Could this be the future Mark of the Beast?

What do you think?

Revelation 13:16-17 NKJV

16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, 17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or[f] the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Video
http://www.tangle.com

Don't take the mark!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bEFo8BPBGc

Obviously you didn't watch the last 15 seconds of the video, otherwise you would've known that the chip is optional.

That is just another wacky conspiracy theory.

Dunno but it looks painful ;-;

Do not want.

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

these type of threads are always amusing.II_Seraphim_II

It could be. That silliness that passed will screw up some stuff.

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]these type of threads are always amusing.aaronmullan

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

Teenaged

Nope. The bible says clearly that the beast will be marked with the number 666. Not any other around.curono

using bible quotes to find find the truth in something is flawed because you are using the bible.nimatoad2000

using bible quotes to find find the truth in something is flawed because you are using the bible.nimatoad2000

But the video and the Bible verses seem so similar don't they?

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

Jemdude

Yeah, and some people think that cucumbers taste better pickled.

Can't see it

Nope. The bible says clearly that the beast will be marked with the number 666. Not any other around.curono

Actually its not that clear and some say it is in fact 616.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

Jemdude

*breaks the desk with head*

Damn now I have to hit the wall...

[QUOTE="curono"]Nope. The bible says clearly that the beast will be marked with the number 666. Not any other around.ViewtifulScott

Can't we just get it on our left hand, thereby gaming the system?

To the TC. I believe the Bible is the Word of God (even though it's not what it originally was due to translation) but we need to be careful about reading into everything and trying to back it up with scripture. Also, 666 is just the closest they could get to the correct translation of the mark of the beast. Think more metaphorically, but only God knows...

Can't we just get it on our left hand, thereby gaming the system?

GabuEx

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

Jemdude

Yes, yes that's the case. The Bible doesn't mention a word about dinos, and The hardcore Bible folowers in US belive that God put their fossils straight to the ground. But on the other hand they seem to belive that 4000 year old book did foresee coming of the microchips.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

Huh? And again.... huh?

The OP is very.... confusing and I fail to see the relevance of the Bible quote...

Jemdude

I have a personal policy to not take threads made by people who believe the Earth is 6000 years old seriously....sorry....

With-Hatred

[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

I have a personal policy to not take threads made by people who believe the Earth is 6000 years old seriously....sorry....

JudgementEden

good point

I wonder how many times a day you type 666 or 616 into the computer. What about if we converted the characters you type on a keyboard to ASCII values, or Hex or Octo code. How many times does it appear when your viewing a digital picture of yourself, could the colours around your right hand add up to 666. What if we added then divided then added and took the root of that.

You're looking for a sequence of numbers in a world run by numbers. You're going to find it everywhere. It has absolutly no meaning.

This also applies to that terrible number: 13.

[QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

I have a personal policy to not take threads made by people who believe the Earth is 6000 years old seriously....sorry....

JudgementEden

So what did you do at school?

Ignore the teacher and the books?

You seem to take every militant anti-science stance, but I dont think you would be able to support it if you saw the world around you and the life you are enjoying.

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"][QUOTE="With-Hatred"]

I have a personal policy to not take threads made by people who believe the Earth is 6000 years old seriously....sorry....

Teenaged

So what did you do at school?

Ignore the teacher and the books?

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"] Not all Christians believe the Earth is that young. Also, how do you know the Earth is any older? Did you study it for yourself? Or are you taking what the scientists say by blind faith? Did you get the idea from school text books? You know, the same ones that lie to you about other subjects?JudgementEden

So what did you do at school?

Ignore the teacher and the books?

No, because the bible is bunk. Don't believe a word of it.

what the hell are we talking about here?GazaAli

This topic is now about.......... cows!

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"] No, I was sort of brainwashed like everyone else, I just did my own study a few years later. I found that a lot of things in text books, mainly history, are lies. But I would be getting off-topic. JudgementEden

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Oh boy.... >_______>

Teenaged

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"] Yeah, I could say the same for you close minded "everything is a fairy tale" types.JudgementEden

Heck the other day I was trying to refute the mathematical principle that 0,9999... = 1. (well my intention wasnt to refute it; it just didnt sit well with me)

Trust me if I have objections to something, I express them, even if they come from a university textbook. Maybe it goes along with being an agnostic, not sure.

Also I dont know about you, but I find a fundamental difference between the process of learning stuff at school and the process of getting initiated into a religion.

Two totally different things.

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Well I guess the "NO U" rebuttal is very effective, eh?

Teenaged

Heck the other day I was trying to refute the mathematical principle that 0,9999... = 1.

Trust me if I have objections to something, I express them, even if they come from a university textbook. Maybe it goes along with being an agnostic, not sure.

Also I dont know about you, but I find a fundamental difference between the process of learning stuff at school and the process of getting initiated into a religion.

Two totally different things.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"] I'm frankly not expecting anyone here to believe what I say, its GameSpot. There maybe some people here who may agree with me or know what im talking about atleast, but thats minuscule I think. Tell me, is it too crazy to think that you are brainwashed in school? Is it really THAT hard to believe?JudgementEden

Heck the other day I was trying to refute the mathematical principle that 0,9999... = 1.

Trust me if I have objections to something, I express them, even if they come from a university textbook. Maybe it goes along with being an agnostic, not sure.

Also I dont know about you, but I find a fundamental difference between the process of learning stuff at school and the process of getting initiated into a religion.

Two totally different things.

The process is entirely different.

The process at school, tries to answer to many "why"'s and is much more receptive to doubt than a religious tradition. The religious tradition (rather the source of it) is what it is and will never change ignoring any doubt and any evolvement being carried out in the centuries.

Constant change, which is something for which many people criticise science, is the very reason why its more reliable than religion on certain issues. Because it is more keen on realising mistakes and fixing them. Its not rigid and its deffinetely not arbitrary at the same level as a religious tradition.

[QUOTE="JudgementEden"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Well I guess the "NO U" rebuttal is very effective, eh?

Teenaged

Heck the other day I was trying to refute the mathematical principle that 0,9999... = 1.

Trust me if I have objections to something, I express them, even if they come from a university textbook. Maybe it goes along with being an agnostic, not sure.

Also I dont know about you, but I find a fundamental difference between the process of learning stuff at school and the process of getting initiated into a religion.

Two totally different things.

Initiated into a religion? Man i'm glad I have faith and not religion. I find it crazy how we've spent all that money changing the "opinions" in most school books, and then spend even more building a friggin "big bang" machine that creates what they call "dark matter' or the "god particle" and they don't even know what it is. Then there's the chunks of metal they got beaming through space trying to "figure it out"....