This topic is locked from further discussion.
Off the top of my head;
Black Stone Cherry
Airbourne (got a real heavy AC/DC sound to them)
Chickenfoot
Them Crooked Vultures
The Black Keys
Black Country Communion
The Answer
Slam Cartel
Hollywood Undead ... though idk if they're considered purely rock as they have a lot of hiphop elements
Muse, The Killers, The black keys.
I don't think there will ever really be a hugely influencial band like in the past though.
Oh and those forgot :PMuse, The Killers, The black keys.
I don't think there will ever really be a hugely influencial band like in the past though.
firefluff3
If we are actually being serious and talking about current rock music then Arcade Fire, Deer Hunter, Radiohead, and Beach House take the cake by a landslide. If I had to pick one, I would say the current best band in the world are the Arcade Fire. Consistently fantastic albums, never set themselves to high nor take themselves too seriously. A bunch of incredible talented musicians.
I would have guessed Elton John :PIf we are actually being serious and talking about current rock music then Arcade Fire, Deer Hunter, Radiohead, and Beach House take the cake by a landslide. If I had to pick one, I would say the current best band in the world are the Arcade Fire. Consistently fantastic albums, never set themselves to high nor take themselves too seriously. A bunch of incredible talented musicians.
mexicangordo
approve of this list. I would add Megadeth if they count (are we going with bands that are playing or fomed this generation.?)lamb of god
linkin park
killswitch engage
avenged sevenfold
slipknot
stone sour
murderdolls
straight line stitch
psyclon nine
all that remains
five finger death punch
dream theatre
wednesday 13
rob zombie
white zombie
rammstein
seether
opiate for the masses
godhand
adema
freakhouse nonpoint
mushroomhead
marilyn manson
korn
in this moment
hollywood undead
godsmack
deadstar assembly
disturbed
dope
chimaira
celldweller
breaking benjamin
bullet for my valentine
black veil brides
maybe not current best but well known id give most of them that
almasdeathchild
You're disgustingGood to see OT has a lot of good taste in music.
'll like to add Shinedown and Three Days Grace.
Also, how do we mean current, like they are still active? Or they formed s=more recently then say....JUdas Priest?
Bardock47
Okkervil River
Porcupine Tree
Crippled Black Phoenix
Super Furry Animals
Elbow
The Leisure Society
The Divine Comedy
The Dear Hunter
Sunset Rubdown
Haken
Liars
The Love Language
Menomena
Pineapple Thief
Portugal The Man
The National
Unexpect
Amplifier
Gazpacho
Belle and Sebastian
Calexico
The Clientele
[QUOTE="Bardock47"]You're disgusting What great argument on why these bands aren't considered good. I applaud your debating skills good sir.Good to see OT has a lot of good taste in music.
'll like to add Shinedown and Three Days Grace.
Also, how do we mean current, like they are still active? Or they formed s=more recently then say....JUdas Priest?
imaps3fanboy
You're disgusting What great argument on why these bands aren't considered good. I applaud your debating skills good sir. I legitimately can't tell the difference between shinedown and bands like three days grace. Just a bunch of "bro" music /hipster Basically, they're generic garbage with extremely, let me emphasize that word, EXTREMELY little creativity.[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Bardock47"]
Good to see OT has a lot of good taste in music.
'll like to add Shinedown and Three Days Grace.
Also, how do we mean current, like they are still active? Or they formed s=more recently then say....JUdas Priest?
Bardock47
[QUOTE="Bardock47"]What great argument on why these bands aren't considered good. I applaud your debating skills good sir. I legitimately can't tell the difference between shinedown and bands like three days grace. Just a bunch of "bro" music /hipster Basically, they're generic garbage with extremely, let me emphasize that word, EXTREMELY little creativity. I find it easy to differntiate the two:? Now, I wil agre; I dont expect them to form the next wave of a music revoloution. However, I will say they do have creativty in what they do, and are good at it. There songs are fun and I really enjoy listening to them.At the ned of the day it is difference in taste, and starting a debate in music generally better appraoched without a direct insult if you want an actual disscussion.[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] You're disgustingimaps3fanboy
I legitimately can't tell the difference between shinedown and bands like three days grace. Just a bunch of "bro" music /hipster Basically, they're generic garbage with extremely, let me emphasize that word, EXTREMELY little creativity. I find it easy to differntiate the two:? Now, I wil agre; I dont expect them to form the next wave of a music revoloution. However, I will say they do have creativty in what they do, and are good at it. There songs are fun and I really enjoy listening to them.At the ned of the day it is difference in taste, and starting a debate in music generally better appraoched without a direct insult if you want an actual disscussion. Technically mediocre, creatively stale.[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Bardock47"] What great argument on why these bands aren't considered good. I applaud your debating skills good sir.
Bardock47
I find it easy to differntiate the two:? Now, I wil agre; I dont expect them to form the next wave of a music revoloution. However, I will say they do have creativty in what they do, and are good at it. There songs are fun and I really enjoy listening to them.At the ned of the day it is difference in taste, and starting a debate in music generally better appraoched without a direct insult if you want an actual disscussion. Technically mediocre, creatively stale.[QUOTE="Bardock47"]
[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] I legitimately can't tell the difference between shinedown and bands like three days grace. Just a bunch of "bro" music /hipster Basically, they're generic garbage with extremely, let me emphasize that word, EXTREMELY little creativity. imaps3fanboy
You can't argue over creativity. Both those bands do their own melodies/lyrics/arrangements. Which means they have some creative energy, no matter what you guys think about them. They are commercially successful acts- someone must like them.
I could say The Killers are the best band ever, but you could argue back and forth all day on why or why not.
Technically mediocre, creatively stale.[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"]
[QUOTE="Bardock47"] I find it easy to differntiate the two:? Now, I wil agre; I dont expect them to form the next wave of a music revoloution. However, I will say they do have creativty in what they do, and are good at it. There songs are fun and I really enjoy listening to them.At the ned of the day it is difference in taste, and starting a debate in music generally better appraoched without a direct insult if you want an actual disscussion.
Shmiity
You can't argue over creativity. Both those bands do their own melodies/lyrics/arrangements. Which means they have some creative energy, no matter what you guys think about them. They are commercially successful acts- someone must like them.
I could say The Killers are the best band ever, but you could argue back and forth all day on why or why not.
Except that their "arrangements" are derived from every hard rock band ever..I find it easy to differntiate the two:? Now, I wil agre; I dont expect them to form the next wave of a music revoloution. However, I will say they do have creativty in what they do, and are good at it. There songs are fun and I really enjoy listening to them.At the ned of the day it is difference in taste, and starting a debate in music generally better appraoched without a direct insult if you want an actual disscussion. Technically mediocre, creatively stale. You already made your point, I agree, there isnt a whole lot technialty going on wth eithr (however 3DG has a kickass drummer they need to better utilize). The riffs arent complex. But they're simple and good. I enjoy it. Again I will disagree over their level of creativity, there creativyt level is fine. I dont expect a huge tonal shift or genre shift, ala' Linkin Park. They are creativily fine with what they do. U not enjoying them, is ur personal taste.[QUOTE="Bardock47"]
[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] I legitimately can't tell the difference between shinedown and bands like three days grace. Just a bunch of "bro" music /hipster Basically, they're generic garbage with extremely, let me emphasize that word, EXTREMELY little creativity. imaps3fanboy
[QUOTE="Shmiity"][QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"] Technically mediocre, creatively stale.
imaps3fanboy
You can't argue over creativity. Both those bands do their own melodies/lyrics/arrangements. Which means they have some creative energy, no matter what you guys think about them. They are commercially successful acts- someone must like them.
I could say The Killers are the best band ever, but you could argue back and forth all day on why or why not.
Except that their "arrangements" are derived from every hard rock band ever..Music borrows from itself all the time. Do you know how many songs are rooted in just I IV V? Thousands? Huge components of popular music are melodic motives and text. You can't copyright a harmony- for good reason. Saying a band sucks because their arrangements are simple is stupid. You just don't like them.
Except that their "arrangements" are derived from every hard rock band ever..[QUOTE="imaps3fanboy"][QUOTE="Shmiity"]
You can't argue over creativity. Both those bands do their own melodies/lyrics/arrangements. Which means they have some creative energy, no matter what you guys think about them. They are commercially successful acts- someone must like them.
I could say The Killers are the best band ever, but you could argue back and forth all day on why or why not.
Shmiity
Music borrows from itself all the time. Do you know how many songs are rooted in just I IV V? Thousands? Huge components of popular music are melodic motives and text. You can't copyright a harmony- for good reason. Saying a band sucks because their arrangements are simple is stupid. You just don't like them.
That's a contributing factor to my disdain. Not only are they technically boring, but they have nothing new to bring to the table style wise. If you're going to play music like that, at least have entertaining personalities, and halfway decent/varying music like the Foo Fighters or Red Hot chili Peppers.
[QUOTE="PurpleHaze89"]They're too derivative to be that influential. They haven't really done much that hasn't already been done, especially by Queen and Radiohead. Agreed. My favorite band, but no they havent influenced much.Muse by a veeeeeeeery long shot
They're going to be the most influental band in the next few decades, quote me on that.
Engrish_Major
This, RHCP, Gotye, and Rise Against.The Killers, The Strokes, Muse, FUN, The Vaccines..
There are a lot of good new wave/postpunk revival rock bands these days
Shmiity
[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]I agree with the first two. You bumped this just so you can post "I agree"?Zebrahead
Darling Tieves
Steriogram
Darwin's Waiting Room
311
NiKva
Circa Survive, Thrice, The Reign of Kindo, At the Drive In, Incubus, Deftones, Fall of Troy, Jaguares(Spanish), Minus the Bear
MuseShmiityI'll agree with this. Anyone like Cage The Elephant? And why hasn't anyone said Tool? Or are we talking about bands that have started up within the last 10 or so years?
[QUOTE="Shmiity"]MusejesuschristmonkI'll agree with this. Anyone like Cage The Elephant? And why hasn't anyone said Tool? Or are we talking about bands that have started up within the last 10 or so years?I take the thread title to mean non-heavy rock bands that are still together. I could be wrong.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment