Android vs. iPhone.which is better?

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

I've done app development and Android is LEAGUES beyond iOS in that department.

Not to mention it doesn't feel as dated, slow, or as unresponsive. Apple really don't know what they're doing when it comes to designing software. But hey, it looks pretty and is simple enough to follow for technologically challenged individuals so it sells.

Avatar image for unrealtron
unrealtron

3148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 unrealtron
Member since 2010 • 3148 Posts
I prefer Android.
Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

Iphone......I am using a mac to post this and charge my iphone and ipod at the same time.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Iphone......I am using a mac to post this and charge my iphone and ipod at the same time.

Mercenary848

You can do that with any brand computer and pretty much every current smartphone and tablet

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#55 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

Iphone......I am using a mac to post this and charge my iphone and ipod at the same time.

Mercenary848
Holy crap, because you totally cant do all that stuff on a PC of even the most obscure chinese assembler. Seriously you talk as if you couldn't charge your iphone or ipod at the same time on a regular PC.
Avatar image for Papadrach
Papadrach

1965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Papadrach
Member since 2008 • 1965 Posts

I have a 4s. I like it, can play all my music on it easisly. Shortcuts are simple, app navigation is easy, menus are simple to go through and everything works real well. Sure you don't have all the crazy customization that androids have, but I don't need that. It does what I want really well. Simple interface, perfect size, ipod, apps, internet.

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

[QUOTE="Mercenary848"]

Iphone......I am using a mac to post this and charge my iphone and ipod at the same time.

lightleggy

Holy crap, because you totally cant do all that stuff on a PC of even the most obscure chinese assembler. Seriously you talk as if you couldn't charge your iphone or ipod at the same time on a regular PC.

No I wasnt lol, I was just kind of makeing note that I have a lot of apple products for some reason. I did not say that you couldnt do that with a regular pc, you were just makeing assumtions. Honestly you and the other guy read way to into my posts shame on you two, but that is why GS is awesome lol.

Avatar image for EvilSelf
EvilSelf

3619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#58 EvilSelf
Member since 2010 • 3619 Posts

Android. Apple products are tremendously overpriced...

Avatar image for starfox15
starfox15

3988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#59 starfox15
Member since 2006 • 3988 Posts

Don't forget the 3rd option.  Windows phone.  Or blackberry.  You dont have to limit yourself to just 2 flavors.  

Angry_Mushroom

Get out.

In all seriousness though it kinda comes down to what you want from your phone.  I had an iPhone 4 and recently upgraded to a Galaxy Nexus.  The 4g speed and faster processor really made me happy, but the phone is plastic-y and made of more humble materials.  This seems to be the main differences between the Android and Apple camps.  Apple makes a singular product with premium materials but more modest internals while Android runs the gamut from the most basic smartphone to the flagships such as the HTC one and the Galaxy S 4. 

I work at a phone retailer and having owned both phones, I gotta say I'm really not in love with either system over the other when it comes to Apple vs. Android.  For me it comes down to a price/value determination. 

For other customers, they like the ease of use of most apple products and the fact that they sync with their existing network of apple infrastructure.  When it comes to specs, right now Apple is way behind the curve, but I still think the iPhone 5 is one of the best in-your-hand feeling phones that we have to offer.  We'll see what happens when they announce the new Apple phones.

Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts

[QUOTE="YoshiYogurt"]Android is obviously better, but I prefer the Iphone for it's music player. The ipod player is simply better than anything I've seen on android. OrkHammer007

Poweramp outclasses the iPod app on the iPhone. It has much better sound.

I wasn't able to tweak the EQ on the phone (it wasn't mine, and I wasn't going to adjust it for my ears, then try to revert it), but I found the quality on the iPhone much more hollow-sounding than on my Android. I used the same earbuds for both devices, so it wasn't those.

Traditionally, Apple devices have poorer sound quality than their more affordable counterparts anyway. Their earbuds are awfully tinny, too.

Still doesnt matter because chances are, you used shit earbuds on both to begin with. You are also basing your comparison on the stock music player when in reality, there are far better out there for iOS. Its all about the software.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
And if you ask any app developer, they will tell you that making apps for android is an absoute nightmare. Too many phones, too many specs, too many screen sizes, too many people stuck with older operating systems. The one thing iOS really has going for it is there are only a few phones people are using. only a few specs to worry about during development and everybody us tunning the exact same OS. They don't have those welfare carriers like Metro PCS, Boost Mobile and services like Walmart Straight Talk holding things back.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]And if you ask any app developer, they will tell you that making apps for android is an absoute nightmare. Too many phones, too many specs, too many screen sizes, too many people stuck with older operating systems. The one thing iOS really has going for it is there are only a few phones people are using. only a few specs to worry about during development and everybody us tunning the exact same OS. They don't have those welfare carriers like Metro PCS, Boost Mobile and services like Walmart Straight Talk holding things back.

http://www.mycricket.com/iphone/learn-more http://www.walmart.com/cp/Apple-iPhone-Now-on-Straight-Talk/1101612
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]And if you ask any app developer, they will tell you that making apps for android is an absoute nightmare. Too many phones, too many specs, too many screen sizes, too many people stuck with older operating systems. The one thing iOS really has going for it is there are only a few phones people are using. only a few specs to worry about during development and everybody us tunning the exact same OS. They don't have those welfare carriers like Metro PCS, Boost Mobile and services like Walmart Straight Talk holding things back.

http://www.mycricket.com/iphone/learn-more http://www.walmart.com/cp/Apple-iPhone-Now-on-Straight-Talk/1101612

I think you are missing the point. The point is that these providers strive on selling low spec budget handsets holding higher quality android phones back. Cricket is selling only the 5. Straight Talk doesn't have anything below the 4 and none of these phones are running anything lower than the current OS. Meanwhile these carriers have millions of users on android phones that were of low specs even two to three years ago running operating systems as early as Gingerbread and Froyo. A developer may want to make a phone that will shine on the Galaxy S3 or S4. Not completely easy to do when you have a large chunk of the market using shit like the Huewai Ascend.
Avatar image for zeroyaoi
zeroyaoi

2472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 zeroyaoi
Member since 2013 • 2472 Posts

I've done app development and Android is LEAGUES beyond iOS in that department.

Not to mention it doesn't feel as dated, slow, or as unresponsive. Apple really don't know what they're doing when it comes to designing software. But hey, it looks pretty and is simple enough to follow for technologically challenged individuals so it sells.

Saturos3091
the iphone may be many things, but slow, and unresponsive isn't one.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]And if you ask any app developer, they will tell you that making apps for android is an absoute nightmare. Too many phones, too many specs, too many screen sizes, too many people stuck with older operating systems. The one thing iOS really has going for it is there are only a few phones people are using. only a few specs to worry about during development and everybody us tunning the exact same OS. They don't have those welfare carriers like Metro PCS, Boost Mobile and services like Walmart Straight Talk holding things back.

http://www.mycricket.com/iphone/learn-more http://www.walmart.com/cp/Apple-iPhone-Now-on-Straight-Talk/1101612

I think you are missing the point. The point is that these providers strive on selling low spec budget handsets holding higher quality android phones back. Cricket is selling only the 5. Straight Talk doesn't have anything below the 4 and none of these phones are running anything lower than the current OS. Meanwhile these carriers have millions of users on android phones that were of low specs even two to three years ago running operating systems as early as Gingerbread and Froyo. A developer may want to make a phone that will shine on the Galaxy S3 or S4. Not completely easy to do when you have a large chunk of the market using shit like the Huewai Ascend.

What is a "large chunk"?
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
Well it wasn't until just two months ago that Gingerbread users finally dropped below supporting over half of smartphones By only supporting 44.2% of devices. Still the largest Android OS. 53.7% of devices are still running some kind of 2.X whether it be Eclair, Froyo or Gingerbread. Meanwhile only 16.5% of devices support Jellybean. That's a whole lot of low spec phones out there holding everything back.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
Well it wasn't until just two months ago that Gingerbread users finally dropped below supporting over half of smartphones By only supporting 44.2% of devices. Still the largest Android OS. 53.7% of devices are still running some kind of 2.X whether it be Eclair, Froyo or Gingerbread. Meanwhile only 16.5% of devices support Jellybean. That's a whole lot of low spec phones out there holding everything back.Murderstyle75
Their are many variations of the Ascend. One of which does not run gingerbread. Also you're pointing out a problem with OEMs, not Android.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
I'm pointing out the problem with the platform and millions upon millions of people using $50 to $150 low budget phones. Like I said. You can't expect to buy that Galaxy S4 and have the same quality app support to that of an iPhone. Most developers call it a nightmare.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
I'm pointing out the problem with the platform and millions upon millions of people using $50 to $150 low budget phones. Like I said. You can't expect to buy that Galaxy S4 and have the same quality app support to that of an iPhone. Most developers call it a nightmare.Murderstyle75
That's the cost of not using a business model that has a one size fits all approach and giving consumers options.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]I'm pointing out the problem with the platform and millions upon millions of people using $50 to $150 low budget phones. Like I said. You can't expect to buy that Galaxy S4 and have the same quality app support to that of an iPhone. Most developers call it a nightmare.DroidPhysX
That's the cost of not using a business model that has a one size fits all approach and giving consumers options.

Which makes it a welfare platform. Some devs even say they don't put much time into their droid apps anyway because everybody wants free.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#71 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts
Android software and hardware utilizing it is more open than iPhone technology, so I prefer Android.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"]I'm pointing out the problem with the platform and millions upon millions of people using $50 to $150 low budget phones. Like I said. You can't expect to buy that Galaxy S4 and have the same quality app support to that of an iPhone. Most developers call it a nightmare.Murderstyle75
That's the cost of not using a business model that has a one size fits all approach and giving consumers options.

Which makes it a welfare platform

I don't think you know what that word means.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] That's the cost of not using a business model that has a one size fits all approach and giving consumers options.

Which makes it a welfare platform

I don't think you know what that word means.

I think I do. They cater to the $50 to $100 no contract crowd. I believe there are even trac-phone and Obama-Phone Androids now. Like I keep saying. Take away the cheap mass market and Android really could be a good platform but when you spend all that money on a GS4, chances are, you are running apps made for the LG Optimus M, Huawei M835 and Samsung Admire.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] Which makes it a welfare platform

I don't think you know what that word means.

I think I do. They cater to the $50 to $100 no contract crowd. I believe there are even trac-phone and Obama-Phone Androids now. Like I keep saying. Take away the cheap mass market and Android really could be a good platform but when you spend all that money on a GS4, chances are, you are running apps made for the LG Optimus M, Huawei M835 and Samsung Admire.

No, you don't. Also, that would be dumb business not to make a profit in that target market.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] I don't think you know what that word means.

I think I do. They cater to the $50 to $100 no contract crowd. I believe there are even trac-phone and Obama-Phone Androids now. Like I keep saying. Take away the cheap mass market and Android really could be a good platform but when you spend all that money on a GS4, chances are, you are running apps made for the LG Optimus M, Huawei M835 and Samsung Admire.

No, you don't. Also, that would be dumb business not to make a profit in that target market.

The target market is the majority of phones. That would be low end single core phones running gingerbread.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"] I think I do. They cater to the $50 to $100 no contract crowd. I believe there are even trac-phone and Obama-Phone Androids now. Like I keep saying. Take away the cheap mass market and Android really could be a good platform but when you spend all that money on a GS4, chances are, you are running apps made for the LG Optimus M, Huawei M835 and Samsung Admire.

No, you don't. Also, that would be dumb business not to make a profit in that target market.

The target market is the majority of phones. That would be low end single core phones running gingerbread.

If they're not making a profit, those phones wouldn't exist. Shit is basic econ.
Avatar image for Murderstyle75
Murderstyle75

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Murderstyle75
Member since 2011 • 4412 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="Murderstyle75"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] No, you don't. Also, that would be dumb business not to make a profit in that target market.

The target market is the majority of phones. That would be low end single core phones running gingerbread.

If they're not making a profit, those phones wouldn't exist. Shit is basic econ.

Still doesnt give you good apps. Only proves its a poor mans market.
Avatar image for web360top
web360top

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 web360top
Member since 2012 • 37 Posts

iPhone is the best!

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38926 Posts
"my self worth is not tied to how slick my phone is" -ronny b