Anyone who supports the official 9/11 narrative should watch this.

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Let's be honest, BBC are never wrong.

champion837

lol.. now that's funny. I feel bad for Guy. Clearly mistakes can be made.

However, I just don't see that kind of mistake happening when the reporter is standing with a clear line of sight to WTC 7. It's also pretty unlikely that the building would fall on it's own just minutes after it was reported on air. That's a pretty tight timeframe. Almost had to be planned to work out that way, and either the cue card or teleprompter guys screwed-up and let the cat out of the bag.

What would be the incentive to demolish building 7?

Most of this page is good, but check out the bottom portion-

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

Avatar image for deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d

7914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5acfa3a8bc51d
Member since 2005 • 7914 Posts
i think the most scariest conspiracy theory for 9/11 is that it was a sacrifice for the devil. the world is a lie 9/11 doesn't concern me as a conspiracy when there is bigger things going on around us. no disrespect to the lost lives from the disaster. all bs aside death happen and i don't like it
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="champion837"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

lol.. now that's funny. I feel bad for Guy. Clearly mistakes can be made.

However, I just don't see that kind of mistake happening when the reporter is standing with a clear line of sight to WTC 7. It's also pretty unlikely that the building would fall on it's own just minutes after it was reported on air. That's a pretty tight timeframe. Almost had to be planned to work out that way, and either the cue card or teleprompter guys screwed-up and let the cat out of the bag.

hartsickdiscipl

What would be the incentive to demolish building 7?

Most of this page is good, but check out the bottom portion-

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

So the government that orchestrated all this did this to destroy documents in the possession of government organizations that are involved in the orchestrating of this event. So yeah basically exactly what pannic said. Wow.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#54 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"] Quite a bit of that "data" is fabricated or points to different conclusions than they claims. For instance the two actual world trade center buildings. People say the windows blew up from the top to the bottom. Clearly this points to a controlled demolition, right? Building demolitions are done from the bottom so it's clearly either a very poor demolition or it wasn't a demolition. They also ignore that WTC7 was on fire for 7 hours without water (no water pressure) and had a building fall on it. Even if it was a controlled demolition it has very real cause for falling. Also why WTC7? What's the point, hardly anyone even KNOWS it was destroyed. Cruise missile to the pentagon? Why is there plane wreckage and why does the hole in the pentagon fit perfectly with an airliner with it's wings removed? Not even going to bother with the plane hologram idea or the notion that steel is immune to fire.Ace6301

WTC 7 did not have a "building fall on it." It was hit with some debris.

From a building. Which then caught it on fire. It then burned for 7 hours. I showed you the diagram of the supports in that building. What aren't you getting here? Do you think they planned for debris to fall on it and catch it on fire? Do you think that wasn't satisfactory for their nefarious schemes and as such they had to demolish the building completely to cover up evidence of them making debris land on it? Seriously what are you getting at here and what point are you trying to make. You have two words on your side that CAN mean something but not always. I have physics and logic. Again just tell me your whole idea of what happened on 9/11 and stop dicking about with things you don't understand.

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

Listen.. What you've been posting is what you've been fed. I don't blame you for swallowing it, complete with nice diagrams and explanations. The problem is that the explanations don't address dozens of issues that point in another direction. It's not that hard to make up a believable story about the support structure of the building being horribly damaged. If you watch the events happen, listen to the cutter charges prior to the explosion, look at the WTC buildings' collapses in the historical anals of steel-framed skyscaper fires, you will see that there is a problem here. That doesn't even get into what has happened since 9/11, where the privacy and rights of US citizens have been violated at an alarming rate. All in the name of security against terrorism.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

hartsickdiscipl

That's what the firefighters said. Are they in it too?

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
So TC, why did the government destroy building 6?
Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
William of Ockham is spinning in his grave.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#58 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="champion837"] What would be the incentive to demolish building 7?Ace6301

Most of this page is good, but check out the bottom portion-

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

So the government that orchestrated all this did this to destroy documents in the possession of government organizations that are involved in the orchestrating of this event. So yeah basically exactly what pannic said. Wow.

No, that's not the bigger picture. It's just a convenient side effect. It was done to ramp up the police state activity in the US by getting the population to cower in fear and accept big brother's "protection." It was done to unite people against a perceived foreign threat while their own government started violating people's rights and interfering in their lives more than ever before. It was also done because the WTC had become a financial liability and needed to go in the eyes of foreign bankers. The Fed (private bank) has sold the US out to foreign bankers and pledged them our souls. The US can't recover from the debt that they're in. The Fed has nobody to regulate it and has betrayed us all.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

So TC, why did the government destroy building 6?PannicAtack

That was an accident, someone pressed the wrong button. (To be fair it was the person's first day on the job, so an easy mistake):D

(I am really getting tired of taking these9/11 conspiracy sheep seriously now. It seems like every year they make the same claims,)

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

So yeah basically exactly what pannic said. Wow. Ace6301
Sometimes the funniest jokes are as funny as they are because they aren't jokes at all.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#61 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

PannicAtack

That's what the firefighters said. Are they in it too?

How many firefighters are on record saying that? Who prepped them for their press interview before they made their statements?

Avatar image for champion837
champion837

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 champion837
Member since 2012 • 1423 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Most of this page is good, but check out the bottom portion-

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

hartsickdiscipl

So the government that orchestrated all this did this to destroy documents in the possession of government organizations that are involved in the orchestrating of this event. So yeah basically exactly what pannic said. Wow.

No, that's not the bigger picture. It's just a convenient side effect. It was done to ramp up the police state activity in the US by getting the population to cower in fear and accept big brother's "protection."

It couldnt have been since there was already a ton of panic and an empty building wouldnt have really made that much of a difference.

Avatar image for Jazz_Fan
Jazz_Fan

29516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Jazz_Fan
Member since 2008 • 29516 Posts

i think the most scariest conspiracy theory for 9/11 is that it was a sacrifice for the devil. the world is a lie 9/11 doesn't concern me as a conspiracy when there is bigger things going on around us. no disrespect to the lost lives from the disaster. all bs aside death happen and i don't like itplaymynutz

Whenever I see your posts, I'm never sure if you're insanely stupid, or incredibly high.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

hartsickdiscipl

That's what the firefighters said. Are they in it too?

How many firefighters are on record saying that? Who prepped them for their press interview before they made their statements?

Translation: I am going to baldfacedly ignore that and assume that any testimony that goes contrary to what I already believe is because the person giving said testimony lied about the events of the day in which their friends died.

But here.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

WTC 7 did not have a "building fall on it." It was hit with some debris.

hartsickdiscipl

From a building. Which then caught it on fire. It then burned for 7 hours. I showed you the diagram of the supports in that building. What aren't you getting here? Do you think they planned for debris to fall on it and catch it on fire? Do you think that wasn't satisfactory for their nefarious schemes and as such they had to demolish the building completely to cover up evidence of them making debris land on it? Seriously what are you getting at here and what point are you trying to make. You have two words on your side that CAN mean something but not always. I have physics and logic. Again just tell me your whole idea of what happened on 9/11 and stop dicking about with things you don't understand.

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

Listen.. What you've been posting is what you've been fed. I don't blame you for swallowing it, complete with nice diagrams and explanations. The problem is that the explanations don't address dozens of issues that point in another direction. It's not that hard to make up a believable story about the support structure of the building being horribly damaged. If you watch the events happen, listen to the cutter charges prior to the explosion, look at the WTC buildings' collapses in the historical anals of steel-framed skyscaper fires, you will see that there is a problem here. That doesn't even get into what has happened since 9/11, where the privacy and rights of US citizens have been violated at an alarming rate. All in the name of security against terrorism.

7 hours on fire with large bits of debris landing on it damaging the building. 7 hours of being on fire without any water because the water pressure was almost non-existent. This has never happened before. Or since. There was a building in China that was on fire for 5 hours WITH water. That's the closest. Here's the thing. I LIKE conspiracy stuff. In fact I watched all the conspiracy videos before ever reading from the official stories and explanation or things from sites like popular mechanics. I looked at both sides and came to a conclusion. My conclusion is that 9/11 was caused by Islamic extremist terrorists. You of all people shouldn't be saying that because someone listens to someone they're deluded. You listen to Alex Jones. A man who can't seem to decide what he believes and contradicts his own beliefs quite often. You listen to these people lie and bend the truth and rather than looking at both sides you just accept what you're told. Conspiracy theorists are just cows to be milked by men who exploit their gullibility. Like seriously you're the one quoting a single man (who makes his money selling books about this stuff) while we're quoting firefighters, engineers and in my case a physicist (because you said it doesn't take a rocket scientist so I asked him and he says it doesn't look like a demolition).
Avatar image for C2N2
C2N2

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 C2N2
Member since 2012 • 759 Posts

So let's see... Grand strategy that involves:

Deceiving billions of people...

Murdering thousands...

Subsequently resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands...

Ruins the economy of the most powerful nation on the planet...

Subsequently ruins the global economy...

Has thousands of militant extremist who claim responsibility, celebrate its occurance...

Has tens of thousands of published reports from reputable sources claiming it was an act of terror committed against the United States...

Has only a few hundred unreputable sources who claim conspiracy and provide nothing more than their own opinions as evidence...

All to accomplish what exactly, sir?

Avatar image for ScorpionTroll
ScorpionTroll

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ScorpionTroll
Member since 2012 • 810 Posts

i think the most scariest conspiracy theory for 9/11 is that it was a sacrifice for the devil. the world is a lie 9/11 doesn't concern me as a conspiracy when there is bigger things going on around us. no disrespect to the lost lives from the disaster. all bs aside death happen and i don't like itplaymynutz
Dafuq, I don't even...

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

So let's see... Grand strategy that involves:

Deceiving billions of people...

Murdering thousands...

Subsequently resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands...

Ruins the economy of the most powerful nation on the planet...

Subsequently ruins the global economy...

Has thousands of militant extremist who claim responsibility, celebrate its occurance...

Has tens of thousands of published reports from reputable sources claiming it was an act of terror committed against the United States...

Has only a few hundred unreputable sources who claim conspiracy and provide nothing more than their own opinions as evidence...

All to accomplish what exactly, sir?

C2N2
Supposedly they did all that so they could pass the Patriot act. Despite the fact they could have done that anyway if everyone was already in on it. They could have just lied about what the Patriot act does. It would have required far, far less involvement than this conspiracy supposedly has. Basically it's a conspiracy because people want it to be so they can get that sweet conspiracy money.
Avatar image for ScorpionTroll
ScorpionTroll

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ScorpionTroll
Member since 2012 • 810 Posts

So let's see... Grand strategy that involves:

Deceiving billions of people...

Murdering thousands...

Subsequently resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands...

Ruins the economy of the most powerful nation on the planet...

Subsequently ruins the global economy...

Has thousands of militant extremist who claim responsibility, celebrate its occurance...

Has tens of thousands of published reports from reputable sources claiming it was an act of terror committed against the United States...

Has only a few hundred unreputable sources who claim conspiracy and provide nothing more than their own opinions as evidence...

All to accomplish what exactly, sir?

C2N2

Supposedly for oil. I think it would have been a lot less complicated to grease the right palms and drill our own oil in Alaska, right? But I'm just a dumb "sheeple", so what do I know?

Avatar image for tylergamereview
tylergamereview

2051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#70 tylergamereview
Member since 2006 • 2051 Posts
I'm wondering, if you actually believed that the government you live under orchestrated 9/11, and did... everything else you stated they did, then why do you live here? How can you stand to live under a government you believe to be so evil? I mean based on the tone of your post, it sounds like you are still living in the U.S. Why? If I actually believed that crap, there is no way in hell I would still live under the people who did it. I'd move, or fight, or do something.
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7062 Posts

Alex Jones:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#72 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

So wait...even though I saw the planes hit the towers, and I saw a fire burn out of control for hours in both towers. I then watched both towers collapse from the top down live. Even though I saw all of this with my own eyes it was all an inside job where the government loaded up the buildings with explosives and blew them up. Yet none of the employees that worked in the towers noticed anything out of the ordinary, and they were in the process of reporting to work like any other morning. This of course makes far more sense than a radical Muslim terrorist who threatened to do this exact thing actually carrying out his plan...ok then. :roll:

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#73 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

TC, why do you always believe in conspiracey theories so much when there is enough real evidence to show what really happened? Why do you dismiss it and then just assume something crazy about it?

9-11 was done by radical Muslims who hate our country and wanted to kill people by commiting acts of terror. This is what actually happened, there are so many holes in your logic that I cannot seen how you think differently.

Really sit down and rethink it over again. Try to be logical about it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

TC, why do you always believe in conspiracey theories so much when there is enough real evidence to show what really happened? Why do you dismiss it and then just assume something crazy about it?

9-11 was done by radical Muslims who hate our country and wanted to kill people by commiting acts of terror. This is what actually happened, there are so many holes in your logic that I cannot seen how you think differently.

Really sit down and rethink it over again. Try to be logical about it.

ShadowMoses900
Its hilarious too, he just doesn't believe in one or two conspiracy theory.. He seems to believe all the big ones, including ancient aliens.. He is a walking stereotype of what a crazy person is.
Avatar image for jetpower3
jetpower3

11631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 jetpower3
Member since 2005 • 11631 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Oh look it's the same old sh*t we've been shown the last 11 years. I'm so surprised that this was posted. Alex Jones needs to learn to pick and choose what he thinks is a conspiracy. It's more self-contradictory than the worst fan-fiction at this point. hartsickdiscipl

If you can come up with an intelligent, reasonable explanation for how all these things (and the other hundreds of issues) fit into the official story, feel free to share. Larry Silverstein said on TV that they pulled Building 7 intentionally. End of discussion.

Do you even know what "pull" means in this context? Regardless of what you see from these sources, it does not refer to demolition but rather withdrawing firefighting efforts. And no matter what it means, why would he potentially let loose hints of such a plot on TV, especially since it is only supposed to involve a few people with any direct knowledge?

Avatar image for shadowkiller11
shadowkiller11

7956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#76 shadowkiller11
Member since 2008 • 7956 Posts
TC you don't even deserve to have Robert De Niro as you avatar.
Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

WTC 7 did not have a "building fall on it." It was hit with some debris.

hartsickdiscipl

From a building. Which then caught it on fire. It then burned for 7 hours. I showed you the diagram of the supports in that building. What aren't you getting here? Do you think they planned for debris to fall on it and catch it on fire? Do you think that wasn't satisfactory for their nefarious schemes and as such they had to demolish the building completely to cover up evidence of them making debris land on it? Seriously what are you getting at here and what point are you trying to make. You have two words on your side that CAN mean something but not always. I have physics and logic. Again just tell me your whole idea of what happened on 9/11 and stop dicking about with things you don't understand.

7 hours of fire from some debris falling on it brought down a steel-framed highrise. That's rich.

Listen.. What you've been posting is what you've been fed. I don't blame you for swallowing it, complete with nice diagrams and explanations. The problem is that the explanations don't address dozens of issues that point in another direction. It's not that hard to make up a believable story about the support structure of the building being horribly damaged. If you watch the events happen, listen to the cutter charges prior to the explosion, look at the WTC buildings' collapses in the historical anals of steel-framed skyscaper fires, you will see that there is a problem here. That doesn't even get into what has happened since 9/11, where the privacy and rights of US citizens have been violated at an alarming rate. All in the name of security against terrorism.

20 floors behind heavily damaged in just 1 corner of the building (from falling debris), not to mention all of the other damage along with a severe fire leads to a building collapsing. That makes too much sense! Obviously they destroyed WTC 1/2 just to destroy WTC7 with bombs and fake air planes and also they had to destroy an extra plane in Pennsylvania for some reason and also destroy a large section of the Pentagon! Genius plan!
Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts
I am tired of all of these 9/11 conspiracy theories. BatCrazedJoker
Anybody who believes 9/11 was an inside job is a moron, plain and simple hands down. It has been disproved before.
Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17986 Posts

9/11 truthers are the biggest idiots walking America's streets.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#80 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17986 Posts

TC, why do you always believe in conspiracey theories so much when there is enough real evidence to show what really happened? Why do you dismiss it and then just assume something crazy about it?

9-11 was done by radical Muslims who hate our country and wanted to kill people by commiting acts of terror. This is what actually happened, there are so many holes in your logic that I cannot seen how you think differently.

Really sit down and rethink it over again. Try to be logical about it.

ShadowMoses900

There's a certain psychology about those who believe in CTs. 9/11 was horrific, such destruction on an unprecedented scale that brought the nation to its knees. I watch footage of the towers collapsing and people running panicked through the streets with the dust cloud on their tails, and I laugh with disbelief because I don't know how else to react as it's hard for me to comprehend what I'm seeing. In the same sense, I think many cannot understand how a huge ordeal could blossom from very simplistic means. They look at the final outcome, and need to believe it was only possible through insanely complex methods.

Basically, the means must match the ends, so a enormous, ridiculously elaborate plot is imagined and enacted to help rationalize it. It's the only way some people can make sense of things, which is understandable as with any massive event in life we all look for equally massive reasons to justify it. Sometimes there are none or they are very small. People cannot accept that the cause was so simple. That it was so simple is what made it possible. The thing is, what the terrorists did was not all that difficult. I must admit, they planned and executed a brilliant attack (don't mean disrespect to the victims here), and it was also a complete no-brainer.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#81 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
Welcome to 10 years ago TC.
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

What is this nonsense? We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen! They hijacked the planes a la Air Force One style and then flew the planes through US airspace and into the most important buildings in the US without anyone knowing! That's the truth duh!

Then, we had to retaliate duh! Even though they didn't come from Iraq, we had to go there to dismantle the weapons of mass destruction, duh! All you conspiracists are crazy.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

What is this nonsense? We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen! They hijacked the planes a la Air Force One style and then flew the planes through US airspace and into the most important buildings in the US without anyone knowing! That's the truth duh!

Then, we had to retaliate duh! Even though they didn't come from Iraq, we had to go there to dismantle the weapons of mass destruction, duh! All you conspiracists are crazy.

Asim90
We didn't invade Iraq as a response to 9/11. We invaded Afghanistan, where it was said Bin Laden was hiding. Iraq was later and for a different reason.
Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts
[QUOTE="Asim90"]

What is this nonsense? We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen! They hijacked the planes a la Air Force One style and then flew the planes through US airspace and into the most important buildings in the US without anyone knowing! That's the truth duh!

Then, we had to retaliate duh! Even though they didn't come from Iraq, we had to go there to dismantle the weapons of mass destruction, duh! All you conspiracists are crazy.

Toxic-Seahorse
We didn't invade Iraq as a response to 9/11. We invaded Afghanistan, where it was said Bin Laden was hiding. Iraq was later and for a different reason.

He was probably 5 when that happend...
Avatar image for CongressManStan
CongressManStan

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 CongressManStan
Member since 2010 • 918 Posts

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]Just to put it out there, if 9/11 was an inside job then THOUSANDS of people would have had to been in on it. That's THOUSANDS of people who would either have to be bought off or silenced. Are you telling me not a single one of them felt bad about staging the worst terrorist attack in US history and came forward?hartsickdiscipl

Not true. There wouldn't need to be more than a few people aware of the scope of the plan. The rest would just take orders.

Yeah, because a small group of leaders could convince a demolition company to rig up the world trade centers with explosives and not suspect anything of it. There is so much science disproving these conspiracies and people like you completely ignore them. There are three groups of people regarding the world trade centers:

1) Those who believe we were attacked because American is a "free country"

2) Those who believe we were attacked because of American's foreign policy of intervention in the middle east.

3) People who believe 9/11 was an inside job. These people often have no engineering/structural design background and get all of there facts from random youtube videos. Now the reality of this was that 9/11 resulted from "blow back" of the US intervening where it shouldn't have, and that is what should be argued for. Yet we still have crazy people like you thinking our government did this to our own people so that we could have an excuse to head over to the middle east for oil. Well that sure worked....

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

So canada was behind 9/11? Those shifty canadians!

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

this

haha

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen!

Asim90
Conspiracy theorist AND racist. Lovely.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38942 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="ad1x2"]Just to put it out there, if 9/11 was an inside job then THOUSANDS of people would have had to been in on it. That's THOUSANDS of people who would either have to be bought off or silenced. Are you telling me not a single one of them felt bad about staging the worst terrorist attack in US history and came forward?ad1x2

Not true. There wouldn't need to be more than a few people aware of the scope of the plan. The rest would just take orders.

So, who wired the entire WTC complex, Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and a few trusted generals? Wiring the building for a controlled demolition isn't something a small crew can do and they would have needed hundreds of people to do it while not being noticed by regular workers.

not to mention that it leaves a RIDICULOUS amount of evidence behind once the demolition is complete....
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38942 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Oh look it's the same old sh*t we've been shown the last 11 years. I'm so surprised that this was posted. Alex Jones needs to learn to pick and choose what he thinks is a conspiracy. It's more self-contradictory than the worst fan-fiction at this point. jetpower3

If you can come up with an intelligent, reasonable explanation for how all these things (and the other hundreds of issues) fit into the official story, feel free to share. Larry Silverstein said on TV that they pulled Building 7 intentionally. End of discussion.

Do you even know what "pull" means in this context? Regardless of what you see from these sources, it does not refer to demolition but rather withdrawing firefighting efforts. And no matter what it means, why would he potentially let loose hints of such a plot on TV, especially since it is only supposed to involve a few people with any direct knowledge?

stop using logic. it's worthless here
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen!

PannicAtack

Conspiracy theorist AND racist. Lovely.

I was being sarcastic, gosh how can people miss that.

Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

What is this nonsense? We all know that this was the work of the evil Islamic cavemen! They hijacked the planes a la Air Force One style and then flew the planes through US airspace and into the most important buildings in the US without anyone knowing! That's the truth duh!

Then, we had to retaliate duh! Even though they didn't come from Iraq, we had to go there to dismantle the weapons of mass destruction, duh! All you conspiracists are crazy.

Toxic-Seahorse

We didn't invade Iraq as a response to 9/11. We invaded Afghanistan, where it was said Bin Laden was hiding. Iraq was later and for a different reason.

Ah yes, it was a different reason that also turned out to be utter bull***.