Concerning same-sex marriage.

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for windsofwang
windsofwang

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 windsofwang
Member since 2008 • 146 Posts

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

windsofwang
because we're not intolerant or oppressive.
Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts

I cannot believe that this is even a goddamn issue. If someone wants to marry, whoever it may be, just **** let them. As long as its consensual and the groom/bride is of age. Thats it. If you don't approve of gay marriage, you are a **** fascist.

Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="windsofwang"]

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

Stumpt25
because we're not intolerant or oppressive.

I beg to differ.
Avatar image for windsofwang
windsofwang

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 windsofwang
Member since 2008 • 146 Posts

[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="windsofwang"]

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

xxDustmanxx

because we're not intolerant or oppressive.

I beg to differ.

Agreed. That is biased and jumping to conclusions. Well arguably America is not oppressive, but tolerance for intolerance is the centerpiece issue of America.

I'm just saying that the reason people flood to America is because they are given the freedom to choose. By restricting the right for same-sex marriage, it acts as a roadblock for all America stands for.

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
[QUOTE="windsofwang"]

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

Stumpt25
because we're not intolerant or oppressive.

A lot of people seem to have the first one covered.
Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts

[QUOTE="xxDustmanxx"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"] because we're not intolerant or oppressive.windsofwang

I beg to differ.

Agreed. That is biased and jumping to conclusions.

I'm just saying that the reason people flood to America is because they are given the freedom to choose. By restricting the right for same-sex marriage, it acts as a roadblock for all America stands for.

Just save your breath man, let it all unfold. In time, things will change. Empires rise and fall.
Avatar image for modestkraut1291
modestkraut1291

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 modestkraut1291
Member since 2009 • 763 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

Avatar image for xxDustmanxx
xxDustmanxx

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xxDustmanxx
Member since 2007 • 2598 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291
Because some gay people are also religious.
Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291

So atheists shouldn't want to marry either?

Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291
Marriage isn't exclusively religious. You can easily get married without the involvement of the church. Homosexuals want to get married because its a right they should hold. Two people of the same sex, in a secure relationship, should be able to have the same rights that come with marriage as a straight couple.
Avatar image for Jekken6
Jekken6

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Jekken6
Member since 2008 • 2642 Posts

It should be allowed. If you allow people that hate eachother to get married, that's worse than gay marriage imo. Let every person of legalage be able to marry whoever they want with eachothers consent

Avatar image for AdamPA1006
AdamPA1006

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 AdamPA1006
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

It should be allowed. If you allow people that hate eachother to get married, that's worse than gay marriage imo. Let every person of legalage be able to marry whoever they want with eachothers consent

Jekken6
OK? So you must allow polygamy and cousins to get married. Cool with that?
Avatar image for manicfoot
manicfoot

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 manicfoot
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts

Its been legal here in the UK for a few years and it hasn't changed my life in any way. People should be allowed to think homosexuals shouldn't marry though. Free country, right?

Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

[QUOTE="Jekken6"]

It should be allowed. If you allow people that hate eachother to get married, that's worse than gay marriage imo. Let every person of legalage be able to marry whoever they want with eachothers consent

AdamPA1006

OK? So you must allow polygamy and cousins to get married. Cool with that?

Slippery slope fallacy. Just because same-sex marriage is allowed, doesn't mean that people will practice other grotesque forms of marriage (not saying that same-sex marriage is grotesque, however). In some parts of America, polygamy and marrying blood relatives is practiced too; should we ban heterosexual marriage because that's obviously the cause of these corrupted pacts? :roll:

Also, would you mind showing me how two consenting, loving adults marrying eachother is the harbinger of polygamy and incest?

Avatar image for dinhibited55
dinhibited55

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 dinhibited55
Member since 2009 • 64 Posts
[QUOTE="Jekken6"]

It should be allowed. If you allow people that hate eachother to get married, that's worse than gay marriage imo. Let every person of legalage be able to marry whoever they want with eachothers consent

AdamPA1006
OK? So you must allow polygamy and cousins to get married. Cool with that?

Why not? Cousin marriage has been practiced in many societies. In fact, my uncle and aunt are cousins, so I take it as an insult to my family. You probably don't care, though. As for polygamy, why not? If everybody in the marriage is a consenting adult, then there's no problem, now is there?
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
[QUOTE="Jekken6"]

It should be allowed. If you allow people that hate eachother to get married, that's worse than gay marriage imo. Let every person of legalage be able to marry whoever they want with eachothers consent

AdamPA1006
OK? So you must allow polygamy and cousins to get married. Cool with that?

I think the Domino Theory was proven to be false quite some time ago...
Avatar image for Ravenhoe
Ravenhoe

99

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 80

User Lists: 0

#18 Ravenhoe
Member since 2008 • 99 Posts

Unfortunately, intolerance has always been (to most people) an important part to establish their own position in society. The "mob" will always look for something or someone to discriminate, because by creating boundaries between the "self" / the "established" and "the "other" people create their own identites in which they feel secure and snuggly. Homophobia is after all only one sort of discrimination in a long line of discriminations in human history, of which some are still going on. Women, Jews, Afro-Americans, Indians, Disabled people .. sadly, the list goes on.

Homosexuality is not unnatural (there are homosexual animals)and it is not the same as siblings or cousings (1st, 2nd grade) marrying because the reason why they are not allowed to be married is the risk of bearing a disabled child. (BTW, only sexual intercourse between siblings and cousins is illegal, nothing else.So, they can live together, kiss and have sex but no coitus)

Everyone who discriminates homosexuals is basically on the same level as a fascist in the Third Reich, an uneducated, selfish simpleton.

River

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.modestkraut1291
Not really...
Avatar image for Ravenhoe
Ravenhoe

99

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 80

User Lists: 0

#20 Ravenhoe
Member since 2008 • 99 Posts

Per definition, religion is nothing but a set of beliefts. And it is only the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Islam and Christianity) who defy Homosexuality. There is no homosexual stance in other (world) religions such as Buddhism, Taoism, Shintu and so forth.

There are many homosexual christians and homosexual christian groups around too.

River

Avatar image for Ggirl56
Ggirl56

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Ggirl56
Member since 2009 • 51 Posts

I just stopped carrying. I live in vemont and we just legalized gay marriage, and like I said I don't give two s**ts and a f**k. im still really up in the air about it. on one side theres that whole religion aspect about it, wheres marriage is only to be between a nam and a woman and that's traditional. But there the other side where America is supposed to respect the whole differences and that makes sense, but the already have civil rights and some other s*** thats just as good as marriage. so shwat ever.

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291
Marriage was around before religion, and what's more, you do realise gay people can be religious too?
Avatar image for modestkraut1291
modestkraut1291

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 modestkraut1291
Member since 2009 • 763 Posts

[QUOTE="modestkraut1291"]

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

ithilgore2006

Marriage was around before religion, and what's more, you do realise gay people can be religious too?

sure, some religions it would make sense. but if youre a christian or something like that and you have a gay marriage then youre a hypocrite. but hey, whats religion without hypocrisy?

Avatar image for kakkarott23
kakkarott23

2134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 kakkarott23
Member since 2003 • 2134 Posts
I personally do not believe in gay marriage. It is a religious thing and should be taken up there. However, I do believe in civil unions for all couple getting married at the court house or without a religious aspect. All couples under this umbrella should have the same rights gay or straight. I think there should be some situation that allows them to have the same rights as married couples. I would be happy if it was a commitment ceremony aslong as they get the same legal benefits.
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291

Marriage isn't just a religious thing, there are many legal benefits that come with it as well. Plus just because someone's gay doesn't mean they're not religious.

Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#26 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291
So you're telling me my atheist aunt and atheist uncle got married at the court house fore religious reasons? Yeah, its more than just a religion thing. Married couples get certain "benefits" and the like and its nice to say "we're married" I mean why not? They're alread living together, having sex, sharing expenses etc. Maybe I'll start a movement against straight people having children because of the high divorce rate and we'll see how that works out.
Avatar image for FAB_GS
FAB_GS

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 FAB_GS
Member since 2009 • 161 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMvviFbkf0

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

windsofwang

We don't kill/enslave/imprison/make a public example of them.

As a country, America is doing just fine. Separation of Powers means it's some of the people you have an issue with.

Avatar image for darkhorse286
darkhorse286

440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 darkhorse286
Member since 2007 • 440 Posts

I think it should be allowed. If they love each other why deny them the right?

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.

but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.

modestkraut1291
Campaign for disallowing atheists marrying and then your point will be valid.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="windsofwang"]

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

Theokhoth

We don't kill/enslave/imprison/make a public example of them.

As a country, America is doing just fine. Separation of Powers means it's some of the people you have an issue with.

So they should be grateful and not ask "too much".....?

Please elaborate....

Avatar image for Snakewiseman
Snakewiseman

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Snakewiseman
Member since 2009 • 1287 Posts

I know a couple of gay people there really nice I dont know how they could be gay though it is repulsive to me

Avatar image for BeepBoop16
BeepBoop16

562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 BeepBoop16
Member since 2008 • 562 Posts

Well arguably America is not oppressive

windsofwang

Avatar image for ZIGGYZa
ZIGGYZa

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 ZIGGYZa
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
anerica is opressive. its just not as blatent.
Avatar image for foolio_67
foolio_67

8866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 foolio_67
Member since 2003 • 8866 Posts

I cannot believe that this is even a goddamn issue. If someone wants to marry, whoever it may be, just **** let them. As long as its consensual and the groom/bride is of age. Thats it. If you don't approve of gay marriage, you are a **** fascist.

xxDustmanxx

Why can't younger people love as well? The legal age of consent is when humans become capable of love?

Avatar image for deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
deactivated-60f8966fb59f5

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-60f8966fb59f5
Member since 2008 • 1719 Posts
[QUOTE="windsofwang"]

[QUOTE="xxDustmanxx"] I beg to differ.xxDustmanxx

Agreed. That is biased and jumping to conclusions.

I'm just saying that the reason people flood to America is because they are given the freedom to choose. By restricting the right for same-sex marriage, it acts as a roadblock for all America stands for.

Just save your breath man, let it all unfold. In time, things will change. Empires rise and fall.

I think the reason Proposition 8, for example, passed is because of the indolence of those against it...
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts

[QUOTE="windsofwang"]

How can we expect to be distinguished from any other intolerant, oppressive country if we don't learn to accept people that are different from us?

Theokhoth

We don't kill/enslave/imprison/make a public example of them.

As a country, America is doing just fine. Separation of Powers means it's some of the people you have an issue with.

That covers the more obvious oppression. But the intolerance is certainly still there.
Avatar image for alphamale1989
alphamale1989

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 alphamale1989
Member since 2008 • 3134 Posts
Socal reform takes time.
Avatar image for SegaGenesisfan
SegaGenesisfan

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 SegaGenesisfan
Member since 2008 • 1085 Posts

Unfortunately, intolerance has always been (to most people) an important part to establish their own position in society. The "mob" will always look for something or someone to discriminate, because by creating boundaries between the "self" / the "established" and "the "other" people create their own identites in which they feel secure and snuggly. Homophobia is after all only one sort of discrimination in a long line of discriminations in human history, of which some are still going on. Women, Jews, Afro-Americans, Indians, Disabled people .. sadly, the list goes on.

Homosexuality is not unnatural (there are homosexual animals)and it is not the same as siblings or cousings (1st, 2nd grade) marrying because the reason why they are not allowed to be married is the risk of bearing a disabled child. (BTW, only sexual intercourse between siblings and cousins is illegal, nothing else.So, they can live together, kiss and have sex but no coitus)

Everyone who discriminates homosexuals is basically on the same level as a fascist in the Third Reich, an uneducated, selfish simpleton.

River

Ravenhoe

Your showwing a lot of flawed thinking in the wholepost, like comparing homosexuals to animals... Your suggesting that white people are bad, your descriminating. Heck we descriminate against illegal immigrants all the time, is it bad, not exactly, so the term descrimination is so cliche. It seems like your the one who wants to feel secure and snuggly. And I am not afraid of homosexuals, if anything they are afraid of me (ok I got that from Master Chief sucks at Halo). Well intermarraying is unnatural because it does not produce good children, homosexuality is unnatural because it does not bear children in a marriage setting. Is that not the poitn of marriage? And dont make the arguement that you can have kids without being married, because that has so many holes in it. Most people who have kids before marriage do it out of stupidity. Marriage is how we organise family life, without it we have anarchy, just like what the animal kingdom is.

See the slippery slop fallacy has been overturned, now someone is sayying "but why cant young people have sex?" And it is not oppresion that gay marriage is illegal for the most part, they can still get jobs just like anyone else. Most peoples morals are that homosexuality is wrong, mainly because it also has a wide range of perverted sex acts, having sex with anyone, spreading disease.

So if anything, maybe same sex marriage is not really bad, maybe it will control all the random sex that produces disease. I mean come on people, for someone to be in the pornography business, they have to be homosexual...

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#40 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator  Online
Member since 2004 • 50086 Posts
This is just an issue which could be resolved by giving civil unions the same privileges as you get from marriage.

I think it should be allowed. If they love each other why deny them the right?

darkhorse286
Why is marriage between first cousins banned in some states? I mean... if they "love" each other... right? :P
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts

Homosexuality does not mean loving the same sex, you can love another dude and not be homosexual. Homosexuality is sexual attraction to the same gender, so we would be changing a long standing tradition based on what type of sex people enjoy. If homosexuals want to receive the same rights at a married couple that's fine, but to ask for the rest of the world to change the definition of marriage is unreasonable.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#42 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Homosexuality does not mean loving the same sex, you can love another dude and not be homosexual. Homosexuality is sexual attraction to the same gender, so we would be changing a long standing tradition based on what type of sex people enjoy.

Ace_WondersX
Not entirely sure how you're able to equate marriage with sex though. Just because someone is married doesn't necessarily mean that they will be having sex. I mean, there isn't a commandment somewhere saying; You must have sex when you are married. Nor is there a law to such an extent.
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]

Homosexuality does not mean loving the same sex, you can love another dude and not be homosexual. Homosexuality is sexual attraction to the same gender, so we would be changing a long standing tradition based on what type of sex people enjoy.

Vandalvideo
Not entirely sure how you're able to equate marriage with sex though. Just because someone is married doesn't necessarily mean that they will be having sex. I mean, there isn't a commandment somewhere saying; You must have sex when you are married. Nor is there a law to such an extent.

That's the point i'm trying to get across, marriage has always been man and woman, but do you expect the definition to change because someone sexual attraction is different.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#44 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"] That's the point i'm trying to get across, marriage has always been man and woman, but do you expect the definition to change because someone sexual attraction is different.

You're missing the point. Marriage is not the same as sexuality. You cannot defend the current trend by saying; Marriage is man and woman. I mean, technically, marriage has absolutely nothing to do with sex. Not to mention the bible doesn't sufficiently establish that a man cannot marry another man. It merely has some passages which illustrate marriages between men and women.
Avatar image for Ace_WondersX
Ace_WondersX

4455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Ace_WondersX
Member since 2003 • 4455 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"] That's the point i'm trying to get across, marriage has always been man and woman, but do you expect the definition to change because someone sexual attraction is different.

You're missing the point. Marriage is not the same as sexuality. You cannot defend the current trend by saying; Marriage is man and woman. I mean, technically, marriage has absolutely nothing to do with sex. Not to mention the bible doesn't sufficiently establish that a man cannot marry another man. It merely has some passages which illustrate marriages between men and women.

which is why we wouldn't change the long-standing definition of marriage base on someone's sexual preferences.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#46 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"] which is why we wouldn't change the long-standing definition of marriage base on someone's sexual preferences.

Once again, you're not really changing anything to begin with. Marriage isn't based on sexuality in the first place. Marriage was never exhaustively between man and woman to begin with.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
You're missing the point. Marriage is not the same as sexuality. You cannot defend the current trend by saying; Marriage is man and woman. I mean, technically, marriage has absolutely nothing to do with sex. Not to mention the bible doesn't sufficiently establish that a man cannot marry another man. It merely has some passages which illustrate marriages between men and women.Vandalvideo
Marriage is a gateway for a family though; therefore, only fertile people of the opposite sex should marry. If they cannot reproduce, what use is there for sex? Sure, they can have sex for recreational purposes, but that's not the purpose of marriage. Thus, same-sex marriage should not be allowed.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#48 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Genetic_Code"] Marriage is a gateway for a family though; therefore, only fertile people of the opposite sex should marry. If they cannot reproduce, what use is there for sex? Sure, they can have sex for recreational purposes, but that's not the purpose of marriage. Thus, same-sex marriage should not be allowed.

One of the modern adaptations of a marriage is for a family. However, a marriage isn't exhaustively for a family. Besides, you can still have a family with commercial surrogacy or adoption. The family can still exist. You don't have to have sex to be a family.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
One of the modern adaptations of a marriage is for a family. However, a marriage isn't exhaustively for a family. Besides, you can still have a family with commercial surrogacy or adoption. The family can still exist. You don't have to have sex to be a family.Vandalvideo
However, it wouldn't be a biological family, and you don't have to be married to adopt or have commercial surrogacy. I disagree with your contention that marriage isn't exhaustively for a family. If it wasn't, then why would the two individuals be considered united for the remainder of their lives? They are bounded as a family.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#50 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Genetic_Code"] However, it wouldn't be a biological family, and you don't have to be married to adopt or have commercial surrogacy. I disagree with your contention that marriage isn't exhaustively for a family. If it wasn't, then why would the two individuals be considered united for the remainder of their lives? They are bounded as a family.

A biological family isn't necessarily an imperative of marriage. There isn't a law somewhere saying; Married people MUST have a baby which is related by blood and MUST be a family. Marriage is strictly, prima facie, a business transaction to share specific rights between the two. Marriage does not hollistically equal family.