[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]No, if it's a "lack of, " then it's not an alternative anything. A "lack of" shouldn't need to be advertised.
Of course, I don't buy into the "lack of belief" nonsense anyway; I just find this stunt to be hilariously hypocritical. "We don't believe in anything, but we feel we need to broadcast our non-belief and convert people to this state of non-belief."
Theokhoth
You make it sound as this state of non-belief is inherently evil and wrong.What? I don't even imply that. >_>
Christians believe in something; ergo, Christians want other people to believe the same thing; ergo, Christians advertise their beliefs. Atheists, according to atheists, don't believe in something but rather lack a belief in something; ergo, they've nothing to advertise.
And people are aware of the existence of atheists; I don't get why they use that excuse to make lawsuits and obviously offensive billboards. "Oh, we just want people to know atheists exist!" We do know. We've known since you guys popped up in Greece all those millenia ago.
And I know what Christianism is all about and I'm sure all the world knows but I don't want to be reminded that I am a sinner by Christian billboards every time I walk down the street.
And here you play with technicalities. A lack of belief in something is not no belief at all. If I saw a campaign against smoking would I say that they shouldn't go about yelling that smoking's bad? And whether this analogy works, I think it does. For some people somking is bad (becausestudies have showed it) and for others smoking is good (relieves stress etc). The same with religion: for some it is good because it is comforting, for others it is bad because it feeds lies and continually bashes atheists.
And i'm not saying you are implying it. The way you put it it sounded like that. I figured it was not your intention but it sounded like that.
Log in to comment