California is on fire.......Terrorist Attack?

I'm waiting for somebody in the media to label this fire somebody started as a terroist attack. :)

No one ever wants to take responsibility for their actions.

a standard forest fire, its pretty dry in California.martin_f

I going with that.

[QUOTE="martin_f"] a standard forest fire, its pretty dry in California.Samwel_X

I going with that.

A fire as a terrorist attack? Maybe if they were burning a big landmark or something.

State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.YeahYes

State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.YeahYes

I'm sure the state of California sponsored the fire, so they would then have to waste billions of dollars rebuilding and providing aid to the victims...makes perfect sense.

[QUOTE="YeahYes"]State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.1ND1FF3R3NT

I'm sure the state of California sponsored the fire, so they would then have to waste billions of dollars rebuilding and providing aid to the victims...makes perfect sense.

Are you sure he didn't mean the media being sponsored to label it a terrorist attack?

[QUOTE="1ND1FF3R3NT"]

[QUOTE="YeahYes"]State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.Platearmor_6

I'm sure the state of California sponsored the fire, so they would then have to waste billions of dollars rebuilding and providing aid to the victims...makes perfect sense.

Are you sure he didn't mean the media being sponsored to label it a terrorist attack?

Pretty sure. Either way, the media doesn't need anyincentive to speculate about that. They'll do it eventually regardless.

A fire terrorist attack is pretty lame. They'd probably release 500 cats carrying Small Pox instead. That'd be a terrorist attack. wemhim

A fire terrorist attack is pretty lame. They'd probably release 500 cats carrying Small Pox instead. That'd be a terrorist attack. wemhim

i lol'd :lol:

isnt over there where the fires are happening where they film p0rn?Tjeremiah1988

Those sets must've been real hawt before the fires... :oops:

Not a Terrorist Attack. It was probably just Pot-smoking vandals...

[QUOTE="YeahYes"]State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.1ND1FF3R3NT

I'm sure the state of California sponsored the fire, so they would then have to waste billions of dollars rebuilding and providing aid to the victims...makes perfect sense.

[QUOTE="martin_f"] a standard forest fire, its pretty dry in California.Samwel_X

I going with that.

agreed

State Sponsored maybe, in order to cause fear in the public, but that's probably not the case.YeahYes

Cause fear in the public....lmao!!

like 9/11

:P

I personally think the fire department started the fire so they could get more money for their budget. When it all boils down its always money, because in America a man will sacrifice the world to save his own ***.

There are no such thing as terrorists. What ever thay do they do for good reasons. I think Bush should pull out of Iraq because he has no right to even be there trying to change their government.erilev

How do you know if theres no such thing as terrorists? Because you don't seem to know what the word means. The Iraq government was a dicatorship which is something diffrent. We went to Afghanistan to try and stop terrorists. There are insurgents in Iraq now but they weren't who we went out to stop, but they are the reason we need to stay there now. Go clean Hillary Clintons shoes or something.

ya the sun works for bin laden now

[QUOTE="erilev"]There are no such thing as terrorists. What ever thay do they do for good reasons. I think Bush should pull out of Iraq because he has no right to even be there trying to change their government.Platearmor_6

How do you know if theres no such thing as terrorists? Because you don't seem to know what the word means. The Iraq government was a dicatorship which is something diffrent. We went to Afghanistan to try and stop terrorists. There are insurgents in Iraq now but they weren't who we went out to stop, but they are the reason we need to stay there now. Go clean Hillary Clintons shoes or something.

Hillary Clinton is a warhawk, she is establishment politician all the way don't let her or the democratic party's "liberal" ideas fool you.

I'm waiting for somebody in the media to label this fire somebody started as a terroist attack. :)

No one ever wants to take responsibility for their actions.

SentryGunner411

So the media will say it is a terrorist attack because they don't want to take responsibility for starting the fire?

[QUOTE="SentryGunner411"]

I'm waiting for somebody in the media to label this fire somebody started as a terroist attack. :)

No one ever wants to take responsibility for their actions.

duxup

So the media will say it is a terrorist attack because they don't want to take responsibility for starting the fire?

We didn't start the fire...

But the scientific reason that the fires are so bad is that there is a high pressure system inland that is causeing dry winds, spreading the flames and bringing no precipitation. Geography 109 FTW!!!