• 133 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

Yes because they must think of their values first to teach them after...

Timesplitter14

Do you understand the meaning of the word innate?  And how did you give my argument to someone else anyway?

Well their ability to think of their values is innate... or maybe it's something that's not innate nor taught?

No....that would be trial and error.....and learning. 

Avatar image for skullkrusher13
skullkrusher13

8629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 skullkrusher13
Member since 2004 • 8629 Posts

[QUOTE="dragonlife29"]Awesome. A debate with no flaming, and I ended it :D (I think)
 Timesplitter14

yeah I'm surprised lol. There's no hate in here :)

well you did change the title of the thread, removing "is best" from the title.  That did make you look like an ass, and I could see how that would cause flaming.

Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

[QUOTE="dragonlife29"]Awesome. A debate with no flaming, and I ended it :D (I think)
 skullkrusher13

yeah I'm surprised lol. There's no hate in here :)

well you did change the title of the thread, removing "is best" from the title.  That did make you look like an ass, and I could see how that would cause flaming.

Yeah I also thought it was too... assy. I didn't want to bash religious people, I just want a good debate

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180194 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

Yes because they must think of their values first to teach them after...

dragonlife29

Do you understand the meaning of the word innate? And how did you give my argument to someone else anyway?

I chuckled... :P

Very funny......:(
Avatar image for dragonlife29
dragonlife29

14543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 dragonlife29
Member since 2005 • 14543 Posts
[QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

I can't prove that values are innate but I can semi-prove they aren't taught with the question I've asked you. (but it's still not 100% proof)

Timesplitter14

No you can't.....and you put conditions on the question you asked because you decided what answer you wanted. Values are taught....it's that simple.

yea but answer my question!!! where did the first humans learn their values!?

Do you yourself believe there were values along with the first humans?

They're not born with values but they think about them themselves then they share them after that. So I guess they are part innate and part taught... you made me realise that.

Actually, you kind of contradicted your realization. How can they not be born with it, yet somehow be innate anyway?

The essence of my philosphical point was that the philosophers weren't born with values, but taught them to themselves--meaning that your innate argument is not the best.
Avatar image for dragonlife29
dragonlife29

14543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 dragonlife29
Member since 2005 • 14543 Posts
[QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

Yes because they must think of their values first to teach them after...

LJS9502_basic

Do you understand the meaning of the word innate? And how did you give my argument to someone else anyway?

I chuckled... :P

Very funny......:(

Sorry :(

:P
Avatar image for SimpJee
SimpJee

18309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 SimpJee
Member since 2002 • 18309 Posts
Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god.  This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being?  There you go.
Avatar image for dragonlife29
dragonlife29

14543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 dragonlife29
Member since 2005 • 14543 Posts
Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god. This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being? There you go.
SimpJee
Isn't the idea of God's existence (or nonexistence) based on hints, though? Isn't the Bible just one big collection of alleged hints?

You mean to say there's no concrete proof. Right?
Avatar image for SimpJee
SimpJee

18309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 SimpJee
Member since 2002 • 18309 Posts
[QUOTE="SimpJee"]Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god. This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being? There you go.
dragonlife29
Isn't the idea of God's existence (or nonexistence) based on hints, though? Isn't the Bible just one big collection of alleged hints?

You mean to say there's no concrete proof. Right?

I don't see the Bible as being any kind of evidence whatsoever, or a hint. I see it as fiction, because the material has no base in reality. I meant just what I said, from all I've read seen or heard, I haven't seen even a mere hint of proof (concrete or otherwise) of the existence of god. This lead me to the conclusion that there isn't one.  I also don't know how anyone could come to any other conclusion, which is why Agnostics confuse me heh.
Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

I can't prove that values are innate but I can semi-prove they aren't taught with the question I've asked you. (but it's still not 100% proof)

dragonlife29

No you can't.....and you put conditions on the question you asked because you decided what answer you wanted. Values are taught....it's that simple.

yea but answer my question!!! where did the first humans learn their values!?

Do you yourself believe there were values along with the first humans?

They're not born with values but they think about them themselves then they share them after that. So I guess they are part innate and part taught... you made me realise that.

Actually, you kind of contradicted your realization. How can they not be born with it, yet somehow be innate anyway?

The essence of my philosphical point was that the philosophers weren't born with values, but taught them to themselves--meaning that your innate argument is not the best.

Yeah but since they teach the values to themselves, they must be born with the ability to do it... so it could be innate. What's important is that they come up with their own values themselves

Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts

[QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="SimpJee"]Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god. This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being? There you go.
SimpJee
Isn't the idea of God's existence (or nonexistence) based on hints, though? Isn't the Bible just one big collection of alleged hints?

You mean to say there's no concrete proof. Right?

I don't see the Bible as being any kind of evidence whatsoever, or a hint. I see it as fiction, because the material has no base in reality. I meant just what I said, from all I've read seen or heard, I haven't seen even a mere hint of proof (concrete or otherwise) of the existence of god. This lead me to the conclusion that there isn't one.  I also don't know how anyone could come to any other conclusion, which is why Agnostics confuse me heh.

Well... Agnosticism can lead to Atheism or Religion. It depends where your questionning will lead you. If you're not convinced, you stay agnostic.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

Timesplitter14


I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't believe they think anymore than the other groups....just because someone thinks differently than you does not mean they don't think.:roll:dragonlife29

I don't need a religion to set my values.

Values are taught.....not innate. You learned them somewhere. :roll:

I disagree. This makes no sense, and where did the first human learned them? :roll:

It makes perfect sense. You aren't born with the ability to discren right from wrong, are you?



No, but certain values are pretty much constant among all cultures and religions. Why? Because those values have an innate survival advantage that helps communities to survive.

We're social animals, and society can't exist without some degree of order. We literally cannot survive on our own. We NEED to rely on the strength of the community.

So what do you think would happen if we were all allowed to murder and steal? Society would collapse, everyone would be everyone's enemy, and our species would very quickly become extinct.
Avatar image for crucifine
crucifine

4726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#64 crucifine
Member since 2003 • 4726 Posts
[QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="SimpJee"]Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god. This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being? There you go.
SimpJee
Isn't the idea of God's existence (or nonexistence) based on hints, though? Isn't the Bible just one big collection of alleged hints?

You mean to say there's no concrete proof. Right?

I don't see the Bible as being any kind of evidence whatsoever, or a hint. I see it as fiction, because the material has no base in reality. I meant just what I said, from all I've read seen or heard, I haven't seen even a mere hint of proof (concrete or otherwise) of the existence of god. This lead me to the conclusion that there isn't one.  I also don't know how anyone could come to any other conclusion, which is why Agnostics confuse me heh.

I'm agnostic, because I believe in superior beings, but not gods.  I don't believe in there being a perfect image of man or any ultimate truth.  There will never be any ultimate truth.  But, I do believe there are things out there that are superior to humans.  Aliens, or even other humans.  Whatever being exists in the dimension above ours.  Who knows?  You can prove that there isn't any evidence of God, but you can't prove to me that there aren't superior beings.  We don't know enough for there to be an answer to that.  Maybe when the new telescope goes up?
Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

MrGeezer



I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't exist

Avatar image for MordusMythril
MordusMythril

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 MordusMythril
Member since 2006 • 1135 Posts
I just don't concern myself with such things that our secular minds couldn't possibly fathom. As far as I know, I am my own god.
Avatar image for Apenoot
Apenoot

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 Apenoot
Member since 2005 • 2087 Posts

Values are part innate. Stuff like motherlove, not killing ppl at random... other values are learned from others but can be changed if one things about it himself/herself

Avatar image for doubutsuteki
doubutsuteki

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#68 doubutsuteki
Member since 2004 • 3425 Posts

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

Timesplitter14


Yes, I reject the idea of a god. I am atheist, for good reasons. I don't want a god to decide what I should or shouldn't do. Even if there was a god I would still be against him/her/it.

Agnosticism. Well, how can you know that you don't know if there is a god? Perhaps there is enough evidence to other people, to convince them that there is no god - and that agnostics just don't see it, for whatever reason.
Avatar image for doubutsuteki
doubutsuteki

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#69 doubutsuteki
Member since 2004 • 3425 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

Timesplitter14



I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't exist



Well, it's up to you to prove that there is a god. And you can't.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
No. I've thought about it. Logic tells me there's no God. Einstein discovered a lot of the secrets of the universe thinking in his studio apartment. So I think that logic is proof enough. I mean, I acknowledge that you can't disprove God, but it's still lame. I guess God kind of exists one way or another by how you define him, but in terms of a divine, all powerful, and omniscient being sentimental to human life, yeah, no.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#71 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Agnosticism...so basically you live in a world full of dull reasonableness?
Avatar image for flclisfun
flclisfun

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 flclisfun
Member since 2007 • 583 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

I can't prove that values are innate but I can semi-prove they aren't taught with the question I've asked you. (but it's still not 100% proof)

Timesplitter14

No you can't.....and you put conditions on the question you asked because you decided what answer you wanted. Values are taught....it's that simple.

yea but answer my question!!! where did the first humans learn their values!?

They learned their values when they realized that they don't like to be hurt or stolen from, and other people don't like it either. So I guess they taught themselves.
Avatar image for flclisfun
flclisfun

583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 flclisfun
Member since 2007 • 583 Posts
No. I've thought about it. Logic tells me there's no God. Einstein discovered a lot of the secrets of the universe thinking in his studio apartment. So I think that logic is proof enough. I mean, I acknowledge that you can't disprove God, but it's still lame. I guess God kind of exists one way or another by how you define him, but in terms of a divine, all powerful, and omniscient being sentimental to human life, yeah, no.quiglythegreat
Can you tell me the logic behind it? No really, I want to know.:roll:
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#74 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Agnosticism is what I follow. I think trying to comprehend the incomprehensible is foolish and just leads people to argue over things that are impossible to prove right or wrong. I wish I had the religiosity of some people on this planet. The hope, the community, the morals, the devotion... but I cannot get past the fact that it all comes apart when you bring my belief into it... I just cannot comprehend the incomprehensible.
Avatar image for Apenoot
Apenoot

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 Apenoot
Member since 2005 • 2087 Posts

[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"]No. I've thought about it. Logic tells me there's no God. Einstein discovered a lot of the secrets of the universe thinking in his studio apartment. So I think that logic is proof enough. I mean, I acknowledge that you can't disprove God, but it's still lame. I guess God kind of exists one way or another by how you define him, but in terms of a divine, all powerful, and omniscient being sentimental to human life, yeah, no.flclisfun
Can you tell me the logic behind it? No really, I want to know.:roll:

The logic behind it is that religion as it exists now (any religion) doesn't make sense. The only thing discussions about religion boils down to is the 'believing' argument 'we can't comprehend the mind of God' and 'You can't prove there is no God' which are inherently weak arguments.

Avatar image for dhyce
dhyce

5609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 dhyce
Member since 2003 • 5609 Posts

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't existTimesplitter14

The same with every other god man has ever thought up, or any imaginary being you can come up with.

People don't understand the concept of proof; you put forth a concept like God, can you prove it? The burden of proof is on those who are religious, to say he can't be disproven is silly, because that's not how proving a concept works. Every single God in the history of mankind can't be disproved, the same with flying spaghetti monster and magical flying fuzzy pink lobster that cruises around the universe singing power metal ballads. The bottum line with proof is that you put forth a concept and try to prove it, saying "it can't be disproven" isn't really part of the equation.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"]No. I've thought about it. Logic tells me there's no God. Einstein discovered a lot of the secrets of the universe thinking in his studio apartment. So I think that logic is proof enough. I mean, I acknowledge that you can't disprove God, but it's still lame. I guess God kind of exists one way or another by how you define him, but in terms of a divine, all powerful, and omniscient being sentimental to human life, yeah, no.flclisfun
Can you tell me the logic behind it? No really, I want to know.:roll:

God created all the rules and the whole idea of God is that he can break them with divine intervention. The entire idea of divinity is really contrary to everything we know about the physical universe. Everything has to be self consistent, and really that's the divine thing about things to me, but anyway, God basically is incredible just because he can change the regular workings of the universe...? Why would he do that in the first place if he created the goddamn thing? And where precisely does God exist? And how does he exist?
Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

doubutsuteki



I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't exist



Well, it's up to you to prove that there is a god. And you can't.

I don't believe in god, but I don't have any proof that it doesn't exist. That's why I'm agnostic. I question myself until I find a real answer

Avatar image for SimpJee
SimpJee

18309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 SimpJee
Member since 2002 • 18309 Posts
[QUOTE="SimpJee"][QUOTE="dragonlife29"][QUOTE="SimpJee"]Belief requires at least some form of evidence, there has been none in support of god, not even a single piece of evidence to even HINT that there is a god. This leads me to atheism because since there is no evidence, why should I even consider the possibility of there being a God or some existential being? There you go.
crucifine
Isn't the idea of God's existence (or nonexistence) based on hints, though? Isn't the Bible just one big collection of alleged hints?

You mean to say there's no concrete proof. Right?

I don't see the Bible as being any kind of evidence whatsoever, or a hint. I see it as fiction, because the material has no base in reality. I meant just what I said, from all I've read seen or heard, I haven't seen even a mere hint of proof (concrete or otherwise) of the existence of god. This lead me to the conclusion that there isn't one. I also don't know how anyone could come to any other conclusion, which is why Agnostics confuse me heh.

I'm agnostic, because I believe in superior beings, but not gods. I don't believe in there being a perfect image of man or any ultimate truth. There will never be any ultimate truth. But, I do believe there are things out there that are superior to humans. Aliens, or even other humans. Whatever being exists in the dimension above ours. Who knows? You can prove that there isn't any evidence of God, but you can't prove to me that there aren't superior beings. We don't know enough for there to be an answer to that. Maybe when the new telescope goes up?

This is where I'm confused about Atheism. Wouldn't that mean you are an Atheist? Because you don't believe in one or a couple beings that just popped up and decided to create us, correct? Therefore you're an atheist. Also, there is no evidence of some superior being, so why believe in them until some kind of evidence shows up?
Avatar image for MordusMythril
MordusMythril

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 MordusMythril
Member since 2006 • 1135 Posts
Agnosticism...so basically you live in a world full of dull reasonableness? Sajo7

Better than a world full of false hopefulness.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

Timesplitter14



I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't exist



True, but I don't recall ever saying that god doesn't exist.
Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts


True, but I don't recall ever saying that god doesn't exist.
MrGeezer
Well do you think God exists?
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

True, but I don't recall ever saying that god doesn't exist.
quiglythegreat
Well do you think God exists?



Of course not. If I did, I wouldn't be an atheist.
Avatar image for Niebz
Niebz

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 Niebz
Member since 2007 • 207 Posts

[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't existdhyce

The same with every other god man has ever thought up, or any imaginary being you can come up with.

People don't understand the concept of proof; you put forth a concept like God, can you prove it? The burden of proof is on those who are religious, to say he can't be disproven is silly, because that's not how proving a concept works. Every single God in the history of mankind can't be disproved, the same with flying spaghetti monster and magical flying fuzzy pink lobster that cruises around the universe singing power metal ballads. The bottum line with proof is that you put forth a concept and try to prove it, saying "it can't be disproven" isn't really part of the equation.

You took the words right out of my head. 

Avatar image for DrummerJon
DrummerJon

9668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 DrummerJon
Member since 2004 • 9668 Posts
Religious and atheists are polar opposites, and its impossible to group atheists together since it is not an organized belief system. However if I may for a moment steal a Richard Dawkins idea. People fall into these category's when it comes to the existence of god. 1-100% sure there is a god 2-is very confident there is a god but not completely sure 3-On the fence, but prefers to think theres a god. 4-Perfect agnostic (never really thinks/cares about religion usually) 5-On the fence, but prefers to think there isn't one 6-is very confident there is no god but not completely sure 7100% sure there is no god Only crazy people fall into 1 or 7, these two ignore logic completely. 4 is a group of people who really don't think about god,because anyone who does will lean on way or the other. Personally I am a 6, I feel like everything points to there being no god. I would say I'm 99% sure but then again negatives cant be disproven. Its the same % that i believe pixies and unicorns aren't real. So I round down and call myself an Atheist.
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#86 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajo7"]Agnosticism...so basically you live in a world full of dull reasonableness? MordusMythril

Better than a world full of false hopefulness.

Doesn't have to be false. In the 19th century I could say that were going to land on the moon, even if at that time its not realistic.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="MordusMythril"][QUOTE="Sajo7"]Agnosticism...so basically you live in a world full of dull reasonableness? Sajo7

Better than a world full of false hopefulness.

Doesn't have to be false. In the 19th century I could say that were going to land on the moon, even if at that time its not realistic.

no one living in the 19th century would go to the moon.
Avatar image for Nisstyre_56
Nisstyre_56

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 Nisstyre_56
Member since 2006 • 2849 Posts
I agree with the tc. Religion is just a crutch, a pitiful crutch for people who are scared of dying
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't believe they think anymore than the other groups....just because someone thinks differently than you does not mean they don't think.:roll:Timesplitter14

I don't need a religion to set my values.

Values are taught.....not innate. You learned them somewhere. :roll:

I disagree. This makes no sense, and where did the first human learned them? :roll:

God, duuuh! :P
Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
I agree with the tc. Religion is just a crutch, a pitiful crutch for people who are scared of dyingNisstyre_56
...maybe you don't understand the concept of religion.
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

IMO,

Religious and Atheists.... they're all the same. They all believe in something they can't prove. Religious people take other people's values and principles and that's that. They don't even think. They choose the religion that fits their needs. Religion is like a social assistance for intellectual pauvrety. It's for those who don't know what to think, what they want, so they just choose one of these ''packs of values''.

Agnostics think about the existance or the unexistance of a God. They don't need a religion to tell them how to think and how to act. They set their own values, and they think, instead of following the herd.

THOUGHTS?
I dunno but I feel like I'm gonna get flamed to death

Timesplitter14



I'm an atheist. Will you please tell me what I believe that I can't prove?

Well there's no real proof that god doesn't exist

theres no proof that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist.
Avatar image for Nisstyre_56
Nisstyre_56

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 Nisstyre_56
Member since 2006 • 2849 Posts
[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]I don't believe they think anymore than the other groups....just because someone thinks differently than you does not mean they don't think.:roll:Mr_sprinkles

I don't need a religion to set my values.

Values are taught.....not innate. You learned them somewhere. :roll:

I disagree. This makes no sense, and where did the first human learned them? :roll:

God, duuuh! :P

no, Confucious. Hell, Jesus probably got all his "morals" from eastern religions.
Avatar image for Nisstyre_56
Nisstyre_56

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#93 Nisstyre_56
Member since 2006 • 2849 Posts
[QUOTE="Nisstyre_56"]I agree with the tc. Religion is just a crutch, a pitiful crutch for people who are scared of dyingSajo7
...maybe you don't understand the concept of religion.

sorry meant theistic religions
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]

God, duuuh! :PNisstyre_56

no, Confucious. Hell, Jesus probably got all his "morals" from eastern religions.

sorry, I may not have been entirely serious. Guess i forgot the /sarcasm tag.

Avatar image for Nisstyre_56
Nisstyre_56

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#95 Nisstyre_56
Member since 2006 • 2849 Posts
[QUOTE="Nisstyre_56"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]

God, duuuh! :PMr_sprinkles

no, Confucious. Hell, Jesus probably got all his "morals" from eastern religions.

sorry, I may not have been entirely serious. Guess i forgot the /sarcasm tag.

I realize that, but I was trying to turn it into something serious
Avatar image for Wolf7040
Wolf7040

1312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Wolf7040
Member since 2003 • 1312 Posts

I don't believe they think anymore than the other groups....just because someone thinks differently than you does not mean they don't think.:roll:LJS9502_basic

Exactly, they think within the realm of which they were introduced. If you were born in the wild, and left there to live up and grow from unaware youth (somehow.) You would not believe in Jesus Christ, no one ever told you about him, "Jesus who?" Their thinking within the realm of which their shown, Christianity, (among with other religions) would not exist if someones parents didn't tell kids about it.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

True, but I don't recall ever saying that god doesn't exist.
MrGeezer
Well do you think God exists?



Of course not. If I did, I wouldn't be an atheist.

Atheist can just mean you hate Jesus or don't believe in Jesus.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"] Atheist can just mean you hate Jesus.

...that's new.
Avatar image for Sim_genius
Sim_genius

9562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#99 Sim_genius
Member since 2005 • 9562 Posts
It's peanut butter jelly time!!! Oh wait... is this the wrong thread?
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

True, but I don't recall ever saying that god doesn't exist.
quiglythegreat
Well do you think God exists?



Of course not. If I did, I wouldn't be an atheist.

Atheist can just mean you hate Jesus or don't believe in Jesus.

atheist. 'A' means no, and 'theism' is the belief in a god.