America being based on Religious Principles good or bad?

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="cee1gee"]

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Hewkii

Leviticus 18:22

Teehee

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

[QUOTE="cee1gee"]

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Hewkii

Leviticus 18:22

Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Rougehunter

Leviticus 18:22

Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29

What's the current conversion rate on 50 shekels of silver in to Dollars?
Avatar image for gamerlifegrace
gamerlifegrace

693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 gamerlifegrace
Member since 2009 • 693 Posts

[QUOTE="cee1gee"]The First Amendment was clearly understood and explained by the man who wrote it and the man who first applied it as law. Fisher Ames wrote the First Amendment. He also wrote that the Bible should always remain the principle text book in America's classrooms. John Jay, original Chief-Justice U.S. Supreme Court, said it is the duty of all wise, free, and virtuous governments to help and encourage virtue and religion That is 1 of the foundersGabuEx

OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:

All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into bad exploitation just like any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...

Hitler (his ideaologies do not reflect christian ideals at all)

Extermination of Christians back in AD 40-100

Genocide in Rwanda, Sudan, Dafur

Racism

Bigotry

The Aparthied

Slave trading (modern day slavery)

The Conquests of Genghas Khan, Herod, Augustus Caesar, our "founding fathers', Cleopatra, and various Egyptian Pharohs

Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="cee1gee"]The First Amendment was clearly understood and explained by the man who wrote it and the man who first applied it as law. Fisher Ames wrote the First Amendment. He also wrote that the Bible should always remain the principle text book in America's classrooms. John Jay, original Chief-Justice U.S. Supreme Court, said it is the duty of all wise, free, and virtuous governments to help and encourage virtue and religion That is 1 of the foundersgamerlifegrace

OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:

All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...

Hitler (his ideaologies do not reflect christian ideals at all)

Extermination of Christians back in AD 40-100

Genocide in Rwanda, Sudan, Dafur

Racism

Bigotry

The Apartied

Slave trading (modern day slavery)

The Conquests of Genghas Khan, Herod, Augustus Caesar, our "founding fathers', Cleopatra, and various Egyptian Pharohs

Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???

>________>

Irrelevant post is irrelevant.

Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???

gamerlifegrace
yes, and please include a mythic series of conquests I heard about. it involved European countries, and occurred around the 13th Century (1200s). I think a man named "Richard the Lionheart" was involved somehow, too.
Avatar image for gamerlifegrace
gamerlifegrace

693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 gamerlifegrace
Member since 2009 • 693 Posts

[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:

Teenaged

All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...

>________>

Irrelevant post is irrelevant.

Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.

"irrelevant post is irrelevant"

If you want to make a "smart" quote, then please let it make sense next time.

And I felt that what I said needed to be said.

Avatar image for rjxtian
rjxtian

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 rjxtian
Member since 2005 • 2638 Posts

Sure, seperation of Church and State. Since Religions are based on standards which try to promote harmony within the congregation and society as a whole, I think it is good.

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"] All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...

gamerlifegrace

>________>

Irrelevant post is irrelevant.

Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.

"irrelevant post is irrelevant"

If you want to make a "smart" quote, then please let it make sense next time.

And I felt that what I said needed to be said.

If you want to make a post in reply to another post then please let it be relevant next time and not make it as if you are actually countering any point that has been made.

And of course you should express your opinion but I felt like pointing out the fact that your post was irrelevant to the one you were responding to.

Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts

Sure, seperation of Church and State. Since Religions are based on standards which try to promote harmony within the congregation and society as a whole, I think it is good.

rjxtian
agreed
Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts

I am leaning towards good, why?

because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...

cee1gee
Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]Since when was the USA founded directly on religious principles? :?cee1gee
when the pilgrims came

The United States was founded as a secular nation.
Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]

I am leaning towards good, why?

because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...

hamstergeddon
Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.

but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"]Actually, youre wrong. Christianity through time has found its princilples and morals not only in the government, but also in our everyday lives.gamerlifegrace

You're going to have to take that up with Founding Father John Adams. :P

I could care less what he said. Many things were said in the constitution such as "all men are created equal", but they still had slavery back then.

The founding fathers were against slavery but they knew if they banned it they would never succeed as a nation.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"] but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?

no, and you misinterpreted/ignored his point. a Muslim can be discriminated against in a Christian nation just as well as an Atheist can.
Avatar image for RushMetallica
RushMetallica

4501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#66 RushMetallica
Member since 2007 • 4501 Posts
Wait, you don't actually like the pigrims do you? The same people who killed or imprisoned anyone who didn't agree with their religion, which by the way is the exact reason they came to America. Hypocracy at its best. No, people have to stop associating God with politics, everywhere. Its called secularism.
Avatar image for AFraud
AFraud

1500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 AFraud
Member since 2004 • 1500 Posts

OP, you do realize that most of the founding fathers, including George Washington himself, were Deists, not Christians, and absolutely despised organized religion?

The US was founded on separation of church and state. The idea of mixing religion and politics, or of the US being a Christian country are fantasies cooked up by the religious right.

Avatar image for bkno4u
bkno4u

1558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 bkno4u
Member since 2006 • 1558 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]

I am leaning towards good, why?

because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...

hamstergeddon
Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.

Unless, of course, the will of the people reflects religious doctrine. In which case not only would it be just to make laws favoring religion, but it would also largely sidestep the Establishment Clause. So it's not surprising to me that many laws (like those forbidding gay marriage) have been enacted that favor religious doctrine because they were just crystallization of the norms of the majority, but as time passes, the norms are slowly changing, and so too are the laws.
Avatar image for darkIink
darkIink

2705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 darkIink
Member since 2006 • 2705 Posts
[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]

I am leaning towards good, why?

because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...

cee1gee
Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.

but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?

no. religious laws have no meaning to me, only to those who believe in the religion. non-religious laws are unbiased and are written for everyone, not just the religious. example: limiting work to just 6 days so the holy day can be for rest (sunday) is unfair, because I don't care about keeping sunday holy or for rest. but limiting work HOURS per week is for everybody so that the minimum wage workers/lower class isn't taken advantage of by greedy business owners.
Avatar image for Shiggums
Shiggums

21436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#70 Shiggums
Member since 2007 • 21436 Posts

Seems to have worked out fine, so....good.

Avatar image for krazykillaz
krazykillaz

21141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 krazykillaz
Member since 2002 • 21141 Posts
I'm very much against religion playing a role in lawmaking and other public affairs.
Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#72 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

You see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

America was founded on Christian principles, insofar as American principals and morals were Christian at the time. Our society had barely begun to excise Puritanical values at the time so it is only natural that some seeped into our laws and Constitution. The founding fathers certainly didn't deliberately and purposefully make America a Christian theocracy, but there were Christian influences in some of the laws that they made in the same way that there were British influences, enlightenment influences, and Lockean influences. If we are to say that America was founded as a Christian nation, we should also say that America was founded as a British nation. After all, many founding fathers were British and the Magna Carta and British Constitution influenced the American government.

Wait, you don't actually like the pigrims do you? The same people who killed or imprisoned anyone who didn't agree with their religion, which by the way is the exact reason they came to America. Hypocracy at its best. No, people have to stop associating God with politics, everywhere. Its called secularism.RushMetallica

In fairness, the Puritians did this moreso than the pilgrims. Also, they didn't so much imprision as banish (your point is still valid, just nitpicking).

Avatar image for HomicidalCherry
HomicidalCherry

959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 HomicidalCherry
Member since 2009 • 959 Posts

You see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.

turtlethetaffer

Christian principals would be much more readily described as socialist than capitalist (fyi, socialism and fascism are COMPLETLELY unrelated).

Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts
[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"]

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

You're going to have to take that up with Founding Father John Adams. :P

SAGE_OF_FIRE

I could care less what he said. Many things were said in the constitution such as "all men are created equal", but they still had slavery back then.

The founding fathers were against slavery but they knew if they banned it they would never succeed as a nation.

you actually believe they were against it? ofcourse they werent which is why they owned some..otherwise they wouldnt of owned any
Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts

You see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.

turtlethetaffer
Judging by your other thread, I think it's safe to say you have absolutely no idea what Socialism is. Or, for that matter, really anything about America, Christianity, Buddhism etc. it might be good to know stuff before you try to argue it
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"] you actually believe they were against it? of course they werent which is why they owned some..otherwise they wouldnt of owned any

some were against, and some were for. it took some Realpolitik to come up with a solution to the British problem.
Avatar image for Godless_Liberal
Godless_Liberal

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Godless_Liberal
Member since 2009 • 49 Posts

As i posted in the other thread.

"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

-Adams, Treaty of Tripoli

Constitution, Article VI, Sect.2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="cee1gee"] you actually believe they were against it? of course they werent which is why they owned some..otherwise they wouldnt of owned any

some were against, and some were for. it took some Realpolitik to come up with a solution to the British problem.

yes and some of the founders were against religion and some were for
Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts

I don't think that concepts like "murder is bad" and "don't steal" are exclusive to religion.

GabuEx
pretty much this
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"] yes and some of the founders were against religion and some were for

therefore we should ignore the ones who were against because
Avatar image for cee1gee
cee1gee

2042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 cee1gee
Member since 2008 • 2042 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="cee1gee"] yes and some of the founders were against religion and some were for

therefore we should ignore the ones who were against because

i never said to ignore it, laws are laws
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]

I am leaning towards good, why?

because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.

im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works

Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...

cee1gee

Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.

but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?

Non religious =/= anti-religious

Therefore no, you cant call that unjust.

Avatar image for MrPraline
MrPraline

21351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 MrPraline
Member since 2008 • 21351 Posts
[QUOTE="cee1gee"] but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?

No.
Avatar image for Shhadow_Viper
Shhadow_Viper

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Shhadow_Viper
Member since 2009 • 2300 Posts

It is good and bad. There are many great values associated with Christianity and that is beneficial. However there are many close minded ideologies that have been transcending into our Gov't and society and that is entirely detrimental.

Opposing gay marriage because they don't think it is "right", well then don't marry a person of the same sex. It's not like outlawing gay marriage will diminish homosexuality. All it does is create more problems and solves none.

There are also those who wish to outlaw abortion for everyone because they don't believe in it...As if outlawing abortions will end their existence. Women who want one will get it, whether sanitarily and safely from a doctor, or risky and dirty back alley procedure.

Opposing stem cell research because they still think the only method of procuring stem cells is from a fetus, therefore they believe abortions will be encouraged to meet demand.

These are just a few examples of how religious values can be detrimental to society, by causing more problems and solving none.

Avatar image for m45t3rch13f
m45t3rch13f

1070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 m45t3rch13f
Member since 2004 • 1070 Posts
Bad. America should become a secular country. Do you want America to be the Christian-version of Saudi Arabia?
Avatar image for tofu-lion91
tofu-lion91

13496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 tofu-lion91
Member since 2008 • 13496 Posts
Bad. For many many reasons
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#88 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
The United States was not founded on religious principles though. Gabu has given so many excellent examples of secular intention of the Founding Fathers. Let me give another. Contrast the First Amendment (freedom of and from religion) to the First Commandment. How can these two possibly be reconciled? To God, the allowance of freedom from and of religion is anathema, he is the one and only God.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
I don't even know what a "religious principle" is? Is it principles like "don't murder people" and "don't steal from people"? If so, then yeah it's good, but there's no need to call them religious principles - that would just be needlessly polarizing. However, if by religious principles you mean principles that explicitly promote a specific religion (I guess in this case that would be Christianity), then no, that is very bad.
Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

[QUOTE="Rougehunter"]

[QUOTE="Hewkii"] Leviticus 18:22Bourbons3

Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29

What's the current conversion rate on 50 shekels of silver in to Dollars?

I think its something like $1500

Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts
I'd say religion has done much more good than evil. It's united people in America for a long long time, and the general morals tend to work to the benefit of the people.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
I'd say religion has done much more good than evil. It's united people in America for a long long time, and the general morals tend to work to the benefit of the people.Setsa
*excluding gays, infidels, and anyone deemed not 'really' Christian.
Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts
[QUOTE="Setsa"]I'd say religion has done much more good than evil. It's united people in America for a long long time, and the general morals tend to work to the benefit of the people.Hewkii
*excluding gays, infidels, and anyone deemed not 'really' Christian.

Well, if America wasn't united under the same religion (predominantly Christian), then there probably would have been a lot more conflicts akin to another batch of Holy Wars.
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
[QUOTE="Setsa"] Well, if America wasn't united under the same religion (predominantly Christian), then there probably would have been a lot more conflicts akin to another batch of Holy Wars.

except that this happens all the time anyway (look up "Whore of Babylon" and anything mentioning Mormons).
Avatar image for Setsa
Setsa

8431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 Setsa
Member since 2005 • 8431 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="Setsa"] Well, if America wasn't united under the same religion (predominantly Christian), then there probably would have been a lot more conflicts akin to another batch of Holy Wars.

except that this happens all the time anyway (look up "Whore of Babylon" and anything mentioning Mormons).

Not as bad as if their was widespread unrest and conflict amongst religious groups in America. I mean, image North America if there was an equal amount of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and pagans.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

America being based on principles period: good or bad?

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts
Not as bad as if their was widespread unrest and conflict amongst religious groups in America. I mean, image North America if there was an equal amount of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and pagans.Setsa
yeah, I mean we might have problems like people angrily complaining about a Muslim prayer on Capitol Hill or something.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#98 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="Setsa"]Not as bad as if their was widespread unrest and conflict amongst religious groups in America. I mean, image North America if there was an equal amount of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and pagans.Hewkii
yeah, I mean we might have problems like people angrily complaining about a Muslim prayer on Capitol Hill or something.

Wow, I really regret reading that.