A problem with evolution

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

problem for evolution theory is that of explaining the origin of consciousness. Human beings are not just physical systems; we have rich mental lives. There is more to this mentality than electrical events in the brain. For any mental state, there is a physical event (what is going on in the brain) and a mental event (what that feels like for us). The two are, at least in principle separable; there's no logical contradiction in having one without the other.

The process of natural selection selects organisms for survival based only on their behaviour, on what they do. An organism that behaves as we behave but which does not have the attendant mental states that we have will have just as much survival value as we do. Mentality is not necessary for behaviour, and nothing more than behaviour is necessary for survival, so there is no survival value to having mental states.

Evolution theory, though, can only explain the origin of traits that have survival value. For example, we have two eyes rather than one, according to evolution theory, because that makes it possible to judge distances more accurately, increasing our chances of survival. Consciousness, though, does not increase our chances of survival; we are no more likely to survive than we would be if physical events in our brain did not give rise to conscious experiences, if our decisions just happened automatically as in a computer.

Evolution theory, therefore, cannot explain the origin of consciousness.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
You are ascribing "non-physical" components to consciousness with no evidence. Also, evolution does not restrict itself to things that benefit survival; it allows the emergence of traits that do not hinder survival. Further sapience, which has emerged from consciousness, certainly has vast survival value. You seem to be speculating in a vacuum isolated from any evidence.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts

Okay then. Doesn't really dispute the fact that allele frequency in a population changes over time, but yeah.

Avatar image for Citrus25
Citrus25

2466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 Citrus25
Member since 2009 • 2466 Posts
And your real question is?
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

so there is no survival value to having mental states.

kneeha

Yeah, fear has no evolutionary advantage whatsoever.

Anyway, has it occurred to you that consciousness could be a byproduct of the intelligence of humans which is evolutionarily advantageous? Or that it is useful in that it enables humans to be social animals, which lets them work together, which also carries survival advantage? Or that consciousness enables us to learn and to find creative solutions to problems?

Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Me thinks that our consciousness is a trait that was survival value.
Avatar image for Dirok_Slogwar
Dirok_Slogwar

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Dirok_Slogwar
Member since 2009 • 86 Posts
Conciousness is just another word for analytical thinking and decision making. And those help a lot in increasing chance of survival.
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

kneeha

To allow society to form at a level of complexity that significantly enhances survival.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

kneeha
Ah, good old "irreducible complexity" :|
Avatar image for Dirok_Slogwar
Dirok_Slogwar

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Dirok_Slogwar
Member since 2009 • 86 Posts
Also, octopuses are highly intelligent and have emotions, go look them up.
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

kneeha
But it's a mental state. And I notice you ignored every other point I made.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

kneeha
Fear is the result of knowing your life is danger I would assume, stress being a by-product.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="kneeha"]

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

Funky_Llama
But it's a mental state. And I notice you ignored every other point I made.

You can't possibly be surprised by that, given the cherry picking in the initial post...
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

You are ascribing "non-physical" components to consciousness with no evidence. Also, evolution does not restrict itself to things that benefit survival; it allows the emergence of traits that do not hinder survival. Further sapience, which has emerged from consciousness, certainly has vast survival value. You seem to be speculating in a vacuum isolated from any evidence.xaos

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

Avatar image for Mikey132
Mikey132

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Mikey132
Member since 2005 • 5180 Posts

With all you said, there's still waaaay more many problems with me believing in Gods.

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
A magical invisible being created us, there... are you happy now?
Avatar image for FastNorwegian
FastNorwegian

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 FastNorwegian
Member since 2009 • 859 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
Uh... you're a bit off topic. >.>
Avatar image for HellsAngel2c
HellsAngel2c

5540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22 HellsAngel2c
Member since 2004 • 5540 Posts
I believe it would be a byproduct of out intelligence. Also, apea are considered to be inbetween animal EQ and human EQ, which could explain the evolutionary 'link' of conciousness
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"]You are ascribing "non-physical" components to consciousness with no evidence. Also, evolution does not restrict itself to things that benefit survival; it allows the emergence of traits that do not hinder survival. Further sapience, which has emerged from consciousness, certainly has vast survival value. You seem to be speculating in a vacuum isolated from any evidence.kneeha

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. Without our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

Avatar image for Dirok_Slogwar
Dirok_Slogwar

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dirok_Slogwar
Member since 2009 • 86 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
Evolution isn't about chance...
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

zakkro

Fear is the result of knowing your life is danger I would assume, stress being a by-product.

Not really Productive Fear is Fight or Flight which isinstinct not conciousness.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
Good thing that is NOT what the big bang (or evolution) is...
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"]You are ascribing "non-physical" components to consciousness with no evidence. Also, evolution does not restrict itself to things that benefit survival; it allows the emergence of traits that do not hinder survival. Further sapience, which has emerged from consciousness, certainly has vast survival value. You seem to be speculating in a vacuum isolated from any evidence.kneeha

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

"Purpose" implies design and is not a relevant question here; when you refer to consciousness, exactly what do you mean? Are you talking abstract reasoning, language, etc? After all, most animals also have what I would characterize as consciousness. I need to know what you are talking about exactly, and what complexity you associate with it before I can respond.
Avatar image for Dirok_Slogwar
Dirok_Slogwar

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Dirok_Slogwar
Member since 2009 • 86 Posts

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="kneeha"]

Fear is a result of stress not conciousness its basic survival

kneeha

Fear is the result of knowing your life is danger I would assume, stress being a by-product.

Not really Productive Fear is Fight or Flight which isinstinct not conciousness.

Takes consciousness to feel fear...
Avatar image for Mikey132
Mikey132

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Mikey132
Member since 2005 • 5180 Posts

I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian

Not that I want to argue, but the Big Bang did not create humans, it created the Universe. Humans came along many millions of years after the big band. We even have Dinosaur bones to prove how long things have been living on this earth. But, if you believe in god I'm sure that's hardcore evidence you'll instantly dismiss.

Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

[QUOTE="xaos"]You are ascribing "non-physical" components to consciousness with no evidence. Also, evolution does not restrict itself to things that benefit survival; it allows the emergence of traits that do not hinder survival. Further sapience, which has emerged from consciousness, certainly has vast survival value. You seem to be speculating in a vacuum isolated from any evidence.-Sun_Tzu-

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. With our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduceFastNorwegian
This is why we can't have nice things.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life.FastNorwegian
That was a sweeping misrepresentation of the Big Bang. The Big Bang wasn't an explosion firstly; just a sudden release of energy. Secondly, human evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang theory. That's like comparing different genres of film. They may be somewhat related in that, without the Big Bang theory for example, it would be impossible for evolution to have occurred without space or time for life to exist in, but that doesn't change the fact that they're viewed independently.
I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
Why does the way in which you were created affect the responsibility you hold in life?
Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
But mental states do contribute to evolution -- hence why the biggest brained and most intelligent species on the planet reigns supreme.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

kneeha

How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. With our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

I have no idea what you are talking about. The manner that we as a species thinks contributes to us being "fit". Again, conciousness is a survival trait. It allows for us to better ourselves individually and to create more advanced tools as a species.

Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

I believe it would be a byproduct of out intelligence. Also, apea are considered to be inbetween animal EQ and human EQ, which could explain the evolutionary 'link' of conciousnessHellsAngel2c
hmm.. valid point not really arguable not likely but valid all the same.

Avatar image for Mikey132
Mikey132

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Mikey132
Member since 2005 • 5180 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

But what would be the purpose of said traits. And why would they form at a level of complexity such as conciousness

kneeha

How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. With our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

Our ability to be conscious is because we have the ability to remember things. If you can't remember anything, you are nothing. There are many many different types of animals on this earth that do not believe in a God because they do not have the mental capacity for anything other than survival. What you're saying has no bounds in disproving the big bang theory. It's like me saying "there's a problem with god because people feel hate. How could an all loving god create such a mess" If you feel you disproved the big bang. I just disproved the existence of god!

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts

[QUOTE="FastNorwegian"]It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduceFunky_Llama

This is why we can't have nice things.

I'm with this guy. You don't even have a point, try educating yourself about these theories before making wild assumptions and other silly stuff.
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. With our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

-Sun_Tzu-

No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

I have no idea what you are talking about. The manner that we as a species thinks contributes to us being "fit". Again, conciousness is a survival trait. It allows for us to better ourselves individually and to create more advanced tools as a species.

What i am saying is your not talking about conciousness.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"]No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

kneeha

I have no idea what you are talking about. The manner that we as a species thinks contributes to us being "fit". Again, conciousness is a survival trait. It allows for us to better ourselves individually and to create more advanced tools as a species.

What i am saying is your not talking about conciousness.

Which is why I want to know what the heck it is that you are describing as "consciousness". Here are a couple of starting points from Merriam-Webster: - the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself - the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"]No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

kneeha

I have no idea what you are talking about. The manner that we as a species thinks contributes to us being "fit". Again, conciousness is a survival trait. It allows for us to better ourselves individually and to create more advanced tools as a species.

What i am saying is your not talking about conciousness.

Uhh, yes I am. Conciousness as defined by Merriam-Webster: 1 a: the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b: the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c: awareness ; especially : concern for some social or political cause 2: the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : mind 3: the totality of conscious states of an individual 4: the normal state of conscious life 5: the upper level of mental life of which the person is aware as contrasted with unconscious processes
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
The Big Bang was not a "large explosion", it was the rapid expansion of a singularity.
Avatar image for yoshi-lnex
yoshi-lnex

5442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 yoshi-lnex
Member since 2007 • 5442 Posts

Seems pretty strait forward to me; certain mental developments increased chances of survival, so a gradual process of them developing occured.

Avatar image for FastNorwegian
FastNorwegian

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 FastNorwegian
Member since 2009 • 859 Posts
[QUOTE="FastNorwegian"]I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.ithilgore2006
The Big Bang was not a "large explosion", it was the rapid expansion of a singularity.

Doesn't matter. It still came out of no where with no higher help.
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

[QUOTE="kneeha"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"] How does the human species survive? It is not because of man's strenght or speed; it is a combination of our intelligence and our profound awareness of our surroundings (i.e. our conciousness) that allows man to develope tools that our survival is dependent on. With our profound sense of awareness we would no longer have this biological advantage that makes us one of the "fittest".

Mikey132

No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

Our ability to be conscious is because we have the ability to remember things. If you can't remember anything, you are nothing. There are many many different types of animals on this earth that do not believe in a God because they do not have the mental capacity for anything other than survival. What you're saying has no bounds in disproving the big bang theory. It's like me saying "there's a problem with god because people feel hate. How could an all loving god create such a mess" If you feel you disproved the big bang. I just disproved the existence of god!

Im not even talking about the big bang theory. But valid point Though you are stil not talking about the conciousness i am referring to.

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#45 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="FastNorwegian"]I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
The Big Bang was not a "large explosion", it was the rapid expansion of a singularity.

Doesn't matter. It still came out of no where with no higher help.

Do you know what a singularity is?
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="FastNorwegian"]I just don't believe in the Big Bang. It's a bit ludacris that a large explosion made human beings, that just happen to be compatible and reproduce, and that just happen to have a brain by which they can use to supply theirselves with further life. Believe me, Christianity is a crazy idea to, but it at least lets immprobable ludacris chance become a little less chancey. I like to think I have a general purpose in life.FastNorwegian
The Big Bang was not a "large explosion", it was the rapid expansion of a singularity.

Doesn't matter. It still came out of no where with no higher help.

Creation ex nihilo happens constantly; I suggest reading up on vacuum fluctuations and Hawking radiation to learn more.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts
[QUOTE="FastNorwegian"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"] The Big Bang was not a "large explosion", it was the rapid expansion of a singularity.xaos
Doesn't matter. It still came out of no where with no higher help.

Creation ex nihilo happens constantly; I suggest reading up on vacuum fluctuations and Hawking radiation to learn more.

Your fancy Spanish term and book learnin' is no match for blind speculation!
Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

Let me break it down in simpler terms. Why would we develop thoughts or emotions that would not help our survival rate.Or like most concious thought hinders our survival.

Avatar image for Mikey132
Mikey132

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Mikey132
Member since 2005 • 5180 Posts

[QUOTE="Mikey132"]

[QUOTE="kneeha"]No also not conciousness Im refering to the more complexities in or thought processes, you are still refering to the basic levels of thought.Even invention cannot be called conciousness because it can still be performed without the extras.

kneeha

Our ability to be conscious is because we have the ability to remember things. If you can't remember anything, you are nothing. There are many many different types of animals on this earth that do not believe in a God because they do not have the mental capacity for anything other than survival. What you're saying has no bounds in disproving the big bang theory. It's like me saying "there's a problem with god because people feel hate. How could an all loving god create such a mess" If you feel you disproved the big bang. I just disproved the existence of god!

Im not even talking about the big bang theory. But valid point Though you are stil not talking about the conciousness i am referring to.

A higher awareness in our consciousness comes from many years of evolution. Humans that lived 10,000 years ago did not have the same capacity that we do today, they did not live as long either. If this consciousness was provided by a higher power, the first humans on this earth would have built cars, skyscrapers, and nukes. Our entire consciousness has evolved period!

Avatar image for kneeha
kneeha

1333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 kneeha
Member since 2003 • 1333 Posts

Let me break it down in simpler terms. Why would we develop thoughts or emotions that would not help our survival rate.Or like most concious thought hinders our survival.