[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Leviticus 18:22im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Hewkii
Teehee
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Leviticus 18:22im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Hewkii
Teehee
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Leviticus 18:22Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Hewkii
Leviticus 18:22Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29 What's the current conversion rate on 50 shekels of silver in to Dollars?[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Rougehunter
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]The First Amendment was clearly understood and explained by the man who wrote it and the man who first applied it as law. Fisher Ames wrote the First Amendment. He also wrote that the Bible should always remain the principle text book in America's classrooms. John Jay, original Chief-Justice U.S. Supreme Court, said it is the duty of all wise, free, and virtuous governments to help and encourage virtue and religion That is 1 of the foundersGabuEx
OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:
All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into bad exploitation just like any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...
Hitler (his ideaologies do not reflect christian ideals at all)
Extermination of Christians back in AD 40-100
Genocide in Rwanda, Sudan, Dafur
Racism
Bigotry
The Aparthied
Slave trading (modern day slavery)
The Conquests of Genghas Khan, Herod, Augustus Caesar, our "founding fathers', Cleopatra, and various Egyptian Pharohs
Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]The First Amendment was clearly understood and explained by the man who wrote it and the man who first applied it as law. Fisher Ames wrote the First Amendment. He also wrote that the Bible should always remain the principle text book in America's classrooms. John Jay, original Chief-Justice U.S. Supreme Court, said it is the duty of all wise, free, and virtuous governments to help and encourage virtue and religion That is 1 of the foundersgamerlifegrace
OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:
All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...Hitler (his ideaologies do not reflect christian ideals at all)
Extermination of Christians back in AD 40-100
Genocide in Rwanda, Sudan, Dafur
Racism
Bigotry
The Apartied
Slave trading (modern day slavery)
The Conquests of Genghas Khan, Herod, Augustus Caesar, our "founding fathers', Cleopatra, and various Egyptian Pharohs
Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???
>________>Irrelevant post is irrelevant.
Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.
yes, and please include a mythic series of conquests I heard about. it involved European countries, and occurred around the 13th Century (1200s). I think a man named "Richard the Lionheart" was involved somehow, too.Last time I checked, those werent based on Christian Principles... Would you like for me to continue???
gamerlifegrace
All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...>________>[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"]
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]
OK, that's two. Here are some other founders you might know:
Teenaged
Irrelevant post is irrelevant.
Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.
"irrelevant post is irrelevant"If you want to make a "smart" quote, then please let it make sense next time.
And I felt that what I said needed to be said.
>________>[QUOTE="Teenaged"]
[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"] All of those men that you named were slave owners, and yet they want to talk about God being unjust??? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I dont remember slave trading being in the Bible... Christianity can be used into false exploitation as any other thing. Last time I checked, most of the worlds problems (right now) and in the past had nothing to due with the scripture...
gamerlifegrace
Irrelevant post is irrelevant.
Gabu merely mentioned all those founding fathers to show that the "minds" behind the make-up of USA were not Christian. And thus indicating that Christian teachings passed into laws because they were found (at the time for some of them) to be good and beneficial; not just because they stemmed from Christianity.
"irrelevant post is irrelevant"If you want to make a "smart" quote, then please let it make sense next time.
And I felt that what I said needed to be said.
If you want to make a post in reply to another post then please let it be relevant next time and not make it as if you are actually countering any point that has been made.And of course you should express your opinion but I felt like pointing out the fact that your post was irrelevant to the one you were responding to.
Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual.I am leaning towards good, why?
because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...
cee1gee
[QUOTE="_en1gma_"]Since when was the USA founded directly on religious principles? :?cee1geewhen the pilgrims came The United States was founded as a secular nation.
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual. but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?I am leaning towards good, why?
because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...
hamstergeddon
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]
[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"]Actually, youre wrong. Christianity through time has found its princilples and morals not only in the government, but also in our everyday lives.gamerlifegrace
You're going to have to take that up with Founding Father John Adams. :P
I could care less what he said. Many things were said in the constitution such as "all men are created equal", but they still had slavery back then.
The founding fathers were against slavery but they knew if they banned it they would never succeed as a nation.OP, you do realize that most of the founding fathers, including George Washington himself, were Deists, not Christians, and absolutely despised organized religion?
The US was founded on separation of church and state. The idea of mixing religion and politics, or of the US being a Christian country are fantasies cooked up by the religious right.
[QUOTE="cee1gee"]Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual. Unless, of course, the will of the people reflects religious doctrine. In which case not only would it be just to make laws favoring religion, but it would also largely sidestep the Establishment Clause. So it's not surprising to me that many laws (like those forbidding gay marriage) have been enacted that favor religious doctrine because they were just crystallization of the norms of the majority, but as time passes, the norms are slowly changing, and so too are the laws.I am leaning towards good, why?
because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...
hamstergeddon
[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual. but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious? no. religious laws have no meaning to me, only to those who believe in the religion. non-religious laws are unbiased and are written for everyone, not just the religious. example: limiting work to just 6 days so the holy day can be for rest (sunday) is unfair, because I don't care about keeping sunday holy or for rest. but limiting work HOURS per week is for everybody so that the minimum wage workers/lower class isn't taken advantage of by greedy business owners.I am leaning towards good, why?
because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...
cee1gee
You see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.
America was founded on Christian principles, insofar as American principals and morals were Christian at the time. Our society had barely begun to excise Puritanical values at the time so it is only natural that some seeped into our laws and Constitution. The founding fathers certainly didn't deliberately and purposefully make America a Christian theocracy, but there were Christian influences in some of the laws that they made in the same way that there were British influences, enlightenment influences, and Lockean influences. If we are to say that America was founded as a Christian nation, we should also say that America was founded as a British nation. After all, many founding fathers were British and the Magna Carta and British Constitution influenced the American government.
Wait, you don't actually like the pigrims do you? The same people who killed or imprisoned anyone who didn't agree with their religion, which by the way is the exact reason they came to America. Hypocracy at its best. No, people have to stop associating God with politics, everywhere. Its called secularism.RushMetallica
In fairness, the Puritians did this moreso than the pilgrims. Also, they didn't so much imprision as banish (your point is still valid, just nitpicking).
You see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.
turtlethetaffer
Christian principals would be much more readily described as socialist than capitalist (fyi, socialism and fascism are COMPLETLELY unrelated).
[QUOTE="gamerlifegrace"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]
You're going to have to take that up with Founding Father John Adams. :P
SAGE_OF_FIRE
I could care less what he said. Many things were said in the constitution such as "all men are created equal", but they still had slavery back then.
The founding fathers were against slavery but they knew if they banned it they would never succeed as a nation. you actually believe they were against it? ofcourse they werent which is why they owned some..otherwise they wouldnt of owned anyJudging by your other thread, I think it's safe to say you have absolutely no idea what Socialism is. Or, for that matter, really anything about America, Christianity, Buddhism etc. it might be good to know stuff before you try to argue itYou see, religious principles could mean anything from Christianity to Buhhdism. Anyway, this country was built on Christian principles and that is why it worked... you know, before politicians started trying to make us Socialist/ Facist.
turtlethetaffer
As i posted in the other thread.
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
-Adams, Treaty of Tripoli
Constitution, Article VI, Sect.2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="cee1gee"]Because so long as the government makes laws based on religious beliefs, it is unjust for all the other people that aren't of that religious belief. A government making religious laws would force people not of that religion to follow another religion's moral doctrines and values, and that is patently unjust. Tyranny of the majority is just as bad as tyranny of an individual. but its not unjust for religious people to live by laws that are non religious?Non religious =/= anti-religiousI am leaning towards good, why?
because it has worked for a couple hundred years, and the only downfall i can see is America straying away from it.
im not sure why anyone would want to change it? sure when people think Religion they think God and such, but this is different, this is laws we live by, which works
Plus its not like we have holy wars and demand people to pick a religion...
cee1gee
Therefore no, you cant call that unjust.
It is good and bad. There are many great values associated with Christianity and that is beneficial. However there are many close minded ideologies that have been transcending into our Gov't and society and that is entirely detrimental.
Opposing gay marriage because they don't think it is "right", well then don't marry a person of the same sex. It's not like outlawing gay marriage will diminish homosexuality. All it does is create more problems and solves none.
There are also those who wish to outlaw abortion for everyone because they don't believe in it...As if outlawing abortions will end their existence. Women who want one will get it, whether sanitarily and safely from a doctor, or risky and dirty back alley procedure.
Opposing stem cell research because they still think the only method of procuring stem cells is from a fetus, therefore they believe abortions will be encouraged to meet demand.
These are just a few examples of how religious values can be detrimental to society, by causing more problems and solving none.
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Also Deuteronomy 22:28-29 What's the current conversion rate on 50 shekels of silver in to Dollars?I think its something like $1500[QUOTE="Hewkii"] Leviticus 18:22Bourbons3
[QUOTE="Setsa"]I'd say religion has done much more good than evil. It's united people in America for a long long time, and the general morals tend to work to the benefit of the people.Hewkii*excluding gays, infidels, and anyone deemed not 'really' Christian. Well, if America wasn't united under the same religion (predominantly Christian), then there probably would have been a lot more conflicts akin to another batch of Holy Wars.
Not as bad as if their was widespread unrest and conflict amongst religious groups in America. I mean, image North America if there was an equal amount of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and pagans.Setsayeah, I mean we might have problems like people angrily complaining about a Muslim prayer on Capitol Hill or something.
[QUOTE="Setsa"]Not as bad as if their was widespread unrest and conflict amongst religious groups in America. I mean, image North America if there was an equal amount of Christians, Muslims, Jews, and pagans.Hewkiiyeah, I mean we might have problems like people angrily complaining about a Muslim prayer on Capitol Hill or something.
Wow, I really regret reading that.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment