If absurdly rich people didn't exist, then the rest of us wouldn't be able to watch illegal Russian street-races between Ferarris and Bugattis on youtube. That thought really keeps me awake at night.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
If absurdly rich people didn't exist, then the rest of us wouldn't be able to watch illegal Russian street-races between Ferarris and Bugattis on youtube. That thought really keeps me awake at night.
Well just look at the ratio of pay per CEO when compared to their workers. 40 years ago it was 39:1, now it's over 1000:1. If that doesn't make you shake your head in disgust I don't know what will. HoolaHoopMan
If things continue as they have I can for see america sliding to a two tier society in the not to distant future. Well on the bright side it give the rest of the world a lesson on how not to run a country.
No surprises there, considering almost every american who votes, votes for a party that hates the middle class.htekemeralddamn democrats, destroying jobs with taxes regulations and mandates, i do not understand why they get so many votes.
They aren't supposed to have that much of an adjustment while the rest of the country stagnates. That is not a recipe for a successful country.The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]They aren't supposed to have that much of an adjustment while the rest of the country stagnates. That is not a recipe for a successful country. Why?The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
LJS9502_basic
Misconception 1: How much money you earn directly relates to how much you've "earned" by hard work. Manual laborers who work all day destroying their own body in the process barely scrape a living together while any decent CEO can make millions. Thing is, those CEO's wouldn't even have a job without legions of manual laborers. Progressive taxes just fix the natural imbalance in wages, while also taking money from where it doesn't hurt. This is why the tax cuts for the rich are a bad idea.
Misconception 2: It isn't a problem as long as middle class/lower class don't go backwards in how much they earn. If there's one thing we can learn from history is that empires fall because of huge differences between high and lower classes. It leads to social unrest and unhappiness. So yes, the rich getting way too rich can actually become a problem. Apart from that, there's a balancing aspect. If politicians cared about making the middle class better off, it would probably come from the share that the rich get. Economics isn't a zero sum game, but it's not too far off.
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]They aren't supposed to have that much of an adjustment while the rest of the country stagnates. That is not a recipe for a successful country. Why?The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
LJS9502_basic
It is a damn shame. This is only proving the point that the gap between rich in poor and increasing. Not only did the poor lose income gain but the rich gained more then them. We need to tax the rich more heavily in my opinion.MgamerBDWhy is it that if the rich make more money, they don't deserve it and need to be taxed more heavily? What kind of attitude is this?
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]They aren't supposed to have that much of an adjustment while the rest of the country stagnates. That is not a recipe for a successful country. Why?Why what? With a shrinking middle class...more social programs get enacted which ups taxes. With only the wealthy able to maintain a tax base...they have to be taxed more. Thus, the burden falls on the wealthy rather than the middle class (not that that is a bad thing but the wealthy find ways to hide their taxable income)....or revolution occurs. Which spells success to you?The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
BMD004
and completely kill the US economy.....brilliant....you win teh internets.....The rich should be used to cure the deficit. Obama should come up with a new tax bracket that requires people who make over $200,000.00 per year to be hit with a 75% non-refundable tax.
BluRayHiDef
The gap between rich and poor is growing. I dont think thats a winning formula.That's a problem with with lower classes. That's not a problem with the upper class. no its the problem of people of rich getting every figure thing they want caused they have money yet whine about something going to stop and hurt them give me a break.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
Pirate700
Not sure where we came up with the idea that everyone should have the samde amount of money...or begrudge those that have more....all this talks abotu is the gap...have more people moved from poverty to the Middle class or from middle to rich?...and if so...isn't that what is more important?...the gap is meaningless.....Omni-SlashNot a problem that everyone doesn't have the same money...is a problem that some pay more of a percentage of their income into taxes than others.
]Not a problem that everyone doesn't have the same money...is a problem that some pay more of a percentage of their income into taxes than others.LJS9502_basicthat I agree with....
It honestly disturbs me how many people do not seem to get the problem.
First of all, throw all of your dreams and preconceived notions of a little perfect free market capatlist American utopia out the window. Globalized free market capitalism does not work, and will not work. Why? Because there is only so much to go around, and the idea of a infinte ever lasting cycle of cylical consumption and even distribution between consumer and producer was a failed construct from the get go. We are living on archaeic principles of century old establishments and thinkers, and the money has always been at the forefront of peoples minds.
Second of all, get the idea of Upper/middle/lower class out of your head because this too is no longer relevent. There is anyone who is on multi billion dollar corporate/government payroll, and then there are those who are not.
Third of all, these "rich" multi national super corporate conglomerates (GE, Halliburton, Goldman Sachs) no longer even have anything to do with the American populace...at least other than the top 1% and American based banks. So WHY, WHY do people seek to defend them? They profit and take advantage of foreign peoples willing to whore themselves out simply to make a better name for themselves and because they know no better. Look up suicide rates in Eastern Pacific countries (China, Japan, Indonesia)...yeah, not good.
Globalization is creating a corporate elite that owns more capital, more "wealth" and "riches", and more power than any organization or government could dream of. Hell the banks have everyone believing that useless paper with fancy designs backed up by no empirical worth is actually the meaning of life, and that your credit score is not some manipulative system of total control, so they canget away with anything apparently.
And to top it all of, our current system does not even encourage progress anymore...it inhibits it, holding back enourmous amounts of potential. Oil companies, electric companies,automotive companies, air travel companies, government programs, and now even space companies...the list goes on. America is dying, and long with it the rest of the world.
It honestly disturbs me how many people do not seem to get the problem.
First of all, throw all of your dreams and preconceived notions of a little perfect free market capatlist American utopia out the window. Globalized free market capitalism does not work, and will not work. Why? Because there is only so much to go around, and the idea of a infinte ever lasting cycle of cylical consumption and even distribution between consumer and producer was a failed construct from the get go. We are living on archaeic principles of century old establishments and thinkers, and the money has always been at the forefront of peoples minds.
Second of all, get the idea of Upper/middle/lower class out of your head because this too is no longer relevent. There is anyone who is on multi billion dollar corporate/government payroll, and then there are those who are not.
Third of all, these "rich" multi national super corporate conglomerates (GE, Halliburton, Goldman Sachs) no longer even have anything to do with the American populace...at least other than the top 1% and American based banks. So WHY, WHY do people seek to defend them? They profit and take advantage of foreign peoples willing to whore themselves out simply to make a better name for themselves and because they know no better. Look up suicide rates in Eastern Pacific countries (China, Japan, Indonesia)...yeah, not good.
Globalization is creating a corporate elite that owns more capital, more "wealth" and "riches", and more power than any organization or government could dream of. Hell the banks have everyone believing that useless paper with fancy designs backed up by no empirical worth is actually the meaning of life, and that your credit score is not some manipulative system of total control, so they canget away with anything apparently.
And to top it all of, our current system does not even encourage progress anymore...it inhibits it, holding back enourmous amounts of potential. Oil companies, electric companies,automotive companies, air travel companies, government programs, and now even space companies...the list goes on. America is dying, and long with it the rest of the world.
someone does not know what a free market theory is and instead uses the Mercantilist theory. well that was a waste of some of my lunch time[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Pirate700"] They aren't supposed to have that much of an adjustment while the rest of the country stagnates. That is not a recipe for a successful country.BMD004Why?
It is a damn shame. This is only proving the point that the gap between rich in poor and increasing. Not only did the poor lose income gain but the rich gained more then them. We need to tax the rich more heavily in my opinion.MgamerBDWhy is it that if the rich make more money, they don't deserve it and need to be taxed more heavily? What kind of attitude is this?
Because the further the gap increases soon our pyramid will hold two types of income. Rich and Poor. With the missing middle class that is not agood way to run a country. Also no matter how hard they worked for it they still should be taxed. I'm sure they will survive without that new car or house. Its called being fair BMD004 if we work hard to survive down here. They have to at least pay more taxes like the middle and lower class.
Because the further the gap increases soon our pyramid will hold two types of income. Rich and Poor. With the missing middle class that is not agood way to run a country. Also no matter how hard they worked for it they still should be taxed. I'm sure they will survive without that new car or house. Its called being fair BMD004 if we work hard to survive down here. They have to at least pay more taxes like the middle and lower class.
"fair" is subjective......[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] The gap between rich and poor is growing. I dont think thats a winning formula.
DroidPhysX
So people who work hard for themselves and make a lot of money don't deserve what they have worked for?
But poor and middle class families who didn't work for it do derserve that money?
Uhh, a good amount of millionares didnt work hard for their money. They inherited it.if they inherited it its unlikely their earning more from it.
PLEASE tell me this is a joke.[QUOTE="Pirate700"]
[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]
The rich should be used to cure the deficit. Obama should come up with a new tax bracket that requires people who make over $200,000.00 per year to be hit with a 75% non-refundable tax.
th3warr1or
Edit: I should stop posting. My sarcasm detector is broken.
Edit2: I'm not sure it's a joke.
Its not, he says some crazy stuff. Everywhere i go I see him say something and people ask the same thing
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]
So people who work hard for themselves and make a lot of money don't deserve what they have worked for?
But poor and middle class families who didn't work for it do derserve that money?
Uhh, a good amount of millionares didnt work hard for their money. They inherited it.if they inherited it its unlikely their earning more from it.
whom ever they inherited it from earned it, and decided to give it to them, the wealth has been earned. if you think that money should be taken from them then you must also think any gift given to you should be taken from you. illegalize gifts is a platform i have never seen beforeWhy is it that if the rich make more money, they don't deserve it and need to be taxed more heavily? What kind of attitude is this?[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Why?[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]It is a damn shame. This is only proving the point that the gap between rich in poor and increasing. Not only did the poor lose income gain but the rich gained more then them. We need to tax the rich more heavily in my opinion.MgamerBD
Because the further the gap increases soon our pyramid will hold two types of income. Rich and Poor. With the missing middle class that is not agood way to run a country. Also no matter how hard they worked for it they still should be taxed. I'm sure they will survive without that new car or house. Its called being fair BMD004 if we work hard to survive down here. They have to at least pay more taxes like the middle and lower class.
That is artificial fairness. Taxing people to even out the wealth is artificial.Unforunately that is a consequence of any merit based system. Those with the skills and the means will continue to do well, those without won't. Generally, if you have the skills and formula to be successful, you will continuously exploit it and continue to further the gap between others who don't.
[QUOTE="BluRayHiDef"]
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]PLEASE tell me this is a joke.
Wasdie
We need that money. Also, we should stop the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, immediately. Welfare should also be cut, and the people who have been on welfare should be placed into speically assigned neighborhoods, where there are no tax-supported public services like police-enforcement or firemen-services. These people should be forced to take government assigned public-service jobs themselves, and hit with a 75% tax rate which would go toward paying back the money they used when they were on welfare, and toward the deficit. Prisons should be shut down, since they're a waste of money. All of the prisoners should just be gassed and done with. Neighborhoods which are in school districts which have low acadmic averages should stop receiving tax-money for their public shools. We need that money, too.
Haha good one...
:|
Why don't you just gas the poor and the kids in those poor performing schools - we all know the poor and dumb account for 100% of all crime. Makes it simpler.How dare you see those rich, who worked so hard, should not deserve to earn more and more money? Those lazy middle class workers deserve to earn little! I mean how hard could it be to work in a factory?!
the problem is that everyone is supposed to get richer as gdp grows. but it seems like only the rich are getting most the benefits of the good times and not sacrificing anything during the bad times. heck they even get bailed out.The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
Pirate700
there's actually a huge difference between the upper middle class/lower upper class and the super rich. they usually have the same education and skills but it's family/social connections that become the key. lets face it wealth makes gaining more wealth really easy. look at the kids of the super rich. they could be C students and still make more than 99% of the population.Unforunately that is a consequence of any merit based system. Those with the skills and the means will continue to do well, those without won't. Generally, if you have the skills and formula to be successful, you will continuously exploit it and continue to further the gap between others who don't.
sonicare
Studies have shown that the bigger the income gap between the rich and the rest, the lower the rates of happiness for a country....
Why is it that if the rich make more money, they don't deserve it and need to be taxed more heavily? What kind of attitude is this? BMD004
Because the further the gap increases soon our pyramid will hold two types of income. Rich and Poor. With the missing middle class that is not agood way to run a country. Also no matter how hard they worked for it they still should be taxed. I'm sure they will survive without that new car or house. Its called being fair BMD004 if we work hard to survive down here. They have to at least pay more taxes like the middle and lower class.
That is artificial fairness. Taxing people to even out the wealth is artificial. The entire financial and monetary system is artificial...terrible argument.The rich are supposed to keep getting richer. I don't like how that somehow seen as a problem. The middle and lower class issues are problems.
the problem is that everyone is supposed to get richer as gdp grows. but it seems like only the rich are getting most the benefits of the good times and not sacrificing anything during the bad times. heck they even get bailed out. sure fire signs of a planned market, and wealth does not grow in a planned market as it is a zero sum market. in a free market you get mutually beneficial trade and everyone gets richer over timeperhaps if the middle class had more capital to use in productive or other ways the gap would not be growing. now what takes money from people, its not those employers, they give money to people..... i may need some help here, does anyone know what takes money from people in an involuntary manor?Studies have shown that the bigger the income gap between the rich and the rest, the lower the rates of happiness for a country....
With-Hatred
[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]perhaps if the middle class had more capital to use in productive or other ways the gap would not be growing. now what takes money from people, its not those employers, they give money to people..... i may need some help here, does anyone know what takes money from people in an involuntary manor? However, the wealthy have ways to hide assets and not pay tax...which means when the government needs more money a disproportionate amount falls on the middle class who have no means to hide assets.Studies have shown that the bigger the income gap between the rich and the rest, the lower the rates of happiness for a country....
surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]perhaps if the middle class had more capital to use in productive or other ways the gap would not be growing. now what takes money from people, its not those employers, they give money to people..... i may need some help here, does anyone know what takes money from people in an involuntary manor?robin hood?Studies have shown that the bigger the income gap between the rich and the rest, the lower the rates of happiness for a country....
surrealnumber5
Studies have shown that the bigger the income gap between the rich and the rest, the lower the rates of happiness for a country....
perhaps if the middle class had more capital to use in productive or other ways the gap would not be growing. now what takes money from people, its not those employers, they give money to people..... i may need some help here, does anyone know what takes money from people in an involuntary manor? However, the wealthy have ways to hide assets and not pay tax...which means when the government needs more money a disproportionate amount falls on the middle class who have no means to hide assets. its not about hiding assets it is about exponential growth, 10 million will have more growth in utility over X time at X rate than 10k. even if the 10million had a 1% return and the 10k had a 100% return the new value of 10.1M had greater growth than that of the new value at 20k. capital growth is an amazing thing and i think this quote is fitting Albert Einstein- The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest not to say the tax code is not filled with holes thanks to special interest groups, but i do not think the blame should be placed on people trying to do their best because the system is keeping others from having the ability to accumulate capital for future investment.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] perhaps if the middle class had more capital to use in productive or other ways the gap would not be growing. now what takes money from people, its not those employers, they give money to people..... i may need some help here, does anyone know what takes money from people in an involuntary manor?surrealnumber5However, the wealthy have ways to hide assets and not pay tax...which means when the government needs more money a disproportionate amount falls on the middle class who have no means to hide assets. its not about hiding assets it is about exponential growth, 10 million will have more growth in utility over X time at X rate than 10k. even if the 10million had a 1% return and the 10k had a 100% return the new value of 10.1M had greater growth than that of the new value at 20k. capital growth is an amazing thing and i think this quote is fitting Albert Einstein- The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest not to say the tax code is not filled with holes thanks to special interest groups, but i do not think the blame should be placed on people trying to do their best because the system is keeping others from having the ability to accumulate capital for future investment. But when one hides assets...they are making more than their share of money and not paying their share of the expenses. Close the loopholes and we probably won't need to raise taxes on anyone....
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] However, the wealthy have ways to hide assets and not pay tax...which means when the government needs more money a disproportionate amount falls on the middle class who have no means to hide assets. LJS9502_basicits not about hiding assets it is about exponential growth, 10 million will have more growth in utility over X time at X rate than 10k. even if the 10million had a 1% return and the 10k had a 100% return the new value of 10.1M had greater growth than that of the new value at 20k. capital growth is an amazing thing and i think this quote is fitting Albert Einstein- The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest not to say the tax code is not filled with holes thanks to special interest groups, but i do not think the blame should be placed on people trying to do their best because the system is keeping others from having the ability to accumulate capital for future investment. But when one hides assets...they are making more than their share of money and not paying their share of the expenses. Close the loopholes and we probably won't need to raise taxes on anyone.... i am for a flat rate much like milton friedman, but that would not change the standings of the middle class at all, for those rich people like al gore who abuse the tax system it would put a dent in their profits but that still does nothing for the people you seek to help.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment