This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why is this even an issue? Love is love, no matter what gender. If a male wants to marry another male, that's their life and their decision. Who are we to deny them the love they've found in one another?edisni_edistuoWe are the society, thats who.
A biological family isn't necessarily an imperative of marriage. There isn't a law somewhere saying; Married people MUST have a baby which is related by blood and MUST be a family. Marriage is strictly, prima facie, a business transaction to share specific rights between the two. Marriage does not hollistically equal family. VandalvideoNo one's disputing that, but it would be preferable in practice. What I prefer though is that civil unions would take the place of how you define marriage, giving marriage a better, stronger meaning for fertile individuals who want to reproduce with each other. Your definition of marriage, as taken per face value, comes off emotionless. Essentially, you are ignoring the responsibilities that comes with those rights and the resources that are available, which can establish a proper family and can only be done so through family. Adoption works as a last resort. It is not, however, the preferable option, especially on the child.
[QUOTE="edisni_edistuo"]Why is this even an issue? Love is love, no matter what gender. If a male wants to marry another male, that's their life and their decision. Who are we to deny them the love they've found in one another?VandalvideoWe are the society, thats who. Yes, and as the society, we need to recognize that those who are gay want to marry just like those who are straight.
Yes, it can cause some problems. But this is an issue that won't go away. This is just one more change the United States isn't ready for, just like the civil rights movement. Eventually, we will gradually be open enough to the idea that it will be allowed. It just seems to be taking longer than usual :PManiacc1That, ultimately, is what I think will happen. People will be more open to the idea as time progressed and eventually, there's no resistance.
You have to unmarry marriage from the emotional aspects that people have irresponsibly applied to it. You have to look at the facts of what marriage actually is. Marriage, at face value, is strictly a business transaction which doesn't expressly state that one must have sex with their partner or establish a 'proper family' with their partner.VandalvideoFine, but ignoring the implicit details removes much what makes marriage a marriage.
[QUOTE="Ravenhoe"]
Unfortunately, intolerance has always been (to most people) an important part to establish their own position in society. The "mob" will always look for something or someone to discriminate, because by creating boundaries between the "self" / the "established" and "the "other" people create their own identites in which they feel secure and snuggly. Homophobia is after all only one sort of discrimination in a long line of discriminations in human history, of which some are still going on. Women, Jews, Afro-Americans, Indians, Disabled people .. sadly, the list goes on.
Homosexuality is not unnatural (there are homosexual animals)and it is not the same as siblings or cousings (1st, 2nd grade) marrying because the reason why they are not allowed to be married is the risk of bearing a disabled child. (BTW, only sexual intercourse between siblings and cousins is illegal, nothing else.So, they can live together, kiss and have sex but no coitus)
Everyone who discriminates homosexuals is basically on the same level as a fascist in the Third Reich, an uneducated, selfish simpleton.
River
SegaGenesisfan
Your showwing a lot of flawed thinking in the wholepost, like comparing homosexuals to animals... Your suggesting that white people are bad, your descriminating. Heck we descriminate against illegal immigrants all the time, is it bad, not exactly, so the term descrimination is so cliche. It seems like your the one who wants to feel secure and snuggly. And I am not afraid of homosexuals, if anything they are afraid of me (ok I got that from Master Chief sucks at Halo). Well intermarraying is unnatural because it does not produce good children, homosexuality is unnatural because it does not bear children in a marriage setting. Is that not the poitn of marriage? And dont make the arguement that you can have kids without being married, because that has so many holes in it. Most people who have kids before marriage do it out of stupidity. Marriage is how we organise family life, without it we have anarchy, just like what the animal kingdom is.
See the slippery slop fallacy has been overturned, now someone is sayying "but why cant young people have sex?" And it is not oppresion that gay marriage is illegal for the most part, they can still get jobs just like anyone else. Most peoples morals are that homosexuality is wrong, mainly because it also has a wide range of perverted sex acts, having sex with anyone, spreading disease.
So if anything, maybe same sex marriage is not really bad, maybe it will control all the random sex that produces disease. I mean come on people, for someone to be in the pornography business, they have to be homosexual...
And you talk about flawed thinking... There are plenty of straight people who sleep around. Heck, there are even a group of women who go around South Africa who rape men on purpose to spread AIDS. The reason why AIDS is spreading across developed countries is because of the children who are born as a result of the sex between straight couples where one is already infected. Why does everyone assume that every gay man must have a one-night stand seven times a week? And that every one of them is infected with dozens of sexual diseases? And even if they were overly promiscuous, why would those who sleep around even go near marriage? The homosexuals that want same-sex marriage to be legalised are the ones who want to be in a long-term relationship, or those who have been living with their partner for a while, and who want the opportunity to gain the same rights straight married couples have.The fact that it's an issue disgusts me.
MasterC5
Same here, makes me want to take one of those idiots who likes to point at Obama and say "Look how far we've come!" and punch them in the face. We're the same closed minded savage society we've always been, we've just found a new target.
...without it we have anarchy, just like what the animal kingdom is.SegaGenesisfanI'd appreciate that you'd never again compare these two. Please. Anarchy would work because we are not normal animals. And i suppose you never though homosexuality could be a self containing method to prevent overpopulation? Marriage is the problem here. It shouldn't exist.
gay marriage is ridiculous in the first place. it doesnt make any sense(to me). why would a gay person want to get married? its a religious thing and being gay doesnt exactly fit into any religion...at all.
but it should definitely be legal and the fact that we only havea few statesthat allow it is sick.
because only religious people get marriedI simply did not bother to talk about straight sleeping around, but homosexuality = sleeping around no matter how you look at it. Dude, even my human biology book has a part on homosexuality and diseases. Yes straight people have the same disease, guess how they got it? I dont think having sex with random people is ok either way, I did imply that sleeping with random people is wrong did I not? The fact is homosexuals are far more likely to have diseases, and people are using speudo science to say it is natural... Well even so, I personally would not want to have to worry about that. Difference here is you didnt directly address my point, you changed the subject if anything. Yes Africa has the supstition that sex solves the problem, but I never mentioned that, talk about flawed thinking, your not addressing my points. A non sequiter.
I simply did not bother to talk about straight sleeping around, but homosexuality = sleeping around no matter how you look at it. Dude, even my human biology book has a part on homosexuality and diseases. Yes straight people have the same disease, guess how they got it? I dont think having sex with random people is ok either way, I did imply that sleeping with random people is wrong did I not? The fact is homosexuals are far more likely to have diseases, and people are using speudo science to say it is natural... Well even so, I personally would not want to have to worry about that. Difference here is you didnt directly address my point, you changed the subject if anything. Yes Africa has the supstition that sex solves the problem, but I never mentioned that, talk about flawed thinking, your not addressing my points. A non sequiter.SegaGenesisfanNo, homosexuality does not = sleeping around. I can honestly say that I don't sleep around. Even if homosexuals were more likely to carry sexual diseases, it doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed to marry. Those who do wish to marry will be as likely to stay faithful to their partner as any straight married person. So they won't spread diseases anyway. Back to one of your original points, marriage isn't exclusively about having children. If someone gets married just to have children, then their thinking is wrong. You should get married because you love someone, and because you want to stay with them. People who can't have children, either for medical reasons or through age, get married all the time. Do you honestly believe that they shouldn't be allowed to marry? As far as I'm aware, the government shouldn't be allowed to ask someone why they want to get married. So the fact that homosexual couples can't have children is irrelevant. If they want to marry, they should be allowed to. As for homosexuality being unnatural, that's debatable. I think it is natural. Anything that occurs in nature is natural, and homosexuality among animals is well-documented. Apart from anything else, we don't live natural lives any more. The clothes you wear, the car you drive, and the computer you use, are all unnatural. Even the food most people eat is so processed that its barely natural by the time it gets on to their plate. You can't apply the 'its not natural' argument to some things, while living a perfectly unnatural, manufactured life yourself.
Im fine with any 2 CONSENTING people to get married via Civil union/marriage . Just don't force a church to marry people if they don't want to marry them
I cannot believe that this is even a goddamn issue. If someone wants to marry, whoever it may be, just **** let them. As long as its consensual and the groom/bride is of age. Thats it. If you don't approve of gay marriage, you are a **** fascist.
xxDustmanxx
So in your opinion, I'm a fascist.
The state has no authority to do such a thing. The first amendment protects the church's rights vis-a-vis who they marry.Im fine with any 2 CONSENTING people to get married via Civil union/marriage . Just don't force a church to marry people if they don't want to marry them
Epic__Lulz
Wrong! If same-sex marriage was legalized: Pastors could be sued/arrested for refusing to marry homosexuals, anyone could be arrested for "hate speech" if they voiced their opinion on the issue, etc. I say that we need a new system of uniting lovers. Some complain about "civil unions" so I say that we change it so that you get all the same rights with a civil union as a marriage. That way, homosexuals could have the same legal rights as others without christians having to participate in it.Head_of_games
church's don't have to marry homosexuals if they don't want to.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment