[QUOTE="WiiCubeM1"]I was a biology major in college. One of the things I studied in my free time was the examination of dependency and acceptance of domesticated animals to humans, cats included. Your link describes the physiological reasonings for purring, an evolutionary trait cats created to allow a cat to deal with stress, not a list of reasons why a cat can't be affectionate or a study into the psychological aspects humans personify onto lesser neural systems.
There is a reason I didn't include purring in my reasons why I believe cats are affectionate. There are many other signs of affection a cat can show, such as kneading or the showing of their stomachs, among others, but a purr isn't a faithful marker for the attachment. Just because you linked to an article to Scientific American (without fully comprehending it's full reasoning, meaning you are using an article that goes into the physiological processes that cause a purr to explain the emotional attachements of a cat to a human) doesn't mean you have a full grasp of the situation.
Plus, that particular article is over 10 years old. The information it pertains to may not even be accurate anymore.
MrGeezer
And I wasn';t talking to you, I was talking to Pirate. He claimed that when a cat is sleeping on you and purring, that's affection. The link debunks that. The fact that there ARE unemotional physiological reasons for such behavior DOES mean that you can't look at that behavior and take it as a sign of affection. At that point it has nothing to do with whether or not there IS affection, it's that you can't tell if there's affection by looking at those particular behaviors.I understand you weren't talking to me, but I chime in when I see an argument I have some credence in. Pirate's reasoning have been mostly correct thus far, though his purring argument is incorrect. So far you have been resigning yourself to disproving everyone's different reasons to thinking a cat can be affectionate and, as a blunt approximation of your posts, claiming cats don't want to be affectionate and that nearly everything they do has nothing to do with affection. That's just simply an overexageration
I understand your posts about cats being solitary creatures and some of their actions are just a result of their nature, not affection, but cats can be, and are very often, very affectionate to their owners and some of these actions are the result of those feelings of their affections, such as, to put it simply, "acting cozy" to their owners. Purring is not a good marker, but following their owners, constantly rubbing against them, batting their eyes slowly, showing their stomachs, and kneading are. Basically, your argument that cats purring and a few other actions are not signs of affection is correct, but your attempts to disprove most of the reasons given to you in this thread so far has been wrong, and your "anthropomorphism" theory for my judgments doesn't apply to the signs I recognize from my cats: their tendency to follow me around everyehere and constantly knead me, among others.
In short, I'm simply pointing out you are using the purring argument to apply to most situations, which is just simply untrue.
Log in to comment