Spetznaz NRS-2 gun blade FTWmarkop2003
But you only get one shot. :( I guess you could throw the handle if you miss... ;)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="markop2003"]Spetznaz NRS-2 gun blade FTWluamhtrad
But you only get one shot. :( I guess you could throw the handle if you miss... ;)
When your enemy realises that you can shoot with your knife you don't need another shot.My favourite to shoot has to be a good ol' bolt-action rifle. Far prefer it to semi-automatics (can't shoot fully automatics here in the UK). So simple. Such fun.
And it makes me feel like I'm living in the 1880s when I shoot mine sometimes for some reason. The classic vibe I guess.
My favourite to shoot has to be a good ol' bolt-action rifle. Far prefer it to semi-automatics (can't shoot fully automatics here in the UK). So simple. Such fun.
And it makes me feel like I'm living in the 1880s when I shoot mine sometimes for some reason. The classic vibe I guess.
The M40 rifle is the one I'd choose if you said, "you get one bolt action rifle... choose." That Remington 700 frame is a winner, like the Springfiled 1911 frame.I think the best gun would be one that can kill a man,KlownMasterWhat if you need to kill a charging rhino? :)
[QUOTE="sonicare"]
This thread needs Verge.
Ask, and ye shall receive...lots and lots of guns.
M1A SOCOM II
Lox_Cropek
The SOCOM II is crap, honestly. If you want an M1A rifle that isn't full-sized, you're much better off with the Scout variant. It's actually what the armed force's EBR is, and those two extra inches of barrel REALLY help the 7.62x51 round in terms of muzzle velocity and accuracy.
Is that a henry you've got there on the left? Nice collection man... I guess you're a fan of wooden frames? Ever consider snagging a wood-framed Dragunov?Frame_Dragger
That would be the venerable Mosin Nagant on the far left. I also have the sniper variant with a PU scope. And yes, I'm a HUGE fan of military rifles that have wooden stocks. I'd love a genuine SVD, but those things run over $5k, easily. I'd have to make do with a Romanian PSL for $800 and go through a further $500 or so to make it look like a Dragunov.
A bunch of people have already said this, but... There's no "best gun." (And that's the last time I use the term "gun" here.) Different weapons provide different capabilities. It's not fair to compare a Glock with a machinegun. One is totally unsuitable to accomplishing the other's mission. A better topic would have been "Favorite Firearm." Then people could answer based on their use of firearms. In that case, I pick the 1911. That's the weapon I use the most, professionally and personally. At the same time, I don't claim the 1911 is the "best" sidearm, nor do I recomment it to everyone. It's just best for me.
By the way, I'm shocked that this has gone five pages without someone trolling the thread.
EDIT: Four pages..
The thread I'm looking at only has 2 pages... :PA bunch of people have already said this, but... There's no "best gun." (And that's the last time I use the term "gun" here.) Different weapons provide different capabilities. It's not fair to compare a Glock with a machinegun. One is totally unsuitable to accomplishing the other's mission. A better topic would have been "Favorite Firearm." Then people could answer based on their use of firearms. In that case, I pick the 1911. That's the weapon I use the most, professionally and personally. At the same time, I don't claim the 1911 is the "best" sidearm, nor do I recomment it to everyone. It's just best for me.
By the way, I'm shocked that this has gone five pages without someone trolling the thread.
EDIT: Four pages..
Palantas
[QUOTE="Palantas"]The thread I'm looking at only has 2 pages... :PA bunch of people have already said this, but... There's no "best gun." (And that's the last time I use the term "gun" here.) Different weapons provide different capabilities. It's not fair to compare a Glock with a machinegun. One is totally unsuitable to accomplishing the other's mission. A better topic would have been "Favorite Firearm." Then people could answer based on their use of firearms. In that case, I pick the 1911. That's the weapon I use the most, professionally and personally. At the same time, I don't claim the 1911 is the "best" sidearm, nor do I recomment it to everyone. It's just best for me.
By the way, I'm shocked that this has gone five pages without someone trolling the thread.
EDIT: Four pages..
SilentFireX
*brofists*
These guns:
*flexes*
Suzy_Q_Kazoo
Why are you apologizing? Guys are gonna sit there and imagine you flexing and drool. ;)
The thread I'm looking at only has 2 pages... :P[QUOTE="SilentFireX"][QUOTE="Palantas"]
A bunch of people have already said this, but... There's no "best gun." (And that's the last time I use the term "gun" here.) Different weapons provide different capabilities. It's not fair to compare a Glock with a machinegun. One is totally unsuitable to accomplishing the other's mission. A better topic would have been "Favorite Firearm." Then people could answer based on their use of firearms. In that case, I pick the 1911. That's the weapon I use the most, professionally and personally. At the same time, I don't claim the 1911 is the "best" sidearm, nor do I recomment it to everyone. It's just best for me.
By the way, I'm shocked that this has gone five pages without someone trolling the thread.
EDIT: Four pages..
coolbeans90
*brofists*
3 pages :(but i came into this thread to agree with whatever Palantas said
The term best is really subjective. As for my favorite firearm, it would have to be the M16A1 I fired when I was in the Marines way back when.
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"]Is that a henry you've got there on the left? Nice collection man... I guess you're a fan of wooden frames? Ever consider snagging a wood-framed Dragunov?Verge_6
That would be the venerable Mosin Nagant on the far left. I also have the sniper variant with a PU scope. And yes, I'm a HUGE fan of military rifles that have wooden stocks. I'd love a genuine SVD, but those things run over $5k, easily. I'd have to make do with a Romanian PSL for $800 and go through a further $500 or so to make it look like a Dragunov.
I'm not saying the Glock isn't a good gun, but if you could have any Glock vs. any Sig Sauer, Beretta, or Springfield you'd still go for a glock chambered in 9mm? I wouldn't even recommend that for target shooting, and the stopping power is underwhelming IMO.The best rifles I've fired are the M4 and HK416. Glock 9mm is the best pistol.
KC_Hokie
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]I'm not saying the Glock isn't a good gun, but if you could have any Glock vs. any Sig Sauer, Beretta, or Springfield you'd still go for a glock chambered in 9mm? I wouldn't even recommend that for target shooting, and the stopping power is underwhelming IMO.Yes. Best pistol I've ever fired and I've fired a lot. Very accurate, compact handgun with a low recoil. And who needs stopping power unless you're shooting at someone on PCP.The best rifles I've fired are the M4 and HK416. Glock 9mm is the best pistol.
Frame_Dragger
The best rifles I've fired are the M4 and HK416. Glock 9mm is the best pistol.
I'm not saying the Glock isn't a good gun, but if you could have any Glock vs. any Sig Sauer, Beretta, or Springfield you'd still go for a glock chambered in 9mm? I wouldn't even recommend that for target shooting, and the stopping power is underwhelming IMO.Yes. Best pistol I've ever fired and I've fired a lot. Very accurate, compact handgun with a low recoil. And who needs stopping power unless you're shooting at someone on PCP. Well, personally I'm a strong believer in the Mozambique drill as the model for SD/HD, and executed properly you don't need large caliber. However, you'd be surprised at the range of reactions people display to gunshot wounds with or without factors like drugs. On the other hand, if you clip the lower ventricle of the heart or descending aorta, you don't have to worry about that. In a real life situation it's good to rely on training and accuracy, but having the insurance of some stopping power can't hurt you. As for your preference for the Glock I'd agree that it's accurate and some models are compact. Personally however, when prolonged use grip, and lasting accuracy are concerned, I'm not as much of a fan. Just my take though, it's not as though I'd throw away most Glocks.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] I'm not saying the Glock isn't a good gun, but if you could have any Glock vs. any Sig Sauer, Beretta, or Springfield you'd still go for a glock chambered in 9mm? I wouldn't even recommend that for target shooting, and the stopping power is underwhelming IMO.Frame_DraggerYes. Best pistol I've ever fired and I've fired a lot. Very accurate, compact handgun with a low recoil. And who needs stopping power unless you're shooting at someone on PCP. Well, personally I'm a strong believer in the Mozambique drill as the model for SD/HD, and executed properly you don't need large caliber. However, you'd be surprised at the range of reactions people display to gunshot wounds with or without factors like drugs. On the other hand, if you clip the lower ventricle of the heart or descending aorta, you don't have to worry about that. In a real life situation it's good to rely on training and accuracy, but having the insurance of some stopping power can't hurt you. As for your preference for the Glock I'd agree that it's accurate and some models are compact. Personally however, when prolonged use grip, and lasting accuracy are concerned, I'm not as much of a fan. Just my take though, it's not as though I'd throw away most Glocks.Most of the handguns you listed from the companies above aren't any bigger than 40 caliber.
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Yes. Best pistol I've ever fired and I've fired a lot. Very accurate, compact handgun with a low recoil. And who needs stopping power unless you're shooting at someone on PCP.KC_HokieWell, personally I'm a strong believer in the Mozambique drill as the model for SD/HD, and executed properly you don't need large caliber. However, you'd be surprised at the range of reactions people display to gunshot wounds with or without factors like drugs. On the other hand, if you clip the lower ventricle of the heart or descending aorta, you don't have to worry about that. In a real life situation it's good to rely on training and accuracy, but having the insurance of some stopping power can't hurt you. As for your preference for the Glock I'd agree that it's accurate and some models are compact. Personally however, when prolonged use grip, and lasting accuracy are concerned, I'm not as much of a fan. Just my take though, it's not as though I'd throw away most Glocks.Most of the handguns you listed from the companies above aren't any bigger than 40 caliber.
Sig Sauer and Beretta both have compact and standard lines that chamber from 9mm-.45 ACP, and the 1911 IS a .45 ACP standard. Anyway, I'm happy with the beretta in 9mm, one in 40 S&W, and my SS in .357 Sig rounds... basically a jumped up 9mm to compromise between a musket ball and the overpenetration of the 10mm Auto.
EDIT: My bad, not .45 compacts in the Beretta AFAIK
Most of the handguns you listed from the companies above aren't any bigger than 40 caliber.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Well, personally I'm a strong believer in the Mozambique drill as the model for SD/HD, and executed properly you don't need large caliber. However, you'd be surprised at the range of reactions people display to gunshot wounds with or without factors like drugs. On the other hand, if you clip the lower ventricle of the heart or descending aorta, you don't have to worry about that. In a real life situation it's good to rely on training and accuracy, but having the insurance of some stopping power can't hurt you. As for your preference for the Glock I'd agree that it's accurate and some models are compact. Personally however, when prolonged use grip, and lasting accuracy are concerned, I'm not as much of a fan. Just my take though, it's not as though I'd throw away most Glocks.Frame_Dragger
Sig Sauer and Beretta both have compact and standard lines that chamber from 9mm-.45 ACP, and the 1911 IS a .45 ACP standard. Anyway, I'm happy with the beretta in 9mm, one in 40 S&W, and my SS in .357 Sig rounds... basically a jumped up 9mm to compromise between a musket ball and the overpenetration of the 10mm Auto.
EDIT: My bad, not .45 compacts
Like I said from the start..my favorite is a 9mm pistol. Specifically a Glock. I'm not that impressed with Beretta weapons until you get into shotguns. And Sig Sauer's don't perform any better. Most competitors actually prefer Glocks.Most of the handguns you listed from the companies above aren't any bigger than 40 caliber. KC_Hokie
Sig Sauer and Beretta both have compact and standard lines that chamber from 9mm-.45 ACP, and the 1911 IS a .45 ACP standard. Anyway, I'm happy with the beretta in 9mm, one in 40 S&W, and my SS in .357 Sig rounds... basically a jumped up 9mm to compromise between a musket ball and the overpenetration of the 10mm Auto.
EDIT: My bad, not .45 compacts
Like I said from the start..my favorite is a 9mm pistol. Specifically a Glock. I'm not that impressed with Beretta weapons until you get into shotguns. And Sig Sauer's don't perform any better. Most competitors actually prefer Glocks. If you say so, although it's nice to see recognition for Beretta's craftsmanship when it comes to shotguns. I wouldn't use a sig for competition, but I personally would prefer a Beretta... I think for me it's a grip thing.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"]Like I said from the start..my favorite is a 9mm pistol. Specifically a Glock. I'm not that impressed with Beretta weapons until you get into shotguns. And Sig Sauer's don't perform any better. Most competitors actually prefer Glocks. If you say so, although it's nice to see recognition for Beretta's craftsmanship when it comes to shotguns. I wouldn't use a sig for competition, but I personally would prefer a Beretta... I think for me it's a grip thing. Do you have small hands? If you're having trouble gripping use a less powerful pistol. I couldn't hit much with a .45 so I moved down to a 9mm. It's a world of difference.Sig Sauer and Beretta both have compact and standard lines that chamber from 9mm-.45 ACP, and the 1911 IS a .45 ACP standard. Anyway, I'm happy with the beretta in 9mm, one in 40 S&W, and my SS in .357 Sig rounds... basically a jumped up 9mm to compromise between a musket ball and the overpenetration of the 10mm Auto.
EDIT: My bad, not .45 compacts
Frame_Dragger
If you say so, although it's nice to see recognition for Beretta's craftsmanship when it comes to shotguns. I wouldn't use a sig for competition, but I personally would prefer a Beretta... I think for me it's a grip thing. Do you have small hands? If you're having trouble gripping use a less powerful pistol. I couldn't hit much with a .45 so I moved down to a 9mm. It's a world of difference. No, I don't have huge or small hands, and my accuracy doesn't suffer... I just prefer the feel of the 92FS in particular. What can I say, these things really are matters of preference, and the gun that's comfortable for you to shoot is, IMO, the best gun for you. On a sidenote, The KRISS Vector would be close to a "best gun" if I had to choose and ignore the "the best gun is the one that is comfortable and gets the job done" credo. I say this in the spirit of the OP, who was thinking of "cool" guns... the Vector definitely fits that bill. Still, I'm more of a, "Remington from cover" kind of guy than a submachnine/assault rifle guy. A pistol, a rifle, a shotgun and you're set. More can't hurt, but that's a great basic loadout for life, marksmanship, and SD/HD. ...Years later, I own more than the simple trio... expensive damned hobby given the ammo too. Oh well, worth it.[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Like I said from the start..my favorite is a 9mm pistol. Specifically a Glock. I'm not that impressed with Beretta weapons until you get into shotguns. And Sig Sauer's don't perform any better. Most competitors actually prefer Glocks. KC_Hokie
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment