to this judge:

"He also wrote that the Juliet's lawyer had presented no evidence as to the child's lack of intelligence or maturity, nor that "a child of similar age and capacity" would not have understood the danger of riding a bicycle into an old woman."

I doubt that judge is going to be a judge come next elections.

3 months later? Maybe she died because she was 87? Also its not the 4 year olds fault some old **** couldn't get out of the way.

breakinglaws

[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]

[QUOTE="Quick-Time"]You can't sue minors.topgunmv

Not according to this judge:

"He also wrote that the Juliet's lawyer had presented no evidence as to the child's lack of intelligence or maturity, nor that "a child of similar age and capacity" would not have understood the danger of riding a bicycle into an old woman."

I doubt that judge is going to be a judge come next elections.

Despicable.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]

Not according to this judge:

"He also wrote that the Juliet's lawyer had presented no evidence as to the child's lack of intelligence or maturity, nor that "a child of similar age and capacity" would not have understood the danger of riding a bicycle into an old woman."

mattbbpl

I doubt that judge is going to be a judge come next elections.

They have to be elected though.

I'd like to see the elderly ladies medical records. If the hip fracture caused death 3 months later, I wonder what they did directly after the incident to supposedly remedy the problem.Setsa

My grandmother fell and broke her hip at a similar age. Her mind was fine before it happened, but afterwards you'd be lucky to get more than a smile and a "hi" out of her. 7 or 8 months after the accident you could barely speak to her at all.

She just completely deteriorated. At that age, a broken hip is a lot more than just a broken bone.

We all know they are going to seek the damages from the state or the parents... This is despicable.

Stupid, stupid, stupid, thats all that I can think.

kidsmelly

This world lacks common sense....

Gaming-Planet

That's some major bull**** right there.

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

BigBoss154

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Shot_Mr._Burns#Part_two

Not always indeed.

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

BigBoss154

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

Here is another murderer who was a child: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Bell

But she was 10, and the kids in your example were 10 as well.

10 is long way in learning and maturity from 4.

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

swamprat_basic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

Here is another murderer who was a child: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Bell

But she was 10, and the kids in your example were 10 as well.

10 is long way in learning and maturity from 4.

Still not enough... Human's can't even percieve depth until they are almost two (which is why you don't allow infants that can crawl to be on top of things, as they can't tell they are above something as they have no idea of depth and will simply crawl off the edge)... So I don't see how this judge considers a 4 year old able to judge morality 2 years later... 10 year olds either in the case of those examples... The human brain isn't even fully developed until you are well into your 20's....

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I doubt that judge is going to be a judge come next elections.

topgunmv

They have to be elected though.

[QUOTE="swamprat_basic"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

Buttons1990

Here is another murderer who was a child: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Bell

But she was 10, and the kids in your example were 10 as well.

10 is long way in learning and maturity from 4.

Still not enough... Human's can't even percieve depth until they are almost two (which is why you don't allow infants that can crawl to be on top of things, as they can't tell they are above something as they have no idea of depth and will simply crawl off the edge)... So I don't see how this judge considers a 4 year old able to judge morality 2 years later... 10 year olds either in the case of those examples... The human brain isn't even fully developed until you are well into your 20's....

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] Don't most judges lack term limits?mattbbpl

They have to be elected though.

That would certainly be a bummer.

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

[QUOTE="TheHighWind"]

She didn't know any better.

Children are always innocent, end of story.

swamprat_basic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger

Not always.

Here is another murderer who was a child: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Bell

But she was 10, and the kids in your example were 10 as well.

10 is long way in learning and maturity from 4.

Those cases usually are caved in by public demand rather any kind of rationale research, or thought.

She was 4 years old.

This is bull, back when I was 4, I was riding my bike, and I crashed. I'd admit that I wasnt aware that bikes cant go up 90 degree angles. Maybe that girl thought that the old lady would move out of the way, or maybe she was distracted by something. After all, kids, epecially kids younger than 6, have very poor attention spans.

Wow, just...wow....:?

"He also wrote that the Juliet's lawyer had presented no evidence as to the child's lack of intelligence or maturity, nor that "a child of similar age and capacity" would not have understood the danger of riding a bicycle into an old woman"

Wait....this can't be serious???? You have to prove to a judge that a 4 year old lacks intelligence and maturity?

wow, what is wrong with the judge... How is this even possible...?

I don't really understand how you "sue" a child since she isn't even old enough to have a job or money. What are they going to take from her? Her barbie collection?UT_Wrestler