This topic is locked from further discussion.
Morals could be viewn as societys take on ethicsBiancaDKWhy are you so wise, and philosophical, and..stuff?
ugly duckling syndrome[QUOTE="BiancaDK"][QUOTE="West-Coast-G"] Why are you so wise, and philosophical, and..stuff?tzar3
So... you are ugly?
No, she use to be. I fail to see the connection, though.Morals could be viewn as societys take on ethicsBiancaDKEthics are different from morals. Ethics is the application of morals. Our english word morals comes from the Latin mos. Morals are just your base rules for what's right and wrong. They're personal. Ethics are more society's take on morals. To your question, no, it wasn't immoral in her view, but it would be immoral in others' views. Edit: Added a thought!
so the old lady wouldn't be morally wrong ?"A code of standards or ethics one chooses to live by". This was a test question on my Nursing Aide exam lol.
Smoke89
[QUOTE="Smoke89"]so the old lady wouldn't be morally wrong ?"A code of standards or ethics one chooses to live by". This was a test question on my Nursing Aide exam lol.
CyperWingdAngel
I don't really know.The nursing school at my university requires we have CNA certification so I just did it to have it.
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]Morals could be viewn as societys take on ethicsMaddy_KEthics are different from morals. Ethics is the application of morals. Our english word morals comes from the Latin mos. Morals are just your base rules for what's right and wrong. They're personal. To your question, no, it wasn't immoral in her view, but it would be immoral in others' views. You could easily view it as i described it, i said nothing wrong. "Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") has three principal meanings. In its first, descriptive usage, morality means a code of conduct which is held to be authoritative in matters of right and wrong. Morals are created and defined by society, philosophy, religion, or individual conscience. An example of the descriptive usage could be "common conceptions of morality have changed significantly over time."
[QUOTE="Maddy_K"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"]Morals could be viewn as societys take on ethicsBiancaDKEthics are different from morals. Ethics is the application of morals. Our english word morals comes from the Latin mos. Morals are just your base rules for what's right and wrong. They're personal. To your question, no, it wasn't immoral in her view, but it would be immoral in others' views. You could easily view it as i described it, i said nothing wrong. "Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") has three principal meanings. In its first, descriptive usage, morality means a code of conduct which is held to be authoritative in matters of right and wrong. Morals are created and defined by society, philosophy, religion, or individual conscience. An example of the descriptive usage could be "common conceptions of morality have changed significantly over time." I don't know what you mean by "descriptive usage." I've never heard that term before. Plus, those are not the "three principal meanings" of mores or moralitas...I don't know where you got that from. Moralitas is neo Latin, not classical Latin. It has little to do with the carried-over concept. To the Romans, mores in the most common context of Latin texts meant "customs." I don't know how up you are on Ancient Mediterranean history, but traditions were everything to the Romans. I was just pointing out that what you said was mixed up. Morals come before ethics, not the other way around. Ethics is the study of or action on morals.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment