Aug 2nd is the real debt deadline. There is not another week : U.S. Treasury

  • 100 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

It's not just that they could tax the rich more, it's that they could also stop spending so much. Do you know how many worthless government programs are out there at the moment? How many bloated, ineffectual offices there are out there (besides congress, mind you :P)? We don't NEED that stuff. We could cut those AND tax more, and have the debt paid off twice as quickly and then we'd be in a much better place for passing other bills and perhaps lowering taxes or founding (useful) government programs after the economy has been fixed.

Mafiree
But the Republicans dont want that. And Obama is prepared to Veto anything that doesn't include a tax increase. Meaning Aug 2nd will be an exciting day. Quick Americans! Switch to a different Currency while the USD is still worth something!

Obama will not veto anything..... If it gets passed the senate it would be political suicide to do so.

I think you meant "past the senate"... Regardless, it would be terrible to simply make cuts on everything without generating more income. People will cry for their benefits, even though they dont pay for them.
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

I'm pretty sure US is gonna pull through this one.

Serraph105

Considering that this is mostly just politics I'd say you are probably right. I'd agree with you 100%, but the tea party members have me on edge. Seriously I may not like most republicans in Congress right now, but I do trust them enough that I believe they understand the need to do the essentials like this. The tea party on the other hand, I just don't get the feeling that they understand what needs to be done.

Yeah, Dow Jones not crashing means investors are still very very confident of US being able to pay its debt.

Not to mention almost everyone in Congress has a stake in the stock/financial market (I mean cmon, everyone there probably owns some form of stocks). Unless they'reshort-selling or heavily invested in put options :lol: then everyone's screwed.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

I'm pretty sure US is gonna pull through this one.

nitekids2004

Considering that this is mostly just politics I'd say you are probably right. I'd agree with you 100%, but the tea party members have me on edge. Seriously I may not like most republicans in Congress right now, but I do trust them enough that I believe they understand the need to do the essentials like this. The tea party on the other hand, I just don't get the feeling that they understand what needs to be done.

Yeah, Dow Jones not crashing means investors are still very very confident of US being able to pay its debt.

Not to mention almost everyone in Congress has a stake in the stock/financial market (I mean cmon, everyone there probably owns some form of stocks). Unless they'reshort-selling or heavily invested in put options :lol: then everyone's screwed.

I don't think they believe anything bad will actually come of not raising the debt ceiling.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Vague how? I made a broad statement, not a vague one. The U.S. still defaults even if we pay the interest on our debt. The U.S. has a countless number of obligations. If we don't pay social security recipients, that is a default. If we don't pay veteran's benefits, that is a default. If we don't pay current troops overseas, that is a default. If we don't pay lower income people in food stamps, that is a default. If we don't give college students the federal loans that they are entitled to, that is a default. I can go on and on. The U.S. has a legal obligation to honor all of these contracts; from interest on our debt to food stamps. If we don't honor these legally binding contracts, we'd be going into default. airshocker

One can be vague by being broad.

We won't be going into default concerning paying the interest on our debt, which seems to be the one thing that would definitely screw our world up.

Defaulting on anything will screw our world up. If you're a bond investor, and you see the U.S. not fulfilling it's legal obligations, is that going to make you want to buy more U.S. treasury bonds? They're going to be thinking when are we next? When does our money get cut off? Especially considering there are going to be huge protests when large groups of American's aren't getting the money they are legally entitled to because it instead had to go to foreign investors. That's not going to make people happy. There's going to be a huge amount of political pressure to stop paying this interest and instead spend that money at home. It's not going to be politically sustainable. Paying only the interest on our debt isn't good enough. We have plenty of other bills to pay besides that, that we have a legal obligation to pay.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts
[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Vague how? I made a broad statement, not a vague one. The U.S. still defaults even if we pay the interest on our debt. The U.S. has a countless number of obligations. If we don't pay social security recipients, that is a default. If we don't pay veteran's benefits, that is a default. If we don't pay current troops overseas, that is a default. If we don't pay lower income people in food stamps, that is a default. If we don't give college students the federal loans that they are entitled to, that is a default. I can go on and on. The U.S. has a legal obligation to honor all of these contracts; from interest on our debt to food stamps. If we don't honor these legally binding contracts, we'd be going into default. -Sun_Tzu-

One can be vague by being broad.

We won't be going into default concerning paying the interest on our debt, which seems to be the one thing that would definitely screw our world up.

Defaulting on anything will screw our world up. If you're a bond investor, and you see the U.S. not fulfilling it's legal obligations, is that going to make you want to buy more U.S. treasury bonds? They're going to be thinking when are we next? When does our money get cut off? Especially considering there are going to be huge protests when large groups of American's aren't getting the money they are legally entitled to because it instead had to go to foreign investors. That's not going to make people happy. There's going to be a huge amount of political pressure to stop paying this interest and instead spend that money at home. It's not going to be politically sustainable. Paying only the interest on our debt isn't good enough. We have plenty of other bills to pay besides that, that we have a legal obligation to pay.

Nah, the USA can simply declare bankruptcy and have the US treasury take everything :P
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"] Considering that this is mostly just politics I'd say you are probably right. I'd agree with you 100%, but the tea party members have me on edge. Seriously I may not like most republicans in Congress right now, but I do trust them enough that I believe they understand the need to do the essentials like this. The tea party on the other hand, I just don't get the feeling that they understand what needs to be done.Serraph105

Yeah, Dow Jones not crashing means investors are still very very confident of US being able to pay its debt.

Not to mention almost everyone in Congress has a stake in the stock/financial market (I mean cmon, everyone there probably owns some form of stocks). Unless they'reshort-selling or heavily invested in put options :lol: then everyone's screwed.

I don't think they believe anything bad will actually come of not raising the debt ceiling.

Well then... :lol:

I always say you need a basic knowledge in economics beforeholding a lawmaking position.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

Yeah, Dow Jones not crashing means investors are still very very confident of US being able to pay its debt.

Not to mention almost everyone in Congress has a stake in the stock/financial market (I mean cmon, everyone there probably owns some form of stocks). Unless they'reshort-selling or heavily invested in put options :lol: then everyone's screwed.

nitekids2004

I don't think they believe anything bad will actually come of not raising the debt ceiling.

Well then... :lol:

I always say you need a basic knowledge in economics beforeholding a lawmaking position.

seriously check this out. This guy says he actually wants to lower the debt ceiling.

Avatar image for luisen123
luisen123

6537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 luisen123
Member since 2006 • 6537 Posts
It's over, The US is finished.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"] I don't think they believe anything bad will actually come of not raising the debt ceiling.

Serraph105

Well then... :lol:

I always say you need a basic knowledge in economics beforeholding a lawmaking position.

seriously check this out. This guy says he actually wants to lower the debt ceiling.

Sounds like a solid idea. Abandon all social benefits, and increase taxes until the debt it paid. Then maybe they can spend their income, instead of taking out loans every month.

Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"] I don't think they believe anything bad will actually come of not raising the debt ceiling.

Serraph105

Well then... :lol:

I always say you need a basic knowledge in economics beforeholding a lawmaking position.

seriously check this out. This guy says he actually wants to lower the debt ceiling.

Thanks for the nice laughs :lol:

Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

After August 2nd, if the debt ceiling is not raised, the government will not be able to afford to pay retired American's their Social Security Checks, Veterans Pensions or Medicare/Medicaid benefits.

In other words, a WHOLE LOT OF ANGRY, PISSED OFF AMERICANS will want to strangle the GoP Leadership for not compromising on some new taxes for the richest of Americans to cover the revenue required to maintain those programs.

There area handful of GoP leaders like Cantor who honestly believe that they can win elections by screweing over retired Americans just to make a point about taxes on rich people.

They are wrong. They will fail.

They're basically handing over their seats to Democrats in the next elections even though they are delusionally thinking that it will win more GoP seats.

They have no idea the s***storm they are going to be kicking up when grandma and grandpa don't get their social security checks next month.

And it's all because Boehner/Cantor won't compromise to meet the Democrats halfway on the budget.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

If we default, I'm going to switch my political party.

Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

What's even more sad is that the GoP leadership is trying to get a vote on their own Budget plan that has zero compromises in it - and will never pass the Senate to begin with.

They are wasting their time on a bill that will never be passed anyway, just to make some sort of stupid, selfish, symbolic bill that they foolishly believe will win them new seats in upcomming elections.

This is with many members of the GoP AGAINST Boehner's plan.

There are actually decent-minded Republicans who understand the severity of the situaiton and are refusing to support it. But their leadship is hell-bent on making a spectacle out of the fear it's creating for pure political gain.

The GoP needs new leadership and they need it FAST because the current crop is being controlled by the Tea Party who care about nothing but their own bank accounts and nothing else.

Avatar image for Cataclism
Cataclism

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 Cataclism
Member since 2007 • 1537 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]You don't have to trust Geithner word; he is not the only one who's been saying this. Moody's, S&P's, the IMF, and a long list of other well respected analysts have come out and said the same exact thing. Bad things are going to happen August 2nd if we don't raise the debt ceiling. There's no avoiding it. The U.S. is going to default on its obligations - the money is just not going to be there. Since May 16th, when we hit the debt ceiling, the treasury has been shuffling money around to try and avoid this unimaginable scenario. But in a few days he won't have any more money to shuffle around. airshocker

We're not going to default on the interest to our debt. That's fear-mongering. We take in enough tax revenue to pay for the debt and quite a few other things.

If tax-revenue was enough the US government wouldn't have needed to borrow money in the first place...

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts

All I'm saying is I don't trust a word Geithner says on this subject anymore.

airshocker

it's a good thing for us that other do.

Avatar image for DeX2010
DeX2010

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 DeX2010
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts
Goodbye USA. All Superpowers come to an end eventually :) Also I am 90% sure that the real risk of default begins on August 15th(According to experts) and this is because although the USA will run out of borrowed money on the 2nd, they have enough cash to keep going until the 15th. http://news.yahoo.com/default-deadline-truly-aug-2-analysts-no-000349079.html http://economicsnewspaper.com/policy/spain/revelation-august-15-the-day-is-the-deadline-for-debt-51227.html In other words, the US can run on bare scraps until August 15th. Then, if your politcal parties still can't make a deal, then your ******.
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

Goodbye USA. All Superpowers come to an end eventually :) Also I am 90% sure that the real risk of default begins on August 15th(According to experts) and this is because although the USA will run out of borrowed money on the 2nd, they have enough cash to keep going until the 15th. http://news.yahoo.com/default-deadline-truly-aug-2-analysts-no-000349079.html http://economicsnewspaper.com/policy/spain/revelation-august-15-the-day-is-the-deadline-for-debt-51227.html In other words, the US can run on bare scraps until August 15th. Then, if your politcal parties still can't make a deal, then your ******.DeX2010

Well, Obama could use executive order and raise the Debt Ceiling for 90 days. That would get us through Thanksgiving!

But, the Holiday Shopping season looks like it'll be absolutely DEAD for the retail industry because nobody will have any money to go shopping with!

MERRY CHRISTMAS! Here's some coal!

Ooops - you can't afford coal either. Give me that back.

Avatar image for Atmanix
Atmanix

6927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Atmanix
Member since 2009 • 6927 Posts

If we default, I'm going to switch my political party.

sonicare

What are you currently?

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

Everyone in Congress should be fired after this whole thing is over and be unable to run for office for the rest of their lives. This is crazy.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="Atmanix"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

If we default, I'm going to switch my political party.

What are you currently?

I'm a registered republican, but growing disenfranchised with them. Especially with the more radical elements that seem to be taking over the party. I've always been somewhat of a fiscal conservative, but on social issues my stances are more in line with the democrats. Hard to find a party that represents me.
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts

Fellas there is going to be no default, there is no way the tebaggers would destroy the krook brothers empire or bankster annual bonuses.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

Fellas there is going to be no default, there is no way the tebaggers would destroy the krook brothers empire or bankster annual bonuses.

EasyStreet
Sarah Palin perfectly demonstrated what's wrong with todays politics. She said she will not help fundraise for GOP freshmen in 2012 and even get a candidate to challenge them in the primary if they don't vote against raising the debt ceiling.
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

This ultimately comes down to one thing:

The Rich Paying more taxes (Dem's proposal) vs. Retired Americans and War Veterans losing their benefits (GoP proposal)

Sorry Rich Guys, you won't be getting much support beyond the GoP leadership and their Tea Party benefactors. Make the compromise or tick off A LOT of registered voters. (And screw up the whole economy in the process)

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

[QUOTE="Atmanix"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

If we default, I'm going to switch my political party.

sonicare

What are you currently?

I'm a registered republican, but growing disenfranchised with them. Especially with the more radical elements that seem to be taking over the party. I've always been somewhat of a fiscal conservative, but on social issues my stances are more in line with the democrats. Hard to find a party that represents me.

Welcome to my world.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="Atmanix"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"]

If we default, I'm going to switch my political party.

sonicare

What are you currently?

I'm a registered republican, but growing disenfranchised with them. Especially with the more radical elements that seem to be taking over the party. I've always been somewhat of a fiscal conservative, but on social issues my stances are more in line with the democrats. Hard to find a party that represents me.

Independence is a beautiful thing

Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Atmanix"]

What are you currently?

surrealnumber5

I'm a registered republican, but growing disenfranchised with them. Especially with the more radical elements that seem to be taking over the party. I've always been somewhat of a fiscal conservative, but on social issues my stances are more in line with the democrats. Hard to find a party that represents me.

Independence is a beautiful thing

Yep it sure is. Though lately I have been skipping elections because all the options are just turrible.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="sonicare"] I'm a registered republican, but growing disenfranchised with them. Especially with the more radical elements that seem to be taking over the party. I've always been somewhat of a fiscal conservative, but on social issues my stances are more in line with the democrats. Hard to find a party that represents me.EasyStreet

Independence is a beautiful thing

Yep it sure is. Though lately I have been skipping elections because all the options are just turrible.

i went to the last one just to vote no on every state and local bond sale

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

Don't believe it, this is just a random day picked to use to scare the crap out of old people. There have been plenty of economists pointing out that the government still will be able to fill it's obligations well beyond Aug 2nd. Don't believe the hype.

Further more, the government is continuingly defaulting on the american people in the form of inflation. Not a damn talking head on any of the news channels are even mentioning that.

Ron Paul says it the way it really is, as usual...

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Don't believe it, this is just a random day picked to use to scare the crap out of old people. There have been plenty of economists pointing out that the government still will be able to fill it's obligations well beyond Aug 2nd. Don't believe the hype.

Further more, the government is continuingly defaulting on the american people in the form of inflation. Not a damn talking head on any of the news channels are even mentioning that.

Ron Paul says it the way it really is, as usual...

jer_1

i read an article about inflation and debasing the money are, in effect, the same thing as defaulting as the creditor is getting a lessor value than expected from the debtor.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#80 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts

[QUOTE="jer_1"]

Don't believe it, this is just a random day picked to use to scare the crap out of old people. There have been plenty of economists pointing out that the government still will be able to fill it's obligations well beyond Aug 2nd. Don't believe the hype.

Further more, the government is continuingly defaulting on the american people in the form of inflation. Not a damn talking head on any of the news channels are even mentioning that.

Ron Paul says it the way it really is, as usual...

surrealnumber5

i read an article about inflation and debasing the money are, in effect, the same thing as defaulting as the creditor is getting a lessor value than expected from the debtor.

time to buy a house and hope for hyper-inflation.
Avatar image for EasyStreet
EasyStreet

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 EasyStreet
Member since 2003 • 11672 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="jer_1"]

Don't believe it, this is just a random day picked to use to scare the crap out of old people. There have been plenty of economists pointing out that the government still will be able to fill it's obligations well beyond Aug 2nd. Don't believe the hype.

Further more, the government is continuingly defaulting on the american people in the form of inflation. Not a damn talking head on any of the news channels are even mentioning that.

Ron Paul says it the way it really is, as usual...

comp_atkins

i read an article about inflation and debasing the money are, in effect, the same thing as defaulting as the creditor is getting a lessor value than expected from the debtor.

time to buy a house and hope for hyper-inflation.

There will be no hyperinflation the banks will horde all the money possible just look at Japan.
Avatar image for Optical_Order
Optical_Order

5100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Optical_Order
Member since 2008 • 5100 Posts

Horse-s***.

Geithner has been saying that since six months ago. Man has cried wolf so many times I don't see how we can trust a word that comes out of Treasury's mouth.

airshocker

I thought those were like "warning checkpoints" or something.

Aug. 2 has been the actual deadline for awhile.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

Horse-s***.

Geithner has been saying that since six months ago. Man has cried wolf so many times I don't see how we can trust a word that comes out of Treasury's mouth.

Optical_Order

I thought those were like "warning checkpoints" or something.

Aug. 2 has been the actual deadline for awhile.

Furthermore thats not a really good example.. Seeing as what happened in the end is the wolf actually came and ate the boy..

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

Horse-s***.

Geithner has been saying that since six months ago. Man has cried wolf so many times I don't see how we can trust a word that comes out of Treasury's mouth.

sSubZerOo

I thought those were like "warning checkpoints" or something.

Aug. 2 has been the actual deadline for awhile.

Furthermore thats not a really good example.. Seeing as what happened in the end is the wolf actually came and ate the boy..

the wolf also eats the parents.............or at least it does in my version. :twisted:

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

I thought those were like "warning checkpoints" or something.

Aug. 2 has been the actual deadline for awhile.

Serraph105

Furthermore thats not a really good example.. Seeing as what happened in the end is the wolf actually came and ate the boy..

the wolf also eats the parents.............or at least it does in my version. :twisted:

in my version the wolf eats the girl and he and his master (the woodsmen) live happily ever after

Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#86 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]I never once heard may 31st. Perhaps you're getting stuff mixed up? Regardless, it's not something that should be taken lightly.airshocker

Perhaps I got the dates mixed up, but he has made arbitrary dead-lines before. I see no reason to listen to a word he says anymore in regards to the debt ceiling.

I recall a May deadline as well earlier in the year.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]I never once heard may 31st. Perhaps you're getting stuff mixed up? Regardless, it's not something that should be taken lightly.nintendofreak_2

Perhaps I got the dates mixed up, but he has made arbitrary dead-lines before. I see no reason to listen to a word he says anymore in regards to the debt ceiling.

I recall a May deadline as well earlier in the year.

it was a "soft" deadline. they said at the time they could swizzle some things around to push the final hard deadline to aug. 2nd.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#88 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Furthermore thats not a really good example.. Seeing as what happened in the end is the wolf actually came and ate the boy..

surrealnumber5

the wolf also eats the parents.............or at least it does in my version. :twisted:

in my version the wolf eats the girl and he and his master (the woodsmen) live happily ever after

In my version the girl paid the wolf a sum of money to stop him eating her, thus resulting in a market solution to the problem.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

the wolf also eats the parents.............or at least it does in my version. :twisted:

chessmaster1989

in my version the wolf eats the girl and he and his master (the woodsmen) live happily ever after

In my version the girl paid the wolf a sum of money to stop him eating her, thus resulting in a market solution to the problem.

if only she had thought of that before the wolf started :P

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#90 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] in my version the wolf eats the girl and he and his master (the woodsmen) live happily ever after

surrealnumber5

In my version the girl paid the wolf a sum of money to stop him eating her, thus resulting in a market solution to the problem.

if only she had thought of that before the wolf started :P

In another version, the military sends Navy SEALs to snipe the damn wolf before he can hurt anyone. Total casualties: one wolf.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#91 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
My dollars had better be worth something when I arrive.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Furthermore thats not a really good example.. Seeing as what happened in the end is the wolf actually came and ate the boy..

the wolf also eats the parents.............or at least it does in my version. :twisted:

in my version the wolf eats the girl and he and his master (the woodsmen) live happily ever after

*grabs all fairy tale books from local Libray* What?! *reads them all* :cry: I can't find this story.......
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] In my version the girl paid the wolf a sum of money to stop him eating her, thus resulting in a market solution to the problem.chessmaster1989

if only she had thought of that before the wolf started :P

In another version, the military sends Navy SEALs to snipe the damn wolf before he can hurt anyone. Total casualties: one wolf.

but in a strange twist they were about ten years late.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if only she had thought of that before the wolf started :P

Serraph105

In another version, the military sends Navy SEALs to snipe the damn wolf before he can hurt anyone. Total casualties: one wolf.

but in a strange twist they were about ten years late.

seals kept checking caves and spider holes, they never thought the wolf would be owned by a "friendly" neighbor, the sleeping wolf never saw the hit coming

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#95 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

So is now the time to quickly stock tons of ammo and prepare for anarchy? I swear that's what I've been reading for the past few days in OT.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

So is now the time to quickly stock tons of ammo and prepare for anarchy? I swear that's what I've been reading for the past few days in OT.

Wasdie

You haven't done that already? I am disappoint.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#97 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So is now the time to quickly stock tons of ammo and prepare for anarchy? I swear that's what I've been reading for the past few days in OT.

airshocker

You haven't done that already? I am disappoint.

Well I have some ammo, around 400 rounds...

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#98 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So is now the time to quickly stock tons of ammo and prepare for anarchy? I swear that's what I've been reading for the past few days in OT.

Wasdie

You haven't done that already? I am disappoint.

Well I have some ammo, around 400 rounds...

400 rounds? You need at least 4,000. :P
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#99 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

You haven't done that already? I am disappoint.

chessmaster1989

Well I have some ammo, around 400 rounds...

400 rounds? You need at least 4,000. :P

Damn I should go buy it before my money is useless and then ammo turns into currency.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Well I have some ammo, around 400 rounds...

Wasdie

I actually bought a 600 round case of lacquered iron-jacketed .223s like a month ago. Haven't had time to go shooting with my AR-15, though. I think I'm prepared for anarchy.