Boston Bomber pleads not guilty.

Some people will refuse to believe anything if the government is involved, or blame the government in a conspiracy. Others will blindly follow the givernment like it's God. Same as bilnd antheism and blind religious fervor. 

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="gago-gago"]He should say it was self defense.frannkzappa

against marathoners?

they were running at him.

He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.Nuck81

And who told you all this?  You personally verified it?

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.hartsickdiscipl

And who told you all this?  You personally verified it?

There is far more evidence of his guilt than this magical government conspiracy.

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.hartsickdiscipl

And who told you all this?  You personally verified it?

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.hartsickdiscipl

And who told you all this?  You personally verified it?

He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.foxhound_fox

yea, that's good for the rule of lawBossPerson

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]yea, that's good for the rule of lawfoxhound_fox

I'm gonna assume you're being tongue in cheek BossPerson

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]I'm gonna assume you're being tongue in cheek foxhound_fox

sounds painful

He's taking advantage of the conspiracy theories.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.Nuck81

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.Stesilaus

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

Do you think he should get the death penalty or just be locked away for life?

 

http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/us/boston-bombing-case/index.html

0rbs

umm...he plead not guilty.  I think he should have a trial first, don't you?

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]He has already been found guilty by the media and public. They might as well just skip the trial and put him directly in jail.Stesilaus

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

Then why go through the bother of a trial? Why not just beef the guy when he was hiding in the boat and be done with it then and there?

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Probably has something to do with him being filmed setting the bomb down, shooting police officers, and being on the run. But you know, I'm sure it's just coincidence he was in possession of the bomb just seconds before it was detonated....worlock77

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

Then why go through the bother of a trial? Why not just beef the guy when he was hiding in the boat and be done with it then and there?

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Probably has something to do with him being filmed setting the bomb down, shooting police officers, and being on the run. But you know, I'm sure it's just coincidence he was in possession of the bomb just seconds before it was detonated....BossPerson

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Probably has something to do with him being filmed setting the bomb down, shooting police officers, and being on the run. But you know, I'm sure it's just coincidence he was in possession of the bomb just seconds before it was detonated....worlock77

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

Then why go through the bother of a trial? Why not just beef the guy when he was hiding in the boat and be done with it then and there?

We know that at least his apprehension and exit from the boat were being photographed, if not filmed.  If the cops were aware of this, they may have been more than hesitant to kill him right there.  IDK about you, but I didn't see a gun when he exited the boat.  I also didn't see anything that supported the idea that he was firing at the cops from the boat, yet we know they were firing at him.  He was hunkered down in the boat under a tarp, as spotted by thermal from a chopper, IIRC.  

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

Even tying the brothers directly to the planting of the bombs wouldn't rule out the possibility of CIA involvement. The CIA could have built the bombs and given them to the Tsarnaev patsies, along with instructions on how to deploy them.

According to FBI-employee-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a possible motive for a false flag attack was to provide a pretext for selling out the Chechen rebels (who have previously enjoyed the CIA's material support) to Russia. The expectation was that Putin would reciprocate in the UN Security Council by offering no opposition to the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria.

 

hartsickdiscipl

Then why go through the bother of a trial? Why not just beef the guy when he was hiding in the boat and be done with it then and there?

We know that at least his apprehension and exit from the boat were being photographed, if not filmed.  IDK about you, but I didn't see a gun when he exited the boat.  I also didn't see anything that supported the idea that he was firing at the cops from the boat, yet we know they were firing at him.  He was hunkered down in the boat under a tarp, as spotted by thermal from a chopper, IIRC.  

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Then why go through the bother of a trial? Why not just beef the guy when he was hiding in the boat and be done with it then and there?

Person0

We know that at least his apprehension and exit from the boat were being photographed, if not filmed.  IDK about you, but I didn't see a gun when he exited the boat.  I also didn't see anything that supported the idea that he was firing at the cops from the boat, yet we know they were firing at him.  He was hunkered down in the boat under a tarp, as spotted by thermal from a chopper, IIRC.  

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

We know that at least his apprehension and exit from the boat were being photographed, if not filmed.  IDK about you, but I didn't see a gun when he exited the boat.  I also didn't see anything that supported the idea that he was firing at the cops from the boat, yet we know they were firing at him.  He was hunkered down in the boat under a tarp, as spotted by thermal from a chopper, IIRC.  

hartsickdiscipl

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] Photographed by the FBI. All the news cameras were moved away. Perfect Opportunity to kill him with only FBI as witnesses.Person0

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

When did he fire back at them?  Do we have that on video, with proof that it was definitely him?  What I saw definitely didn't add up.  Even if he did do what they said he did, how do we know that someone else in the US gov't, as reported by some sources, didn't put him up to it?

What makes you so sure that you can even have a valid opinion on this situation?  The information we're being fed may be pure BS.  

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

hartsickdiscipl

When did he fire back at them?  Do we have that on video, with proof that it was definitely him?  What I saw definitely didn't add up.  Even if he did do what they said he did, how do we know that someone else in the US gov't, as reported by some sources, didn't put him up to it?

What makes you so sure that you can even have a valid opinion on this situation?  The information we're being fed may be pure BS.  

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

We know that at least his apprehension and exit from the boat were being photographed, if not filmed.  IDK about you, but I didn't see a gun when he exited the boat.  I also didn't see anything that supported the idea that he was firing at the cops from the boat, yet we know they were firing at him.  He was hunkered down in the boat under a tarp, as spotted by thermal from a chopper, IIRC.  

hartsickdiscipl

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

I take it you have never heard of the death by a thousand cuts then?  The premiss is that you only die after the one thousandth cut and it was preformed in China up until 1905 when it was banned. People most certainly be shot mulitple times without dying as long as nothing vital is hit. 

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

Oh that's right.. Isn't this the guy they claim was bleeding for hours from multiple gunshot wounds while laying in the boat?  Then he climbs out of the boat on his own, and they pin him to the ground and handcuff him rather roughly.  He must be superman.   

hartsickdiscipl

When did he fire back at them?  Do we have that on video, with proof that it was definitely him?  What I saw definitely didn't add up.  Even if he did do what they said he did, how do we know that someone else in the US gov't, as reported by some sources, didn't put him up to it?

What makes you so sure that you can even have a valid opinion on this situation?  The information we're being fed may be pure BS.  

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

where do you get this stuff?mattbbpl

He already showed you the site :P

The possible Syria link was proposed by Sibel Edmonds in the following edition of the "Lew Rockwell Show", which, unfortunately, is 48 minutes long. If you spend the time listening, though, you'll realize that she's not some lunatic-fringe conspiracy theorist. On the contrary, she's highly intelligent and disarmingly well-informed.

She makes it clear that the possible Syria link is merely an hypothesis and that she's also open to the possibility that there was no false flag attack and that the bombing was a simple case of "blowback".

He's taking advantage of the conspiracy theories.

Gaming-Planet

Get dem tinfoil hats ready.

Hart. 

Kill yourself.

Do you think he should get the death penalty or just be locked away for life?

 

http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/us/boston-bombing-case/index.html

0rbs

Hart. 

Kill yourself.

MakeMeaSammitch

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

 

And you lapped up every bit of it.  

hartsickdiscipl

I haven't had the chance to examine that evidence.  I have no way of knowing how much is true.  What I do know is that the global elite control the mainstream media, and their agendas are helped by manipulating the public perception.  

However, they had the CIA and NSA pick a perpetrator that wasn't Islamic-looking enough to justify Big Oil's invasion of another petroleum-rich country.

Their patsy was clearly a reptilian. We all know how unstable they are.

Also, the Novus Ordum Mundi didn't give them enough connection to Hamas, al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Mensa, so they could nuke Syria with impunity.

Finally, the Freemasons failed to teleport him somewhere safe so they could have martial law, an enhanced Patriot Act, a prolonged manhunt that turns up several anti-FBI conspiracies, and a monopoly on Girl Scout cookies.

Hart. 

Kill yourself.

MakeMeaSammitch

Or get some sunlight at least

If he's found guilty, he should probably get life imprsonment.

There is never a scenario where I can imagine supporting the death penalty.

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] And you ignore all evidence because CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!!!!!!OrkHammer007

I haven't had the chance to examine that evidence. I have no way of knowing how much is true. What I do know is that the global elite control the mainstream media, and their agendas are helped by manipulating the public perception.

However, they had the CIA and NSA pick a perpetrator that wasn't Islamic-looking enough to justify Big Oil's invasion of another petroleum-rich country.

Their patsy was clearly a reptilian. We all know how unstable they are.

Also, the Novus Ordum Mundi didn't give them enough connection to Hamas, al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Mensa, so they could nuke Syria with impunity.

Finally, the Freemasons failed to teleport him somewhere safe so they could have martial law, an enhanced Patriot Act, a prolonged manhunt that turns up several anti-FBI conspiracies, and a monopoly on Girl Scout cookies.

this about sums it up.