Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
As did Islam with their last caliphate(the Ottoman Empire).Islam will probably never reach that point because it has the absolute best conditions to flourish: Ignorance, illiteracy, and severe oppression.
I'm a non Muslim and about 3/4 of the way through....
-Jihad means to Overcome Internal Struggle, Strive for Social Justice, and to Overcome oppressive Tyranny.
-Women are equal to men in Islam
-Don't hate other people, Treat Others Fairly
-If someone says Hi to you say Hi back to them.
-Spend your money for good: to help your parents, your family, orphans, wayfarers, and the needy.
It's a shame fanatics have given Islam fuel to let others that don't understand to intensify their fear and Hatred. I guess Islam has the same problems Modern Christianity does, It's true message has been subverted by Dogma, Greed, Fanaticism, and desire for power and Influence.
you could say the exact same thing about jews or christians. They're just as bad and have just as much bloodlust as them
Christians and jews don't really act out in violence....
hahahahaha, that's a joke right? Spanish inquisition, the Crusades in the middle ages, All the wars that are all in the name of Jesus or God? What about the 50 last years in the middle east? israel having warfare domestically and with countries around them? Like when Ariel Sharon butchered a hell of a lot of people? What about the old testament, with all the killings and the slaughtering (if it's true) in the name of a so called imaginary dude in the sky.
We don't live hundreds of years ago, and Israel is allowed to defend itself.
and Israel is allowed to defend itself.
Butchering 1000 of people in the name of self defense? this is what ariel sharon did.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
and how many muslims bombarding?? dude there are 1.2 billion muslims terrorists are in minority. Lot of nation has involved in some type of terrorism.
WW2, cold war, vietnam war, etc or most recent ukraine/russia crisis.
Religion relies way too much on interpretation
So no matter how peaceful the text may seem to you
There's an equal amount that use it as justification for all manner of horrific things
@LJS9502_basic: So the Crusades weren't over religion? Ok... And you didn't adress the other things i said which are true
Well actually the Crusades were over land and power. I actually did address your statement. Only a small percentage of war....until 10 have been fought due to religion itself.
They also fought against muslims who and they were against them, sure everything is about land, power and money. But come on dude, Crusades was a holy war.
*sigh* No it was over power and land. It was dressed that way to appeal to people but the contention was over getting back land and thus insuring one's power. Because the two sides were different religions does not inherently mean it's religious.
The whole point of it was to retake Jerusalem dude. The holy place for christianity? Even Pope Urban the second called it a "holy war". There was also the French Wars in 16th century. Also consider that most people through history have been religious people and based their wars of that, power and money alone
No the whole point was power. Anyway as I said that was a long long time ago. It's not an excuse for today. Second...the Muslims did take over a city...Jerusalem...that wasn't theirs. Don't be such a hypocrite all the time. But if you want to pretend it was over religion then we know who started the war.
Islam is such a terrible religion. They constantly talk about how it's the minority, but after constantly seeing violent Muslim protests in Europe and the rest of the world, it makes you question that statement. It has no place in modern world and needs to be destroyed.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
and how many muslims bombarding?? dude there are 1.2 billion muslims terrorists are in minority. Lot of nation has involved in some type of terrorism.
WW2, cold war, vietnam war, etc or most recent ukraine/russia crisis.
This.
It's about as stupid as saying all Americans are school shooting gun nuts or all Jews are greedy businessmen. Or, video games should be banned because its violence would corrupt a generation of children.
The peaceful Muslims across the world are, unfortunately, the ones without a leg to stand on. Because of abrogation the violent parts of the Qu'ran are the ones that are highlighted and practiced. Chapter nine, for instance, abrogates all of the peaceful parts of the Qu'ran that come before it. If you don't know what abrogation is, you aren't reading the Qu'ran in context.
So, in reality, Islam truly is a religion of violence.
It's not a religion of violence in the sense that Mohammed was trying to murder as much people as possible.
What it is, is a religion of imperialism. That;s what separates it from Judaism (which couldn't care less about converting others) and Christianity (which still cares less than Islam about its propagation).
And of course, when imperialist deeds often require violence.
The peaceful Muslims across the world are, unfortunately, the ones without a leg to stand on. Because of abrogation the violent parts of the Qu'ran are the ones that are highlighted and practiced. Chapter nine, for instance, abrogates all of the peaceful parts of the Qu'ran that come before it. If you don't know what abrogation is, you aren't reading the Qu'ran in context.
So, in reality, Islam truly is a religion of violence.
It's not a religion of violence in the sense that Mohammed was trying to murder as much people as possible.
What it is, is a religion of imperialism. That;s what separates it from Judaism (which couldn't care less about converting others) and Christianity (which still cares less than Islam about its propagation).
And of course, when imperialist deeds often require violence.
You clearly haven't read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion then, friend. Islam is the only anti-imperialist movement in the world and is fighting against the Zionist-controlled American quest for global domination.
Open your eyes, unbeliever! Lest ye wish to become a subservient gentile.
The peaceful Muslims across the world are, unfortunately, the ones without a leg to stand on. Because of abrogation the violent parts of the Qu'ran are the ones that are highlighted and practiced. Chapter nine, for instance, abrogates all of the peaceful parts of the Qu'ran that come before it. If you don't know what abrogation is, you aren't reading the Qu'ran in context.
So, in reality, Islam truly is a religion of violence.
It's not a religion of violence in the sense that Mohammed was trying to murder as much people as possible.
What it is, is a religion of imperialism. That;s what separates it from Judaism (which couldn't care less about converting others) and Christianity (which still cares less than Islam about its propagation).
And of course, when imperialist deeds often require violence.
You clearly haven't read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion then, friend. Islam is the only anti-imperialist movement in the world and is fighting against the Zionist-controlled American quest for global domination.
Open your eyes, unbeliever! Lest ye wish to become a subservient gentile.
ill read it after I watch RT and PressTV, the only anti-imperialist news channels
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
you can feel the cognitive dissonance oozing
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
you can feel the cognitive dissonance oozing
in who?
@MakeMeaSammitch: He still claimed Christians or jews don't do violence... Which is total bs and Israel is invading not defending. Two very different things
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
you can feel the cognitive dissonance oozing
in who?
LJ
@RadecSupreme:
So you are saying 1.2 billion people are violent? Have you ever interacted with Muslims before? And please don't say you knew one or two. I mean you actually been around Muslims enough to know how they are?
Don't believe everything you see in the media. The media can make a 20 person protect look like 200 people.
@MakeMeaSammitch: He still claimed Christians or jews don't do violence... Which is total bs and Israel is invading not defending. Two very different things
I think you need to read more.
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
Considering I stated less than 10% of wars are the result of religion I would imagine Islam as being a religion would fit in there now wouldn't it? Or are you just feeling put upon?
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
Considering I stated less than 10% of wars are the result of religion I would imagine Islam as being a religion would fit in there now wouldn't it? Or are you just feeling put upon?
you don't really understand how logic works...
explain to me what makes the crusades any less religious than al qaeda.
Basically, you're fine with inserting muslim violence in the "10 %" but not christian violence of days of old.
you don't really understand how logic works...
explain to me what makes the crusades any less religious than al qaeda.
Basically, you're fine with inserting muslim violence in the "10 %" but not christian violence of days of old.
Uh it's you that doesn't understand logic. I'm talking about in total. IE all wars fought throughout history so I don't know what you are on about.
A book written by humans for the purpose of control. It sounds so vaguely similar to another book of stories written by men to control people...
Except the bible isn't advocating for a caliphate. The Qur'an is.
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
Considering I stated less than 10% of wars are the result of religion I would imagine Islam as being a religion would fit in there now wouldn't it? Or are you just feeling put upon?
you don't really understand how logic works...
explain to me what makes the crusades any less religious than al qaeda.
Basically, you're fine with inserting muslim violence in the "10 %" but not christian violence of days of old.
The Crusades was a holy war, just open a damn book or look on the internet. Christians and Jews have waged war. So saying Crusades isn't a war based on religion is folly
@LJS9502_basic: I think you have to be the only person claiming that the Crusades were not a holy war
Personally, I agree with him taking the more nuanced and complex position that looks behind the veil of religiosity put on the crusades to try to inspire enthusiasm.
But taking that position would force you to hold true that almost every violent thing muslim groups or states have ever done was not about religion but about politics. Somehow, I doubt he would acknowledge that.
Considering I stated less than 10% of wars are the result of religion I would imagine Islam as being a religion would fit in there now wouldn't it? Or are you just feeling put upon?
you don't really understand how logic works...
explain to me what makes the crusades any less religious than al qaeda.
Basically, you're fine with inserting muslim violence in the "10 %" but not christian violence of days of old.
The Crusades was a holy war, just open a damn book or look on the internet. Christians and Jews have waged war. So saying Crusades isn't a war based on religion is folly
Such simplicity in your thinking. Again the Crusades were land and power. Land was taken. There were two capitals for the Christian religion. The Byzantine seat was under siege from Muslims. The Roman Pope however saw this as the perfect time to get sole control...ie power...so instead of helping the Byzantines as they asked, he developed the Crusades for the Holy Land. Yes he dressed it up for the people....can't tell them the truth....who would fight for that? And sent them on their way. But it was never ever over religious ideology. Crack a book sometime.
@LJS9502_basic: As i said before, it's always about power and money. But the whole war was based on religion mate, check various historians as i have stated...
@LJS9502_basic: So the Crusades weren't over religion? Ok... And you didn't adress the other things i said which are true
Well actually the Crusades were over land and power. I actually did address your statement. Only a small percentage of war....until 10 have been fought due to religion itself.
While that is true, the publicly stated reason was religious, so that is technically what the first Crusade was originally about and the following Crusades were a continuation of the battles years prior.
I read a little but every line ended with an exclamation point so I thought I was getting yelled at and I don't like getting yelled at so I stopped reading it.
@LJS9502_basic: So the Crusades weren't over religion? Ok... And you didn't adress the other things i said which are true
Well actually the Crusades were over land and power. I actually did address your statement. Only a small percentage of war....until 10 have been fought due to religion itself.
While that is true, the publicly stated reason was religious, so that is technically what the first Crusade was originally about and the following Crusades were a continuation of the battles years prior.
That doesn't make it religious. They weren't fighting about ideology or really to spread said ideology. They fought over a piece of land with the intent to cement power. Nonetheless this does not change the fact that he is dead wrong about religion being the reason for war. It's a very very very small percentage.
I don't know why you guys are talking about Christians in the same light as modern day jihadist. Yes there may have been bloody wars in the name of Christianity in the past, but the key phrase there is "in the past" plus they were WARS not coward terrorist atrocities.
I'm an agnostic atheist; I don't believe in any of the gods that are known through the religions of mankind, but I neither deny nor affirm that there exists a god of some sort. If there is a god, I don't think it cares about us; considering the horrible things that humanity does to itself, I think that a caring god would actively help us or put us out of our misery as a species. In my opinion, a god would be apathetic toward us, because compared to it, we'd be as micro organisms are to us: infinitesimal.
To be fair, we humans are beings that like to pride ourselves on our intelligence and free-will. Would you honestly want a divine being forcefully imposing His will over your actions and thoughts on a daily basis? People always bring up that argument without addressing the implications. Do you remember how it was like having your parents look over your shoulder 24/7, correcting you, making you do things you don't want? If so, then imagine that on a grander scale. Think of it this way, you're agnostic atheist, but it's your choice not to believe. If God made an active appearance in your life you would have no choice of what to think or feel. And besides us being intelligent beings and being capable of compassion and altruism, aren't we supposed to care for our fellow man? Some of us don't have to be assholes to others, but we choose to be, and there's no excuse for that. We have nothing to blame but ourselves for our problems.
I grew up in a Christian household but i stopped believing in God when i was a teenager. My life isn't any different now than it was then, religion never had a huge impact in my life. I don't need a book to tell me not to be an asshole, but some people do and i get that.
I grew up in a Christian household but i stopped believing in God when i was a teenager. My life isn't any different now than it was then, religion never had a huge impact in my life. I don't need a book to tell me not to be an asshole, but some people do and i get that.
If you lived in the Middle East you'd be murdered for apostasy. In some places, at least.
I would not compare Islams "problems" with Modern Christianitys 2014 edition
You would rather none of the horrors of Islam be brought out into the light of day.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Have you?
Oh wait, don't answer that. I don't care to read any more scripture via your copy and paste method.
Every time this comes up in discussion, people always resort to the "middle age" argument, like that has any relevance to today's Christianity. Tell me of a time in the last 50 years where Christians resorted to "violence of the worst kind" against non-believers. And then compare your findings to those of Muslims and see what you get.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Have you?
Oh wait, don't answer that. I don't care to read any more scripture via your copy and paste method.
Every time this comes up in discussion, people always resort to the "middle age" argument, like that has any relevance to today's Christianity. Tell me of a time in the last 50 years where Christians resorted to "violence of the worst kind" against non-believers. And then compare your findings to those of Muslims and see what you get.
i lol'd
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Have you?
Oh wait, don't answer that. I don't care to read any more scripture via your copy and paste method.
Every time this comes up in discussion, people always resort to the "middle age" argument, like that has any relevance to today's Christianity. Tell me of a time in the last 50 years where Christians resorted to "violence of the worst kind" against non-believers. And then compare your findings to those of Muslims and see what you get.
Ever heard of the Klu Klux Klan?
Also, since you referenced the closed thread. Let me help you educate yourself on your faith again.
Step 1. Take a look at those scriptures.
2. Study them with the topic of channeling the Holy Spirit and being vibrant about your faith in mind.
3. Make the Connection on they there are relevant and how you can apply those scriptures to your daily life
4. Become a better Christian.
That's called Bible Study son, something every true Christian should do on their own
If the KKK isn't good enough for you, since I'm sure you'll claim they're not actually Christian, you can look up on your own.
The National Liberation Front of Tripura
National Socialist Council of Nagaland
The Lord's Resistance Army,
Army of God
Concerned Christians, a Christian group from Israel
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Have you?
Oh wait, don't answer that. I don't care to read any more scripture via your copy and paste method.
Every time this comes up in discussion, people always resort to the "middle age" argument, like that has any relevance to today's Christianity. Tell me of a time in the last 50 years where Christians resorted to "violence of the worst kind" against non-believers. And then compare your findings to those of Muslims and see what you get.
Ever heard of the Klu Klux Klan?
Also, since you referenced the closed thread. Let me help you educate yourself on your faith again.
Step 1. Take a look at those scriptures.
2. Study them with the topic of channeling the Holy Spirit and being vibrant about your faith in mind.
3. Make the Connection on they there are relevant and how you can apply those scriptures to your daily life
4. Become a better Christian.
That's called Bible Study son, something every true Christian should do on their own
The KKK? LMAO! You're really comparing modern day Christianity to a bunch of redneck white supremacists?? That's your argument? Wow.
Islam needs to be eradicated. The world would be better off without it.
And christians.
Christians aren't going bombing people and declaring jihad on everyone not a Muslim.
Muslims threaten the very fabric of modern civilization. Christians, while generally conservative on some issues, are much, much more progressive.
they had their centuries of absolute authority and violence of the worst possible kinds. They got dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age, and still have further to go...christian immorality is now done indirectly instead of direct violence.. Islam hasn't reached that point yet.
Romans persecuted Christians for hundreds of years - stop with the BS about Christians being this driving force of hatred and violence. And if you knew anything about history of Christianity you would know that they changed with the times...there was no "kicking and screaming" into the modern age.
You've never been educated on the Middle Ages have you?
Have you?
Oh wait, don't answer that. I don't care to read any more scripture via your copy and paste method.
Every time this comes up in discussion, people always resort to the "middle age" argument, like that has any relevance to today's Christianity. Tell me of a time in the last 50 years where Christians resorted to "violence of the worst kind" against non-believers. And then compare your findings to those of Muslims and see what you get.
Ever heard of the Klu Klux Klan?
Also, since you referenced the closed thread. Let me help you educate yourself on your faith again.
Step 1. Take a look at those scriptures.
2. Study them with the topic of channeling the Holy Spirit and being vibrant about your faith in mind.
3. Make the Connection on they there are relevant and how you can apply those scriptures to your daily life
4. Become a better Christian.
That's called Bible Study son, something every true Christian should do on their own
The KKK? LMAO! You're really comparing modern day Christianity to a bunch of redneck white supremacists?? That's your argument? Wow.
They're a terrorist group that bases their belief in Christianity.
Just like ISIS and Al Qaeda do with Islam.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/21/virginia-kkk-fliers_n_5008647.html
Educate yourself son
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment