Proud not to be.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm British, So my vote doesn't count.69ANT69Your vote is implied and always in favor. Is that what you mean?
Well if you are unhappy with certain things, you could take some sort of action. Why deal with it as opposed to trying to improving the situation? Diablo112688Do you really think that an average 17-year-old girl from Fargo, North Dakota could do something to change the entire country? I don't want any "anything is possible" cliches because that doesn't really apply. It isn't likely and I'm okay with just dealing with it.
I think taking pride in your country could be interpreted as being fascist, so people shy away from making these claims. I personally think the two should not be equated - it's rather silly. Why would it be interpreted as fascist? You mean nationalistic, yes?[QUOTE="kulmiye"]Well of course why shouldn't I be....entropyecho
Not proud to be an American citizen? Don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out. Live in another country like I have for more than 10 years & you will appreciate just how fortunate you are to be there. This is not to put down other great countries that give their citizens safe, stable and prosperous conditions in which to build a life - places like the UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia, etc come to mind - but I get tired of whiny spoiled kids in suburbia who think it's cool to put down one of the few countries in the world that allow them to have the soft lives they have. Like every country in the world, the US has its problems and tries to make itself better. People can argue about the best way to accomplish that and sometimes it doesn't work out well at first, but that's how it goes everywhere....
Not proud to be an American citizen? Don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out. Live in another country like I have for more than 10 years & you will appreciate just how fortunate you are to be there. This is not to put down other great countries that give their citizens safe, stable and prosperous conditions in which to build a life - places like the UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia, etc come to mind - but I get tired of whiny spoiled kids in suburbia who think it's cool to put down one of the few countries in the world that allow them to have the soft lives they have. Like every country in the world, the US has its problems and tries to make itself better. People can argue about the best way to accomplish that and sometimes it doesn't work out well at first, but that's how it goes everywhere...backinthekrakAppreciation =/= Pride.
Well of course why shouldn't I be....kulmiyeI think taking pride in your country could be interpreted as being fascist, so people shy away from making these claims. I personally think the two should not be equated - it's rather silly. Why would it be interpreted as fascist? You mean nationalistic, yes? Fascism is ultra nationalism.. Things like the past 8 years in the Bush adminstration could be considered rather fascist in approach.. Such as the fact that the adminstration suggested that any kind of criticism towards them or the government is unamerican, unpatriotic.. Cowardly for letting the terrorists win etc etc.. This exact same thing was also done during the Cold War especially during the 50s where basically YOU had to be "proud to be a American" or you may be considered a commie.
I'm not necessarily proud to be an American citizen, but I feel extraordinarily fortunate to be one.
I have to say even suggesting I should feel proud of the actual doings of the country hypothetically. I would say no, what they have done in the past 55 years has been more negative than positive when it comes to foriegn policy.. Its quite amusing how some people are completely clueless why regions like the Middle East despise the United States. sSubZerOoMan, if you are worried about what 'regions like the Middle East' think about us - or anything, for that matter - it says more about you than our 'foreign policy'...
Fascism is ultra nationalism.. Things like the past 8 years in the Bush adminstration could be considered rather fascist in approach.. Such as the fact that the adminstration suggested that any kind of criticism towards them or the government is unamerican, unpatriotic.. Cowardly for letting the terrorists win etc etc.. This exact same thing was also done during the Cold War especially during the 50s where basically YOU had to be "proud to be a American" or you may be considered a commie.sSubZerOoFascism incorporates ultranationalism, or generally does in application. Are you implying that all nationalism, or even most nationalism, is fascistic? The paragraph opening your following statement is, forgive me, hyperbolic sloganeering. First, the type of explicit ideological repression during not just the 50's, but from the late 19th century through McCarthyism (and in a more implied capacity in pop culture thereafter) has little correlation with the vague nationalism of American culture in recent years beyond the inevitable nature of gradual "progress,"*** the limitations of which all cultures are subject to.
The Bush administration was certainly nationalist, but every administration is at least vaguely nationalist. The term nationalist has been skewed in the pop culture lexicon by the Nazis, National Front, KKK, and their analogues. The effect of the entertainment-news media needs their recognition here too, hahaha. Most importantly, nationalism is not expressly related to fascism; it exists in all political ideologies. I wouldn't consider anything the American government did throughout it's entire existence "fascist." Lamentable, disgusting, incorrigible, repressive, exploitative, and classist certainly, but in any way fascist? I've really grown weary of the ease which people use the word "fascist." Out of curiosity, are you implying Italian and German fascism, or ideologically pure fascism? If you would like to discuss political ideologies in vague terms, then we can use the terms more freely, but I don't think you intended for the word to be vague.
***Whatever the hell that word means.
Edit: As a sidebar, political theory, sociology, and history (or social sciences in general) were my first academic interests, and my current major (economics), I'm not opposed to a more thorough conversation. :)
I am surprised how close the poll is, but I do agree that this country doesn't field the great leaders of the past.
Hahaha. Most of it's actually over sentence structure. I'll add or delete a comma, or maybe add a semicolon. Sometimes I'll add or delete an entire sentence. Of course, the spelling error does occur sometimes...You need to start using the spell check before you hit "submit", haha.
BR1NG3R
We've had about four of those. The rest have been clowns.I am surprised how close the poll is, but I do agree that this country doesn't field the great leaders of the past.
vibrantdesign
Even some of "those" were questionable presidents. You could always trust good old Thomas Jefferson to repress a rebellion against usurous taxation, classist cronyism, repression, monopolization, employee exploitation, and dubious legal contracts in favor of "the wealthy."
George Bush's domestic policy seems like one of Barny's group hugs compared to those of Jefferson's administration, hahaha.
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]I have to say even suggesting I should feel proud of the actual doings of the country hypothetically. I would say no, what they have done in the past 55 years has been more negative than positive when it comes to foriegn policy.. Its quite amusing how some people are completely clueless why regions like the Middle East despise the United States. backinthekrakMan, if you are worried about what 'regions like the Middle East' think about us - or anything, for that matter - it says more about you than our 'foreign policy'... I voted yes to the thread question, but what do you mean by that?
I'm proud... AMERICA **** YEAH if this doesn't get you pumped then you are not an American http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3222652797595136179
Fascism incorporates ultranationalism, or generally does in application. Are you implying that all nationalism, or even most nationalism, is fascistic? The paragraph opening your following statement is, forgive me, hyperbolic sloganeering. First, the type of explicit ideological repression during not just the 50's, but from the late 19th century through McCarthyism (and in a more implied capacity in pop culture thereafter) has little correlation with the vague nationalism of American culture in recent years beyond the inevitable nature of gradual "progress,"*** the limitations of which all cultures are subject to.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Fascism is ultra nationalism.. Things like the past 8 years in the Bush adminstration could be considered rather fascist in approach.. Such as the fact that the adminstration suggested that any kind of criticism towards them or the government is unamerican, unpatriotic.. Cowardly for letting the terrorists win etc etc.. This exact same thing was also done during the Cold War especially during the 50s where basically YOU had to be "proud to be a American" or you may be considered a commie.YourChaosIsntMe
The Bush administration was certainly nationalist, but every administration is at least vaguely nationalist. The term nationalist has been skewed in the pop culture lexicon by the Nazis, National Front, KKK, and their analogues. The effect of the entertainment-news media needs their recognition here too, hahaha. Most importantly, nationalism is not expressly related to fascism; it exists in all political ideologies. I wouldn't consider anything the American government did throughout it's entire existence "fascist." Lamentable, disgusting, incorrigible, repressive, exploitative, and classist certainly, but in any way fascist? I've really grown weary of the ease which people use the word "fascist." Out of curiosity, are you implying Italian and German fascism, or ideologically pure fascism? If you would like to discuss political ideologies in vague terms, then we can use the terms more freely, but I don't think you intended for the word to be vague.
***Whatever the hell that word means.
Edit: As a sidebar, political theory, sociology, and history (or social sciences in general) were my first academic interests, and my current major (economics), I'm not opposed to a more thorough conversation. :)
Ideological.. And Bush was text book, he used nationalism in trying to push forward bills like the Patriot Act and allow torture even though it violated human rights and trampled over the Constiution.. But it was the "Patriotic" thing to do, and if you disagreed you were not a patriot, quite possibly a coward or a traitor.. Hell Kerry's smearing was based not only on claiming he was a coward, but they called him unamerican for standing up against the Vietnam War...
Fascism incorporates ultranationalism, or generally does in application. Are you implying that all nationalism, or even most nationalism, is fascistic? The paragraph opening your following statement is, forgive me, hyperbolic sloganeering. First, the type of explicit ideological repression during not just the 50's, but from the late 19th century through McCarthyism (and in a more implied capacity in pop culture thereafter) has little correlation with the vague nationalism of American culture in recent years beyond the inevitable nature of gradual "progress,"*** the limitations of which all cultures are subject to.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Fascism is ultra nationalism.. Things like the past 8 years in the Bush adminstration could be considered rather fascist in approach.. Such as the fact that the adminstration suggested that any kind of criticism towards them or the government is unamerican, unpatriotic.. Cowardly for letting the terrorists win etc etc.. This exact same thing was also done during the Cold War especially during the 50s where basically YOU had to be "proud to be a American" or you may be considered a commie.YourChaosIsntMe
The Bush administration was certainly nationalist, but every administration is at least vaguely nationalist. The term nationalist has been skewed in the pop culture lexicon by the Nazis, National Front, KKK, and their analogues. The effect of the entertainment-news media needs their recognition here too, hahaha. Most importantly, nationalism is not expressly related to fascism; it exists in all political ideologies. I wouldn't consider anything the American government did throughout it's entire existence "fascist." Lamentable, disgusting, incorrigible, repressive, exploitative, and classist certainly, but in any way fascist? I've really grown weary of the ease which people use the word "fascist." Out of curiosity, are you implying Italian and German fascism, or ideologically pure fascism? If you would like to discuss political ideologies in vague terms, then we can use the terms more freely, but I don't think you intended for the word to be vague.
***Whatever the hell that word means.
Edit: As a sidebar, political theory, sociology, and history (or social sciences in general) were my first academic interests, and my current major (economics), I'm not opposed to a more thorough conversation. :)
Ideological.. And Bush was text book, he used nationalism in trying to push forward bills like the Patriot Act and allow torture even though it violated human rights and trampled over the Constiution.. But it was the "Patriotic" thing to do, and if you disagreed you were not a patriot, quite possibly a coward or a traitor.. Hell Kerry's smearing was based not only on claiming he was a coward, but they called him unamerican for standing up against the Vietnam War... This is not narrowing Bush down, because we had this kind of thing for the past 50 years for the Cold War.. Now we have a new Cold War, in which we are now going against Middle Eastern fundamentalism.
Oscar Wilde: "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious".. I am inclined to agree.. People should not be proud or loyal to your country but the values from which it stands for.I don't really understand patriotism tbh. But if I was proud, it would be because of my own accomplishments, not because of the dirt I stand on.
Leejjohno
[QUOTE="Leejjohno"]Oscar Wilde: "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious".. I am inclined to agree.. People should not be proud or loyal to your country but the values from which it stands for.I don't really understand patriotism tbh. But if I was proud, it would be because of my own accomplishments, not because of the dirt I stand on.
sSubZerOo
I guess you are right, but that doesn't necessarily mean that those "virtues" are, in this case anyway.
No. It's just where I was born. I also happen to be a citizen of the Phillipines, I'm not proud of that either.
[QUOTE="Leejjohno"]Oscar Wilde: "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious".. I am inclined to agree.. People should not be proud or loyal to your country but the values from which it stands for.Perhaps, to some, the country is a symbol for those values.I don't really understand patriotism tbh. But if I was proud, it would be because of my own accomplishments, not because of the dirt I stand on.
sSubZerOo
Oscar Wilde: "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious".. I am inclined to agree.. People should not be proud or loyal to your country but the values from which it stands for.Perhaps, to some, the country is a symbol for those values.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Leejjohno"]
I don't really understand patriotism tbh. But if I was proud, it would be because of my own accomplishments, not because of the dirt I stand on.
entropyecho
It's nothing to be proud of when those values, ironically get trodden on.
No, I'm not proud of being born into an arbitrary collective of people. I'm happy to live here but I don't see how you could have pride in being born somewhere. What are you proud of exactly? The politicians? The laws? The arbitrary borders? The nation's history that you had no part in? Pride in things of this nature continually baffles me.
Yes I am.
I would be here right now if wasn't for the opportunities this country gave to my parents to succeed. It's a great country.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment