[QUOTE="Teenaged"]When did I say that we have any first hand evidence?[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Wrong. We have ZERO first hand evidence presented in this story. We have second or third hand at best. And I'm skeptical whenever another persons conclusions are involved.
I suppose you have heard the saying...three sides to every story.
jeremiah06
But this is not a matter of conclusions. The events are just being trasferred to us. With the narrators conclusions which like I said we do apply skepticism on. But we dont apply skepticism on events selectively. There should be a criterion and a reason why you apply skepticism on the x part of the story and not on the y part. And why the scenarios that you bring up us x and not y.
We, conventionally and for the sake of the discussion (I repeat) assume he is not lying about the events. If we dont, we can apply skepticism to any part of the story. Not selectively and with selective possible scenarios.
You guys! This arguing is meaningless. Fact! Two wrongs don't make a right. The tactful thing to do would have been saying no. How crappy of a person do you have to be(noticing that 99% of the posters agree with TC) to go out of your way to screw over a mentally retard man???? I understand you're MrGeezer a man's man, no ones *****, but come on!!! Why not say no right off giving him time to find another ride?I am not saying MrGeezer was right to not be clear towards the mentally challenged person because his co-workers did the same. or generally didnt treat that person the way they should.All I said was that his co-workers are to blame for the same thing. Therefore if I were them, I wouldnt have the face to go and blame MrGeezer.
Log in to comment