![](http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee275/br0kenrabbit/chart.jpg)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i understand the argument that you're making, but personally, i'm most concerned about that second figure.
low exercise and poor diet = 365,000 deaths annually. scary.
health isn't a good argument for legalizing drugs. legalized drugs may put an increased strain on the health system because potentially more people will do them.
I'm for the legalization of most soft drugs, simply because making them illegal doesn't work on multiple levels. but the health argument is fairly easy to shoot down.
Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
It's in the article.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
-starman-
This is more pointing out the hypocrisy than taking any particular stance. Everytime I hear an alcoholic complain about druggies I want to smack them due to their own ignorance.Marijuana is a poor substitute for alcohol. An alcohol high doesn't feel anything like a marijuana high.
And alcohol is awesome. If you don't like it, don't drink it.
MrGeezer
you do realize you can get statistics to say pretty much anything you want them to
and
im for the legalization of every drug (i drink but thats it) the way i see it, its your body, you should have the right to trash it, its not the governments job to regulate what you smoke inhale inject eat drink or apply
Because (I assume you live in America) you claim to live in the most free country in the world.I think "this is worse than that" is one of the silliest arguments you can make. Yes, a kick in the balls is worse than a kick to the stomache. But why even have the possibility for both when you can make do with one (or ideally none?)
Bio_Spark
So why is 'the one' people have chosen by far more dangerous than others that they consider more problematic, but aren't really?I think "this is worse than that" is one of the silliest arguments you can make. Yes, a kick in the balls is worse than a kick to the stomache. But why even have the possibility for both when you can make do with one (or ideally none?)
Bio_Spark
[QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge...Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge..."But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it." That's in the article. The point being it's unknown, but you can't change aspects of the body without some kind of result.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
xaos
You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.swizz-the-gamerWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance.
[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]This is more pointing out the hypocrisy than taking any particular stance. Everytime I hear an alcoholic complain about druggies I want to smack them due to their own ignorance.Marijuana is a poor substitute for alcohol. An alcohol high doesn't feel anything like a marijuana high.
And alcohol is awesome. If you don't like it, don't drink it.
br0kenrabbit
I don't care if people smoke pot or not, I just get annoyed when people are like "hey man, you ought to get high!" Or "pot is harmless, man! Smoke it up!" Or "why are you smoking tobacco? You need to start smoking WEED!"
I don't care if people smoke weed or not. I just don't like the hardcore potheads who are either always talking about how they smoke weed, or try to get other people to smoke weed. If I've ever complained about marijuana users, I would have been complaining about the ones who are complete idiots.
br0ken rabbit, you type similarly to DS, so you must be his alt. :roll:
I learned that today. Everyone who types like someone else, is an alt of that person. There's like, 12 people here at most.
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.br0kenrabbitWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance. Well are you...?
0 deaths from marijuana? And they say its bad for you? :roll:_Brennan_
dont start smoking TEH MARIJUANAS or YOU could become one of those 0 deaths!!!!!!!!!!!
marijuana... STILL A THREAT!
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge..."But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it." That's in the article. The point being it's unknown, but you can't change aspects of the body without some kind of result. Yes, you can; there are any number of ways to compelling demonize alcohol use/overuse, but "something happens that might possibly perhaps maybe have negative effects" is not one of themIs there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.swizz-the-gamerWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance. Well are you...? I had a prescription for Marinol which is synthetic THC, but the doctors have since moved me to straight marijuana. It's not a recreational decisions, but a medical one.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge..."But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it." That's in the article. The point being it's unknown, but you can't change aspects of the body without some kind of result. Yes, you can; there are any number of ways to compelling demonize alcohol use/overuse, but "something happens that might possibly perhaps maybe have negative effects" is not one of them So explain how the exact same arguments are used to keep marijuana illegal. See the hypocrisy?Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
xaos
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge..."But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it." That's in the article. The point being it's unknown, but you can't change aspects of the body without some kind of result. Yes, you can; there are any number of ways to compelling demonize alcohol use/overuse, but "something happens that might possibly perhaps maybe have negative effects" is not one of them So explain how the exact same arguments are used to keep marijuana illegal. See the hypocrisy? So that justifies lashing out against alcohol? That's my problem with your thread.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.br0kenrabbitWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance. Well are you...? I had a prescription for Marinol which is synthetic THC, but the doctors have since moved me to straight marijuana. It's not a recreational decisions, but a medical one. Okay. From personal experience, mushrooms have serious effects on your mental health as does marijuana
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. What's in the article is: "However, the study did not demonstrate that the smaller brain volume actually impaired memory or mental function, notes James Garbutt, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill." Nice dodge..."But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it." That's in the article. The point being it's unknown, but you can't change aspects of the body without some kind of result. Yes, you can; there are any number of ways to compelling demonize alcohol use/overuse, but "something happens that might possibly perhaps maybe have negative effects" is not one of them So explain how the exact same arguments are used to keep marijuana illegal. See the hypocrisy? So that justifies lashing out against alcohol? That's my problem with your thread. I'm lashing out against the hypocrisy. Read the first post again.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
xaos
You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.swizz-the-gamer:lol: Chemical drugs ftw.
I'm lashing out against the hypocrisy. Read the first post again.br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. The above quote where you imply there is information damning alcohol that isn't there definitely makes it not read this way to me.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.Jandurin:lol: Chemical drugs ftw. Very very true! I don't do them anymore, but my god did I have some fun.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.swizz-the-gamerWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance. Well are you...? I had a prescription for Marinol which is synthetic THC, but the doctors have since moved me to straight marijuana. It's not a recreational decisions, but a medical one. Okay. From personal experience, mushrooms have serious effects on your mental health as does marijuana I've done mushrooms. And acid. Many many years ago. I don't have any mental health disorders than I didn't have previously. In fact, the mushrooms helped a lot with overcoming depersonalization. It's for that reason that I am now scheduled for a clinical Ecstasy session with my therapist. I've been schizophrenic since birth, drugs had nothing to do with it. It's the other way around actually...I started doing drugs because I was schizophrenic and wanted to escape the confines of my ailment. I have done nothing illegally in over 15 years, however. All drugs I currently use are under a doctors supervision.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]I'm lashing out against the hypocrisy. Read the first post again.xaos
[QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article. The above quote where you imply there is information damning alcohol that isn't there definitely makes it not read this way to me. I'm implying that the information you're seeking is in the article, not the damaging effects.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"]You know what I hate. How you Shroomers and stoners look down on us chemical drug users.br0kenrabbitWhat makes you think I'm a shroomer or stoner? I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy, not indicating my own stance. Well are you...? I had a prescription for Marinol which is synthetic THC, but the doctors have since moved me to straight marijuana. It's not a recreational decisions, but a medical one. Okay. From personal experience, mushrooms have serious effects on your mental health as does marijuana I've done mushrooms. And acid. Many many years ago. I don't have any mental health disorders than I didn't have previously. In fact, the mushrooms helped a lot with overcoming depersonalization. It's for that reason that I am now scheduled for a clinical Ecstasy session with my therapist. I've been schizophrenic since birth, drugs had nothing to do with it. It's the other way around actually...I started doing drugs because I was schizophrenic and wanted to escape the confines of my ailment. I have done anything illegally in over 15 years, however. All drugs I currently use are under a doctors supervision. I'm not going to defend weed. I must have smoked tons of the stuff in my life, and i don't belive it has had any good effect on me. It takes away all your drive in life, yes I know it's different for everyone and I know people who smoke it and are completely fine. But for many people it has a very negative effect. I've done LSD a fair few times and I belive it to be a mostly positive influence on my life.
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="Bio_Spark"]So why is 'the one' people have chosen by far more dangerous than others that they consider more problematic, but aren't really?I think "this is worse than that" is one of the silliest arguments you can make. Yes, a kick in the balls is worse than a kick to the stomache. But why even have the possibility for both when you can make do with one (or ideally none?)
Bio_Spark
Because:
A) It's been in common use in the country for much longer than other substances, and long before we had a good understanding of the risks and health problems other than drunkeness. Hell, we still thought cigarettes were okay until the the late 60s.
B) We still don't have much research on illegal drugs, relatively speaking. Marijuana in particular is a schedule I drug (it really shouldn't be) so research is extremely restricted.
A) Marijuana has been in use since at least the 3rd century B.C. B) This may be true, but the research we have on Alcohol definitely says that it's a bad substance any way you take it. So if we had as much negative research on marijuana as we do on alcohol (we don't), would that be okay to make it legal? Why have on criteria for one substance and a completely different criteria for another?[QUOTE="-starman-"]It's in the article.Is there a direct link between brain size and either intelligence or mental illness?
br0kenrabbit
the article is somewhat ambiguous about it, though. they don't really say that if the shrinkage is permanent, or if the effects compound, just that drinkers have less mass than non-drinkers. does that mean they have had a drink within the week? month? year?
either way, apparently the difference isn't much.
from the article:
"We're talking very small differences here," says Dr. Garbutt, who was not involved in the study. "We're not seeing 10 to 20 percent shrinkage."
However, he says, reduction in brain mass is an interesting finding. "But we have a long way to go to figure out the implications of it."
it sounds like one of those articles about living below power lines causing cancer. sure there may be an increased risk, but it's slight and everything you do has an impact on your health one way or another, so worrying about the little things is a waste of time.
worrying can cause cancer, too, you know.
LINK
eh, what can you do?
Established, yes. But who perpetuates it?And we have different criteria because the Drug Schedules were established by old men who don't really know much, and wanted to try outlaw them based on how widely used they are, instead of real danger.
Bio_Spark
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="Bio_Spark"]Established, yes. But who perpetuates it?And we have different criteria because the Drug Schedules were established by old men who don't really know much, and wanted to try outlaw them based on how widely used they are, instead of real danger.
Bio_Spark
Their successors, unfortunately. Who are equally old and only marginally more knowledgeable.
And this is what I'm railing against: the hypocrisy.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment