This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="super_mario_128"] Because Adam fell in love with Eve; not Steve... :roll:luke1889Goddammit, it rhymes, so there's no counterargument to it. :P Precisely! :o See? These guys get the picture! :twisted:
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] It's just not natural, right or moral anyhow. It's not like we have same opinions about homosexuality, anyhow. If somebody decides to be homosexual, that's fine with me as it is their choice. However, I certainly won't like it if a gay man tries to hit on me!Ultimate-PlayaWhy isn't it moral? It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.
Right now, we're facing issues from overpopulation.
The way I see it, since allowing homosexuals to have sex doesn't contribute to this problem, why should we stop them?
It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.[QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Why isn't it moral?RadBooley
Right now, we're facing issues from overpopulation.
The way I see it, since allowing homosexuals to have sex doesn't contribute to this problem, why should we stop them?
Hey, who said about stopping? I only disagree with the homosexual agenda because I don't like it. It doesn't mean I want to go out and rabidly convert homos to heteros.It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.Ultimate-PlayaYou're assuming that homosexuality is a choice. It's in humanity - it exists - so I don't see how it can be immoral. I certainly didn't choose, as I said earlier; who would choose to be socially frowned upon by some and choose a lifestyle that doesn't involve children? Sounds pretty daft, to me. Ah well.
[QUOTE="RadBooley"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.Ultimate-Playa
Right now, we're facing issues from overpopulation.
The way I see it, since allowing homosexuals to have sex doesn't contribute to this problem, why should we stop them?
Hey, who said about stopping? I only disagree with the homosexual agenda because I don't like it. It doesn't mean I want to go out and rabidly convert homos to heteros. You're ignoring his main point: there is an OVERpopulation problem. So having kids actually isn't helpful.[QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Why isn't it moral?Funky_LlamaIt's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.*sigh* That it is unnatural is irrelevant. Using toilets instead of taking a dump on the ground is unnatural; I don't see you objecting to that. Secondly... if it's immoral to be in such a state that you can't have babies, then it's immoral to be infertile - and thus, immoral to be, for example, a young child. So... do you think that it is a moral obligation to breed?If nature intended that there should be homosexuals then why even bother creating women?
You're ignoring his main point: there is an OVERpopulation problem. So having kids actually isn't helpful.Funky_LlamaThere wouldn't be an overpopulation problem if India and China would invest in birth control. ;) :P
[QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"][QUOTE="Dante2710"]no. im a lesbian thoughDante2710If you're a lesbian then you're a homosexual. Homo means same and when combined with sexual it means same sex. but im a male :xYou can't have a male lesbian. :?
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.Ultimate-Playa*sigh* That it is unnatural is irrelevant. Using toilets instead of taking a dump on the ground is unnatural; I don't see you objecting to that. Secondly... if it's immoral to be in such a state that you can't have babies, then it's immoral to be infertile - and thus, immoral to be, for example, a young child. So... do you think that it is a moral obligation to breed?If nature intended that there should be homosexuals then why even bother creating women?
...because without women, the species would die out due to a lack of childbirth?
Look. Some people are homosexuals. Most are heterosexuals. You can't change that, whether you think nature "intended" it or not.
[QUOTE="Dante2710"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] If you're a lesbian then you're a homosexual. Homo means same and when combined with sexual it means same sex. Funky_Llamabut im a male :xYou can't have a male lesbian. :? Dante proved you wrong by existing. :|
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] It's just not natural, right or moral anyhow. It's not like we have same opinions about homosexuality, anyhow. If somebody decides to be homosexual, that's fine with me as it is their choice. However, I certainly won't like it if a gay man tries to hit on me!Ultimate-PlayaWhy isn't it moral? It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with. Relationships aren't all about sexual reproduction. They're about sharing your life with someone you love. You have a very narrow minded view on life. Less than 10% of all people are homosexual, so this whole "if everyone is gay we would all die" thing is arbitrary and silly. It's never, ever going to happen. Secondly, there's no point in homosexuals living a 'straight' lifestyle to reproduce. That is why they're homosexual after all, because they don't like the opposite sex. Entering such a relationship would be a lie and unhealthy. Likewise, what do you make of heterosexual couples that don't want kids or are infertile? Are they just as immoral and unnatural because they aren't fulfilling this 'law' of nature? To all the religious folk, If Steve were there, he wouldn't have eaten the damn fruit ;)
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"]I'm already a man! Ultimate-PlayaYou haven't walked down enough roads yet, buddy... It's just not natural, right or moral anyhow. It's not like we have same opinions about homosexuality, anyhow. If somebody decides to be homosexual, that's fine with me as it is their choice. However, I certainly won't like it if a gay man tries to hit on me!
No one decides to be homosexual.
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="btaylor2404"]The llama concurs that she's pretty hawt. People were saying she could pass for a boy! :|I'm with you on her battlefront23, she's too young for my tastes, but beautiful, especially in that picture.
battlefront23
No, he is a boy with long hair.
[QUOTE="dmc333"][QUOTE="battlefront23"] People were saying she could pass for a boy! :|vlin1108
No, he is a boy with long hair.
Then what's that there, extending itself out of her chest?In these days, should that really be a question? Boys can get implants too.
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Ultimate-Playa"] It's because of the natural order that homosexuality creates conflict. The natural man were to work, and make women pregnant to carry on life. The natural woman were to nurture and give birth to babies. No same sex relationship can successfully accomplish such. If there were no heterosexual men or women in mankind then there would be no humans to begin with.Ultimate-Playa*sigh* That it is unnatural is irrelevant. Using toilets instead of taking a dump on the ground is unnatural; I don't see you objecting to that. Secondly... if it's immoral to be in such a state that you can't have babies, then it's immoral to be infertile - and thus, immoral to be, for example, a young child. So... do you think that it is a moral obligation to breed?If nature intended that there should be homosexuals then why even bother creating women?
Uh to reproduce maybe same reason why men were sigh "made" what we do in between is our own choice and if a man loves another man it's not anyone's opinion to judge them, no it's not my obligation to anyone to carrry a man's baby if I don't want, everything has repoductive organs to reproduce because otherwise there would be nothing left, we EVOLVED that way, Love is more than reproduceing, some people it may amaze you don't want children
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="btaylor2404"]The llama concurs that she's pretty hawt. People were saying she could pass for a boy! :| I thought she was the lead singer for the kings of leon. No idea who she is.I'm with you on her battlefront23, she's too young for my tastes, but beautiful, especially in that picture.
battlefront23
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment