I'm sure this was debated here before, but here goes anyway. I recently came across this argument in favor of religion - the claim is that atheism (and atheistic regimes) have killed more people than all religions combined. The person making this claims continued with sweeping generalizations about the propensity of violence and unrest of different religions. I will not mention that here. I am more concerned with this statistic. Common examples of atheists responsible for mass-killings are Hitler Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
First of all, can anyone verify the religious beliefs, or lack thereof, of the people above?
Do you believe there is any truth to this argument?
How can one accurately tally the deaths caused by these two subgroups (deaths "in the name of 'God'" and deaths by "atheists?"
Are we justified in pinning the blame of the killings solely on the religious proclivity of an individual?
entropyecho
I think it's important to seperate a mass murderer who kills people because his atheist belief dictates it's right, and a mass murder who kills people for completely unrelated reasons but happens to be atheist.
Log in to comment