did american make a mistake when bombing .japan?

  • 114 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 1337_ownage
1337_ownage

1668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 1337_ownage
Member since 2006 • 1668 Posts
No,they left us no alternative than to create a weapon capable of mass destruction in which they would have no hope of victorygun65
but on normal people.....ones thats wasnt involved in war, its like the terrorists attacking new york. if they bombed it on abort or something would have been better. America should of concentrated on japan..instead oof sending some to europe
Avatar image for bobwill1
bobwill1

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#102 bobwill1
Member since 2003 • 2487 Posts

[QUOTE="gun65"]No,they left us no alternative than to create a weapon capable of mass destruction in which they would have no hope of victory1337_ownage
but on normal people.....ones thats wasnt involved in war, its like the terrorists attacking new york. if they bombed it on abort or something would have been better. America should of concentrated on japan..instead oof sending some to europe

Well, it was an agreement by the Allies, the figure I heard was that 85% of US wartime expenditures went to fighting Germany and Italy, leaving only about 15% of wartime production for Japan.

Avatar image for 1337_ownage
1337_ownage

1668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 1337_ownage
Member since 2006 • 1668 Posts

It was either that or try a mainland attack, and that would mean extreme casualties on both sides. They were given fair warning and didnt back down, so they got what they got. Thats what happens when you try to sucker punch america like they did.....Def_Jef88

well 200,00 innocent > 1000000000 soilders

soldiers fight to die for country

innocent try to live life 

Avatar image for bobwill1
bobwill1

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 bobwill1
Member since 2003 • 2487 Posts

[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"]It was either that or try a mainland attack, and that would mean extreme casualties on both sides. They were given fair warning and didnt back down, so they got what they got. Thats what happens when you try to sucker punch america like they did.....1337_ownage

well 200,00 innocent > 1000000000 soilders

soldiers fight to die for country

innocent try to live life

140,000 civilians died, mostly through suicide, on Okinawa rather than surrender.
Avatar image for 1337_ownage
1337_ownage

1668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 1337_ownage
Member since 2006 • 1668 Posts

[QUOTE="1337_ownage"][QUOTE="gun65"]No,they left us no alternative than to create a weapon capable of mass destruction in which they would have no hope of victorybobwill1

but on normal people.....ones thats wasnt involved in war, its like the terrorists attacking new york. if they bombed it on abort or something would have been better. America should of concentrated on japan..instead oof sending some to europe

Well, it was an agreement by the Allies, the figure I heard was that 85% of US wartime expenditures went to fighting Germany and Italy, leaving only about 15% of wartime production for Japan.

big mistake, but innocent death was worst 

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts

[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"]It was either that or try a mainland attack, and that would mean extreme casualties on both sides. They were given fair warning and didnt back down, so they got what they got. Thats what happens when you try to sucker punch america like they did.....1337_ownage

well 200,00 innocent > 1000000000 soilders

soldiers fight to die for country

innocent try to live life

our soldiers were innocent....  Japan was the one who initiated the attack.

It was them or us, and ill choose them first anyday... 

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#107 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts

[QUOTE="peypan"]during world war ii, the US bombed the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki.  the japenese refused to surrender to the war and they were warned about the bombs well before the attack.  the bombs were the first [maybe only?] atomic bombs to be dropped not as a test.  was this a mistake? Tim_Q

 We didn't warn them.  Truman was given five choices, 1) Continue fire bombing, 2) Invasion (scheduled November 4th), 3) Drop with warning, 4) Drop with Demonstration, 5) Drop without warning.  We went with option five to minimize American casualties.

Actually, they went with #3.  Before the bombing, Japanese officials were told that if they did not surrender, they should expect a rain of destruction from the sky.  They didn't surrender and paid for it.

Also, i don't think it was a mistake.  The bombing saved millions of lives.  Half a million U.S. troops alone were predicted to die if an invasion of mainland Japan occured.

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#108 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
Yes it was a mistake b/c it was totally unnecessary! the first atomic bomb was i guess a good warning but the second was totally uncalled for and unnecessary b/c Japan was not given enough time to react and assess the events of the first atomic bomb. I believe the war could have been ended in a different manner (killing hundreds of thousands of citizens is not the answer)
Avatar image for jackelhunter
jackelhunter

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 jackelhunter
Member since 2005 • 598 Posts
considering the alternatives, it had to be done.  we had to find a way to end the war with as little casualties as possible, and this was our last option.  war is terrible, don't expect it to be pretty.
Avatar image for FateStayNight
FateStayNight

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 FateStayNight
Member since 2007 • 321 Posts

[QUOTE="qetuo6"]What's up with these topics all of a sudden?Sajo7

My thoughts exactly, can't we argue about something else, preferably not about America?

Ya come one guys.
Avatar image for Tim_Q
Tim_Q

1963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#111 Tim_Q
Member since 2005 • 1963 Posts
[QUOTE="Tim_Q"]

[QUOTE="peypan"]during world war ii, the US bombed the japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki.  the japenese refused to surrender to the war and they were warned about the bombs well before the attack.  the bombs were the first [maybe only?] atomic bombs to be dropped not as a test.  was this a mistake? GamerForca

 We didn't warn them.  Truman was given five choices, 1) Continue fire bombing, 2) Invasion (scheduled November 4th), 3) Drop with warning, 4) Drop with Demonstration, 5) Drop without warning.  We went with option five to minimize American casualties.

Actually, they went with #3.  Before the bombing, Japanese officials were told that if they did not surrender, they should expect a rain of destruction from the sky.  They didn't surrender and paid for it.

Also, i don't think it was a mistake.  The bombing saved millions of lives.  Half a million U.S. troops alone were predicted to die if an invasion of mainland Japan occured.

When I say a warning, I mean a detailed description of what we're going to do, not a, "You're all going to die."

 Hell, America didn't even know what we were about to unleash, we had no idea the kind of destruction it would bring up the world.  During the testing of the first bomb, a building was constructed, thought to make it through the blast, and bomb proof, it was completely destroyed.  America was shocked just as much as anyone else about the Atomic bomb.

Avatar image for Foolio1
Foolio1

7467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#112 Foolio1
Member since 2003 • 7467 Posts
I don't think it was a mistake.  Japan was willing to fight to the last man, literally.  Something was needed to put an end to the war quickly.
Avatar image for YourOldFriend
YourOldFriend

4196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 YourOldFriend
Member since 2005 • 4196 Posts
Nope, it saved more lives to take out 2 cities than to have a brutal conflict in landgrab battles. The Japanese were ferocious warriors on their own land, very respectably so, thus the casualty rate would have been at least triple that of the bombs death rate.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
not really...they wanted to test thoes bombs after they've used so many resources on them.