AC/DC became a cartoonish-joke after Bon Scott died. And even the Bon Scott albums didn't really revolutionize hard rock. Not that music has to be revolutionary to be good, it's just that if we're comparing AC/DC to Metallica, we have to take it into account. It may be hard to appreciate or comprehend when Metallica has been a mainstream music force since the 90s, but there was a time when Metallica was revolutionary. They were influenced by bands most people had never heard of (keep in mind that even Iron Maiden and Judas Priest didn't find commercial success till the early 80s). And they made metal faster, more punkish with their first album. Their second album was a true revolution in metal songwriting, with a darker, heavier sound influenced by Sabbath and Venom, while at the same time incorporating progressive flourishes.
Also, unlike AC/DC, who has rehashed the same sound and themes for their whole career, Metallica does not have any two albums which sound alike (with the exception of Load and Reload). Kill 'em All is punkish and gleefully maniacal. Ride the Lightning is morbid, nihilistic, and progressive. Master of Puppets is socio-political and builds on the progressive sound with an increase in time changes and the like. And Justice for All is disillusioned, with a focus on the failures of the judicial system, and is the most progressive Metallica album and easily one of the most progressive rock albums. And of course, the albums after that are so different that I don't even need to bother explaining them. Sure, the music took a dip for the worse, and it was all commerically oriented (with the exception of Death Magnetic), but it was different.
Log in to comment