Blacks and h*mosexuals argue on Dr.Phils show

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bobg360
bobg360

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 bobg360
Member since 2006 • 397 Posts

[QUOTE="bobg360"][QUOTE="mexicangordo"] Six months ago a Homosexual student was killed in California.... And many others are still being harassed, abused, neglected, killed durring 2008 not the 1960's.... but then again it still uncomparable to the Black community simply because the LGBT community are "different." :roll:sSubZerOo

I would hardly compare the scope of the black struggle to that of the LGBT struggle. Considering the fact that black slaves were a large part of the Western, "civilized" culture for a couple hundred years, I feel that you are not acknowledging the struggles that blacks have endured throughout the course of history.

No one argues that, slavery was a bad thign to happen and it happened far earlier then the middle ages.

In 1860, there were about 4 million black slaves in America (3.95 million can be considered 4). Coupled with the fact that for a number of years blacks were counted as 3/5 of a person in the United States, this is a group that has been oppressed far more than LGBT.

No I don't agree.. If you were openly gay in any the majority of cultures you would be condemend by EVERY ONE. Through out the world gays became very hated, the difference is they could hide it but still..

Furthermore, blacks have had their families broken apart during slavery because members have been sold to other plantations and owners. However, if you would like to look at more modern history, consider the Civil Rights movement. Blacks had their own water fountains, schools, and even neighborhoods.

Oh noes! Seeing as if you were openly gay you would most likely have gotten treated as if they were a black student in a white school.. Gays were outcasts, the reason why you didn't hear about them is because they were a far smaller minority.. And they kept hidden due to beign hated on all sides, blacks, whites, any other minotirty.

Civil Rights leaders had their houses vandalized and some were killed (i.e. MLK).

If you were gay and openly admited it this would happen to you.. Most likely it would be even worse seeing as people thought it was a sin of their religion.

I am not denying that throughout the course of history LGBT have been treated unfairly or improperly (as that would be sheer ignorance).

Unfairly improperly by meaning torture, murder, exclusion, harrassment.. Then yes, if anything gays were treated even worse during the 60s if they openly admited it, because they were excluded out of all social rings.

I am simply asking you to look at the larger scope of the two situations.

Apparently you arn't looking at the larger scope of thigns.. Racism has always been a factor no matter the group of people.. But Homosexuality was even worse because it aligned a hatred from all groups towards the homosexual, they saw it as unnatural and in the christian sense a sin against god..

In doing so, you will see that while these two situations both show the bigotry in society, the blacks have endured far more than LGBT.

To even make the comparison is dumb as hell.. They both suffered greatly in different measures.. To even make the comparison and claim one has suffered more over the other is ridiuclous.

If you can name me 100 accounts of LGBT being sold then I will cede this argument to you without any qualms.

If you can't udnerstand that homosexuality was much more then racism but a deep seeded hatred that lead to people being stoned to death.. Then i don't know what to say.. Unlike the blacks homosexualities are even a smaller faction, a faction that has hatred based on religion and supposedly being "unnatural" agianst them.. Blacks at least had each other, homosexuals were isolated and most saw it even worse then having a black person near them.. Now yet again am I saying they had it rougher? Of course not, they are different and equally have suffered and oppressed.. Its like argueing who was oppressed more, women or blacks.. Its a stupid argument and each have their attributes you can not really make a objective comparsion for.

I agree that this is a stupid arguement to have, seeing as how deciding who is more opressed helps no one. The fact that you claim that the whole world is suddenly anti-LGBT is simply ignorant. You say that LGBT were harassed, tortured, or killed, but so where blacks on an even larger scale. The only arguement you have given is that I somehow do not understand that LGBT have suffered. I do. The fact that you claim gays were excluded from social rings is worse than a black man, woman, or child being killed is completely ridiculous. If you look at the situation today, there are supporters of LGBT rights who have thrown down crosses during the course of the recent happenings over Prop 8. That incident had no reprecussions. I think that it would be safe to say, however, that if a black man had defiled some religious symbol of a white man during the Civil Rights movement would have been far worse. As I said earlier, arguing over who was opressed more solves nothing. The fact that you claim "social rings" as a reason for the great injustice that has been done to LGBT is simply stupid. Sir, I ask you, what social ring was there for the first slaves who came to America after being forced to leave their families and watch their friends die on a boat while being transported across an ocean?
Avatar image for CptJSparrow
CptJSparrow

10898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 CptJSparrow
Member since 2007 • 10898 Posts
Denying equal rights to a group of people is denying equal rights to a group of people.
Avatar image for ronniepage588
ronniepage588

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#103 ronniepage588
Member since 2003 • 4188 Posts
[QUOTE="ronniepage588"]

big difference, you can chose to be gay or not, whether you really aren't or just lying that you aren't, you can still chose, but blacks couldn't chose their skin color. 

so atleast if you were gay you could lie about it.  

stevenk4k5
You can't choose your sexual orientation. Choosing to HIDE it is a completely different story.

you absolutely can choose your sexual orientation if you want to. but i agree with you if you are saying most people do not. and i obviously said that they COULD HIDE it. thats what i was saying. Gays could hide it, and thats a major difference in their struggle. Gays want all the attention and sympathy that blacks got, yet without deserving any of it. O, the horror, life is so tough, i can't marry a person of the same sex! boohoo. marriage is a religious ceremony and should remain that way. besides with divorce rates as high as they are nowadays, you guys are blowing marriage way out of proportion. And gays act like theyre a seperate race and special because of their sexual preference. screw that. nobody cares if you like stickin you penis in an anus, thats just disgusting. besides you know what would start happening if it was legalized everywhere? we'd see young dudes marrying old farts to get their money just like you see young pornstars doing all the time.
Avatar image for Nkemjo
Nkemjo

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Nkemjo
Member since 2005 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Nkemjo"]

I'm in Ireland and it's not bad at all, you'd think it would be as were a christian nation :P

Theokhoth

Subzero is under the impression that correlation = causation. He really should look up ancient Rome; the Empire that popularised Christianity in the first place?

Haha true, those romans were promiscuous.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Nkemjo"]

I'm in Ireland and it's not bad at all, you'd think it would be as were a christian nation :P

Theokhoth

Subzero is under the impression that correlation = causation. He really should look up ancient Rome; the Empire that popularised Christianity in the first place?

I am aware of that, I am a history major.. The problem with this is A) Most historians beleive that Christianity in that time saw gay relationships prohibited in the sense of boy-man relationships.. In the end in my opinion like slavery most justified the hatred towards the gays with their religious beliefs, like many do to this day.

And it isn't really accurate to say that Roman empire populaized it. The king Constantine converted, and he basically forced every one else to convert to it.. Infact people like Charlamagne (spelling?) specifically converted to Christianity to gain a united kingdom, and to convert people to a similar line of religion.

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="bobg360"] I would hardly compare the scope of the black struggle to that of the LGBT struggle. Considering the fact that black slaves were a large part of the Western, "civilized" culture for a couple hundred years, I feel that you are not acknowledging the struggles that blacks have endured throughout the course of history.

No one argues that, slavery was a bad thign to happen and it happened far earlier then the middle ages.

In 1860, there were about 4 million black slaves in America (3.95 million can be considered 4). Coupled with the fact that for a number of years blacks were counted as 3/5 of a person in the United States, this is a group that has been oppressed far more than LGBT.

No I don't agree.. If you were openly gay in any the majority of cultures you would be condemend by EVERY ONE. Through out the world gays became very hated, the difference is they could hide it but still..

Furthermore, blacks have had their families broken apart during slavery because members have been sold to other plantations and owners. However, if you would like to look at more modern history, consider the Civil Rights movement. Blacks had their own water fountains, schools, and even neighborhoods.

Oh noes! Seeing as if you were openly gay you would most likely have gotten treated as if they were a black student in a white school.. Gays were outcasts, the reason why you didn't hear about them is because they were a far smaller minority.. And they kept hidden due to beign hated on all sides, blacks, whites, any other minotirty.

Civil Rights leaders had their houses vandalized and some were killed (i.e. MLK).

If you were gay and openly admited it this would happen to you.. Most likely it would be even worse seeing as people thought it was a sin of their religion.

I am not denying that throughout the course of history LGBT have been treated unfairly or improperly (as that would be sheer ignorance).

Unfairly improperly by meaning torture, murder, exclusion, harrassment.. Then yes, if anything gays were treated even worse during the 60s if they openly admited it, because they were excluded out of all social rings.

I am simply asking you to look at the larger scope of the two situations.

Apparently you arn't looking at the larger scope of thigns.. Racism has always been a factor no matter the group of people.. But Homosexuality was even worse because it aligned a hatred from all groups towards the homosexual, they saw it as unnatural and in the christian sense a sin against god..

In doing so, you will see that while these two situations both show the bigotry in society, the blacks have endured far more than LGBT.

To even make the comparison is dumb as hell.. They both suffered greatly in different measures.. To even make the comparison and claim one has suffered more over the other is ridiuclous.

If you can name me 100 accounts of LGBT being sold then I will cede this argument to you without any qualms.

If you can't udnerstand that homosexuality was much more then racism but a deep seeded hatred that lead to people being stoned to death.. Then i don't know what to say.. Unlike the blacks homosexualities are even a smaller faction, a faction that has hatred based on religion and supposedly being "unnatural" agianst them.. Blacks at least had each other, homosexuals were isolated and most saw it even worse then having a black person near them.. Now yet again am I saying they had it rougher? Of course not, they are different and equally have suffered and oppressed.. Its like argueing who was oppressed more, women or blacks.. Its a stupid argument and each have their attributes you can not really make a objective comparsion for.

bobg360

I agree that this is a stupid arguement to have, seeing as how deciding who is more opressed helps no one. The fact that you claim that the whole world is suddenly anti-LGBT is simply ignorant. You say that LGBT were harassed, tortured, or killed, but so where blacks on an even larger scale. The only arguement you have given is that I somehow do not understand that LGBT have suffered. I do. The fact that you claim gays were excluded from social rings is worse than a black man, woman, or child being killed is completely ridiculous. If you look at the situation today, there are supporters of LGBT rights who have thrown down crosses during the course of the recent happenings over Prop 8. That incident had no reprecussions. I think that it would be safe to say, however, that if a black man had defiled some religious symbol of a white man during the Civil Rights movement would have been far worse. As I said earlier, arguing over who was opressed more solves nothing. The fact that you claim "social rings" as a reason for the great injustice that has been done to LGBT is simply stupid. Sir, I ask you, what social ring was there for the first slaves who came to America after being forced to leave their families and watch their friends die on a boat while being transported across an ocean?

Thats the whole point. Thats why i don't understand why so many people minimize what homosexuals go through yet recognize what has happened to African Americans. It is a very pointless debate.... and a very sad comparasion. People are starting to act as if they want to be more oppressed. Its just... sad.
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Nkemjo"]

I'm in Ireland and it's not bad at all, you'd think it would be as were a christian nation :P

Nkemjo

Subzero is under the impression that correlation = causation. He really should look up ancient Rome; the Empire that popularised Christianity in the first place?

Haha true, those romans were promiscuous.

Romans are wannabe Greeks. Now they were kinky!
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="bobg360"] I would hardly compare the scope of the black struggle to that of the LGBT struggle. Considering the fact that black slaves were a large part of the Western, "civilized" culture for a couple hundred years, I feel that you are not acknowledging the struggles that blacks have endured throughout the course of history.

No one argues that, slavery was a bad thign to happen and it happened far earlier then the middle ages.

In 1860, there were about 4 million black slaves in America (3.95 million can be considered 4). Coupled with the fact that for a number of years blacks were counted as 3/5 of a person in the United States, this is a group that has been oppressed far more than LGBT.

No I don't agree.. If you were openly gay in any the majority of cultures you would be condemend by EVERY ONE. Through out the world gays became very hated, the difference is they could hide it but still..

Furthermore, blacks have had their families broken apart during slavery because members have been sold to other plantations and owners. However, if you would like to look at more modern history, consider the Civil Rights movement. Blacks had their own water fountains, schools, and even neighborhoods.

Oh noes! Seeing as if you were openly gay you would most likely have gotten treated as if they were a black student in a white school.. Gays were outcasts, the reason why you didn't hear about them is because they were a far smaller minority.. And they kept hidden due to beign hated on all sides, blacks, whites, any other minotirty.

Civil Rights leaders had their houses vandalized and some were killed (i.e. MLK).

If you were gay and openly admited it this would happen to you.. Most likely it would be even worse seeing as people thought it was a sin of their religion.

I am not denying that throughout the course of history LGBT have been treated unfairly or improperly (as that would be sheer ignorance).

Unfairly improperly by meaning torture, murder, exclusion, harrassment.. Then yes, if anything gays were treated even worse during the 60s if they openly admited it, because they were excluded out of all social rings.

I am simply asking you to look at the larger scope of the two situations.

Apparently you arn't looking at the larger scope of thigns.. Racism has always been a factor no matter the group of people.. But Homosexuality was even worse because it aligned a hatred from all groups towards the homosexual, they saw it as unnatural and in the christian sense a sin against god..

In doing so, you will see that while these two situations both show the bigotry in society, the blacks have endured far more than LGBT.

To even make the comparison is dumb as hell.. They both suffered greatly in different measures.. To even make the comparison and claim one has suffered more over the other is ridiuclous.

If you can name me 100 accounts of LGBT being sold then I will cede this argument to you without any qualms.

If you can't udnerstand that homosexuality was much more then racism but a deep seeded hatred that lead to people being stoned to death.. Then i don't know what to say.. Unlike the blacks homosexualities are even a smaller faction, a faction that has hatred based on religion and supposedly being "unnatural" agianst them.. Blacks at least had each other, homosexuals were isolated and most saw it even worse then having a black person near them.. Now yet again am I saying they had it rougher? Of course not, they are different and equally have suffered and oppressed.. Its like argueing who was oppressed more, women or blacks.. Its a stupid argument and each have their attributes you can not really make a objective comparsion for.

bobg360

I agree that this is a stupid arguement to have, seeing as how deciding who is more opressed helps no one. The fact that you claim that the whole world is suddenly anti-LGBT is simply ignorant. You say that LGBT were harassed, tortured, or killed, but so where blacks on an even larger scale. The only arguement you have given is that I somehow do not understand that LGBT have suffered. I do. The fact that you claim gays were excluded from social rings is worse than a black man, woman, or child being killed is completely ridiculous. If you look at the situation today, there are supporters of LGBT rights who have thrown down crosses during the course of the recent happenings over Prop 8. That incident had no reprecussions. I think that it would be safe to say, however, that if a black man had defiled some religious symbol of a white man during the Civil Rights movement would have been far worse. As I said earlier, arguing over who was opressed more solves nothing. The fact that you claim "social rings" as a reason for the great injustice that has been done to LGBT is simply stupid. Sir, I ask you, what social ring was there for the first slaves who came to America after being forced to leave their families and watch their friends die on a boat while being transported across an ocean?

Their own, blacks had their own culture.. Gays didn't they were considered a freak and were omitted from every one.. There was no gay land, nor a gay country.. Extremely few cultures after 500 AD accepted gays what soe ver.. And people like the Spanish Inquistion made it their duty in hunting them down and exterminating them.. Like I said the only thing they could do is hide that they were gay So yet agian I am saying that they both suffered poorly and I think it ridiculous to claim one has suffered more then the other,

Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"][QUOTE="ronniepage588"]

big difference, you can chose to be gay or not, whether you really aren't or just lying that you aren't, you can still chose, but blacks couldn't chose their skin color. 

so atleast if you were gay you could lie about it.  

ronniepage588
You can't choose your sexual orientation. Choosing to HIDE it is a completely different story.

you absolutely can choose your sexual orientation if you want to. but i agree with you if you are saying most people do not. and i obviously said that they COULD HIDE it. thats what i was saying. Gays could hide it, and thats a major difference in their struggle. Gays want all the attention and sympathy that blacks got, yet without deserving any of it. O, the horror, life is so tough, i can't marry a person of the same sex! boohoo. marriage is a religious ceremony and should remain that way. besides with divorce rates as high as they are nowadays, you guys are blowing marriage way out of proportion. And gays act like theyre a seperate race and special because of their sexual preference. screw that. nobody cares if you like stickin you penis in an anus, thats just disgusting. besides you know what would start happening if it was legalized everywhere? we'd see young dudes marrying old farts to get their money just like you see young pornstars doing all the time.

Did you wake up today and say that you felt like being straight? Would you wake up tomorrow and suddenly decide to be gay Now that I just made my point, onto other matters. Gays shouldn't have to hide the fact that their gay (even though I believe that holding vulgar Gay pride events are completely shameful to the gay community... that is why gays catch so much flack as it is), it's who they are and they have no control over that. I've already stated that I do not believe the gay struggle is directly comparable to the black struggle so I just assume you failed to read all my posts and only got as far to the point where I mentioned I was bisexual. Next, as cliche as this is in this forum, religion does not have a monopoly on marriage as marriage has been around before organized religion. About the separate race thing, I do not believe gays should be recognized as a separate race because your sexuality has nothing to do with your race (as there are gays of many different racial backgrounds). Also, I always love how people always seem to think homosexuality is exclusive to males but when it involves two attractive females it's hot, that's pretty dumb. And I could have sworn young females marry old men all the time for there money, I fail to see how it would be any worse than if it was two men.
Avatar image for Nkemjo
Nkemjo

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Nkemjo
Member since 2005 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Nkemjo"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

Subzero is under the impression that correlation = causation. He really should look up ancient Rome; the Empire that popularised Christianity in the first place?

clembo1990

Haha true, those romans were promiscuous.

Romans are wannabe Greeks. Now they were kinky!

True they even stole all their gods and just renamed them. Dionysus greek god of drink and revelry, that shows they knew how to have a good time.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="Nkemjo"]

 

Haha true, those romans were promiscuous.

Nkemjo

Romans are wannabe Greeks. Now they were kinky!

True they even stole all their gods and just renamed them. Dionysus greek god of drink and revelry, that shows they knew how to have a good time.

They knew a thing or two about sex. For example: Hermes and Aphrodite combine to make Hermaphrodite! When God-cousins get busy!!!!
Avatar image for Truth-slayer
Truth-slayer

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 Truth-slayer
Member since 2004 • 2510 Posts
I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.Tjeremiah1988
What an ignorant thing to say. Gays have been killed for and discriminated against for what they are long before African Americans.
Avatar image for bobg360
bobg360

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 bobg360
Member since 2006 • 397 Posts
Yes, it is ridiculous to determine who has suffered more. I will simply say that I do not believe that the comparison between the struggle of the LGBT community to that of the black community is apt because the nature of what each is fighting for is different.
Avatar image for HybridPhoenix
HybridPhoenix

3598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 HybridPhoenix
Member since 2007 • 3598 Posts
[QUOTE="Tjeremiah1988"]I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.Bourbons3
Homosexuals have been victimised a lot in recent history. Plenty have been abused, fired from their jobs, and murdered because of who they were. Black people weren't illegal. Black people couldn't get go to prison in the US because of who they are. Black people do not have to worry about recieving the death penalty or a life sentence if they live in certain countries in the world, even to this day. To say that the civil rights movement, now that blacks have their rights, is in no way comparable to the LGBT movement is closed-minded. Black people are not the only minority group to try and gain some basic rights in recent history.

Took the words right out my mouth. People are being killed all over the wolrd for being homosexual
Avatar image for Truth-slayer
Truth-slayer

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Truth-slayer
Member since 2004 • 2510 Posts
[QUOTE="fat_rob"]I hate when people compare the civil rights struggle of the 60's to the gay marriage debate...they are not comparable on any level... stevenk4k5
They are not directly comparable (I honestly believe nothing can compare to 400 YEARS of struggle) but there are some shared struggles between blacks and gays.

Homosexuals have been discriminated against for well over 1000 years.
Avatar image for Foolio1
Foolio1

7467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#116 Foolio1
Member since 2003 • 7467 Posts
[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]You can hide sexuality, but you can't hide your race.Silverbond

So someone has to hide who they are in order for them to not get beaten up, harassed....killed? Great, your right! Even now in 2008 as long as gay people hide themselves, they wont get harassed.... :|

This thread is making me very sad...

All I'm saying is the civil rights movement is in no way comparable to what gays aregoing through. Then they have the nerve to get mad at black people.

What I think it ridiculous is that black people discriminate against homosexuals even when they were fighting for their rights not even that long ago.

Avatar image for Nkemjo
Nkemjo

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Nkemjo
Member since 2005 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Nkemjo"][QUOTE="clembo1990"] Romans are wannabe Greeks. Now they were kinky!clembo1990

True they even stole all their gods and just renamed them. Dionysus greek god of drink and revelry, that shows they knew how to have a good time.

They knew a thing or two about sex. For example: Hermes and Aphrodite combine to make Hermaphrodite! When God-cousins get busy!!!!

Nope... they got that idea from pokemon i think.
Avatar image for Nkemjo
Nkemjo

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Nkemjo
Member since 2005 • 585 Posts
[QUOTE="Silverbond"][QUOTE="mexicangordo"] So someone has to hide who they are in order for them to not get beaten up, harassed....killed? Great, your right! Even now in 2008 as long as gay people hide themselves, they wont get harassed.... :|

This thread is making me very sad...

Foolio1

All I'm saying is the civil rights movement is in no way comparable to what gays aregoing through. Then they have the nerve to get mad at black people.

What I think it ridiculous is that black people discriminate against homosexuals even when they were fighting for their rights not even that long ago.

Hmm lets see the right to get married vs right to be considered a proper human, yup the exact same thing. Civil union is the way for gays to go, marriage is a pact under god(and most religions only allow it under a man and women) so why do they want it?

Avatar image for Truth-slayer
Truth-slayer

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 Truth-slayer
Member since 2004 • 2510 Posts
[QUOTE="mexicangordo"][QUOTE="bobg360"]I've never heard of a LGBT student having to be escorted by police to go to school. While both groups have their struggles, the scope of the black struggle for equality throughout the world has been far more difficult that the LGBT. To even try and compare the two is simply ludicrous.bobg360
Six months ago a Homosexual student was killed in California.... And many others are still being harassed, abused, neglected, killed durring 2008 not the 1960's.... but then again it still uncomparable to the Black community simply because the LGBT community are "different." :roll:

I would hardly compare the scope of the black struggle to that of the LGBT struggle. Considering the fact that black slaves were a large part of the Western, "civilized" culture for a couple hundred years, I feel that you are not acknowledging the struggles that blacks have endured throughout the course of history. In 1860, there were about 4 million black slaves in America (3.95 million can be considered 4). Coupled with the fact that for a number of years blacks were counted as 3/5 of a person in the United States, this is a group that has been oppressed far more than LGBT. Furthermore, blacks have had their families broken apart during slavery because members have been sold to other plantations and owners. However, if you would like to look at more modern history, consider the Civil Rights movement. Blacks had their own water fountains, schools, and even neighborhoods. Civil Rights leaders had their houses vandalized and some were killed (i.e. MLK). I am not denying that throughout the course of history LGBT have been treated unfairly or improperly (as that would be sheer ignorance). I am simply asking you to look at the larger scope of the two situations. In doing so, you will see that while these two situations both show the bigotry in society, the blacks have endured far more than LGBT. If you can name me 100 accounts of LGBT being sold then I will cede this argument to you without any qualms. QED

History didnt begin in the 16th century. Black people were an accepted race in Africa for most of human history. They suffered no more than the rest of the millions of people in human history up until that time. It wasnt until colonialism did Africans fall victim to Europeans seeking cheap labor for their new colonies in the Americas. For about 200 years...blacks in the colonies were treated as less than human. They legitimate complaint blacks have was the backwards and despicable manner that the United States treated African Americans for most of the US's history in comparison to the rest of the world. However since the Romans became christians,,,,homosexuality hasnt been tolerated anywhere on the planet. In most societies, the mere mention of having illicit activities was a death sentance. Other people shouldnt have to do your research for you, as you should already know that both group's respective injustices are easily and completely comparable. A simple google search for gays and Nazi Germany and Medieval europe. would of saved you the embarassment.
Avatar image for ronniepage588
ronniepage588

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#120 ronniepage588
Member since 2003 • 4188 Posts
[QUOTE="ronniepage588"][QUOTE="stevenk4k5"] You can't choose your sexual orientation. Choosing to HIDE it is a completely different story.stevenk4k5
you absolutely can choose your sexual orientation if you want to. but i agree with you if you are saying most people do not. and i obviously said that they COULD HIDE it. thats what i was saying. Gays could hide it, and thats a major difference in their struggle. Gays want all the attention and sympathy that blacks got, yet without deserving any of it. O, the horror, life is so tough, i can't marry a person of the same sex! boohoo. marriage is a religious ceremony and should remain that way. besides with divorce rates as high as they are nowadays, you guys are blowing marriage way out of proportion. And gays act like theyre a seperate race and special because of their sexual preference. screw that. nobody cares if you like stickin you penis in an anus, thats just disgusting. besides you know what would start happening if it was legalized everywhere? we'd see young dudes marrying old farts to get their money just like you see young pornstars doing all the time.

Did you wake up today and say that you felt like being straight? Would you wake up tomorrow and suddenly decide to be gay Now that I just made my point, onto other matters. Gays shouldn't have to hide the fact that their gay (even though I believe that holding vulgar Gay pride events are completely shameful to the gay community... that is why gays catch so much flack as it is), it's who they are and they have no control over that. I've already stated that I do not believe the gay struggle is directly comparable to the black struggle so I just assume you failed to read all my posts and only got as far to the point where I mentioned I was bisexual. Next, as cliche as this is in this forum, religion does not have a monopoly on marriage as marriage has been around before organized religion. About the separate race thing, I do not believe gays should be recognized as a separate race because your sexuality has nothing to do with your race (as there are gays of many different racial backgrounds). Also, I always love how people always seem to think homosexuality is exclusive to males but when it involves two attractive females it's hot, that's pretty dumb. And I could have sworn young females marry old men all the time for there money, I fail to see how it would be any worse than if it was two men.

look i never said gays should have to hide anything, but to compare them to what blacks went through is ridiculous. they couldn't simply hide the color of their skin to evade discrimination, gay people can if they chose to. thats the only point i was trying to make. and the truth is, many gays, in fact, do chose to be gay but i agree that most do not, and i also agree that many may just be born that way, but i believe may also become that way unknowingly, like my aunt who had a very abusive father and shes openly expresses all the time thats probably the reason she turned out to be a lesbian. also, i never said i liked lesbians either, never did i say, male gays are gross but female ones are hot! lol i think its all quite gross, but penis in butts is even grosser to me. look i have no problem with gays, and i think its wonderful that people are able to find love with someone else no matter what the gender, but you can't blame me for disliking the way they have sex, i think its gross, i like the good old natural way as nature intended, thats all. 
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="ronniepage588"] look i never said gays should have to hide anything, but to compare them to what blacks went through is ridiculous. they couldn't simply hide the color of their skin to evade discrimination, gay people can if they chose to. thats the only point i was trying to make. and the truth is, many gays, in fact, do chose to be gay but i agree that most do not, and i also agree that many may just be born that way, but i believe may also become that way unknowingly, like my aunt who had a very abusive father and shes openly expresses all the time thats probably the reason she turned out to be a lesbian. also, i never said i liked lesbians either, because lesbians in porn is fake. real lesbians usually look like one female, and one girl that looks like a man, which means somethings wrong psychologically with the one that looks like a nice female. just my opinion, dont respond if you disagree because i dont care.

So...Many...Generalizations...
Avatar image for ronniepage588
ronniepage588

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#122 ronniepage588
Member since 2003 • 4188 Posts
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="ronniepage588"] look i never said gays should have to hide anything, but to compare them to what blacks went through is ridiculous. they couldn't simply hide the color of their skin to evade discrimination, gay people can if they chose to. thats the only point i was trying to make. and the truth is, many gays, in fact, do chose to be gay but i agree that most do not, and i also agree that many may just be born that way, but i believe may also become that way unknowingly, like my aunt who had a very abusive father and shes openly expresses all the time thats probably the reason she turned out to be a lesbian. also, i never said i liked lesbians either, because lesbians in porn is fake. real lesbians usually look like one female, and one girl that looks like a man, which means somethings wrong psychologically with the one that looks like a nice female. just my opinion, dont respond if you disagree because i dont care.

So...Many...Generalizations...

oh boohoo
Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#123 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts
What was the black woman arguing about?
Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

There is a huge difference between one's ethnic and biological heritage versus the sexual preference of individuals. Gay men, who like to sodomize each other...and really, let's be honest here...that's how they identify themselves...gay people identify themselves through their sexual acts...cannot logically compare their situation to the racial discrimination that has plagued so many humans. I don't think homosexuals should be mistreated, but don't compare apples with oranges. If a grown man wants to commit sodomy in the privacy of his own home with another consenting adult male, that's their business. But don't compare peoples' adversion to sexual deviance (deviant to the perpetuation of the human race) to discrimination based upon race. It's a lot different.

 

 


Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"][QUOTE="stevenk4k5"]Woo, I gotta see that one! But still, while I don't believe the struggle of blacks and the struggles of gays are directly comparable, there are some cases in which both struggles meet an equilibrium. The one thing that pops into my head is segregation and the Separate but Equal laws.Silverbond
Well its bad to compare two struggles together but i personaly get offended when someone says a black persons struggles are un-comparable to that of a homosexual. They are almost exactly the same thing, except one is sexuality and the other is race....

You can hide sexuality, but you can't hide your race.

You can also hide your religion.

 

Now if say, some backwards country decided to make Christianity illegal, would THAT be morally acceptable?

 

Hey, the Christians don't HAVE to get put to death for their religious beliefs. They can just HIDE their religious beliefs.

 

And hey, it's not that Christians are being unfairly discriminated against. It's not like the Christians are the ONLY ones who aren't allowed to be Christians. NO ONE is allowed to be a Christian. The Muslims aren't allowed to be Christians, the atheists aren't allowed to be Christians, the Buddhists aren't allowed to Christians either. So what are the Christians complaining about? They're being treated just like everyone else. Now tell me where they are so that I can put them in prison.

 

Same basic concept. Yeah, gays CAN hide their sexuality and pretend to be straight. Yeah, they can get married to someone of the opposite sex and have children just to avoid suspicion that they're gay But why should they have to? 

Avatar image for helium_flash
helium_flash

9244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#126 helium_flash
Member since 2007 • 9244 Posts

[QUOTE="fat_rob"]I hate when people compare the civil rights struggle of the 60's to the gay marriage debate...they are not comparable on any level... stevenk4k5
They are not directly comparable (I honestly believe nothing can compare to 400 YEARS of struggle) but there are some shared struggles between blacks and gays.

WTF???

Gays have been prosecuted for HUNDREDS of years.  And unlike black people, gays were attacked all around the world, not in just the West.  During the witch trials, they would dowse gays with oil, light them on fire, and use them to ignite the stake the "witches" were on.  It is punishable by death in parts of the middle east to be gay Gays have been struggling for a lot longer than blacks have.

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#127 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
Gays have nothing to be complaining about How dare they compare gay marriage to the rights of minorities and black people who were enslaved, lynched, and segregated
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
[QUOTE="Toriko42"]Gays have nothing to be complaining about How dare they compare gay marriage to the rights of minorities and black people who were enslaved, lynched, and segregated

How do gays have "nothing to be complaining about" when a gay individual can't even marry the person they love? I'm not saying that it's right or wrong, but they clearly have something that they should be able to complain about.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]I hate this imaginary culture "war" between the blacks and the gays that keeps on circling the news cycles. If anything it is the mormoms and the evangelicals that are at "war" with the gays. mexicangordo

70% of blacks who voted on Prop8 in California were for it.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/11/70-of-african-a.html

Wow... I never new that :(

 

It's basically like, "I got my rights, so **** you guys! Hooray! Now there's a black man in the white house! I'm throwing a party at my place and everyone is invited! Except for the gays."

 

That's what the 2008 election year should be most remembered for. Were rights for blacks increased by Obama's victory? No. For pretty much everyone, everything is just the same as it was before the election. Unless we're talking about the gays, who were basically given a big "**** you" by the entire country.

 

And it's not just in California either. Anti-gay legislation was passed in several states from coast to coast. 2008 didn't show that we're all equal. 2008 is the year that showed that we'd rather quit bashing the blacks so much, and focus our efforts on bashing the gays. 

Avatar image for Eman5805
Eman5805

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 Eman5805
Member since 2004 • 4494 Posts
It's not even close, the black struggle and the g@y one. Similar? Sure, but similar in the same way that a skateboard and a car both have four wheels and people can ride them.
Avatar image for Solid_Snake325
Solid_Snake325

6091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#131 Solid_Snake325
Member since 2006 • 6091 Posts

[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]I hate when people compare the civil rights struggle of the 60's to the gay marriage debate...they are not comparable on any level... helium_flash

They are not directly comparable (I honestly believe nothing can compare to 400 YEARS of struggle) but there are some shared struggles between blacks and gays.

WTF???

Gays have been prosecuted for HUNDREDS of years.  And unlike black people, gays were attacked all around the world, not in just the West.  During the witch trials, they would dowse gays with oil, light them on fire, and use them to ignite the stake the "witches" were on.  It is punishable by death in parts of the middle east to be gay Gays have been struggling for a lot longer than blacks have.

Where are your getting your ridiculous info? HUNDREDS of years? And the witch trials wasn't even a long period of time...Don't accuse people of being wrong when you clearly are not right.
Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"][QUOTE="fat_rob"]I hate when people compare the civil rights struggle of the 60's to the gay marriage debate...they are not comparable on any level... helium_flash

They are not directly comparable (I honestly believe nothing can compare to 400 YEARS of struggle) but there are some shared struggles between blacks and gays.

WTF???

Gays have been prosecuted for HUNDREDS of years. And unlike black people, gays were attacked all around the world, not in just the West. During the witch trials, they would dowse gays with oil, light them on fire, and use them to ignite the stake the "witches" were on. It is punishable by death in parts of the middle east to be gay Gays have been struggling for a lot longer than blacks have.

 

That's actually how the "f" word came to be applied to gays. The "f" word was originally used to refer to use to pieces of wood which were used as kindling to start fires. That word was applied to homosexuals because they'd take homosexual people and light them on fire to start the fires which were used to burn witches.

 

I know that some gay people use that word casually in the same way that some blacks casually use that word. I once saw a conversation where a gay man used that word to refer to himself, and then a straight woman had to educate him on exactly what that word meant, and the horror emanating from the gay man's face at what he'd been saying all this time was so thick that I could almost reach out and grab it.

 

It's an ugly word. Its origins are brutal and horrific, and it absolutely shows what gays have had to go through over the years. The implications of what you say whenever you call someone that word are just about the most hateful things you could possibly say to someone. 

Avatar image for Red-XIII
Red-XIII

2739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Red-XIII
Member since 2003 • 2739 Posts
look i never said gays should have to hide anything, but to compare them to what blacks went through is ridiculous. they couldn't simply hide the color of their skin to evade discrimination, gay people can if they chose to. thats the only point i was trying to make. and the truth is, many gays, in fact, do chose to be gay but i agree that most do not, and i also agree that many may just be born that way, but i believe may also become that way unknowingly, like my aunt who had a very abusive father and shes openly expresses all the time thats probably the reason she turned out to be a lesbian. also, i never said i liked lesbians either, never did i say, male gays are gross but female ones are hot! lol i think its all quite gross, but penis in butts is even grosser to me. look i have no problem with gays, and i think its wonderful that people are able to find love with someone else no matter what the gender, but you can't blame me for disliking the way they have sex, i think its gross, i like the good old natural way as nature intended, thats allronniepage588
And how would you know that homosexuals choose to be gay Recent studies point towards homosexuality being biologically determined. http://nymag.com/news/features/33520/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/2000/03/30/wdigit30.html Please stop flinging around the notion that gay people choose when you have no personal experience yourself. As for this whole issue, it's utterly ridiculously. Both groups have suffered for years at the hands of the majority. Homosexuals are still persecuted in many countries around the world. To say that one person's suffering is less than anothers is deplorable. No one should have to suffer any injustice.
Avatar image for Lockedge
Lockedge

16765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Lockedge
Member since 2002 • 16765 Posts

I don't know any gay person who equates their struggle to the struggles of black people in America's storied history. Never have I heard one say they've had to endure the same hardships. They aren't alike in that regard.

However, one cannot say similarities cannot be drawn. One cannot say they aren't comparable in the roots of the struggles.

Black people and gay people are victims of hate crimes. When black people were afforded rights and protection, violence towards black people increased for a while before people settled down. When gay people were thrust into the spotlight and afforded rights(albeit they required less than black people did, obviously) and protection, violence against them went up. In fact, hate crimes against gay people have increased over the past few years. There have been a number of brutal acts of violence against gay people in just the past decade.

People might say 'I think homosexuality is wrong', and I'm absolutely ok with that, and I'm certain my gay friends would agree as well. They don't want to force people into liking homosexuality. They just want the same treatment that everyone else in the country gets. They want to know that there are plans in place to promote tolerance in our schools so violence against young homosexuals drops, and suicide rates for young homosexuals drop. 

Just recently in Toronto, a lesbian couple was attacked by a man while waiting for their child after school. Luckily, they weren't too badly harmed, but it goes to show the kind of attitude some people have. Can you imagine, as a child leaving the school, seeing your parents attacked by some stranger? Can you imagine, as a parent, having to explain that act of violence, and the terrible question of "why"?

The allowance of gay marriage is greater than the sum of its parts. It is the progress of tolerance in a society. It ensures the safety of thousands of children in the future, and makes strides to allow them to grow up happy. You can't legislate away homosexuality. It is a natural, if fairly uncommon occurrance. 

You don't have to like it, or support it. Just tolerate it, for the sake of the thousands of gay youth driven to suicide each year, for the hundreds attacked and beaten each year, and for all those killed for being gay.

Because not allowing it prevents steps from being taken to help out.

And you know, if people are so stuck up on marriage, let the churches decide, and tear it out of all the consitutions. Let religion decide who can get married, and let the government give people those rights and protections. 

But those against their kids learning what homosexuality is, and against their kids being tolerant of homosexuals....they have no excuse. They're despicable people hoping to raise despicable children who hate gay people, much like back in the 60's there were folk who hated black people and wanted their children to hate black people.

And those children could very well grow up and cause misery, pain, or death on those they're taught to be prejudiced of.

So for those against gay marriage, if you're against it for the sanctity of marriage, then you get a semi-free pass, but let me tell you that the government hands out marriages, and the government is not god(who links two people spiritually until death do them part), so if you're getting those marriage benefits, you've committed blasphemy. You're better off getting marriage "back to it's sacred roots" and out of the government for good.

As a member of the LGBT community, I'd like to, in ten years, not be so afraid of merely going to a bar/pub with my friends, or be alone (anywhere, at any time of day) waiting for someone, or dating someone. I'd like people to not think of me as sub-human like seemingly so many do. I'd like for someone not to revile in disgust and get all aggressive when I mention what I am. I'd like, though, more than anything, for more people to know about homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality, etc. in the future, so other people don't have to face the same obstacles I and too many others have.

Avatar image for freshgman
freshgman

12241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 freshgman
Member since 2005 • 12241 Posts
difference between what blacks went through is bigger, if your gay you can hide it. you cant do the same with skin color
Avatar image for Enosh88
Enosh88

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Enosh88
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.Tjeremiah1988

*insert facepalm picture*

did you realy just say that homosexuals have never been killed or otherwise discriminated just beacose of what they are?

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#138 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
look i never said gays should have to hide anything, but to compare them to what blacks went through is ridiculous. they couldn't simply hide the color of their skin to evade discrimination, gay people can if they chose to. thats the only point i was trying to make. and the truth is, many gays, in fact, do chose to be gay but i agree that most do not, and i also agree that many may just be born that way, but i believe may also become that way unknowingly, like my aunt who had a very abusive father and shes openly expresses all the time thats probably the reason she turned out to be a lesbian. also, i never said i liked lesbians either, never did i say, male gays are gross but female ones are hot! lol i think its all quite gross, but penis in butts is even grosser to me. look i have no problem with gays, and i think its wonderful that people are able to find love with someone else no matter what the gender, but you can't blame me for disliking the way they have sex, i think its gross, i like the good old natural way as nature intended, thats all. ronniepage588
That's completely wrong. Why would you choose to be gay The hostility towards homosexuals has become pretty apparent in the wake of Prop 8. I don't think anyone would choose to put themselves in that situation.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
difference between what blacks went through is bigger, if your gay you can hide it. you cant do the same with skin colorfreshgman
Tell that to Michael Jackson.
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#140 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.Tjeremiah1988
You're claiming homosexuals have never been murdered for it, harrased, fired, ridiculed, shunned?
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#141 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

I don't know any gay person who equates their struggle to the struggles of black people in America's storied history. Never have I heard one say they've had to endure the same hardships. They aren't alike in that regard.

However, one cannot say similarities cannot be drawn. One cannot say they aren't comparable in the roots of the struggles.

Black people and gay people are victims of hate crimes. When black people were afforded rights and protection, violence towards black people increased for a while before people settled down. When gay people were thrust into the spotlight and afforded rights(albeit they required less than black people did, obviously) and protection, violence against them went up. In fact, hate crimes against gay people have increased over the past few years. There have been a number of brutal acts of violence against gay people in just the past decade.

People might say 'I think homosexuality is wrong', and I'm absolutely ok with that, and I'm certain my gay friends would agree as well. They don't want to force people into liking homosexuality. They just want the same treatment that everyone else in the country gets. They want to know that there are plans in place to promote tolerance in our schools so violence against young homosexuals drops, and suicide rates for young homosexuals drop. 

Just recently in Toronto, a lesbian couple was attacked by a man while waiting for their child after school. Luckily, they weren't too badly harmed, but it goes to show the kind of attitude some people have. Can you imagine, as a child leaving the school, seeing your parents attacked by some stranger? Can you imagine, as a parent, having to explain that act of violence, and the terrible question of "why"?

The allowance of gay marriage is greater than the sum of its parts. It is the progress of tolerance in a society. It ensures the safety of thousands of children in the future, and makes strides to allow them to grow up happy. You can't legislate away homosexuality. It is a natural, if fairly uncommon occurrance. 

You don't have to like it, or support it. Just tolerate it, for the sake of the thousands of gay youth driven to suicide each year, for the hundreds attacked and beaten each year, and for all those killed for being gay.

Because not allowing it prevents steps from being taken to help out.

And you know, if people are so stuck up on marriage, let the churches decide, and tear it out of all the consitutions. Let religion decide who can get married, and let the government give people those rights and protections. 

But those against their kids learning what homosexuality is, and against their kids being tolerant of homosexuals....they have no excuse. They're despicable people hoping to raise despicable children who hate gay people, much like back in the 60's there were folk who hated black people and wanted their children to hate black people.

And those children could very well grow up and cause misery, pain, or death on those they're taught to be prejudiced of.

So for those against gay marriage, if you're against it for the sanctity of marriage, then you get a semi-free pass, but let me tell you that the government hands out marriages, and the government is not god(who links two people spiritually until death do them part), so if you're getting those marriage benefits, you've committed blasphemy. You're better off getting marriage "back to it's sacred roots" and out of the government for good.

As a member of the LGBT community, I'd like to, in ten years, not be so afraid of merely going to a bar/pub with my friends, or be alone (anywhere, at any time of day) waiting for someone, or dating someone. I'd like people to not think of me as sub-human like seemingly so many do. I'd like for someone not to revile in disgust and get all aggressive when I mention what I am. I'd like, though, more than anything, for more people to know about homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality, etc. in the future, so other people don't have to face the same obstacles I and too many others have.

Lockedge

You've just put my thoughts on the matter (except that I'm heterosexual) into writing better than I ever could have done. I agree entirely with this post.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#142 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
*whips out popcorn* Anyone want some?
Avatar image for BatmanBegins24
BatmanBegins24

7520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 BatmanBegins24
Member since 2005 • 7520 Posts

I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.Tjeremiah1988

Untill very recently (2003 in some states) homosexuals were put in jail for being homosexuals in America. Untill about 100 years ago homosexuals were hung by the government for the act of anal sex. This was in Europe. You can still be killed for being a homosexual in quite a few African and Middle Eastern countries. There is nowhere in the world that I know of that kills you for being black. You can't compare the homosexual struggle to the black struggle, the homosexual struggle has been going on for longer and the brutality is beyond compare.

Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#144 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
Gay-guys means more girls for me :) So I'm cool with it.
Avatar image for Dutch_Mix
Dutch_Mix

29266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#145 Dutch_Mix
Member since 2005 • 29266 Posts

Dude, that was an intense debate.

I was seriously on the edge of my seat.

 

Avatar image for bean-with-bacon
bean-with-bacon

2134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 bean-with-bacon
Member since 2008 • 2134 Posts

If the majority of blacks are so conservative why didn't they vote for Mccain? Seriously they vote for a president that doesn't hold any of their ideals and call it milestone in the fight for racial equality, how is voting for a president based on the colour of his skin racial equality?

Honestly this whole thing pisses me off, you think the worlds finally on a better path and something like this happens, who gives a **** who was more persecuted? The simple fact is a group of people have been denied equal rights by the dogmatic will of others and are still considered "less then" and hated by a considerable group of people.

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#147 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts

[QUOTE="Tjeremiah1988"]I feel like slapping anyone who compares this to what blacks went through. The only thing gays are crying about is marriage. Black have been killed because they were black, hanged, crosses burned on lawns, couldnt sit in the front of the bus, couldnt get decent education, and etc.BatmanBegins24

Untill very recently (2003 in some states) homosexuals were put in jail for being homosexuals in America. Untill about 100 years ago homosexuals were hung by the government for the act of anal sex. This was in Europe. You can still be killed for being a homosexual in quite a few African and Middle Eastern countries. There is nowhere in the world that I know of that kills you for being black. You can't compare the homosexual struggle to the black struggle, the homosexual struggle has been going on for longer and the brutality is beyond compare.

My thoughts exactly. Up until the 60s, it was illegal to be gay in the UK, and prior anyone caught could be given a sentence in a mental institute until they were literally tortured into being straight.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#148 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"] They are not directly comparable (I honestly believe nothing can compare to 400 YEARS of struggle) but there are some shared struggles between blacks and gays.

I think gay people and Jewish people have had a rougher time, in all honesty.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#149 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

If the majority of blacks are so conservative why didn't they vote for Mccain? Seriously they vote for a president that doesn't hold any of their ideals and call it milestone in the fight for racial equality, how is voting for a president based on the colour of his skin racial equality?

Honestly this whole thing pisses me off, you think the worlds finally on a better path and something like this happens, who gives a **** who was more persecuted? The simple fact is a group of people have been denied equal rights by the dogmatic will of others and are still considered "less then" and hated by a considerable group of people.

bean-with-bacon
Politics isn't so cut and dry. The idea of clear cut party lines is bunk.
Avatar image for Lockedge
Lockedge

16765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Lockedge
Member since 2002 • 16765 Posts

I can't believe it, but I actually sat down and watched a freaking Dr. Phil show.

In short, it was pretty ridiculous. Each "side" had three people representing it, and it was evident by the end who were worthy of being on the show. I can't recall the pro-gay marriage guy who sat in the middle of the attorney and San Francisco's mayor, but he said some pretty rash things. Also quite rash or generally evasive were the "Yes on 8" founder and the woman who heads some marriage/family group. There was a pastor against gay-marriage who I could respect the opinion of, because I don't recall him stretching the truth like his friends were, even if his stance was strictly religious in dealing with a topic that doesn't involve religion.
San Francisco's mayor came across pretty well and raised good point after good point, and solid rebuttal after solid rebuttal. The attorney woman(I think she was an attorney), raised great legal counterpoints to the anti-gay marriage people's visions of the future.

Aside from the breaks being called after every 5 minutes of the show, it wasn't all that bad, but Dr. Phil asked a couple of pretty dumb questions, as usual.

I honestly couldn't believe that they brought in this couple in their audience and asked them why a gay couple in their audience shouldn't be allowed to marry, and they basically said "Well, marriage has been between a man and a woman, like god wants, and that's good for our kids"...and then the gay couple talked about how they were married at *(I can't remember the name for a jewish temple)* by a rabbi, and that their family is very normal, and their children are regular children, and that all they want is to be able to have the same opportunity and protections other couples get.

I swear, once DOMA is repealed, churches all over the states will go ballistic.