Anita Sarkeesian hasn't finished her first project and now wants more money

WARNING: Video may show a lot of triggers, if you're offended then F*CK YOU!!!! :P

So, Anita Sarkeesian has no plans to finish all 12 videos of her Tropes vs Women in Games, so it will only remain with 3 videos and decided to go fund a new project.

Her project focus on first world ordinary women, yet she's asking for a donation goal of $200,000. What ever happened to all the money she made from Tropes vs Women in Video Games?

Also, if you're really interested in ACTUALLY helping women, the Amazing Atheist has made his own donation page to help women in 3rd world countries to have proper schooling and support as well as fighting for human rights. It's called Extraordinary People: Daring to actually help Women

Link for the donation page

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/TheAmazingAtheist

she's just a con artist asking for more money from dumb people.

I feel like I should have a problem with this, but I can't complain since I've been told that one of the biggest problems with the world today is that there are too many over-sensitive people like me who are whining and getting upset about trivial shit that doesn't matter.

So, good for her.

No

What a scam artist...only 3 out of the 12? She really is the poster child of modern day feminism.

I sincerely hope no one falls for her bluffs anymore

She's a fraud plain and simple.

No skin off my back. She got hers. If I could make quick, easy money instead of working a 9-5 and going to school I would. She gamed the system by feeding off peoples emotions and she won.

@byof_america: don't hate the player, hate the game, amirite?! lol

Seriously, though, who do we fault more: the person asking for money, or the dumbshits stupid enough to give it to her?

Crowdfunding feels like a scam 90% of the time.

Anita Sarkeesian is selfish and greedy. Maybe she should be a banker or an oil tycoon.

Going the DSP route, Anita?

She's a hustler, I respect that from her.

Why wouldnt she?

The last one made $400k in profit and she didn't even have to spend any of it to finish the project.

I cant fault anyone for applying the principals of p.t. barnum to make a profit.

Her 100% female staff that wants to complain of unfair sexist conditions is laughing all the way to the bank.

Nothing could be more humorous to me than watching her flaunt hypocrisy and get away with it.

suckers are meant to be fleeced.

Bold Prediction: In a few days, signally about two weeks before deadline, it'll become obvious she's not going to hit her target. So, conveniently (though seemingly not) she will get a rape/death threat from a burner account, she will make huge publicity about how she's staying with friends/family and calling the police/FBI and when it makes the news she'll hit her crowd funding targets.

At I think at this point, most sensible people are starting to realize the type of person she is. Less said about her the better. If there are people out there who still believe what she's doing is completely altruistic, then they deserve to be robbed of their money.

No, f**k off Anita.

Thunderfoot's video was better. The Amazing Atheist is meh...

Perfect response.

I got a feeling that quite a lot of people still do...

@kend0_kap0ni: A con artist himself, as was his father.

I wanted to write so much more, but I guess the only way to make it true is to abandon this place and never come back again

2:50

and by 'place' I mean gamespot

"rational" wiki ;)

I think it's more videos but only three subjects but yeah.... She has'nt exactly been productive and it's really the video content itself, people object to. It's downright misleading and the money clearly went elsewhere.

I don't know enough about this to comment but, she's got a great name. Is that her birth name? The alteration is unreal.

Good, no one cares for you or your feelings!

I used to just find Anita a joke, but then she ended up in front of the UN demanding internet cencorship and suddenly she wasn't funny anymore, but someone I consider to be very dangerous.

Hopefully this move kills her career but I fear it won't.

People demand all sorts of stuff.

@MrGeezer: Most people don't get an audience with the UN.

...to add to that other people also demanding stuff doesn't make her immune to criticism.

this isnt about me, you never got that hm? ... it also isnt about you ... well

what?

Da fuq are you talking about? You said in your alternative account that you wanted to write so much, but you feel like never wanting to come back in GS ever again! And then I said good riddance because you don't bring anything good to discussion but post random that's either completely off subject or you agreeing with SJW propaganda! Like a idiot regressive liberals, you don't make any sense!

@kend0_kap0ni: He started several dubious project's that never seen the light of day, funded through donations in which thousands of dollars vanished.

His father "James Kirk III" spent 5 years in a federal prison for setting up a diploma mill.

More information can be found here: http://bfy.tw/7Pe

yes, I miss you too ...

who are you talking about? "He", who?

Don't people tend to criticize the UN for being ineffective and not really getting much done?

They are a powerful world organization and the fact Anita actually got an audience (along with Zoe Quinn which why the **** was she there? She has literally done NOTHING to try and help the feminist cause but has instead just treated people like shit and then cry victim when she gets called out on her shit. Anita may be a fraud but she at least PRETENDS to try and be helping the female cause.) with a powerful world organization and that is SCARY.

It is like Donald Trump and his run for presidency. People keep laughing at him and joking about what a tool he is but there he is looking like he might get the Republican nomination. You sit there and laugh and be like "how can anyone take this shit seriously" but then before you know it those very people you were laughing at for being stupid and having such dumb ideas are suddenly in a position to have some real influence on the world.

Anita has gotten too far with her bullshit and I can't sit here and laugh at it anymore. It is scary to me that there are people out there who just eat up what she says. It terrifies me that so many people lack the ability to critically analyze what these people say and have no ability to actually do even the TINIEST bit of fact checking and logical thinking. That widespread ignorance and complacency to just eat this stuff up is exactly how shit people gain power in the world and then we get really screwed.

@LostProphetFLCL: Critical thinking isn't taught at school?

The way things are these days it feels like that is not a skill you are taught in school....

South Park never ceases to amaze me!

Maybe it was difficult and thus dropped. :P

Guess her cocaine bucket was running dry.

Cocaine ain't cheap you guys.

I can be an insufferable moron on twitter and make 400k? The **** am I doing with my life

Texas legit stopped funding critical thinking courses, and I didn't see one in New England until I went out of my way to take one in college

@wis3boi: exactly. making the world a shittier place is the growth industry of the 21st century.

I don't like this crazy lady.

@LostProphetFLCL: So, HOW exactly is the UN going to censor the internet?

Furthermore, are you seriously suggesting that an entity as powerful as the UN is gonna censor the internet just because Anita Sarkeesian tells them to? Assuming that they actually somehow get around to censoring the internet, I'm pretty ****ing sure that they were planning on doing it anyway and that Anita ****ing Sarkeesian had approximately nothing to do with it. Do you seriously think that an organization that powerful is just gonna say, "well, Anita Sarkeesian says it's a good idea, so let's go ahead and do it"?

Look, I frankly don't give a shit about the lady. But there's a difference between hating her and actually thinking that she has the power to censor the goddamn internet just because she spoke to the UN. I mean, jebus. I doubt that the president of the goddamn USA could just go to the UN and tell them to censor the internet, and then somehow the internet gets censored. But Anita Sarkeesian? You've gotta be ****ing kidding me. The more powerful the UN is, it's actually LESS likely that anything ****ing Anita Sarkeesian says to the UN will actually amount to a pile of shit.